Bio
Rita Arens authors Surrender, Dorothy and Surrender, Dorothy: Reviews. She is BlogHer.com's senior editor.  Her parenting anthology and BlogHer'...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Farm Subsidies, Frankenfoods and Food, Inc.: What You Don't Often Hear in the Media About Farming

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 24
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

I grew up with soybeans in my backyard and, for a while, hogs. I learned at a young age of the dangers of explosive dust and which chemical containers to stay away from and to not touch hot metal, seriously, ever. I also occasionally got to sit in a combine with my grandfather (even though it wasn't running), ride in a red wagon behind a tractor and eat sweet corn fresh out of the field. I am an Iowa girl, the daughter and granddaughter of farmers.

And so, every time I read another book about the horrors of American food production or see the trailer for Food, Inc., I get fired up.


In March, I wrote a rant on my personal blog, Surrender, Dorothy. That made me feel better for a little while. But recently, I realized it is almost time for my favorite color of green (which is the color of a cornfield right around mid-July), and I got to ruminating on how little we hear from the family farmer in the media about ... farming.

So I called up my cousin, a third-generation Iowa farmer who, along with his father -- my uncle -- still farms the land behind my parents' house as part of their 2,800-acre operation, to see what he had to say about this business of food production in America.

Define "Corporate" Farming

From the get-go, it was clear I had little idea what I was talking about. I immediately led with a question about misconceptions and referred to corporate farming, which is what I hear about a lot in the media.

"Define 'corporate,' Rita," my cousin said. "My dad and I are family farmers, but our uncle R. is corporate. Does he seem corporate to you, in the way you hear talk about corporate in the media?"

Um, no. If my uncle is a corporate farmer, then the S corp under which I write off my laserjet expenses and record the minimal income I make each year from freelancing puts me in the same "corporate" category with Meredith Corporation, applying the same standards.

I asked what he thinks the most common misconception is about farming in mainstream media.

"That there are a ton of big farms -- this idea of 'corporate' farming has been blown way out of proportion. Most farms are still family owned and run, and the stewardship of that land is very important to us."

He's right. From the USDA's Web site:

Most farms (98 percent) are family farms. Large family farms are often organized as family corporations, and these account for growing shares of farm sales, but–contrary to popular belief–the share of farms and sales accounted for by nonfamily corporations is small and has been relatively stable since 1978.

We talked a little about Food, Inc., which for the most part does portray farmers and ranchers as people who are cruel to their animals and who take unnecessary money from the government. "Listen," said my cousin. "If we abuse the land, it won't produce. God has only made so much tillable farm ground, and He isn't making any more. Without the type of farming we do now, we can't feed America. It's not just that there aren't enough people interested in walking beans -- there isn't enough land."

Farm Subsidies and the Cost of Doing Business

I've listened to nonfarmers banging on farm subsidies my whole life, and I do think that -- like welfare, like other government programs designed to help people when they need it most -- there are folks out there who abuse them. But let's first break down why they exist.


It's not easy to calculate how many acres you'd need to farm in order to quit your day job. My cousin said he needed about 1,200 acres to justify his existence on the farm, but some people would consider 5,000 acres full-time work, others 700. It depends on what you're growing, where the land is located, and how many mouths there are to feed.

"Farming is one of the few professions where you buy all your seed, equipment and chemicals retail, and you sell everything wholesale," said my cousin. He explained that he gets different kinds of government subsidies.

  • The kind that built the terraces behind my parents' house.

    This type is used to prevent erosion, which benefits the farmer and the surrounding community, preventing run-off
  • 24
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Rita Arens 130 pts

I'd be interested in reading it!

Rita Arens authors Surrender Dorothy and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak. She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

MLOKnitting 5 pts

I wonder if the Blogher community would be interested in doing a corn free living challenge. I can provide resources. I know the two gentleman who made the movie King Corn attempted it and failed several times during their challenge.

Imagine if you - or your child - didn't have the option of failing to avoid corn - the most subsidized (wrongly) crop in the world.

MLO / Melissa

Books, Movies, Games, Ovarian Cancer, and Life in General at http://www.mloknitting.com/

MLOKnitting 5 pts

Jaelithe touched upon many of my own, on-going concerns. Being a member of the corn allergic community, I am keenly aware of these and many other farming, food processing, and other issues the general public have no knowledge of.

