Bio
I write Stirrup Queens when I'm not reading other people's blogs, cooking, or chasing after my twins. I'm the author of two books: Life from Scratch,...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

France Submits Bill to Outlaw Veils Outside the Home

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 19
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

French President Nicolas Sarkozy submitted a bill today banning the wearing of "full veils" (those that cover the face and body such as a niqab or burqa) in France. The proposed bill goes a step further from France's 2004 ban of religious headdresses within classrooms.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

If the legislation passes, women will not be allowed to wear burqas or niqabs on the streets or in stores.

According to the New York Times,

Fewer than 2,000 women in France wear a version of the full veil, and many of them are French women who have converted to Islam. The full veil is seen here as a sign of a more fundamentalist Islam, known as Salafism, which the government is trying to undercut. On the left, the veil is seen as repressive and a violation of women's rights, even though many women who wear the veil insist that they are doing it as a free choice and see a ban as a restriction of their liberty.

Other officials have suggested a softer law, one that mandates women wearing burqas to uncover their faces only during identity checks and in buildings belong to the state, such as schools. But Sarkozy pushed ahead with his particular bill. According to the UK Telegraph,

Nicolas Sarkozy is to press ahead with the bill claiming that the veil is an "assault on women's dignity."

"We're legislating for the future. Wearing a full veil is a sign of a community closing in on itself and of a rejection of our values," Luc Chatel, a spokesman for Mr Sarkozy, said on leaving a cabinet meeting led by the President.

The Telegraph also reports wide government support for the bill. But even if it doesn't pass, Sarkozy's order steps into a debate about whether -- in a blindness to create a secular state -- the guidelines for government can be passed to its citizens. If a government can create rules that stop a person from practicing her religion, even if the practicing of that religion does not affect any other citizen in the country.

Najat and Siham Wear a Burqa - France

Feministe wrote about a possible ban last June, pointing out both the folly and danger of such an action:

Women make choices about the way we dress for all kinds of reasons -- sometimes to follow a religious tradition, sometimes to be perceived as attractive, sometimes to be invisible, sometimes to just cover our bare asses. Most of our motivations aren't feminist or anti-feminist. When it comes to religious requirements especially, we know that outlawing certain garments in public doesn't make women shed the offending item of clothing; it just makes women refrain from public interactions.

In other words, by "liberating" women, Sarkozy is essentially imprisoning them in their homes, unable to join the general public.

Last month, France's Council of State, the country's highest administrative authority, warned Sarkozy that such a full ban on the veil may be unconstitutional.

Do you believe it should be up to a government to determine what is an "assault on women's dignity?"

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens and Lost and Found. Her book is Navigating the Land of If.

  • 19
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Melissa Ford 5 pts

Allowed or not desiring to go out of the house are two separate things. For instance, I am not allowed to go outside without my clothes on. But it's my choice if I don't want to leave the house without lipstick and heels. And I don't think this is a case of "not allowed" as it is a desire to not go out if it means not being able to live your ethics.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

rebelfashionista 5 pts

I just have to ask, and I have no care what so ever on whether these women practice wearing the niqab, burqa, hijab or what have you, but if it's not a form of oppression, then why is it that these women AREN'T allowed to go anywhere if it gets banned? If it's just a form of religious right, freedom or an expression of their value system, if it represents all these INTANGIBLE things, then why can't they be allowed outside of their homes? Aren't those same intangible expressions or beliefs still able to be carried with them regardless of whatever it is that they wear?

Just my thughts, if someone doesn't mind answering.

oviedostyle 5 pts

Thank you Melissa! If you'd like to learn more about programs that educate women check out the book, "Half The Sky" by Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn. It is very eye opening.

Micro Grants & Free Resources, http://iiwomen.com ( http://iiwomen.com/New/index.htm )

Melissa Ford 5 pts

Absolutely. And there shouldn't be any excuses for discrimination.

I'm on the computer, hence the quick responses :-)

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

busybeeson 5 pts

Agreed. I am just saying that no one should have to tolerate discrimination simply for visiting any part of this world. I think many times people are quick to justify discrimination when it comes in the form of culture.

BTW, I'm very impressed by your quick responses. You are on the ball, lady. :)

Melissa Ford 5 pts

Well...and this is where it gets tricky...the US (for instance) is not a culture that is anti-headscarf. We are a culture that says that we're for people having choice and individual rights for self-expression. Therefore, telling someone to take off their headscarf while in America (or France) would actually be AGAINST what we claim is a founding belief of our country.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

Melissa Ford 5 pts

Anyone who has been a child (um...all of us?) at some point should have internalized this: educating helps, having rules thrown at us do not. When I knew the reasons behind something, I made better choices. And who is to say that a lack of head covering IS the better choice? Perhaps there is so much gained from wearing it that those outside the experience who are trying to change the experience could learn. The education needs to flow both ways--do you hear that, France?

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

busybeeson 5 pts

I agree that you should respect others when you visit another country, but I will not allow myself to be discriminated against for my gender as part of showing respect. I will do anything that a man in my position would be expected to do to show respect to that culture.

If we start changing who we are to fit with the places we are visiting, we would have to expect Muslim women to take off their head scarves in the Western world. I just think all cultures should try to be more inclusive and allow differences without showing disrespect.

