From my email inbox, dated 10:39:48 PM PDT Wednesday
Dear Lisa,
I wanted you to be one of the first to know: on Saturday, I will hold an event in Washington D.C. to thank everyone who has supported my campaign. Over the course of the last 16 months, I have been privileged and touched to witness the incredible dedication and sacrifice of so many people working for our campaign. Every minute you put into helping us win, every dollar you gave to keep up the fight meant more to me than I can ever possibly tell you.
On Saturday, I will extend my congratulations to Senator Obama and my support for his candidacy. This has been a long and hard-fought campaign, but as I have always said, my differences with Senator Obama are small compared to the differences we have with Senator McCain and the Republicans.
I have said throughout the campaign that I would strongly support Senator Obama if he were the Democratic Party's nominee, and I intend to deliver on that promise.
When I decided to run for president, I knew exactly why I was getting into this race: to work hard every day for the millions of Americans who need a voice in the White House.
I made you -- and everyone who supported me -- a promise: to stand up for our shared values and to never back down. I'm going to keep that promise today, tomorrow, and for the rest of my life.
I will be speaking on Saturday about how together we can rally the party behind Senator Obama. The stakes are too high and the task before us too important to do otherwise.
I know as I continue my lifelong work for a stronger America and a better world, I will turn to you for the support, the strength, and the commitment that you have shown me in the past 16 months. And I will always keep faith with the issues and causes that are important to you.
In the past few days, you have shown that support once again with hundreds of thousands of messages to the campaign, and again, I am touched by your thoughtfulness and kindness.
I can never possibly express my gratitude, so let me say simply, thank you.
Sincerely,
Hillary Rodham Clinton
So -- what do you think of this letter? Is this the heartfelt note to followers and gracious concession that will build a bridge to coalitions of voters and donors alike for Obama '08?
Jill Zimon describes Sen. Clinton's email with the headline Clinton's plea to supporters: Stakes too high not to rally behind Obama:
"There will be some people who won’t let her go - either as the candidate or for not using the words they want her to use with her supporters. That’s going to be their problem."
Sen. Clinton's email reads a little like what BlogHer user (and Obama supporter) Laracolvin sounds like she needs to get beyond a "charring" primary season:
What This Idealist Learned From the Primaries
"Happy post-primary. It is final...finally, and Barack Obama is the presumptive Democratic nominee. Somewhere inside me the swells of relief are meeting up with the waves of excitement and pride - but I'll be damned if I can unearth them to show you. See, anticlimatic is a mild description of what I'm feeling. Fatigued - too cliche. Weary - too connotated. Like a steak once pink and juicy left on the grill too long, I'm just plain charred by the past few months..."
In Hillary a la carte, Gloria Pan is, if anything, blunter. After extolling Sen. Clinton's virtues, she takes aim at the entourage in an imaginary conversation with Sen. Obama:
"We totally get it: Hillary et al is probably more than you want to or could swallow. What if, however, in exchange for making her your Number Two, Harold [Ickes] has to go serve in the Middle East for a few years, preferably in a part of the desert where the cellular service is spotty? And Bill [Clinton] could be US ambassador to England and hang out with old pal Tony, if he can get over Tony making George his new BFF before Bill’s seat in the Oval Room was barely cold. With both these dudes out of the country, you could have Hillary à la carte (with a little Chelsea on the side)."
Lefty BlogHer Contributing Editor Morra Aarons, equally blunt and a veteran of John Kerry's 2004 campaign, has moved on to what will win Democrats the election in November: Hillary Clinton isn't macho enough to be VP
What I'm not seeing much of, yet anyway, is an echo of the poll CBS News released yesterday about the fundamental difference Hillary Clinton's candidacy has made for women in public office.
"Hillary Clinton's campaign as the first serious female contender for the Democratic presidential nomination represents a shattering of the glass ceiling in presidential politics, a new CBS News poll shows. Most voters think that win or lose, her candidacy will make it easier for other women to run for president.
"Sixty percent of men and 76 percent of women agree that Clinton's candidacy will make it easier for future women to run for president.
"The historic nature of Clinton’s candidacy is reflected in the bipartisan nature of voters’ views on this question..."