I have been in arguments with medical professionals where I had to have them call the manufacturer about ingredient sources. I won those arguments.

You should get hold of the wonderful documentary King Corn. Though light on the politics, it does a very, very good job of finding many of the root causes of the agricultural and food processing mess of today. The goals were worthy, the cost was too great.

I have worked at a major agricultural university while living in one of the few stats with a high mix of farmland next to exburbs - and even suburbs. I grew up near a factory farm for turkeys. My uncle raised chickens and I was hauled off to community gardens since I was a small child. I know the differences between a small lot farm, a mid-size farm, and a factory farm. I admit to only knowing people who measure their farms in 1000s of acres. We just don't have that much land devoted to farming here.

Monoculture is a greater issue than most people understand with long-term health ramifications. One of the speculated reasons for the increase in peanut allergy is the increase in the use of soy derivatives (not the same way used in the Orient) in processed foods. There has been research over the years that may indicate constant exposure to an allergen can cause allergy in those predisposed to atopy. Peanuts are a legume that are quite closely related to soybeans.

When I think of corporate agriculture, Monsanto comes to mind first, and then Archer Daniels Midland. Those are two most powerful corporations involved. Almost no one reports on the misbehavior of ADM, though.

Once upon a time, farm reports were part of the evening news. That that has stopped is in no small part because people have turned their eyes away from knowing the problems that are coming from current practices.

One major issue for me is that corn is incredibly expensive to farm but our cost on the shelf for corn is kept low through subsidies that actually hurt farmers as well. Corn, in the way it is currently farmed, and the types that are farmed, is very hard on the soil. Most farmers are not allowed to use their fallow fields to grow such things as alfalfa or industrial hemp (see oil industry) which actually replenishes the soil.

Many non-sustainable, and just plain stupid, farming practices became de rigeur due to bad farm and food policy. In Michigan, I remember driving up north to see dust devils because fields had no wind rows. Wind rows prevent top soil from blowing away - which means you don't have to keep replenishing the soil.

I think there is fodder for several posts, so I am going to stop here and, perhaps, come back to this on my own blog in the near future.

Pax,

MLO / Melissa

Books, Movies, Games, Ovarian Cancer, and Life in General at http://www.mloknitting.com/

Rita Arens 130 pts

I am definitely hearing an interest from the community for more on how food is grown and processed and taking it to heart. Thanks for your comments!

Rita Arens authors Surrender Dorothy and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak. She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

h_d_w 5 pts

Wow - you knocked this out of the park, Rita!

I grew up on a sizable farm and ranch in Eastern Colorado: wheat, corn, sunflower, beans (for awhile), and cattle. My father was an incredibly smart man and our farming/ranching operation did very well before he died unexpectedly in '95.

I haven't watched Food, Inc. I was afraid I'd be sad on two counts: that there are people abusing the system and that this is what a lot of people would think ALL farmers are doing (ie: as you said, bad apples spoiling the bunch).

Because the land is getting worked over where we live, we've been in and out of the FSA office dealing with CRP issues, land subsidies, and lately, crop easements (which the CO Dept of Revenue has suddenly decided to "disallow').

It's TOUGH to be a farmer and a rancher. One of my clearest memories is standing with my father on our back porch, watching a huuuuuge thunderstorm roll in. Big blue clouds. And bam - it hailed a circle of corn that was a week away from being ready to pick. He was crushed. There went money, there went time, love and dedication.

Thanks for this post, and I'm glad that Heather Clisby - a friend of mine - posted this for me to take a look.

Well done, Rita.

Heather Clisby 19 pts

Let me add to the gratitude for this fabulous post! I am the granddaughter of a North Dakota farmer and the family land (about 600 acres) is still being farmed by my cousin. I visit every year in September to check on everything and end up learning so much. Mostly, I come away with a deep awe of how much energy and sheer hope goes into farming. Vegas gamblers have nothing on these folks, as you well know.

I also spent one childhood summer "walking beans" in Iowa for my cousin's farm and was excited to even see that phrase again; I understand machines have replaced this human activity.

With doors of awareness being opened right and left (thanks to the media, my animal concerns and my own garden), I am somewhat obsessed with this topic. And I'm so glad that Jaelithe brought up her points about farmers being forced to adapt to the system. I recently received a letter (hand-written, of course) by an older NoDak cousin, who bemoaned the seed monopoly that is now standard in the industry. Is this better for us? I remain unconvinced and it certainly hamstrings the farmer. As for monocropping, don't get me started. Bad, bad, bad idea.

