Bio
For now, I can only marvel that I am still here. I am fairly grumpy, willfully sardonic but have occasional outbreaks of perkiness - though I underst...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

GoDaddy and the Dead Elephant in the Room

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 14
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Bob Parsons, the CEO of GoDaddy - the Ted Turner/Hugh Hefner of web hosting - recently posted a video that shows him killing an elephant bull in Zimbabwe. The highly emotional online backlash against Parsons and his company has been swift. While animal folks cry "Murderer!" and call for boycotts, hunters cheer him on and once again, nobody learns anything. As bad as it was for the elephant, this scenario is not any better for humans.

Parsons six-year relationship with Zimbabwe began with his interest in buffalo hunting. Talking to the locals, he learned of their plight. As Parsons explains it, he killed the elephant at the request of local farmers tired of having their sorghum fields trampled by the same elephant herd. As one might imagine, when a hunter is approached by a village pleading with him to kill a bull elephant, he is not going to investigate alternative methods, no matter how many there are. This is exactly what happened.

"It seems like perhaps Parsons and his company aren't necessarily the type of people with whom we'd like to do business, which is why GOOD has decided to pull all of its sites from GoDaddy.com. If you'd like to join us and let Parsons know you don't give money to colonialist misogynists, follow these 10 simple steps."
--GOOD, in a post entitled: "A Step-By-Step Guide to Boycotting GoDaddy.com"

Though the villagers tried various methods to scare off the herd - drum beating, setting fires, cracking whips - nothing worked. And so, a night hunt was planned and - quite literally - executed. He has explained in interviews that he shot the oldest bull in the herd, with the knowledge that another bull would quickly replace him. (Males are somewhat incidental in the elephant world. The ladies? Invaluable.) Today, an elephant expert - who was not there - chimed in, insisting that evidence illustrates the elephant was actually female.

"I wanted people to know what goes on over there. The fact that there is that type of poverty. People live in that type of situation that that's what's happening. It takes a guy like me - and there's just a few of us - to go into the field at night, when a herd is there, to isolate a bull, shoot the bull. The rest leave immediately and don't return and the crops are saved… The one voice that's not being heard in all this are the people that live over there. They are the ones saying, 'Please come back. Please do this again.'"
--Bob Parsons, explaining why he posted the video in a CNN interview with Brooke Baldwin

No matter Parsons true intentions, posting the gruesome video with great bravado and painting himself as a hero to beleaguered Africans was an asinine move. It is not the actions of a humanitarian, it is the behavior of a bloodthirsty braggart and it smacks of colonialism. And those orange GoDaddy caps on the villagers ripping at the elephant carcass? Way to exploit that branding opp, Bob.

As a successful businessman who makes his living off the Internet, his surprise over the vitriolic response is alarming. Beyond maintaining his own bizarre vlog, does he travel anywhere else on the Web?

Furthermore, does the man not have a publicist? Or even a VP? How about a best friend? Were they on vacation that week? Good lord. Even a herd of Bimbii would know better. (I hear they are trampling fields of Prada knock-offs in China. Tragic.)

"The elephant population in Zimbabwe has now reached crisis proportions and large-scale die-offs are probably imminent and unavoidable. Severe impacts on the environment and bio-diversity will continue for some time, even if population-reduction measures could be initiated rapidly. However, the resources needed to implement effective control and subsequent monitoring are lacking....A combination of culling and some contraception or sterilization would probably be the best solution. Local opinion would favour culling alone but the arguments for this course are not generally supported internationally."
--Conclusions from a 2001 report: "The elephant population problem in Zimbabwe: Can there be any alternative to culling?"

Nevertheless, having camped in Zimbabwe and spent time with its citizens, I have to concede that Parsons makes a few valid points. It is very difficult for the Western mind to understand African life and the unique challenges that come with it. Not only did I witness this

  • 14
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Heather Clisby 5 pts

D,

Thanks for stopping by and giving me the best compliment of all. I've learned a lot since posting this, thanks to our smart readers.

Cheers,

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal & Wildlife Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

dianaelee 5 pts

I've learned a lot from your article and these comments. Thanks for initiating a sane conversation about these issues.

Visit me at Somebody Heal Me: The Musings of a Chronic Migraineur ( http://somebodyhealme.dianalee.net )

Follow me on Twitter @somebodyhealme ( http://www.twitter.com/somebodyhealme )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Bingo! Thank you for stating this clearly. The encroachment of humans into wildlife habitat is a problem that is happening all over the globe. No solution in sight.

(If we were news anchors, I would totally hand the microphone over to you at this point.)

As to your last point, the locals are very poor and do not have access to the firearms they found so handy in Parsons hands. That being said, I have to agree that there should be a more clever solution from the people who live with these animals.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal & Wildlife Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Nancy,

Thanks for reminding me to mention that the GoDaddy boycott is still an excellent idea. Whatever can bring enlightenment to this man couldn't hurt.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal & Wildlife Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Thanks for the link - fascinating interview. You made a great point until you went off the rails with the name-calling.

Your final paragraph was entertaining at best. You are TOTALLY on to the shallowness of me and my dubious retirement plan.

Hugs!

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal & Wildlife Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

You paint a scary picture, Jeannie May. I like to think that good people will prevail and not let such a terrible scene occur.

Mostly, I pray that someone smarter and kinder than Parsons will make the trip to Zimbabwe and offer a less lethal solution to those farmers.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal & Wildlife Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Lucretia,

I can't tell you how much I appreciate your response here because it was a tough post to write. Bob Parsons isn't exactly the kind of guy I want to stand behind but I tried my best to look at the bigger picture.

