Bio
Morra Aarons Mele is the founder of Women Online, a consulting firm for companies, not for profits and political campaigns seeking to mobilize women...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Hey media, can you stop star-f**ing Giuliani?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

“Today, in an effort to expand his base of political support, Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani announced that he will sell cocaine on his official online campaign store. In a speech today in New Hampshire, Giuliani explained "this product has helped me overcome my stupidity and allow me to pronounce absolutely insane things with confidence. I want to share this magic with the people. I do not allow anyone who passes a drug test to work on my campaign, nor should you. Also, we need to go to war with the moon, it is attempting to shift Daylight Savings Time and encroach on our glorious, edible soil." Campaign staff attempted to reach out to Bobby Brown for an endorsement, but Brown responded that "even I am not that insane...and I married Whitney Houston."


Ok, that’s Surfer Girl blogging. But it took you a minute to catch on, eh? For such a staunch conservative, Giuliani is extremely liberal with the truth. I’m sick of it. Hillary Clinton may dodge the truth, but she doesn’t ignore it. And the press is on her like a hawk. She’d never get away with the coverage Giuliani gets away with: what would have happened if Rudy gave the same answer to Tim Russert’s question in last night's Dem debate about driver’s licenses and immigrants in NY State(see Kate Sheppard at Tapped). A few years ago, Rudy might have agreed with NY Governor Spitzer, but now, he’d probably say we should round up illegal drivers and send them to a camp in New Jersey.


This morning on NPR, a reporter played a New Hampshire voter’s fawning clip about Rudy Giuliani (“he’s able to make fun of himself, he’s a real person”) as opposed to Romney (“he’s so slick…I don’t trust him”). Quote selection influences listeners' votes. Last week I went to a political horse race panel and all the influential, big time journalists and pundits were expressing wonder at Giuliani’s campaign-- “disciplined,” “Hard-hitting,” “went out in front and won the news cycle.”


If Rudy Giuliani becomes president of the US, America will go up in smoke within three years. But the press loves the guy. My husband said, “I can’t believe the press is star-fu**ing Giuliani like this. This is what they did to Bush in 2000 and look where we are now.”


I’m not a journalist. I am not a media watchdog or a critic of journalistic practice. But I do ask you to listen critically to media coverage of Giuliani. Listen to the quotes from voters they select to speak. How do they frame him against others? How do journalists frame any candidate against others? (Click here for Chris Matthews and Rudy).

We’ve indeed been here before. Now, Al Gore is the much-admired “Goreacle,” but during the 2000 campaign, journalists spurned Gore for Bush, a failed loser who was fun, charming, and great to have a beer with. An October article in
Vanity Fair sparked a conversation among journalists, urging them to examine the critical way they covered Gore. Evgenia Peretz writes,

“Eight years ago, in the bastions of the "liberal media" that were supposed to love Gore—The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, CNN—he was variously described as "repellent," "delusional," a vote-rigger, a man who "lies like a rug," "Pinocchio." Eric Pooley, who covered him for Time magazine, says, "He brought out the creative-writing student in so many reporters.… Everybody kind of let loose on the guy."

How did this happen? Was the right-wing attack machine so effective that it overwhelmed all competing messages? Was Gore's communications team outrageously inept? Were the liberal elite bending over backward to prove they weren't so liberal?”

And all too often, voters give Giuliani’s flip flopping a pass because he is seen as the only one who can beat Hillary, as Dana writes:

“In the back of my mind, I can't help but think that perhaps the GOP believes that Rudy Giuliani is the only candidate who can debate against Hillary, and therefore Brownback might endorse him to boost the former mayor's electabilty [sic].”

Dana, I don't think it's in the back of your mind. I think it's deliberate spin from the GOP powers that be, and the media's bought it, by and large. Is this perhaps what the media hopes for too? And is this why they put on rose colored glasses when it comes to Rudy?