What I do know is that I am THRILLED to see the word "farmer" more and more in mainstream media. I am now sitting in an airport with crushing deadlines but when I saw your post, I raced to read it. I just read an AP article, "Farmers Defend Way of Life With Facebook, Twitter" by Juliana Barbassa that is excellent. I've already committed to follow some of these guys as I believe, as someone else pointed out, that they are tireless heroes and they must be supported and most of all, understood by us townies.

Well done, Rita! More please.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal & Wildlife Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Melissa Ford 52 pts

Damn, this is a really really cool post. I thought I knew a lot about farming from hanging out on local farms and having my kids participate in farming programs. But this post really opened my eyes. Especially what would go in to getting started.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.com/ ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

Rita Arens 130 pts

I think what you are doing is fascinating. Right now, we seem to have a need for both. I'm lucky in that I live in Missouri and can plop just about any seed in the ground and coax it to grow because the soil here is so rich. I think that was my cousin's main point he wanted to get through to me -- it is not as easy to grow in other areas of the country and the world as it is in the Midwest (and maybe Hawaii?), and that is why farmers are running larger operations here (though 2,800 acres, while large, is not crazy large -- I'm not sure exactly how big an acre is but I think it's near the size of a football field).

Family farmers can and should and do practice good land stewardship, rotate crops and try to avoid weeds and insects with as many natural tools as possible. I feel quite well heard in that the community understands the concerns of farmers perhaps better than I thought -- it has been hard to read the stories in the media the last couple of years. I can't understand why anyone would think someone who makes his or her living off the land would do ANYTHING that would hurt the fertility of the land for any reason, whether by overfarming or not rotating crops or allowing erosion and run-off to pollute water supplies.

Thank you all for making me feel so much better about my decision to write on something so close to my family on a national site.

Rita Arens authors Surrender Dorothy and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak. She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

clarinetsw 5 pts

you are! Thank you for sharing this. :-)

Rita Arens 130 pts

I absolutely agree that awareness is important. The past ten years have instigated a lot of changes in my life, too, and I admit I buy milk with no hormones and try to buy local produce -- as much to support local farmers as for any other reason. I have a few pepper and tomato plants, too.

I think you're right -- we as a country have to ask who is setting the standards and who is making the decisions about our food as well as our healthcare, because they totally go hand in hand.

Rita Arens authors Surrender Dorothy and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak. She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

MauiFarmlet.com 5 pts

I agree with parentinginprogress, I didn't get the same read on Food, Inc. - I actually felt that farmers were represented as hard working, honest people who are suffering under the unrealistic expectations of consumers, monopolistic bullying by conglomerates, and the complicated bureaucracy of government.
I am so glad, though, that you bring to the forefront on this powerful forum these significant topics - I have hoped to read more here about farming/local foods/agriculture since I consider Food, Water, Environment and Education to be the great risks and opportunities for our collective future.
Obviously, I am biased :) since I am so passionate about this topic that I chose to leave the corporate world to return home to Hawaii to try to prove out the potential for a local food movement as a small-scale, sustainable farmer. I have huge respect for commercial and large-scale farmers(I consider anything over 500 acres commercial scale, 100-500 acres large scale, and anything less, well, like us: tiny); but we need to figure out ways we can distribute food responsibilities. Europe has done this extremely well - small family farms are everywhere, they have avoided most GMOs and drugs, and we can hardly say Europeans don't eat well! :) Hawaiians used to do this, as well - live off of "subdivisions" called ahapua'a that went from mountain to ocean, where each community member contributed and traded what they were best suited to growing. This isn't commune living, this is listening to nature, respecting seasons, eating only what's necessary, and being part of a thriving village economy. In other words, advancement is great, but sometimes you can learn most from looking to the past.
While it's not realistic for everyone in Manhattan to raise chickens, it would be great to figure out a model where we can have a more healthy food economy. That's what our family is on a quest to figure out, and I consider it an homage to farmers throughout history.
http://www.MauiFarmlet.com

tophersgirl 7 pts

I was not left with the same impressions from watching Food Inc and I watched it twice. However before watching it I read The Omnivore's Dilemma. I wasn't left feeling like farmers are the bad guys by any means. In fact your statement that Food Inc. "for the most part does portray farmers and ranchers as people who are cruel to their animals and who take unnecessary money from the government" makes me wonder if we watched the same movie.