I think it struck a chord with me because of all the time I spent trying to explain the difficulties of African life to the average American. Solutions to challenges are often brutal and unsavory.

At this point, I'm just pleased that anyone - even those who disagree - managed to read the entire post!

It will be interesting to see if we hear any more from Parsons on this and if he learned anything at all.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal & Wildlife Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Hey Shelley,

Thanka for providing these disturbing links. (I realize that sounds sarcastic but I'm quite serious.) That last one - whew! You're right about Mugabe holding the strings to, well, everything in Zimbabwe and you make a great point about the numbers being debatable.

However, I stand by my assertation that it is very easy for us to pass judgment on the best way to deal with the situation but we are not the ones with very few resources watching our food being trampled over and over again.

Believe me, Parsons "hero" persona does not hold up at all, but at this rate, he has brought attention to an issue that very few people - myself included - were giving much thought to previously.

The second link you sent provided a quote that wraps up this entire issue in one phrase: "...humans are encroaching more and more into areas previously reserved for wildlife."

Funny, I keep hearing the same thing here in the US, and nobody has to lie about it.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal & Wildlife Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

nellewrites 6 pts

(without condemning or praising anyone, because I haven't thought that element through to suss out my view) human and not elephant overpopulation?

That does nothing to solve the current plight of people trying to feed themselves, that I recognise. I am curious why a local didn't take out the elephant. I find it hard to believe an American was needed to take out an African elephant.

nellewrites ( http://nellewrites.wordpress.com/ )

Nancy Hill 6 pts

Most people won't ever realize that Bob Parsons is an a**hat and that supporting Go Daddy is a bad idea for oh so many reasons. But those of us who do, well, we have the ability to vote with our wallets. That is what I'm doing. I'm gradually shifting all my domain registrations with GD to an account I set up with eNom. There are a lot of other registrars too. Working with a top level registrar is definitely the way to go if you if you have multiple domains to manage. But you do have to transfer money in $100.00 increments into your purchasing account at eNom.

Nancy

Web: N. F. Hill ( http://www.nfhill.com )

Political Blog: Build Peace ( http://buildpeace.blogspot.com )

Joe Blow 5 pts

I really think you should do a little more research on Zimbabwe (including how Mugabe destroyed the farmland singlehandedly then corruptly charges foreigners etc.) before mounting ANY defense of Parsons here, it makes you look uninformed at least, and a SHILL/lackey at worst.

Here's a starting point for your education:
http://www.aolnews.com/2011/04/01/zimbabwe-conserv... ( http://www.aolnews.com/2011/04/01/zimbabwe-conserv... )

Now please stop kissing up to people just cause they have a lot of money and stand up for the "right thing". You only live once and nobody ever wished they had sucked up to more jerkoff CEO's on their deathbed.

jeanniemay 5 pts

I am disgusted by Parsons. I am angry that some people think this kind of action is okay ... and brag about it.

Just wondering what will happen when people decide we should start this type of senseless murdering because of human over-population or when our neighbour decides to steal from our crops or when the neighbour tramples our gardens.

GeekMommy 5 pts

I've been avoiding most of the coverage of this, because there's only a certain amount of "the horror! the horror!" anyone can read before you start thinking "seriously? This stopped being about the elephant and started being about this week's Internet drama awhile ago."

But for some reason I clicked over to read this and am pleasantly surprised.

Is Bob Parsons living in his own bubble? Definitely. He's clearly in need of a reality check. The Zimbabweans you've mentioned are without electricity are not going to be watching his video online and saying "Yes! Thank goodness!" The audience for anything like that is going to be a Western one. One that doesn't consider elephants to be "crop pests" or "dangerously overpopulated" - but one that sees them as rare creatures only seen in zoos, circuses (let's not get started on that), and on film.

The video he posted? Would've offended our sensibilities just as much if it had been a deer, bear, or any of the other animals you listed in comparison. At least, those of us who are not hunters.

He seems to have forgotten that most of America gets its meat at the grocery store - neatly packaged so as not to remind anyone that it was once an animal that had to be killed. We are no longer a nation of people that has to adjust to the reality of the food chain means *killing* other animals. That kind of nation will not celebrate with him when they are exposed to his actions. Where Zimbabweans might? They are not the ones watching.

This post is amazingly balanced, thank you. My heart goes out to the elephant - as well as the villagers. But Parsons clearly needs to figure out that he lives in the US and here, very few will sympathize, let alone approve.

Lucretia (aka GeekMommy) Raising a child in a digital world, still a digital girl

shelleyp 5 pts

And everything you say is based on the presumption that the number of elephants quoted--100,000--is actual rather than fabricated by the Zimbabwe government (read that, Mugabe), in order for Zimbabwe to participate in an extremely lucrative, legal ivory market.

http://www.newzimbabwe.com/pages/dinasaur2.11631.h...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/28/zimbab...

You're taking the word of people who have not proven themselves to be trustworthy. And you've totally discounted the commercial hunting firms that offer up a bagged elephant for the grand sum of $45,000 (US), some of which is most likely also kicked back to Mugabe, et al.

Regardless, if there were a problem with elephants in the area, do you really think the people would be dependent on a wannabe poseur like Parsons?

If you want to know the most likely truth behind Parsons' actions, I suggest you look elsewhere.

http://www.zindelesafaris.com/zimbabwe_prices.htm