Forget About the Candidates, What is Your Government Doing to Fix the Economy Now?
by Maria Niles

Here at BlogHer we have looked at how the leading presidential candidates promise to address issues of interest to the community based on the Voter Manifesto. And while it is important to do so, the economy is tanking now and people are hurting now and nothing any candidate promises to attempt to do a year from now will put money in your bank account, gas in your car, pay your mortgage or put food on your table. Therefore, let's take a look at what the government is doing right now to help struggling Americans out.

Have you received a letter from the IRS telling you that the check is in the mail? Marie/y at Work In Progress did and she has concluded that heart attacks are part of the economic stimulus package:

Jeez — can’t they lighten up? Make it look like a winning Publishers’ Clearinghouse Sweepstakes entry or something?! Get people happy to see mail from the IRS, not heart-attacky.

Jennifer at Daily Diatribes: The Deranged Ramblings of a Suburban Soccer Mom on the Edge is blunt in stating what she believes the pinheads who run the federal government want us to do with those checks:

And remember, this is America: if you get that check, head to your nearest mall and SPEND IT!! For God’s sake people, don’t HOARD it! Go to the Gap and buy a new wardrobe! Don’t pay bills with it because that would be UN-AMERICAN!! SPEND, SPEND, SPEND!!!!!!

The tax rebates are part of the confusing at best Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. After reading up all about it I'm still not clear exactly how this is going to make either the economy or my life better but I'll try my best to help you understand how this will or will not impact your life.

An article on The Winners and Losers of the Stimulus Package from Fox Business speculates that the big winners might be accountants (for making the complex calculations for determining the amount of the rebates), mortgage bankers for refinances under the higher loan limits and the losers will be the unemployed who received goose eggs in this basket of government goodies.

Some experts are not optimistic that this package will do much to stimulate the economy and would rather have seen more direct spending from the government.

The stimulus package will probably give the economy at least a small jolt, experts said. But some economists think it could have been improved by more direct spending instead of business tax breaks.

"It's not an optimal package," said Jared Bernstein, an economist with the Democratic-leaning Economic Policy Institute. "From the perspective of bang for the buck, you could have crafted a more effective package."

The key elements of the stimulus package are the tax rebates and temporary changes to government backed loan limits. It does nothing to address unemployment, foreclosures (there are some separate efforts focusing specifically on the mortgage crisis), the falling value of the dollar, rising gas prices (though arguably there is little the government can do, and nothing the presidential candidates can promise to do to affect those, certainly in the short term) or the price of food on your table (part of the problem is that the competition for using food crops as fuel to address rising gas prices is driving up the price of food as well as is the rising price of fuel used to transport food).

Two professors at the University of Washington analyzed the stimulus package and concluded:

The almost-uniform praise by the chattering classes and the press of a process that led to a flawed economic stimulus legislation as exemplary bipartisanship is deeply disturbing, bordering on a national delusion.

Rather than coming to praise this process, we'd like to bury it. It is just one more depressing example that the federal government lacks the will to cope with the major economic problems that threaten the United States.

But the package is what it is so what do you need to know?

How much of a rebate will you receive and how will you get it?

Certainly the IRS FAQ is a good place to start. However, if you want plain English explanations take a look at columns from Eileen Ambrose and Dan Thanh Dang in the Baltimore Sun, Karen Datko at MSN Money's Smart Spending Money Blog or Kathleen at My CFO on the Go! Kay Bell's blog Don't Mess With Taxes is also an excellent resource.

The change in the loan limits will help some homeowners refinance into lower rate mortgages and lower their monthly payments. Also, this change will help some buyers purchase homes in high-cost areas of the country which might slow the rate of some markets declining by helping to help buoy home prices. The increased limits ($729,750 up from $417,000) expire at the end of the year.

Even if the economic stimulus package will not be riding to your economic rescue, Alina Tugend in The New York Times suggests you "resist the impulse to panic over finances." If the stimulus package will affect you, please share your story. What will you do with a tax rebate? Will you refinance or buy a house with the new limits?

Comments

 

Nice job, Maria :)

This is a horribly complex and difficult topic - thanks for tackling it!

Jill
Writes Like She Talks

 

Thanks for the support, Jill

Much appreciated!

PopConsumer
Beyond Help

 

The "rebate" is loan, really.