BTW, my biggest traveling pet peev is when people talk loudly in English to people who don't speak English, as if that is going to suddenly allow them to understand. Duh! ha ha.

Also, this is a serious question: I was wondering how governments handle picture I.D.'s when it comes to Muslim women who wear head scarves? Wouldn't they have to remove at least their face coverings for the picture? I wonder how they address this issue.

oviedostyle 5 pts

Attacking a groups religious beliefs never turns out well. The real problem appears to be basic human rights. If a woman wants to wear a veil, who are we to tell her not to.

As for people who use it oppress women, how about instead of attacking their beliefs we spend our time educating women in countries where women are forced to wear a covering.

This reminds me of the problem with female genital mutilation. When outsiders try to tell vilages of people in Africa that cutting is wrong, it backfires. These people see it as an attack on their culture, not as a way to help. There is a group called Tostan which has made great strides in ending genital mutilation, by education villagers about health risks and womens rights. They don't go to villages and say you have to stop this. They educate the villagers, who can then make the decision to stop.

Micro Grants & Free Resources, http://iiwomen.com ( http://iiwomen.com/New/index.htm )

Melissa Ford 5 pts

Thank you! Going to go check out that link.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

SecondSimone 5 pts

Great post, I enjoy your informative writing style with included visuals!

I think you might be interested in this NPR interview of Leila Ahmed from Speaking of Faith,

http://speakingoffaith.publicradio.org/programs/mu...

Blog on!
www.chelsearising.com ( http://www.chelsearising.com )

Melissa Ford 5 pts

Agreed--no one should be enforcing their beliefs on another person. Though I am a firm believer in following the house rules regardless of my own traditions. If people come in my house, they take off their shoes, even if they wear them in their own house. And I feel the same way about visiting another country--especially when it is a choice (and not part of a job). Or even places within my own country.

The question then comes down to if there is special significance to the headdress and if by wearing it, you're making a statement beyond modesty. An agreement to certain ideas.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

busybeeson 5 pts

I want to first say that I am totally against a ban, but I do think it is interesting that these women are taught at a young age to wear this uniform. Many started at the age of seven, which is hardly an age to make an educated decision. Everyone is indoctrinated with different ideas at a young age no matter what their religion or culture. I just think that these scarves are no different than any other religious tradition that children are taught at a very young age.

I also respect the right of people to wear head scarves in the Western world, but I think they then shouldn't expect western women to wear them in Muslim countries. A friend of mine in the Peace Corps was chased down the street in Morocco because she wasn't wearing a head scarf. Little boys threw stones at her. She couldn't leave her dorm without a male escort. And even though the male escort was being paid to take her around, he told her that he didn't have to do what she told him because she was a woman. I think this attitude is just as bad, if not worse, than France's attitude toward head scarves. Both are wrong, but yet we hear more about the injustices of banning head scarves than the injustices of forcing head scarves upon those who don't want to wear them.

I guess I'm just saying that both the West and the Muslim world try to impose the majority's cultural viewpoint on their countrys' greater populations. It is wrong and we need to work to correct this in the West and in Muslim society.

Melissa Ford 5 pts

I agree wholeheartedly. There is plenty of fashion or religious-articles I don't partake in (even within my own religion!), and that's my choice. But I don't understand that next step--taking away another person's choice--and how it is freeing.

But dude, if you ban bras, I'm throwing mine away too :-)

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

Melissa Ford 5 pts

It would only be fair for the sake of the secular state.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

lindsay39 5 pts

Melissa...

Yeah, I've always found the ones with a dead Jesus very offensive. Hopefully, they will be the next to go. Seems to promote a culture of death, or worshiping dead people, so seems like a good next step.

Cherish each moment, learn from each person you meet, gather wisdom and peace with each passing day

lindsay39 5 pts

Let's just say that I decide that bras are an "assault on women's dignity." After all, they're uncomfortable, and according to some studies, may even contribute to cancer. So I will ban them, to protect women. Or baggy sweaters or tight jeans or high heels or ugly fashions --- once you open the door to a government dictating allowable fashion, and especially when the clothing in question does not result in exposing "private parts" (far from it!), you are heading down a very dangerous path. And when you add religious expression to the mix...government needs to keep its hand off. I have many friends who wear hijabs, and do so by their own choice. Do I like the full veils or even more all-encompassing clothing? Nope. But fortunately, I don't have to wear it. Nor do I have to stop those who choose to do so from expressing their own choices. Works for me!

Cherish each moment, learn from each person you meet, gather wisdom and peace with each passing day

Melissa Ford 5 pts

It would be interesting to learn how the first ban affected girls going to school.

I hope France will be consistent and ban the wearing of crosses. Or churches placing crosses on the outside of their building.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

gsballance 5 pts

I feel the ban is outrageous and an insult to muslim women. Why does the west feel so morally superior? We can't make assumptions that women don't want to wear a veil or that by banning the wearing of a vail, we are liberating women. For the majority of muslim women in western countries it is their choice to wear it based on modesty, religious symbolism or simply a part of their value system. Women are strong regardless of their religion or ethnicity and don't need a government to "save" them. Take a look at the women in Iran who demonstrated and were brave in the face of an oppressive government during last year's elections.
I don't know why France has taken this hard line? When they banned the wearing of headscarves in school, I imagine some girls had to stay home from school. How is that helping anyone? These bans stir up religious conflict. It really irritates me!