Bio
Susan Mernit is a consultant with a practice focused on hyperlocal news, community & civic engsagement and the future of news (see houseoflocal.o...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

The Governor’s Mistress: A Bermuda Love Triangle

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

It was an affair that started online, one of those flirtatious friendships between people who live far away and are very different that turned into a level of honest communication in can be hard to have in everyday life, in real time. Two people far away who emailed and chatted and shared their hearts, taking about the love they wished for and were seeking but did not have and how this chance to connect online, through chats and photos and emails, gave them each something that felt really good.

Only as time went on, their relationship moved into the real world. What had been a dream connection, a cyber-love, turned into a real love. A love that, because it was so unexpected by the two people involved, became even more treasured for its passion. A love that proved to him something essential was missing from his life till now, and proved to her that deep, transformative love still existed.

Only how could these two long-distance lovers allow their relationship to evolve? Living two different lives, thousands of miles apart, how could this successful man, married, a public figure with kids, and this beautiful woman, divorced, with children, and a career woman herself, figure out a way to go forward that would not destroy everything else they had?

The plot of a Danielle Steel novel? The latest plot line from The Hills? Jodi Picoult’s newest short story?
Nope, this is the story of South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford, a proposed Republican Vice Presidential candidate in the 2008 elections, and his relationship with Maria Belen Chapur, an Argentinean divorcee and television reporter for whom Sanford went “disappearrado” for four days in June  2009 when he flew to Buenos Aires to see her without telling anyone where he was going and without leaving anyone else in charge of his state (What if he had been Vice President and done that?)

“He’s hiking the Appalachian Trail,” his (hapless) staff told the press, though it soon came out Sanford has flown south with the knowledge of his wife, determined to end an illicit relationship that fed his heart but conflicted with both his marriage vows and his morals.

Women—and men—in South Carolina are flocking to support Jenny Sanford, the Governor’s wife, who told press she asked her husband to move out two weeks before his trip to Argentina, and who refused to play the supportive wife at a press conference with her (repentant) spouse, instead telling the media, “His career is not a concern of mine. He's going to have to worry about that. I'm worried about my family and the character of my children.”

A recent profile in the Washington Post painted Jenny Sanford as an adultery survivor, refusing to condone her husband’s mistake. However, reports that Gov Sanford has known and corresponded with Maria Belen Chapur for many years, the friendship turning physical in 2008, makes me wonder how much Jenny Sanford knew and condoned, and how much this relationship was conducted with her awareness.  

Certainly, the media reported that Sanford’s trip to Buenos Aires was the second in a year, with the earlier trip made with Jenny Sanford’s approval since the intent of that visit was to break the adulterous couple up (that clearly didn’t work.)

Is it possible that Jenny Sanford kicked her husband out of the house in June 2009 not because he’d fall in love with—and gotten physical with—someone else back in 2008, but because the world had found out?

Could it be that Jenny Sanford’s need to focus on her own character—and step away from her partner-- was a response not to her husband’s loss of romantic love for her (which she had to have experienced MUCH earlier), but to how the world might judge her if she did otherwise--especially since a set of emails between her husband and his lover had been acquired and published in the local papers that made it clear how her husband was deeply smitten with Maria Belen Chapur.

Or, to put it another way, how much was the conflagatory infatuation between Sanford and his paramour a symptom of the death of the Sanford’s married romance, and how much was it the cause?

Reading the week’s worth of love letters  from July 2008 made public and published by The State newspaper in June 2009, the themes that strike me are Chapur and Sanford’s surprise—and deep appreciation—at experiencing ]love (or

  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
storkclub 5 pts

Love triangle never work out coz there is always the one who will be loved more than the other. Thanks for the Blogosphere, I will check them out

Stork Club ( http://www.storkclub.com )

Nordette Adams 6 pts

I've got so many mixed feelings on this that all I can say is good post, Susan. Otherwise, I'll end up spending time writing reams on the Sanford triangle when I know I have actual work I need to do for my personal survival. 

Nordette Adams ( http://www.bookotopia.com ) is a BlogHer CE ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) & you can find her other stuff through Her 411 ( http://her411.com ).

avflox 5 pts

Excellent summary of the situation, Susan. I had thought about the probability that Jenny knew, but that didn't matter to me as much as what I saw unfolding between Mark Sanford and Maria Belen Chapur in those letters. In Jenny's position, I'm not sure I wouldn't have done the same. I don't know. I've never been in her position (perhaps because I lived a don't-ask-don't-tell tacit agreement).

Actually, I don't know whether I ever told you--the night after we had drinks at the Standard, I received a call from my ex-husband (then husband), who was out of town for a few weeks, I think in Florida. He dialed me on accident, and I could hear him speaking about how he was wild and had been wilder in his younger days and a woman, laughing. I remember listening to this, all the way back to Beverly Hills, not because I wanted to hear what was being said, but because I didn't know how to respond.

Finally, it occurred to me that I didn't want to know. So I hung up and I never mentioned it. I still don't know. People have needs, I won't be able to meet all of them. If they need a supplement, then I believe they should find it and never let me know.

If they find a replacement, on the other hand, then please, by all means, let me know.

Bill Cammack 5 pts

I wrote about this almost a full year ago, in August 2008 in "Political Sex Scandals" ( http://billcammack.com/2008/08/10/political-sex-sc... ).  Basically, you can't get ahead in politics without being "A family man".  This is what makes politicians more prone to "affairs" in the same way that the restrictions on Catholic priests have the effects they have on them.

In Sanford's case, he couldn't just quit his wife and hook up with Maria, because, as you state, his political career would have been over.  A CEO or even an assembly-line worker could have made the change instantly, with zero repercussions.

Politicians are trained to get or perhaps take what they want.  They're trained to debate with other people and get their way, for the sake of their constituents.  Then, you want these same men to NOT get what they want romantically/sexually.  It doesn't make any sense.  You're asking men trained to be powerful to act powerless.  This is why they sneak off and "get theirs" behind everyone's backs until they get caught.

Whose fault is it?  Sanford's.  And Spitzer's.  And Clinton's.  AND, AND, AND, AND, AND.....  They're the ones that chose their professions, and they knew what was going to be required of them.  Everything was cool for them until they got caught slippin', and the truth came to light. 

~ Bill ( http://billcammack.com/ )
I blog at billcammack.com ( http://billcammack.com/ )

( http://billcammack.com )