I was left with the understanding that there are problems with the way our nation produces, defines and consumes the foods we grow and create (you cannot tell me we grow pop tarts) chief among them the average American's lack of basic understanding about the system that feeds all of us. Why don't we know more about this? Why doesn't the average person know what a CAFO is, how our food is raised and what that looks like? Why don't we know what the chicken farms in the film look like and how those animals are cared for or not cared for? IT was made absolutely clear in the film that for most of the farms featured, the conditions under which the food was produced were rarely if ever decided upon by the farmer but were instead dictated by the customer which was in most cases a huge corporation. Why are there farmers that are not allowed to talk to media about the way they grow our food because of a contract with what is essentially one of two things to them: a vendor (Monsanto) or a customer (Tyson)? That's crazy. But if I were in the position of some of the farmers in the film I can't say I'd be making a different decision. It's clear that they love farming, why else would they work at it so tirelessly and for barely any money?

As consumers we have the right to ask questions of the people trying to sell us something. As citizens we have a responsibility to question our leaders when we get stonewalled seeking information that should be pasted on billboards. As a parent I have a responsibility to raise my child in the healthiest environment I am capable of providing. That environment is obviously different for every family and everyone should have the right to make different choices, but they should also have the right and ability to make INFORMED choices. It took YEARS to force the labeling of produce to reflect the country of origin. Years. Why is that?

We buy local, grassfed and pastured meats and eggs as our budget allows and we go without items we once considered staples in order to ensure that it does allow more often than not. We buy organic produce when feasible, but local whenever possible. We go to the farmer's market regularly and we know our produce farmer and our egg lady. We started a small garden this spring and are adding two more plots this fall because it's fun and our toddler loved it, whether we got to eat anything or not. We feel more empowered and involved in our food choices. The Omnivore's Dilemma and Food Inc played a huge part in that for our family, acting as springboards that lead us to ask more questions, do more research, get more involved and really think about what food meant to us and what it should mean. We started a garden to understand even more, and caterpillars cost us 30 tomatoes in less than a week. A real farmer would laugh at our "challenges" in the garden and call us lucky. But we'll do it again because we want my daughter to understand that it's ok to go to the store and buy the tomato that tastes like water and is as big as your head, but that not all tomatoes are like that and that neither kind is produced without tremendous care and effort.

We support local and sustainable farming whenever possible because we believe it's a good idea, not because we believe farmers are evil unless you can talk to them under a tent on a Saturday morning while they ask how your kids are and tell you where your onions were grown. We believe it's a good idea because we know more about it now than we did before we watched the film or read other materials. And yeah, we buy fewer pop tarts than we used to, but we still buy them. Sometimes.

Great article, you always make me think!

Rita Arens 130 pts

Every single farmer I know refers to Monsanto as "Monsatan." There are many reasons for this, but mostly because -- to my understanding -- it requires farmers to buy the seeds again each year instead of using their own that came from the plants, or something like that. You probably understand that part of it better than I do.

I remember asking my uncle about this article on Monsanto in Vanity Fair ( http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805?currentPage=1 ) and his head nearly blowing off. I do not know where my family buys their seeds, but I feel farmers are to seed companies as doctors as to pharmaceutical companies -- we have to look at the real source of the problem and who is most incentivized to go off-course -- I don't think it's the farmers in this equation. Monsanto is NOT popular due to its business practices.

I'm certainly not a fan of putting chemicals on fields -- and neither is anyone I know -- except to say it's one of a set of tools used to produce the best crop. They try to handle it in the safest and most environmentally sound way possible -- and that is not the message in the media. That's why I wrote this article -- there is more than one side to every story, and if we want to change the way food production in this country works, we need to look at the root cause of the problem, heh, which I argue is not the farmers themselves -- they are selling their goods wholesale. They don't want to let anything rot in bins -- that is like letting their money literally rot.

Thanks for your lengthy comment -- you're clearly more educated in this area than I am, and I'd love to talk to you about it further.

Rita Arens authors Surrender Dorothy and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak. She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

juliaandruswilliams 5 pts

 Rita Arens That's not quite true that farmers hate Monsanto. They wouldn't be one of the most profitable businesses if farmers hated them. (I for one love Monsanto - so your statement that all farmers you know refer to them as Monsatan is no longer true).

