Dunkin Donuts owes us an explanation. Why in the world did you succumb to the threats of conservative blogger Michelle Malkin and Fox News and pull this ad?
Just because they say the scarf is a Keffiyeh doesn't make it so. It's a fashion accessory.
If the whole incident wasn't so frightening, it would be funny. This is not about being a fashionista.This is about fascism.
Dunkin Donuts, what were you thinking? Are you really that afraid of bloggers and social media that you think your business could be damaged because of a scarf?
You aren't even selling the scarf. You're selling an iced latte.The scarf was just an accessory.
I looked at the ad. I didn't see terrorism. I just saw a scarf with a lot of fringe. My guess is 99% of the people who looked at this ad saw a scarf with fringe- and that could be a reason to pull the ad -- the product placement gets a little lost with all that fringe competing with the Dunkin Donuts drink.
But the ad didn't get pulled because of that. It got pulled for being the 2008 version of a wardrobe malfunction.
Some confessions. No one has ever accused me of being fashion-forward.
Until yesterday I had never heard of the word Keffiyeh--I know I should have known this word but I didn't. It's a good word to know. Glad I've learned it. If you don't know what makes a scarf a Keffiyeh you can check it out here.
Until yesterday, I didn't know that Rachel Ray had a scarf thing.
Until yesterday I didn't know she sold them on her website.
Until yesterday I did not know those scarves came from Urban Outfitters
Until yesterday,I wasn't aware that Urban Outfitters was involved in a Keffiyeh controversy last year.
Oh, and until yesterday I didn't know that conservatives had a problem with people wearing scarves with fringe.
Or maybe its people wearing scarves with fringe that is purchased at Urban Outfitters.
Would anyone being seeing anything other than a scarf if the conservative pundits didn't have an existing bone to pick with the business practices of Urban Outfitters? I don't think so.
So to make any sense of Dunkin Donuts decision you have to understand what the conservative bloggers maintain is a mainstreaming of a symbol of terrorism -- the keffiyah. Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs launched the first attack on Dunkin Donuts last week in a post call mainstreaming terrorism to sell donuts.
The kaffiyeh was made most popular by the late Yassir Arafat. He wore it draped around his head in the shape of historic Palestine throughout his years of participation in the resistance movement, then as president of the Palestinian National Authority.
The Palestinians have endured decades of brutal colonial occupation and exile. Their heroic struggle for freedom has inspired people around the world. Thousands of women and men, young and old, now wear the kaffiyeh proudly as a symbol of resistance and solidarity with the Palestinian struggle.
Ms. Malkin then linked to Mr. Johnson's post and added her own spin in The Keffiyeh Kerfuffle ( oh, another confession. Kerfuffle is not part of my every day language and I did double check with MW online as to its exact meaning. Usual Spelling: carfuffle.chiefly British: disturbance, fuss). It seems that Ms. Malkin has major issues with all the people who wear these scarves.
Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, Spain’s Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, and Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean, and Hollywood darlings Colin Farrell, Sienna Miller, and Kirsten Dunst, and rapper Kanye West have all been photographed in endless variations on the distinctive hate couture. So has Meghan McCain,daughter of the GOP presidential candidate, who really ought to knowbetter given that her dad positions himself as the candidate best equipped to “confront the transcendent challenge of our time: the threat of radical Islamic terrorism.”
Of course the only way all these people would be wearing the offensive scarf is if retailers sold them.That's where Urban Outfitters comes in. They sold a lot of them. Pamela Kirkland at the University of Pittsburgh wrote about the connection last Decemeber.
Fashion is no stranger to politics and vice versa, but has the keffiyeh lost all political significance with its recent boom in popularity? For a while the scarves were available all over the place. Urban Outfitters sold them for 20 bucks in their stores as “anti-war woven scarves.” After many complaints, the retailer was forced to pull them off the shelves, but curiously enough they seem to have reappeared in select stores. Some Canadian branches of the mega-chain sell shegmahs, which is what keffiyehs were called during WWII, in a variety of colors, but not black and white. The scarves can be found on eBay, in boutiques, and just about anywhere else that considers itself up to par with current fashion.