A friend of mind called me. "There's this guy at my gym who says that the tax rebate is just a loan. He's usually right about most things, what do you think about thiat?"

Meh. I'm no economist, tax specialist,etc. But I do get that the money has to come from somewhere, right? Where's it coming from? Did the Economic Stimulus people decide to just tack it on to the existing deficit? I haven't seen any taxes repealed, so did someone find the money in a file cabinet somewhere? Did we pay for the war yet?

I listen to a lot of Olde Tyme Radio and I'm often struck by the ads that run in the WWII era shows. They call for sacrifice and donation to the cause. They call for Americans to buy war bonds and to live frugally. With this administration, we've had none of that and oh, here's a little change, go get yourself something nice. Someone is going to have to pay for both the war and that little extra something. Who do you think it's going to be? It's going to be US, as soon as we have an administration that has the will to manage our finances in a way other than that of a frat boy whose rich parents are picking up the tab.

I love that Obama recently spoke to the US about race in a reasonable and adult like manner. Wouldn't it be delightful if someone did the same about money?

Nerd's Eye View

 

Not this time

This is one of the most confusing aspects of the rebates. I believe in the past rebates have been treated as advances on future tax refunds. So they did indeed work like a loan. You got the rebate and then had to claim it on your next tax return and your refund/amount due was adjusted accordingly.

However, that is not the case this time. Bush is adamant about only cutting taxes so these are a one time tax cut and therefore are not funded. It is simply further reduced revenue to the government which supply-siders believe will be made up with the sales taxes generated by increased consumption funded by the rebates and payroll & income taxes from the newly employed who will be hired to fill the jobs created by the spending spree and from the business tax cuts in the stimulus plan. If that works out as well as it has the past 8 years, then yes, you are correct, it will merely increase the deficit, especially if unpatriotic people pay bills or save the rebates rather than buying stuff (especially stuff made by workers in other countries).

If you receive the rebate this year then you will have to count it on your return next year. This is simply for record keeping purposes because if you do not qualify for the rebate this year you might qualify next year. Although including it on your return next year will not affect your refund/amount due it will prevent you from receiving the rebate twice.

This article explains it well.

The article also contains this advice (to your point, Pam)

Spending money is not your patriotic duty

Yes, Congress and President Bush hope you'll blow this money as quickly as possible to give the economy a shot in the arm.

But politicians' short-term attempts to influence the economy -- and their ability to get re-elected -- should not be your primary concern. Doing what's right and responsible for your own finances will leave you better off and will probably be better for the economy in the long run.

 

Loan vs "Loan"

Maria, I didn't mean loan in a literal sense. I meant that the money had to come from somewhere and that somewhere was sure to be us at some point. But you get it - quote:

f that works out as well as it has the past 8 years, then yes, you are correct, it will merely increase the deficit, especially if unpatriotic people pay bills or save the rebates rather than buying stuff (especially stuff made by workers in other countries).

Our unpatriotic act is like to be something like paying for health insurance or putting it straight into our retirement funds. Oops.

Nerd's Eye View

 

Ah, Got It

Sorry I misunderstood - I've seen a lot of questions/comments on "paying back" the rebate and I thought that was what you were referring to.

The truly scary thing I've heard mentioned, and not in a joking way, is that if extreme measures are needed to prop up the economy, the government will literally print extra money.

And, bad American, you - paying for your health insurance or saving for retirement. Sheesh!

 

Great post!

What a mess. My brother was just telling me today that we're spending literally millions just to mail out notices about the rebates.

Kalyn Denny
Kalyn's Kitchen

 

Crazy broken system

Thanks, Kalyn. And your brother is right - I believe I read it's something like $42 million to send the notices that still are confusing as heck. There's also a huge cost in lost productivity anticipated for the time IRS workers will spend answering questions about the confusing notices and program. Sigh.

 

The stimulus package ...

... is false hope. We definitely need more substance to fix what is broken with our economy. I just hope we can figure it out before we feel like it's 1929 again.

PunditMom
http://punditmom1.blogspot.com
Contributing Editor, Politics & News

 

False hope, indeed

Sad that even though tax rebates have proven to be a poor method of stimulating the economy and unemployment benefits and food stamps have proven to work, Bush refused to consider the latter and only the former because he could call it a tax cut.

And, yep, there are ominous signs of the ghosts of 1929 reappearing.