 

And the seeds issue is really less of an issue than non-farmers make it out to be. You can't even collect seeds from all crops. And, by the way, have you ever thought of how difficult/time consuming/costly it would be to harvest 10,000 + acres of seeds? Even 2000 acres. And on top of that, there is a diminishing return on the fertility of the seeds - you can't use them all. As you said in the article, tractors and machinery are expensive - making this diminishing return on a very difficult investment even more absurd for most farmers.

jaelithe 7 pts

. . . with many of your points, Rita. And I do mean respectfully, because I disagree as someone who once agreed with you, but has since changed her mind.

I'm a Midwesterner, too - a Missourian, specifically, which means I grew up just minutes away from prairie seas of corn and soy and in fact went to high school down the street from Monsanto. I've known farmers - both conventional and organic. I've known pesticide designers and genetic engineers. Once as a teenager, during a science camp field trip, I got to tour Monsanto's GM facility and talk to the some of the scientists working on that golden rice that was supposed to end childhood blindness from malnutrition in Africa (it never did, by the way). They told me with sincerity that their work would save the world from starvation. I could see the excitement in their eyes when they said it - they believed, then, that it was true.

I am very pro-science. I'm a pragmatist. I'm a skeptic. That's why I used to believe people when they said, "We need these pesticides and GM foods to feed the world!"

I am very pro-science. I'm a pragmatist. I'm a skeptic. That's why I NOW believe, having done much more research, read many more studies, and personally seen the effects of industrial food industry on my local environment and economy, that conventional agriculture will one day cause mass famine and may kill our planet if it isn't stopped.

Monoculture (growing miles and miles of the same crop - and in the case of some GM crops, clones of the same plant) in anaethma to nature. It depletes soil beyond repair, causing erosion and water pollution, and it destroys local ecosystems by destroying biodiversity. It makes our entire agricultural system extremely vulnerable to viruses, fungi, and natural disaster, because without genetic variation, plants cannot respond appropriately to changing environmental conditions. The Irish potato famine was a result of potato monoculture.

Patented genetically modified crops both contribute to the monoculture problem and give companies like Monsanto monopolistic control over farmers' lives and livelihoods by ensuring that farmers MUST buy the same seed, every year, from the same company, no matter how much the price rises. It also gives these companies the power to sue small non-GM farmers right out of business if their crops are accidentally contaminated with GM genes (which happens more often than GM companies would like the public to know).

Meanwhile, widespread overuse of glyphosate due to GM corn and soy has caused the rise of Roundup resistant superweeds that are quickly outcompeting traditional weed pests and will likely render Monsanto's Roundup-Ready GM seed - and Roundup - obsolete within the next decade, which means biotech companies will have to develop a new plant poison that may be more toxic than Roundup. (It's the same problem we have with antibiotic resistance in the world of medicine due to careless overuse of antibiotics -- when you use the same poison over and over to kill a living thing, eventually that thing will evolve to resist that poison).

And don't get me started on the fact that the crude GM technology used over a decade ago to create the most popular GM crops was developed before we fully understood the complexity of epigenetics, or that GM food has never been properly tested for safety, or that the FDA has been legally hamstrung when it comes to investigating GM safety . . .

I understand the argument that these issues are a necessary evil we have to accept if we want to feed billions of people, but I don't buy it anymore. For one thing, we already produce enough food to feed the world, yet people are still starving while excess food rots, not because we can't grow enough food, but because political and structural issues mean people can't access it.

Plus, long-term studies have shown that more sustainable agricultural practices, when practiced over a sufficiently long period of time, CAN produce yields that are similar to industrial agriculture (See this : http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/~christos/articles/cv_organic_farming.html)

I think farmers are really great, hardworking people who deserve much more respect than they get in our culture. In fact farmers are just as much heroes as soldiers or firefighters or police officers are to me: we could not live without them.

And that's actually partly why I feel compelled to point out flaws in the conventional agricultural system. Right now most farmers feel compelled to work on a regular basis with expensive chemicals that threaten their own health and gradually deplete the value of their land. They feel they have little choice about where to buy seeds and what to grow. They feel that this system is necessary and the sacrifices it forces on them are necessary because without those sacrifices the world would starve. I don't begrudge them that belief, but having carefully considered the latest science, I don't agree with it.