Some people call the trend politically divisive or say that the more fashionable that the keffiyeh becomes, the less the keffiyeh becomes a political statement. According to Burshtein, “Some Palestinians argued that turning the keffiyeh into a fashion accessory for hipster wannabes trivialized their cause.”
In 2007 Urban Outfitters sold the keffiyehs as "Peace scarves" until mass complaints forced their removal. However, as Meaningful Distraction writes,
Nowadays, the things are ubiquitous in NY as black leggings and skinny jeans. Hell, I even have one.Does this mean I am a terrorist or pro-Palestine? I’m a Jew for Jesus sake! Here’s the deal-These groups are pissed because everyone wearing them and viewing these symbols as fashion, has watered down their significance and trivialized it to the point of no longer being a symbol.
The keffiyeh thing has got to end. I’ll raise my DD to that.
So Urban Outfitters is still on a hit list of conservatives who are none to happy with the retailer selling these scarfs. And probably even madder than Americans like these scarves and have diluted the terrorist connotations.
Now add the fact that Rachel Ray links to Urban Outfitters on her website and her stylist added an Urban Outfitter scarf to the photo shoot and what you get is guilt by association.
What is astonishing in this whole story is not how outlandish and ridiculous Ms. Malkin and Mr. Johnson's claims are regarding this particular scarf. Forget that a Keffiyeh is a particular type of scarf.That has a distinctive checkered design.
This scarf looks like its Paisley. It's silk. It has fringe.
From what I have been reading terrorists don't go for silk scarves.Think wool and/or cotton.
Maybe it was the fear of a YouTube Jeremiah Wright moment that influenced Dunkin Donuts' decsion.
Or maybe,the owners of Dunkin Donuts see what Malkin sees. Now that's a scary thought.
What is scarier is the empowerment that Fox News, Malkin and Johnson must feel right now.
What is even scarier is who and what will be their next target.
Elana blogs about business culture at FunnyBusiness
Comments
Their next target is Target
...because everyone knows that when the terrorists train in training camps they set up bullseyes to shoot at. So a bullseye has become a symbol of anti-U.S. resistance to them. And since it's a symbol that means something to one particular group of people that we're not supposed to like, we need to stop using it as a symbol for anything ourselves.
So Target needs to pay the price. Their logo supports terrorism, even if they don't know it and nobody looking at it would care.
http://backpackingdad.blogspot.com
Yassir Arafat didn't popularize those scarves
Arab men had been wearing keffiyehs long before Arafat. It's a traditional headdress. Give me a break.
Dunkin Donuts is almost making me reconsider my ritual hazelnut coffee and bran muffin. Cowards.
Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|
By the way, I guess Sen. Mc Cain's daughter
is in trouble too
Gawker has a picture of her wearing a real keffiyeh here.
Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|
Give me a break! It's
Give me a break! It's amazing how silly and narrow people can be. All worked up over a keffiyehs. The Americans are acting like the terrorists they criticize. Censorship is not where we're supposed to be coming from.
I need to give up my donut habit anyhow (I'm one of the few people I know who goes for the donuts/muffins and not the coffee). This gives me a good reason.
Has Rachel Ray, who I'm not a fan of, had anything to say about this?
I am about 1/3 conservative and 2/3 liberal.
I can't shake the feeling that Michelle and other's "problem" with this is less about terrorism and more about ignorance. As another commentor pointed out, "Arab men had been wearing keffiyehs long before Arafat. It's a traditional headdress. Give me a break."
I am so tired of people thinking/speaking as if "The Middle East" is ONE place with ONE religion and ONE train of thought. It's not. Not even close.
Morgan Spurlock, the author and director of Super Size Me has another excellent book called Where In The World is Osama bin Laden? It is less about OBL, more about one man's education about "The War on Terror" as seen through the eyes of people who live in the Middle East. I encourage everyone to read it.