Bio
My name is Genie. I was born in Washington D.C. While there are plenty of people in the D.C. area with a penchant for gardening, I was not one of tho...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Family's Trademark of "Urban Homesteading" Sparks Debate

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

This week, a Pasadena, Calif. family sparked passionate debate within the food, gardening and farming communities when they asserted their right to the trademarked terms "Urban Homestead®" and "Urban Homesteading®." Urban farmers, supporters of the movement, food writers and others have loudly protested what they assert is a step across the line when it comes to protection of intellectual property and free expression.

Urban Homestead

The fierce backlash has spawned a Take Back Urban Home-steading(s) Facebook page (the odd punctuation is an effort to prevent the Dervaes family from filing a trademark complaint against the page) and a petition to cancel the trademarks on "Urban Homestead" and "Urban Homesteading." 

The Dervaes family responded today with a press release that explains their approach to the trademark filing:

The Dervaes family project is known as the Urban Homestead®. While they did not come up with the name Urban Homesteading®, they defined its current, specific application. Desiring to safeguard that description of their daily life, Dervaes Institute applied for and received "service marks" for the phrases used in reference to their non-profit work. According to the United States Patent and Trademark Office website, a service mark "identifies and distinguishes the source of a service" and is used interchangeably with "trademark."

What the Dervaeses do is to promote Urban Homesteading as a lifestyle. The objective of acquiring the trademarks was to avoid confusion on the part of the general public and users. In the attempt to maintain the reputation and integrity of the trademarks, Dervaes Institute has privately informed, to date, a total of 16 organizations, publishers and businesses about the proper usage of the registered terms. No threat was made against anyone's first amendment rights; yet, there has been a heated argument in the media against what should have been the Dervaeses' normal rights to protect their trademarks.

Via their Twitter account, the Dervaeses denied they are suing bloggers for use of the terms. Their website featured a blog until as recently as yesterday, but that blog is now inactive. Cached copies of posts from the blog, though, show a series of eight posts between February 16 and 18 defending their position, calling for an end to "harassing emails, comments and calls" they say they have been receiving, and provides the text of the cease and desist letter they sent to those who they consider to be in violation of the trademark. 

According an article by Twilight Greenaway in The Bay Citizen, among those who received a copy of the letter was K. Ruby Blume, founder of Oakland's Institute of Urban Homesteading. And Harriet Ells, a producer at KCRW in Santa Monica, tweeted that the radio station received one of the letters regarding a post on the blog that supports Evan Kleiman's Good Food program.  

"I don't know about you, but this sure doesn't sound like a path to freedom to me but rather a branding of a lifestyle that doesn't belong to them," wrote Deanna Duke of The Crunchy Chicken. "It's like trademarking 'farming'."

Heidi Kooy of Itty Bitty Farm in the City said the controversy left her hurt, then angry, then, finally, sorry for the Dervaes family and their unwillingness to back down from their position. 

If they could only bury the self-aggrandizing flag and realize that all of us urban homesteaders have something of real value to contribute to the conversation. Each urban homestead is different - different projects, different configurations.. Each person or family faces their own challenges. Most of my urban farmy friends read loads of  blogs from all kinds of folks in all kinds of situations. We learn from each other.  I'm certain there is room for all of us at the urban homesteading table.

And to anyone else out there who thinks they are singular in their self-sufficiency ideas (don't even get me started on whether or not any idea is truly our own -- we borrow from everyone else and we all know it), I say phooey to you. Tell that to my friend Martin, who grew up with Chinese immigrant parents. They always kept a chicken in a shopping cart out in their Richmond district neighborhood of San Francisco. Or to my neighbor who told me one day while I was out walking my goats that his Mexican immigrant father who lived only a couple blocks away kept rabbits and chickens for food over 20 years ago. And what about the Asian families in my neighborhood who use

  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
iklych 5 pts

Urban Homesteading trademark was registered in Supplemental Register. It means that it is merely descriptive.
Descriptive marks (or more properly, "merely descriptive marks") are devices which merely describe the services or goods on which the mark is used. If a device is merely descriptive, it is not a mark at all, since it does not serve to identify the source of the goods or services. No trademark rights are granted to merely descriptive marks. No secondary meaning was developed by Dervaes to make it a protectable trademark. Most of people believe and there is sufficient proof in the internet that Urban Homesteading is generic phrase and therefore is incapable of functioning as a trademark
The benefits that apply to Supplemental Registrations are:
1) the mark will appear in trademark searches, and that the registrant is given the right to use the ® symbol in connection with the mark.
2) In addition, having a mark registered on the Supplemental register will assist in achieving registration of the mark in certain foreign countries.
3) Finally, Supplement Registrations can be used to help prove exclusive use of a mark for a five year period, which is one of the ways in which secondary meaning may be proved to the U.S.P.T.O.
Even if no opposition is filed, and the application becomes registered, it is still possible for a third-party to object to the registration of a particular mark. This objection is usually made through a cancellation proceeding, which is similar to an opposition proceeding except that it takes place after registration.