I do agree with you, though, when you say that farmers deserve more sympathy and more respect, and should not be stereotyped or demonized in the media, or blamed as a group for the problems in our food system. "Fly-over state" is my least favorite phrase in the American vocabulary.

juliaandruswilliams 5 pts

 jaelithe Don't you find it absurd for a non-farmer to speak on behalf of all farmers? That's not at all how I, my family, and many of the other farmers in my community feel. Not at all.

Rita Arens 130 pts

There was definitely a period of time in which the CRP was more active, from what I can tell. At this point, it seems to be more about preventing erosion and over-farming than anything else, but I'd love to hear from an expert on the matter.

Rita Arens authors Surrender Dorothy and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak. She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

Rita Arens 130 pts

Maybe you could see if there is a CSA gruop that wants to use that land?

Rita Arens authors Surrender Dorothy and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak. She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

Rita Arens 130 pts

Just want to clarify -- this post is not meant as a poke at people who don't eat meat or who are trying to eat locally or be sustainable. I was a vegan for years and a vegetarian for even longer -- which went over AWESOME in Iowa, let me tell you.

However, I, like you, believe we shouldn't throw the baby out with the bathwater when we're talking about farmers, fishermen, hunters -- any group of people living off the land.

Rita Arens authors Surrender Dorothy and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak. She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

MJ at CheepChix 5 pts

To echo Sundi, Thank you Rita for writing this one.

I grew up on a small family farm and my Dad was one of those "paid to not farm" by the CRP program. It was terrible to sit quietly and listen to classmates' parents grump about how my Dad was being paid by the government to "sit and do nothing." As a respectful child I wasn't allowed to get into their face and tell them that while my Dad wasn't working that field, he was out working a full-time insurance sales job that kept him on the road and away from the family most days. He wasn't sitting and doing nothing, he was trying everything he could to SAVE OUR HOME, the farm! Now I'm a Townie, but I remember and know where the food comes from. I will teach my daughters and any others around me that will listen; I will also teach them how to be respectful and to talk with adults, so that they can tell the naysayers what the real story is.

MJ is a contributing author at www.cheepchix.com ( http://www.cheepchix.com ) updated every Monday

JennaHatfield 160 pts

My parents' Farm is no longer actively farmed. In fact, the farmer who took over the back 40 for a very long time is not even farming it this year. Sad, sad.

I kind of love this post, because I love small family farmers. :)

Jenna Hatfield (@FireMom ( http://twitter.com/FireMom )), from Stop, Drop and Blog ( http://stopdropandblog.com ) and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land ( http://thechroniclesofmunchkinland.com ), is a freelance writer and newspaper photographer.

Sundi_MOZ 5 pts

Thanks for writing this Rita.

My mom was born on a farm in rural Kansas. She named me after her favorite day of the week...the day she always saw her dad because God told him not to work. I still remember riding in the cab alone while he left the truck in drive and climbed into the bed to pitch bails to the cattle.

Although he passed when I was only nine I know where my roots are and that is important to me. Since I can't give my kids a farmer's heritage I'm proud to say they will still appreciate the land and have a deep respect for it.

My husband is an avid hunter and at times I feel frustration with today's society just as you do. (cruelty to animals, consuming meat, blah, blah, blah) Aside from all the negatives I'm proud to say my husband feeds our family through his own labor and that we know exactly what goes into our meat. From the land it comes from and field dressing to processing right in our kitchen and storing it in our own deep freeze we have no questions.

Like the bad apples you mentioned I'll admit there are hunters out there who don't make good decisions, who waste meat and harvest when they shouldn't. That’s not us.

We are all stewarts of the land God gave us. We need to make good decisions. It is just one more thing to teach the next generation…even if the decision is as simple as what to do with a banana peel. For my kids the decision is easy. It goes in the compost pile.

Rita Arens 130 pts

When your job is to get things out of the earth, you do have to take care of the earth if you want to stay in business.

Rita Arens authors Surrender Dorothy and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak. She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

ameliasprout 5 pts

...is the farmer who quits trying to learn how to do it better. I remember back in the 80's when the land stewardship projects were taking root (sorry, couldn't resist). You could tell the ones who really got it. Who understood that if you let your field run off in to the lake, the fishing would be bad, and tourism would be effected, and you couldn't eat the fish. If they got that connection, then teaching them about crop rotation and resource management was easy. Oddly enough, I'm pretty sure those are the farmers who are still in business today.

It is so easy to sit in your house in the city and not make the connection to the actual person who grows your food.