Bio
Gina Carroll is an author and freelance writer. She is currently a featured blogger at Chron.com, with Tortured by Teenagers: Parenting Adolescents w...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Florida State Rep. Stargel's Bill Requires Parents to Make the Grade

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

“Accountability” has been a hot buzz word in education policy for years now. In several states across the country, teachers have had to contend with legislation that ties their salaries and advancement to student performance. And administrators too have had to answer for student test scores and graduation rates.  Now, in Florida at least, parents may have to face the a-word, too!

Florida state Representative Kelli Stargel has proposed a bill that would require teachers to grade parents. The teacher assessment would be a part of students’ progress reports. Parents would receive either satisfactory or unsatisfactory marks, and this grade would be based on three criteria. In Rep. Stargel’s words:

1. A child should be at school on time, prepared to learn after a good night's sleep, and have eaten a meal;
2. A child should have the homework done and be prepared for examinations; and
3. There should be regular communication between the parent and teacher.

Stargel says her goal is not to tell parents how to raise their kids, but instead to complete the accountability circle. "We have student accountability, we have teacher accountability, and we have administration accountability," CNN.com quotes Stargel as saying, "This was the missing link, which was, look at the parent and making sure the parents are held accountable."

A long time ago, early in my parenting career, I encountered a reference to the “learning triangle.” I do not remember from whom this originated, but I have always loved it and have used it ever since. The learning triangle reasoning goes like this: A child’s education is optimized when the learning triangle -- parent, teacher and child -- is firmly in place and each point of the triangle is equally committed to success. In that triangle, everyone is connected to the other. Not only do the teacher and parent have to work with the child, but they must also work with each other.

Stargel’s legislation focuses on holding parents to their end of the bargain -- the parenting angle or point of the triangle, if you will. And they should be so held. Parents have to know that their involvement is vital to their children’s success at school. Studies consistently show that parental involvement can have an enormous impact on academic achievement. This is true for all ages, all races and ethnicities. As one teacher pointed out on CNN Live, teachers “only have so much time with children.” It’s unfair to make them responsible for outcomes that can be and are the fault of negligent parents.

Interestingly, some studies show that certain kinds of involvement matters more than others. A Harvard review of parenting involvement studies found that parenting styles and expectations and a parent’s commitment to talking with and reading with his or her child brought about greater impacts than a parent’s participation or presence at school functions. Thus, if a parent has high expectations for his or her children and interacts with them by talking and reading with them regularly, but is absent from the parent-teacher conference, is this parent unsatisfactorily involved? Since some of the more important parenting factors cannot be measured by a teacher, how can such a grade be meaningful?

As the learning triangle implies, any policy involving parental involvement in education must embrace the notion of cooperation. And a bill that gives teachers the obligation to grade parents on their parenting is not cooperative thinking. As Steve Perry, CNN Education Contributor points out: there is

nothing in any teacher’s training that would put them in a position to effectively judge the parenting of one of their students’ parents.

This may be why a number of teachers have already voiced concern about the prospect of a new grading requirement. One teacher quoted in the CNN article said she didn’t think parents who are not involved would be fazed by an unsatisfactory mark.  Another teacher who left a comment about the bill on TheLedger.com said:

Speaking as a teacher, rest assured it is not our goal or desire to grade parents; in fact our goal is not to test and grade students every waking hour, our focus is to teach.


Several comments expressed doubt about the effectiveness of

  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
The Learning Mama 6 pts

I feel that lack of parental involvement constitutes negligence and parents should be jailed. My husband has to supply kids with necessities. He feeds them on test days because most of them come without eating a good breakfast. We can't really afford to do that but we have to. So I am all for holding them accountable.

Colormepink 5 pts

Another test in a system of tests that has proven to be pointless and ineffective. I live in Florida and I homeschool. Floria schools by and large are ineffective and driving a wedge between parent and teacher will do nothing to help the students. Great job, Florida, way to fail. Again.

Homeschooling, jewelry designing, adventure seeking, picture taking, gadget loving, blog writing, foodie, up for (almost) anything Mom about town.
http://colormepink.com

Gina Carroll 5 pts

We all agree,then, the grading-the-parents idea is faulty thinking! I know a few folks who are doing some amazing things in the parent participation realm. Not the least of which is
Feria Para Aprendar (theLearningTree.com). This ambitious group organizes events to attract and engage parents in their kid's schools in impressive numbers. Their event in LA drew 20,000 people-- Latino families who learned and committed to school involvement.

So there are ways to reach parents that respect, educate and empower. We need to look to those, not provocative legislation.

Gina Carroll, author of 24 Things You Can Do with Social Media to Help Get Into College, also blogs at Think Act Parent.com and

ModaMama 5 pts

then it would seem an important hurdle has been passed. The expectation of actually grading parents, by law none the less, seems clearly faulty but I like the idea of engaging more parents with the information that their role is equally important to the success of their child.

Those things that are painfully obvious to many good parents, I have to tell you, they aren't obvious to all parents. I wonder if instead of legislation, more school districts with at risk student populations could use this model and see fundamental changes in performance.

Also, let's remember some of the trappings of this model, like regular communication don't mean a parent dropping in to a school function once a week but communicating with a child's teacher. As a former teacher, I'd be happy to get a note or an email from a parent to let me know of special situations at home, problems, questions, concerns... this is still a line of communication and helps keep everyone in the loop.

Interesting post, thanks for getting the information out.

www.SaraInAkko.blogspot.com ( http://www.SaraInAkko.blogspot.com )

Life in the Middle East, with craft and spice

KM8392 5 pts

I think this is a very bad idea. Teacher and test grades are being tied together b/c it's is their job to teach children.

While I agree that parents should be involved in their children's education, it is not a job. Because of this, the government has no solid ground to invade their personal lives. This is an invasion of privacy, and I agree with stapinbuzz that it would lead to finger pointing. There are other options (like charter schools, school choice) that would let parent's become involved on their own terms. Check out here for more info: http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/library/educati... ( http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/library/educati... )

The Learning Mama 6 pts

KM8392 It is also the parent's job to make sure their children are doing their homework. Teachers are NOT glorified babysitters.

stampinbuzz 5 pts

I happened to see the Steve Perry interview on CNN and I happen to agree wholeheartedly with his assessment that this type of approach will do nothing but drive a wedge between parents and teachers.

I agree that parents can play a crucial role in the education process, but not every child is lucky enough to come from a home where there is a parent willing to be involved. But every child can have access to a teacher who may be able to help that child overcome the limitations imposed on a him from a compromised home situation.

The University of Virginia just completed a study that says the #1 component that most affected a childs development in academic and language skill was the interactive learning techniques of the teacher herself. Not classroom size, teachers level of education, or the best environment that money can buy, but specific interactions between teacher and child. http://www.virginia.edu/uvatoday/newsRelease.php?i...

Passing a law like this is just another ineffective, bandaid attempt to fix schools that does nothing to address the real problems.

We will NEVER have full participation from every parent in this country. We should be trying to develop ways to break the cycle that bad parenting creates. Bad parents beget more bad parents and the only place that that can be addressed in this country is in the public school system, but this is not the answer. All this law will do is to paint an even more depressing picture for disadvantaged children than they already have for themselves.