You can find more information on http://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/index.html

Genie Gratto 9 pts

That's an interesting perspective, Green Me. I didn't realize they were a 508 corporation. Bizarre...

--- Genie, The Inadvertent Gardener ( http://www.theinadvertentgardener.com )

Genie Gratto 9 pts

Urbanhomesteadmama, you are definitely setting an example for people who want to organize on the web. When's your day of blog action going to be?

--- Genie, The Inadvertent Gardener ( http://www.theinadvertentgardener.com )

Genie Gratto 9 pts

Jenna, exactly. I don't get it at all.

--- Genie, The Inadvertent Gardener ( http://www.theinadvertentgardener.com )

Genie Gratto 9 pts

Melissa, I was wondering the same thing. It didn't get through in 2008, so I don't know why it got through now.

--- Genie, The Inadvertent Gardener ( http://www.theinadvertentgardener.com )

JennaHatfield 9 pts

This kind of boggles my mind, as it is an action that people engage in. It would be like someone within the adoption blogging community attempting to trademark Open Adoption. "I'm sorry, but only *I* can use that term even though people were using it and engaging in the form before me."

Interesting.

Contributing Editor Jenna Hatfield (@FireMom ( http://twitter.com/FireMom )) blogs at Stop, Drop and Blog ( http://stopdropandblog.com ) and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land ( http://thechroniclesofmunchkinland.com ). She is a freelance writer and photographer.

urbanhomesteadmama 5 pts

As the creator of the Take Back Urban Home-steading(s) facebook page I have been amazed to see the support and power of our grassroots community of urban homesteaders. Within two days we have organized a voice through blogs, web pages, twitter, facebook, and the world wide web. Our voice has been heard loud and clear and we refuse to back down until the terms which define our community and our very identity are legally given back to us. In the mean time we will continue to push forward, and will use the terms as much as possible whenever and wherever we can.

My urban homestead blog: http://urbanhomesteaddiaries.blogspot.com/

Green Me 5 pts

"Desiring to safeguard that description of their daily life, Dervaes Institute applied for and received "service marks" for the phrases used in reference to their non-profit work."

I could understand the motive behind the trademark action, if I could also trust the motive behind the formation of their nonprofit. A 508 corporation sole was intended by the IRS to be used by organized religious groups to manage their property and assets. Businesses owned by such a group can direct profits directly into the proprietorship and avoid paying taxes. The description of what the Institute does sounds like a nice solid 501(c)3 not a 508, so I want to know, if they are not in this for the money, but to do good, why did they incorporate as a 508? Do they pay any taxes? If they do not pay taxes, then living off the land in a urban setting and taking advantage of tax payer funded services is unethical and in my mind raises a red flag. I believe in urban homesteading, I believe in voting and freedom gardens, and I understand the importance of doing my part by paying taxes.

Melissa Ford 5 pts

I understand the need for trademarks and totally respect them, BUT I'm a little confused as to how someone could trademark an activity. How this got through...

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her novel about blogging is Life from Scratch ( http://www.life-from-scratch.com/ ).

Genie Gratto 9 pts

I have to say...I agree with you. One of the things that disturbs me most about their press release -- I didn't even address this in my post -- is that they talk about how bloggers aren't reporters, and therefore pretty much write them off as legitimate voices. I think that's as short-sighted as trademarking something that isn't really theirs to trademark...

--- Genie, The Inadvertent Gardener ( http://www.theinadvertentgardener.com )

Genie Gratto 9 pts

Grow and Resist, thanks so much for sharing that link to your perspective -- it's great to add your voice to the conversation!

--- Genie, The Inadvertent Gardener ( http://www.theinadvertentgardener.com )

noveleats 5 pts

This makes me sad. I have always loved what they are doing, but this does seem to be taking it too far. I wish I understand their thought process - why do they need to do this? Did they get bad advice from someone well-meaning? Or is this something they decided on their own? Registering "Little Homestead in the City" is one thing, that's theirs and it's unique - but something as generic and ubiquitous as "urban homesteading" is not a smart move.

Discover how delicious and simple a plant-based diet can be by visiting www.noveleats.com ( http://www.noveleats.com ).

grow and resist 5 pts

Thanks for posting! The idea to trademark a commonly used term/activity/lifestyle is nothing but a land grab. Their continued refusal to answer questions and continued lies about whether or not they have told people to take down names is incredible to me. They have dug their heels in and are alienating a clearly strong and powerful community.
Ugh.
My take: http://growandresist.com/2011/02/16/urban-homestea...