I’ll be listening more carefully now. The press shapes voter opinions. I'm a blogger: I can rant and

  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Kim Pearson 5 pts

Hi Morra,
Yes, the focus on the horse race is a perennial problem -- an easy story to write -- the crabgrass of political journalism. Jay Rosen has a nice blog post ( http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthi... ) from 2004 that connects this style of reporting with the "inside the beltway" mentality that, too often, separates journalists from the concerns of the public whose interest they are presumably protecting. Even earlier, Timothy Crouse's The Boys on the Bus ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A373... ) identified the larger problem -- pack journalism -- that creates a journalism more responsive to the preoccupations of elites than the pressing concerns of the voting public.

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/kim-pearson )|Professor Kim ( http://professorkim.blogspot.com )|

Jenna Raby 5 pts

I'm from New York City, a proud survivor of September 11th. Let me tell you, Giuliani capitalized on a traumatized nation and is getting leverage and lift from the pure lack of sophistication of the American electorate. It is widely known and acknowledged among the press corps that Giuliani is a madman. Give me strength, I left New York to come to California to get away from psychos like Guliani. Keep the pressure on and keep educating everyone you know.

Jenna Raby
http://www.laborfair.com
Laborfair.com: good help is easy to find!
Blog: http://blog.laborfair.com

Catherine Morgan 5 pts

Even scarier than Guiliani in the white house, is the idea that the "media" could (more than likely will) ultimately be responsible for electing the next president. Why not just skip the elections...and let the media and the supreme court figure out what's best for this country? They obviously feel they know better than us, and at least we wouldn't have to worry about whether or not our votes were counted.

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
also at CatherineBlogs.com ( http://www.catherineblogs.com/ ) and The Political Voices of Women ( http://politicsanew.com/ )

moddivorce 5 pts

Arianna's got cajones to say that on national television - Thank goodness! Hopefully more interviews like these will air and shed light on Guiliani's antics. It would be devastating if the media moves this man into the primaries and then, into the white house!

Helene
The Modern Woman's Divorce Guide
http://themodernwomansdivorceguide.com

Catherine Morgan 5 pts

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
also at CatherineBlogs.com ( http://www.catherineblogs.com/ ) and The Political Voices of Women ( http://politicsanew.com/ )

Kim Pearson 5 pts

Perhaps more journalists should have been writing about this July, 2000 research ( http://journalism.org/node/355 ), which included these insights:

If presidential elections are a battle for control of message through the media, George W. Bush has had the better of it on the question of character than Albert Gore Jr., according to a new study of media coverage leading up to the Republican convention.

But in age of skepticism and fragmented communications, the public may not be getting—or believing—the message....

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/kim-pearson )|Professor Kim ( http://professorkim.blogspot.com )|

Morra Aarons Mele 5 pts

Kim

Thanks for sending this and setting straight my perceptions. Personally, I think the tide is turning in favor of nicer Giuliani coverage.

This part is scary, from the Shorenstein ( http://journalism.org/node/8187 ) report:
In all, 63% of the campaign stories focused on political and tactical aspects of the campaign. That is nearly four times the number of stories about the personal backgrounds of the candidates (17%) or the candidates’ ideas and policy proposals (15%). And just 1% of stories examined the candidates’ records or past public performance, the study found.

Yikes. Is this because coverage starts so early and there's so much airtime to fill? Is this a normal occurence?

cooper and emily 5 pts

Let's hope that many, many bloggers follow your lead and that together we give mainstream journalists real reasons to worry by looking over their shoulders and calling them out on their inherent bias and obssessive focus on the trivial.

The Vanity Fair piece, as good as it was at pointing a finger at the journalists most responsible for taking Gore down and giving Bush a free pass, came years too late. This go round, let's see it the critique happen in real time.

Emily McKhann
Website: The Motherhood ( http://www.blogher.com/www.themotherhood.com )
Blog: Been There ( http://www.blogher.com/www.beenthere.typepad.com )
BlogHer Contributing Editor: BlogHers Act ( http://www.blogher.com/blogher-topics/bloghers-act ) ( http://www.blogher.com/blogher-topics/bloghers-act )

Kim Pearson 5 pts

Hey Morra,
The Project for Excellence in Journalism has a new study, "The Invisible Primary." According to their their data ( http://journalism.org/node/8187 ), the coverage of both Clinton and Guiliani is negative, in roughly the same proportions. There's also interesting data on what the press covers versus what the public wants.

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/kim-pearson )|Professor Kim ( http://professorkim.blogspot.com )|