Farewell, Hillary -- Clinton Leaves Race and Endorses Obama
by PunditMom

Today was the day -- the one that some of us dreaded and others had prayed for. The day that Hillary Clinton ended her campaign for the White House.

The setting for Senator Hillary Clinton to say 'goodbye' was lovely. The National Building Museum is one of the grandest settings in Washington, D.C. -- all vaulted ceilings and Italian marble columns. Just exactly the kind of place one would like to make a victory speech, but just as inspiring for a farewell to the troops. The weather? A tad on the steamy side!

Even as Clinton's fans were waiting for her, squeezed shoulder to shoulder inside the grand hall in which she chose to make her departure from the race official, and she was preparing to do what so many have called on her to do for weeks, the cable pundits couldn't help take shots at her sincerity.

"If she stops short of a full-throated endorsement, I wonder whether it's an effort at Clintonian wiggle room," Jonathan Alter said on MSNBC, moments before Clinton's arrival.

There was a serene resignation as Clinton took the stage, no warm-up act preceding her and no introduction. Just Hillary, standing with her family, including her mother. Then the 60-year-old Wellesley girl stood alone to face the crowd and the nation.

"This isn't exactly the party I planned, but I sure like the company!" Hillary proclaimed as she tried to keep the smile on her face for the thousands of acolytes who had waited patiently for her arrival.

Clinton did the obvious -- she thanked her supporters and expressed her gratitude in a poignant and powerful way. And then she uttered the Obama mantra that she knew she had to, "Yes we can!" You know that could not have been easy, yet she did it without choking up and without the least bit of cynicism or snark.

In crafting her efforts to make sure her 18 million fans would join with Obama's voters, Clinton spoke of the country's lost opportunities under George Bush and pondered how different our country would look today if more than three out of the last ten presidents in the past 40 years had been Democrats.

Hillary called strongly and forcefully for her voters to unite behind Obama, as she should have. And she still was able to speak about her passions -- health care for all and making this country a better place for all women by working to get everyone to understand the very real barriers and biases that exist.

Convincing those who supported her to line up behind Obama, especially those who were on board from the very beginning, won't be easy. Many Hillary supporters are still grieving and angry because they feel that the Democratic National Committee tacitly permitted the sexism against Hillary that wasn't always so subtle.

Katherine Seelye of the New York Times and The Caucus blog commented on that theme:

Mrs. Clinton and her aides are known to feel deeply that there was some sexism in this campaign, particularly in the media, and she mentioned it in this speech. She spoke of barriers and biases and not only of equal pay but equal respect. While she urged her supporters not to look back, was she telegraphing that she might take on this subject at some point in a more fulsome way? She obviously feels strongly about this or she would not have brought this up in this, her farewell address as a candidate.

Yet, even in this moment as Hillary steps off the Presidential stage, it is still a victory, according to Marie Wilson, the president and founder of The White House Project, because of how women, and rest of the country, will now view the possibility of women as leaders:

"I am here because of Hillary Clinton."

Over the past few months, that phrase has been repeated to me by hundreds of women you've never met but whose names you may one day recognize. They are this country's next generation of female leaders -- women of all ages and persuasions who have been searching for the means and encouragement to step into positions of leadership in their communities; women of all political affiliations who thank Hillary Clinton for making the impossible finally appear possible.

But will her supporters take Hillary's departing words to heart? As the cliche goes, that remains to be seen.

There is clearly a deep divide between Obama and Clinton supporters that perhaps not even her words -- which the TV pundits acknowledged were the ones she needed to say -- can heal. But Clinton did everything she could in a relatively short speech to send her base back out into the political process to make sure there is not a Republican in the White House in January.

I hope it was enough.

Joanne Bamberger, also known as PunditMom, is a Contributing Editor for Politics & News. You can also find her at MOMocrats and The Huffington Post.

Comments

 

If Hillary had been the nominee

I would have voted her even though I was pissed about some of what went on like Bill's South Carolina-Jesse Jackson primary comment, but I would have voted her and not for the Bushite.

I don't agree with everything the DNC does, and I voted Republican once.  But never for W and couldn't vote for anyone who agrees with most of his policies.  McCain so far speaks from both sides of his mouth to me on Bush policies. Wishy washy or worm.  Either way not good.  Plus, I think Hillary's smarter than he is.

She spoke well and I know it had to be difficult for her. 

 

Nordette Adams is a Contributing Editor with BlogHer.org.

 

I don't know what I'm going

I don't know what I'm going to do.  A couple of days is not enough time for me to be able to see and think and feel clearly.  I'm not so much mad at the media  as disgusted that I was once a fervent part of the pack.  I don't think it was sexism so much that did her in as punditry, from both sides of the gender divide.  A whole lot of what passed for "news" or "informed opinion" were cheap shots, easy and cute, meant to made the deliverer look good.  Clever.  Smart.  I remember that feeling of scoring in print or on air.   Yeah!  Look at me!  I'm the messenger; let me tell you what's really what.   Blech!

So I'm still mad and I feel disenfranchised and, I just realized as I'm writing this, disrespected by the Obama-ites.  I don't know when, or how, I'll feel any different.  I was part of Clinton's base not just because I believed in her, but because I don't believe in him.  He'll have to go a long way to change my mind.

By Jane

http://byjane.blogspot.com

MidLifeBloggers.com 

 

The role of pundits

I agree with your assessment that part of her undoing was as a result of the skewed portrayal Hillary received from the pundits, who were clearly pushing their own agenda.

Do you think part of it was because most of the high profile pundits were men trying to view Clinton through a male lens? 

 

Your question really got me

Your question really got me going.  The response is over at my blog today. 

By Jane

http://byjane.blogspot.com

http://midlifebloggers.com

 

If you are against sexism

I know people need time to think this through and analyze both remaining candidates, but I think that anyone who wants to take a stand against sexism must consider where McCain stands on the issue. In refusing to support the Fair Pay Act in the Senate (he missed the vote, but said if he were there he would vote against fair pay), he told people that it is more important for the government to let companies go about their business than to stop them from discriminating against women.

The Fair Pay Act was set to rectify a terrible verdict from the right-wing Supreme Court that said that people may only file discrimination suits within 6 months of the act of being discriminated against. However, most women do not find out within six months that they are paid less than their male co-workers because companies (and some states) have policies forbidding people to discuss their salaries with co-workers.

McCain said women need more education and training to bring our incomes up. True, but if companies can just pay you less because you are a woman, education and training don't help. Essentially, by not supporting the Fair Pay Act, McCain encourages companies to pay women less than men, and keep the information secret. If they are dumb enough to get caught in six months, then of course they should pay up. If that is not sexism, I'm not sure what is.

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants