Gaza and Israel: Reflections and resources
by Jill Miller Zimon

Let me set out a couple of things from the get-go: I'm not going to glorify Israel and I'm not going to vilify Hamas. I'm also not going to vilify Israel and I'm not going to glorify Hamas.

I could and would do that, if I really thought it would make a
difference. But if people haven't learned by now just how little it
matters to speak extremely about one party or the other, then they must be prepared to be considered part of the problem.  The conflict in the Middle East right now is the textbook definition of complex, and anyone who continues to be one-sided isn't showing an
interest in wanting to be part of the solution.

Expression on behalf of one side? Reasonable, understandable. But one-sided blaring? Not so much, because it doesn't lead to resolution - unless you want more death. I don't know about you, but that's not something I want more of.  And if you are of the opinion that more death is either what we need or what must happen - on either side - then you are not going to want to keep reading this post because I will never agree with that and I won't promote it.

[Speaking of which, has anyone else thought about how, in American culture, when you call someone a martyr, it's a putdown or an insult? It signifies something beyond, extreme, and past the point of just doing something good or kind or helpful for someone.  How does that compare to the concept of martyr that we hear being expressed by some, not all, and most likely only Muslim Palestinans? This point isn't relevant because you think it's sane or insane. It's relevant because of what it implies and what we may infer about a person's perspective as they make choices about their behavior and goals and means to an end.  Really. Think about that.  Again - not because it's something to embrace or reject - but because of how it impacts what a person will do to accomplish what they've come to value as a goal.  So when you read op-eds that talk about how maybe Israel "finally" gets it, they're talking about how this concept of martyr, different from culture to culture, impacts the fighting tactics and rhetoric of Hamas.]

Let's also get some other semantics out of the way:

I could have titled this post, "Palestine and Israel," or
"Arabs and Israelis" or "Muslims and Jews." Some people think the land is all Palestine, some think it's the state of Israel and Occupied Territories, some interchange Arab and Palestinian, some people realize that people born in Israel are Semitic, the same as anyone else born in that region and therefore are Arab Jews (I personally never use this phrase). There are 1.7 million Arab Israelis - some people call them Palestinians too.

And yet, there's probably a statistically significant portion of the global
population that would object to any one of those monikers as referring to the human beings who live in what Professor Kim very wisely
referred to as The Holy Land in her post less than a week ago
about
Israel's response to rocket launches into the Negev Desert,
post-ceasefire with Hamas. So, I'm sticking with G before I, Gaza and Israel.

Finally, I want to state upfront that I suffer from multiple personality disorder:

In writing about the conflict, I could be a good lefty and give you my bleeding heart
liberal chat about absolute disgust for the death tolls and
devastation, for the cultural hardening on both sides that these
conflicts incur and how that is the real damage, and why, regardless of
the long-term uselessnss of an immediate ceasefire with little else
achieved, we nonetheless must demand a ceasefire.

Or, I could
be a good Jew and write about how Hamas, as an Islamist group does not
represent the Christian Arabs or the Druze Arabs or perhaps even many
of the Muslim Arabs and that those groups must choose for themselves
and write about how weak the Arab League is because they can't agree
among themselves and how, in fact, some of those members claim to hate
Hamas as much as Israel is assumed to hate Hamas.

Or, I could
be a good former resident of Israel (1984-85) and recent visitor to
Israel (August 2008) and tell you that Hamas needs to reccognize the
right of Israel to exist or this battle will never end and tell you
about the desires of Israeli Arabs to achieve full parity with Jews in
the state of Israel, which they do recognize because they do not want
to live under Palestinian rule.

Or, I could be a good graduate of
a Jesuit university who spent spring breaks on Methodist church
missions and never understood how classmates could assume that I was a
Zionist just because I was a Jew and tell you about how separate
nationality, identity and religion really are, to me, even though, for
the sake of coming up with easy to pigeonhole, polarized sound bites,
we conflate all three and come up with enemies who are just as much
flesh and blood as each other and, biblically, brothers (see the peace
effort Isaac and Ishmael, which I'm pleased to say was founded by a
fellow Clevelander).

There are probably at least three or four
more identities within me, maybe more, based on my life experiences.

And you know what? 

As
far as what will happen and what should happen in Gaza and Israel? None
of those identities matters. Because whatever I have to say will all be just my opinion - with all that stuff as part of my filter.  That might interest you - in fact, I hope it does keep you curious about what I think regarding the conflict.  But it's critical to remember that these are multiple identities I possess - and that you and everyone around you probably possess a few too, no matter how many or how few you emphasize at anyone time.

So, before I tell you what I really think is going on, let me reiterate:

1. I won't vilify or glorify in a one-sided fashion - there are, at a minimum, two primary populations there and they aren't going away and I won't advocate to relocate one full population and I won't advocate death to one either.

2. I won't get bogged down in semantics - we know who we are talking about and arguing over labels is yet another distraction.

3. Cultural values, including concepts that are foreign to us - like a different sense of martydom - impact how the main actors behave in peace and in war.  We should not ignore that, but there is no need to name-call it either - the mocking it doesn't help in figuring out what to do to end the violence.

4. We, as onlookers, have multiple identities from which we can draw to figure out how to negotiate.  Please remember that as you think to yourself, how does the Middle East violence stop? Some of the best examples of collaboration between Israelis and Palestinians and Israeli Arabs and Jews has been through identifying common interests: parents who have lost children, computer technology gurus, living in the same region inside and outside of Gaza, being a writer.  These are the ways to build a foundation for peace, and co-existence - and they are happening now.

What, literally in the name of God, is going on over there?

The two most important things that are going on can be boiled down as follows:

1.  The conflict is no different than any bully-teasing situation in terms of relationship dynamics. We are all distracted by the death toll - who wouldn't be? No one, least of all Hamas, should be actually, truly or sincerely surprised that Israel took military action.  That's not a statement of right or wrong, it's an observation related to what happens when provoked. The justification for the provocation, even we accept that justification 100%, is also irrelevant because whether it's always been there (Israel as oppressor) or is new (the blockade), it doesn't matter: there was provocation (rocket launches), there was a reaction (Israel goes in).

And now we're all distracted and focusing on the death toll and destruction. Look at the attention and sympathy garnered, the two things terrorism, as shock and awe, always accomplishes, and which also always obscures what no one has articulated: What, beyond the end of the blockade, does Hamas want?

Why has no one articulated this? Because what Hamas wants is a one-state solution, and not even the Arab League can agree to that, let alone acknowledge the goal.

2. The second most important thing I see happening, which is connected to the first, is that I sense a distinct increase in the one-sidedness of the voices I've come to trust as spokespersons for different outlets - pro-Israel,  pro-Palestinian and pro-stop the madness.  And what I believe will have to happen is that we will start asking each other: Do you support a one-state or a two-state solution?

I predict this evolution because, after nearly seven days since we started to discuss the conflict, the dominant lines are the following (which, by the way, are no different than ever before):

1. Israel has always been the occupier and the Palestinians have always been displaced and oppressed: this is the foundation for the rejection of Israel as a legitimate state and the preference for a one-state solution.

2. Israel fought a war (and subsequent wars), it won, an armistice was signed, Gaza was given to Egypt, Israel occupied but has been gone since 2005 when Fatah was in charge, and is disengaging from the West Bank: this is the foundation for dealing with Fatah only, and the preference for a two-state solution.

But no one is talking this talk - because we are so distracted by the fighting.  Now - if this doesn't sound like what happens between siblings or youngish kids from time to time, when the adults aren't in the room and you come in and have to figure out what is going on and all you hear is the blaming?

You have to keep asking questions - you cannot be satisfied with just what you see or are told.

So - in an effort to help you dig deeper, here is a varied assortment of links and resources for keeping up on not just what's going on, but how what is going on is affecting people around the world (in no particular order):

Rasmussen Report: Americans Closely Divided on Israel's Attack of Gaza A lot of partisan interpretation of the data from this report. I'd urge you to read it for yourself.

Random Thoughts Gaza Update 6.5 Includes links primarily to bloggers in Israel and Jewsih bloggers all over the world but the views are from the far left all the way to the far right and include several women and mothers.

 

Sabbagh Blog is blogged from Bahrain (you can read about the blogger here) and includes many photos of the tragedies

Israelity Bites

Israeli Women's Organizations statement

Women vow to blow selves up for Hamas

Poynter Institute’s coverage, “Gaza Battles on Twitter, Blogs.”

Feministing has a good round-up of feminist voices on the violence and the hoped for peace

Will Obama, lawmakers listen to liberal pro-Israel groups’ criticism of the operation in Gaza? 

A column by Alan Dershowitz that appeared in the Christian Science Monitor today called “Israel, Hamas and moral idiocy.”

Responses from the Israel Consulate to questions asked during a two-hour Twitter press conference can be found here, here, here and here.

Twitter hashtags to follow (go here to insert as a search term) include #gaza and #askisrael but also #gazawarofwords for media bias.  These tags and the following Twitterers have been one of my main sources for Gaza-based or pro-Palestinian sentiments/news:

Jillian C. York (who is also with Global Voices Online)

AJGaza which is Al Jazeera’s special Twitter feed for this conflict

Israeli Consulate

The Muqata

Finally, Kim Pearson tweeted links to video: from the IDF and from Al Jazeera's Gaza-special channel

I would also encourage you to use the BlogHer search at the top right of the page.  There are many posts in the network about Gaza and Israel.

Comments

 

Great article plus additional resources

Hi Jill,

Great, well-balanced post about this tragic situation. In my blog posts about the subject, as well in my dialogs on Twitter, I am constantly frustrated by those who are so one-sided that they don't even seem to take the time to read what I am writing, and instead opting to jump to wild (and often way off-base) assumptions about my beliefs, simply because I am writing from Israel.

In addition to your extensive list of resources, I'd like to recommend the "English Writing Israeli Bloggers" aggregator, which can be found at: http://english.webster.co.il/

I've also written several posts on the subject, which can be found on my blog, "something something", at: http://lizarosenberg.wordpress.com

 

As we say in this neck of the desert, life is something something...

 

Side by side

Liza - Thanks for reading and commenting, and offering those links - to your writing as well. I discovered you a couple of days ago but have been so overwhelmed that I have nearly 250 tabs open in Firefox and I STILL think I'm going to find a way to write about them all - even though they're slowing my computer down horrifically!

Another aspect anyone who seriously wants to consider how to end the violence, permanently, should think about is what the two more or less cohesive populations have done to self-organize. We talk about a democracy being a government through which the vote is how you show what you support and don't. Now, I hav a lot of criticism for the coalition gov't style - it's way too unstable for my tastes. But the fact that Israel has not fallen apart completely, internally, over 60 years, with so many factions, is very telling about the strength of the country and society as a whole.

On the other hand, Fatah, Hamas and what other factions within the Palestinian population have achieved how much and when?  They seem, from where I'm sitting (so I AM in need of correction from those who know more - or have some good resources at hand), to be incapable of putting together ruling governments with multiple perspectives - because they welcome or want multiple perspectives. I see this as part of what Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia fight against as well - they recognize the lack of homogeneity and seek ways to keep their societies together without demanding allegiance to on single way of life. Iran, on the other hand, seeks to do the opposite.

Now, if there's to be any global influenceon that part of the world, it seems that we get back to this one state or two state solution question, but not only that, I wonder - how can Hamas, or PAlestinains, truly want one state when that one statecould very well be one that demands homogeneity in culture and religion? There is something very oxymoronic about democratically electing people into leadership who do not want to govern democratically.

And yet - if that's what people want...?

Clear as mud. :)

Stay safe there.

Jill Writes Like She Talks

 

Hey Jill,Very rightly

Hey Jill,Very rightly written. I hope people across both the communities realise that fighting and bombing each other is not a very wise way to prove your point.Being from India, a country which has been rocked recently with terrorism, I sympathise with those who have lost their family members and for them, this war will achieve nothing.

 

 

India's difficulties

Are not all that different in some ways from those of the Israelis and Palestinians. 

What is so important to never forget is that the macro problems the media and all of us are susceptible to being distracted by are mostly fabricated - the violence? It does not have to exist. It exists as a tactic, pure and simple, to shroud, give over for other equally or in this case more violent tactics.  But they all become blue smoke and mirrors that obscure what are, in fact, if we were to be honest, intractably different desires.  Sadly, it is those intractably different desires - one-state versus two-state - that cause me to get rather hopeless.

Jill Writes Like She Talks

 

On martyrs...

Shalom Jill,

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (Detroit, Michigan, 23 June 1963) once famously said:

If a man hasn't discovered something that he will die for, he isn't fit to live.

It seems to me that our condemnation of martyrs is akin to the taunting of good students by bad for being a teacher's pet or tyring to show off.

We have our own long distinguished history of martyrs that include Rabbi Hillel and the defenders of Masada.

Our rabbis taught that there are only three Mitzvot for which we are
allowed to martyr ourselves: not murdering, not raping and not denying
god (some say this last only applies to a community leader speaking
publically.)

In all other cases, we are to chose life and not death: if a gun is put to your head on Yom Kippur and you're told to eat a ham sandwhich or you die, you eat the sandwhich.

If asked what we would die for, nearly everyone would say their family, but beyond that, what would each of us die for?

B'shalom,

Jeff Hess

 

Thank you very much, Jeff

(Jeff is a personal friend and wonderful Ohio-based blogger.)

I do recall that now, thanks for the reminder. 

What do you think, then, about this distinction re: how our cultures view martyrdom and the roll that plays both in strategy and resolution?

I think it is part of what makes the desires of Hamas or so-called Islamists (I'm still really uncomfortable with that word because I'm not 100% sure of its distinctions - I need to do more learning on that) so incompatible, at this stage, with any desires that differ from theirs because of what valuing martyrdom does to your "toolbox" of tactics.

I've been crying in the car all afternoon as I've been shlepping my kids. I am incredibly sad and angry as Israel's ground troops enter Gaza.

Jill lWrites Like She Talks

 

A Thoughtful and Insightful Post

Jill, 

Thank you for tackling such a difficult issue and providing the resources.  I personally appreciate your insights into how we ALL view Middle East issues through the lens of multiple personalities.

As a Christian who is studying the Jewish roots of my faith, I have a deep love for the Jewish people.  I recognize their ancient ties to the region and their right to exist as a nation.  I admire the courage of a nation that struggles to not only survive but thrive while surrounded by enemies. Yet I often find myself in strong disagreement with the policies of their government. On the other hand I can not see why the Arab nations do not set aside land for a Palestinian homeland. 

As a woman, I empathasize with the mothers of every child in that region, both Palestinian and Israeli.  I can not imagine raising children under the constant threat of war.  As a humanitarian and a liberal, I find the suffering of the Palestinian people untolerable.  And as a student of history I see the Middle East conflict as the result of failures in the British Mandate and the United Nations Partition Plans to take into account the cultural and religious divisions in the region. 

It is hard to imagine that a political or military solution will ever resolve the Israeli/Palestinian conflict since both groups have such strong cultural and religious ties to the same patch of land.  The only solution seems to be a national policy which seperates Church and state as well as a dramatic change in the hearts of the people which allows for co-existence and tolerance. 

Pamela Lyn

 

I agree w/you re: possible solution

I think the way you state it is perfect, "The only solution seems to be a national policy which seperates Church
and state as well as a dramatic change in the hearts of the people
which allows for co-existence and tolerance."  But...part of why Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan do not support Hamas (nor does Fatah) is because of Hamas' support of inextricably tying state and religion.  Egypt et al prefer a more secular straddle and, in fact, don't we see how Turkey and other countries are struggling with this - Iraq and Iran for that matter.

I still think that the U.S. represents one of the better incarnations of what the separation of church and state look like, but we have many problems with it too.

Ok- someone needs to give me some HOPE!! :)

Jill Writes Like She Talks

 

War, not a new invention

Before I can take a shot at hope, I would just like to remind you that Mugabe still controls Zimbabwe. He is starving and killing his own citizens, and yet because he has power and offers power to some, he is able to keep on top. And even here, in the US, despite protests and obvious law breaking, bush and co started an absolutely unnecessary war killing thousands for no valid reason. The world is not guided by balanced arguments and discussions. It's not even guided by pundits and professors.

So now to hope. Okay, I'm stymied. Hope would require a change of mindset and worldview. It would require that two peoples who have built absolutely no trust in the other for their lives trust in the other. It would require that one side not celebrate the death of someone from the other side, and it would require someone from one side not think that the other's ultimate goal is its destruction. I also think that until the war or conflict or whatever it is between radical Islam and the West is resolved, this has no chance of truly being resolved, because at this point it is not just about the Israelis and the Palestinians, but about the direction the world will take.

I hope (yes, there's hope here afterall) that compassion will win out because, as we have seen, the passion for power and control and selfishness hasn't made for a very comfy bed to lie in.  

Laura, www.RebelliousThoughtsofaWoman.com

 

Mugabe and friends

You are of course right - there are leaders of many nations who rule in ways that violate the humanity of their own people.  

I also agree for the most part with your description of the intractable nature of the conflict we're discussing. In fact, it's why I ask for someone to spin this toward hope because frankly, it seems to me that radical Islam - or whatever the form of ideology it is that's being embraced by Hamas and possibly Gaza's residents & other Palestinians, has no room for compassion outside of...I'm not sure how large the swath of compassion goes.

I believe that the main restraint on Israel until now has been public opinion, compassion and the belief in itself as a democracy. But in fact it's that last that I most often fault Israel - it needs to develop the nationality of being Israeli - something it's been trying to do and has succeeded in part at - and not as a solely Jewish state - in order to pass muster for me as a democracy.

This is also why I'm scouring my sources for news of what's happening with the 1.7 million Israeli Arabs right now - because I believe that the level of support or disintegration we see in that population's identification with Israel will be very telling about the future.

JillWrites Like She Talks

 

Democracy in a time of war

Is there any democracy that heeds all of its citizens' voices? I think not. Israel and the generals who always seem to be at its helm (either officially or not) will never be a true democracy as long as it keeps needing to fight wars, or feel like another war is imminent. Just as bush used the "I'm keeping you safe" mantra to get into office again, so, too, the party or person who proves that he can be the biggest "protector" will generally win, for good or for bad.

When I left in 2000, before the second intifada started and people were feeling secure, the religious/secular discussion was really ramping up. That would be a better place to be than this--yet another war.

Regarding the Israeli Arab population, I saw that there was a protest in the tiny town of Deir el Assad, near where I used to live in the Galilee. Their situation is so unfair that I just don't see how they can be seen as the voice of Israeli democracy. If I'm not mistaken, their social services and educational services are far below the standards for Jewish Israelis. The mantra that they're still better off than Arabs in other lands needs to be put to a rest and real movement needs to be made. Until they are no longer discriminated against, it's not fair to expect them to be fully Israel-identified.

Laura, www.RebelliousThoughtsofaWoman.com

 

More thoughts

This blog has a few notes about different Israeli Arab incidents -none in the area you mention - one or two at least in The Triangle but I think from yesterday and/or the day before - not 100% recalling which.

Now - the better off than Arabs thing - I can't offer an opinion on that - how could I.  What I've written, however, is based on what I heard directly from Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews who work w/groups like Givat Haviva , and that is that they have said that they (the Israeli Arabs) would prefer to be in a democratic Israel than a Palestinian-run country. Now - if you want to debunk that, I can understand - there are several studies in the last 10 or so years that have come up with similar stats - all something like 65-95% from what I've seen.  Certainly a variation but still a very clear majority.

Again - I visited West Bartaa which is the Triangle and met the mayor his own words were that his son, who is in his 20s, identifies "100%" as an Israeli but works and seeks everyday, in life, to achieve parity with Israeli Jews - legally and on all fronts.  Those are the father's words - he is a man in his mid to late 50s I would say.

About that religious-secular thing - you are not kidding! That deserves an entire post of its own.  Having not been there for 23 years, I was in shock at just how the religious were in Jerusalem - it was really unsettling.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts - I hope you will write more, perhaps in your own entry? Hint hint.

JillWrites Like She Talks

 

Citizens All

I'm not saying that Israeli Arabs would switch over to a Palestinian state, because most of what I have heard and read also says that they want to stay in Israel, that it is their country. What I was just saying is that they should not be used as a barometer of public opinion there.

I just posted a piece that I wrote a posted few days ago on my blog in BlogHer.  

Laura, www.RebelliousThoughtsofaWoman.com

 

Thanks for clarification, your post

For those interested (like me) in reading Laura's post about this, here it is (I think that's the right one!).

Also - I agree - they are not a barometer of public opinion for Israel.  I sense them to be a barometer, however, of the tension on nationality v. identity which is a critical dynamic in nation-building when you do not have a homogenous society.  Culturally, Arabs and Jews native to the area (from the Semitic countries as opposed to being in the Diaspora for generations) are not so different.  But the religion and the nationality - these complicate the allegiances.  So I am curious, interested in how that is holding, or not, for the Israeli Arabs.

Thanks again.

Jill Writes Like She Talks

 

 Thanks for the resources.

 Thanks for the resources. This is something so many are struggling with. I study under some of the most renown academics on the conflict, yet I can't come to terms with it. It it not simple and it leaves even those who have fought with the Israeli army confused.

Here is a brief post, not didactic in nature, from a blogger I read  who happens to have been in the Israeli army for three years.

 

I also suggest another book:

 

 

"The Iron Cage: The Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood"

 

Cooper

 

So many perspectives

Thank you for taking the time to comment and add those resources.

And of course it's so easy for someone like myself who is in a warm house, with plenty of food, doing mundane things like avoiding doing laundry while the world is literally being fought tooth and nail over there.

Without getting all and overly existential, it sometimes feels to me like God is just watching these two siblings continue to try and figure this out.  And God is not playing the parent role in terms of stepping in and saying you must share the one land you have because in this situation, there is nothing to go out and get so that each side can both have their own Tickle Me Elmo.

Would that it were that simple.

Jill Writes Like She Talks

 

Elmo, the new mideast mediator

I'm not a big believer, questioner is more my role, with that said, in my worldview this constant war has nothing to do with God. In my understanding God is more of an ideal, a way of being morally and ethically good and caring--treat the other as you would like to be treated. Perhaps that is what everyone really needs to take to heart.

There surely is a difference between God and religion, where religion is what people (men) have made of God. It doesn't really matter who told who to live in Israel, or who told who that only certain people can live there because they are all there now. Let's stop with the fantasies and get on to reality, a reality that does not fantasize about the other side disappearing.     

(By the way, El is Hebrew for God, Mo is short for some men whose name is Mohammed, especially in the west. Interesting confluence of names. Maybe he really could be a good mediator.)

Laura, www.RebelliousThoughtsofaWoman.com

 

El Mo!

OMG - that is so funny! Of course!  I dated a guy whose last name is Elhai - we used to joke about that a lot re: the God part.

Well - Elmo could barely do worse, right??

Sigh. Thanks again, Laura.  I really enjoyed visiting your blog too. Will try to remember to add it to my blog's roll. :)

JillWrites Like She Talks

 

You talk sense, Jill

First of all, thank you. I have so many questions.

Second, I wonder whether you tell me about the status of Peace Now within Israel?  If I understand their argument, they see the encroachment of Israeli settlements as as needless provocation that helps generate Palestinian support for anti-Israeli violence. I keep looking for something on their website about what's going on in Gaza and I don't find anything.

I have many other thoughts and questions, but they are roiling and incoherent. I will likely come back to ask more soon.

 Shalom, Salaam, Pace

 

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

Peace Now

Kim - I don't know much more than you do but I can give you a few sentiments on the group and the settlements.

Peace Now's website has this resource page up for the current conflict and here's an article about their current effort in Israel, from Associated Content. And here's their site about the settlements - but you are right - it doesn't seem to be updated with anything since late November. (I found that link through this site - Addicted to War - which is bit more left of me but appears to have a long and good list of resources.)

I know that Peace Now was involved in organizing some of the library kind of discussions that have been occurring in NEOhio in the last week - I would guess they're doing the same around the country.

Peace Now, from what I know of discussing its efforts with people in Israel and Conservative branch Jews here (as opposed to Reform or Orthodox, not as in liberal-conservative), is that it is considered somewhat fringe.  I personally don't think it's so fringe at all - it is not, let's say, fringe in the way Meir Kahane was fringe in the other direction, or Neturei Karta is absolutely fringe (and they are the fringe of the fringe on the far right, the Orthodox Jews who say that Israel should not exist at all - and shouldn't have become a nation - because the Messiah isn't here yet - it's a whole other thing!).

Anyway - I believe that we must have efforts like Peace Now - I don't think they are fringe to the point of being detrimental (i.e., inciting violent resistance - their names is after all Peace Now) - because they pound away at the misery caused across the board.  They humanize without exaggeration or hyperbole.  I have found what they offer in terms of information and approach to be reality-based - not an appeal to cultish religious ideals but rather more of a one planet, we have to share it kind of thing.

As for the settlements, I've always been against them. I do not believe in such provocation - at all - as a negotiator in any setting.  Provocation is to be used only at the most critical times and in the most restricted of settings with the most specific of goals and with parties who absolutely know one another (this is part of why I cannot hold Hamas or the Palestinians blameless for the cycle - no matter how much of everything else I agree with in regard to Israel's culpability - and I do hold the Israeli gov't culpable too).

What continues to baffle me, however, is the failure for anything positive to have transpired since the 2005 disengagement.  How long do we allow a population to blame for all the years before? Now - is it reasonable? Can all the history really be what has prevented Gazans from doing much since disengagement? Or has a lot gone on and we've not heard about the progress? I completely am open to that possibility because I have not gone looking on my own.

But that is really a digression.  I don't like the settlements, I don't like the attitude of the settlers, in general not all of course and I support dismantling some of the ones on the W. Bank.  I say some because there are some on the West Bank that in fact are so integrated with their Arab neighbors there that to pull them out would completely destabilize the economies, truly. Efrat is one such settlement and is one that I spent time visiting when I was in Israel in August.

So - as a general rule, I agree w/you and Peace Now re: the settlements.  But disengagement would still need to be done in a planful way - we are still talking about thousands of people and families - AND...although it shouldn't matter to Israel re: disengaging, as a foreign onlooker, I would really PREFER to know that Fatah has some specific, funded plans for what they will do with those areas once the Israelis are gone.

I hope that helps a little.

Thanks for asking. 

Jill Writes Like She Talks

 

1/5/09 Resource update

I just wanted to provide a few more things for people to read, to try and get away from some of the grrr grrr grrr that is going on from both sides, toward both sides.

The images, the stories, coming from both sides are completely intolerable and tonight I wrote on my Facebook Wall, "somebody please make it stop" after I read this story in Editor & Publisher about a journalist whose father died in an IDF bombing in Gaza.

But then there are videos of the IDF showing you just how civilian homes in Gaza are used to store explosives and rockets and other weapons, and just more and more and more stories.

So - here are some:

First, Jack at Random Thoughts continues to provide daily and sometimes 2x/day roundups with excellent links from both the MSM and blogs, from across the spectrum.  Here is his update 9.5 (and that link includes links to all the other updates).

His roundup includes this post from a blogger in Bahrain but I would really urge you to look around that particular blog. I think that gentleman represents what it means to be Muslim and be secular and it's in his presentation that I see hope - if it can get into action, into leadership. I could be wrong about the blogger, but that's the sense I got.

Here is an interesting Newsweek column to which I can relate, Israel's Arabs Are the Answer. If you've read some of what I've written regarding the time I spent in Israel in August 2008, then the sentiments expressed in the column will sound familiar: the wisdom of integrating, incorporating the Israeli Arab population 100%, on all levels.

Finally, the twitters continue and the battle in cyberspace - hacking facebook groups and all kinds of odd things.

And, while thinking about that, and finishing this update, while doing dishes just a few minutes ago,I thought to myself - duh - why can't we use these tools to build a wiki, or something, that puts together all the elements - fantastical and otherwise, of what a path to peace - from this moment forward - would look like. Spell it out, literally.

I'm off to tweet Prof. Kim and a few others.  Anyone who wants to work that social media idea, let's just do it! I've completely had it with this violence and violent word wars.

 

Jill Writes Like She Talks