So -- what do you think? Will Hillary's letter build bridges? Should she be VP or not? Is it possible to recruit her millions of supporters - or will they default to Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican candidate?
And one last question: Do you think more women will run for office now that Hillary has? Will you?
Comments
It's a great letter ...
... but I fear that many will be so jaded they won't take it at face value. I hope she delivers on the promises in that letter because the stakes are too high -- read: Supreme Court -- to let McCain have even one term in the White House.
As for VP, I think it would be a mistake for Hillary to take it -- after all the trumpeting of the first viable woman presidential candidate, should that person settle into the role of a "#2?" I think she should stay in the Senate where she could do a lot more good focuing on legislation, rather than carrying someone else's water.
PunditMom, Contributing Editor for Politics & News
Also at MOMocrats & MomsRising
That is an interesting poll
I really do appreciate everything Senator Clinton has done, as a woman, to lead the way even if it's still hard for this 3rd(4th?) wave feminist to acknowledge much of the sexism that still exists.
Do I wish she would have done it differently, sure. And I look forward to the next female candidate so we can really examine what has changed and the Senator's impact on that change.
I wish I could run for office, but something tells me I had best stick to blogging :) Maybe my daughter will run...
Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain
A Very Positive Letter
Hi Lisa,
I think it's a very positive letter and one that was required for the Democratic Party to start to pull together.
She's earned an offer of the VP spot running with Obama, but that pairing comes with several pitfalls and I would understand if he didn't choose her.
It might actually be better for the campaign if Obama picked someone else, but it would have to be someone with a very good background in foreign policy and an experienced knowledge of how to get things done in Washington.
Megan
BlogHer Contributing Editor, TV/YouTube
Megan's Minute
Video Runway
No bridges, but
This letter will certainly not build bridges to Obama supporters but I don't think it needs to. The key differences between Obama and Clinton are primarily in style, tone and approach to politics and leadership and around the margins of policy and in the underlying schools of thought in which their very similar policy proposals are based.
Clinton's message has been "what I will do for you" whereas Obama's has been "what we will do together." Each candidate's rhetorical approach appeals to their supporters and mystifies and does not appeal to supporters of the other. But it is just style and those who would vote for McCain based on bruised feelings and not for the candidate who offers much the same policies as does Clinton, did not support Clinton on substance in the first place. As Clinton's very strong supporter Hilary Rosen said "I am not a bargaining chip. I am a Democrat."
What will matter most is that Clinton vigorously and enthusiastically campaigns for the Democratic ticket. I believe she will.
And personally I don't want to see her as VP. I think the arguments regarding her delivering voters are based on faulty reasoning. An idea I like much better is that I would love to see her on the Supreme Court. I used to like the idea of Senate Majority Leader but now I think she could make a greater and certainly longer lasting impact on the court.
I hope and believe that her candidacy will serve as a catalyst for more women to run for office. I however will not be one of them. That is a decision I made as a teen after working in politics. And it has nothing to do with how women are treated. It has to do with how we treat people as human beings in politics. Plus campaigning is ugly, nasty and focused more on raising money than on policy work. I'd be interested in doing the work and service but I have no interest in being a highly scrutinized and judged beggar.
ConsumerPop Marketing
PopConsumer (Politics, Current Events & Links)
Beyond Help (Music, TV & Pop Culture)
That's a sweeping statement, with which I
disagree
Explain how I was thrilled and excited about both candidates, then, if each approach "mystifies and does not appeal to" the other side's supporters? That is just SUCH an assumption, not borne out, I should add by the data that the majority of both's supporters would have voted for the other.
I have been trying over the last couple of weeks to recapture the excitement I had over both candidates six months ago. I can do this because I finally realized that it was neither actual candidate who really let me down this election season, it was their most extreme supporters and their behavior. You, Maria, are a rare breed who can ardently support someone without bullying or excoriating those who are on the same side about 90% of the issues, and just voting for a different candidate. Many HRC and BO supporters were not so capable.
I don't follow mainstream media or the rightwing blogosphere that much, so the biggest disappointment I have is how much the Democratic and left-wing blogosphere and twittersphere disappointed me. There's a whole post I need to write about this, but until I do I will just keep reminding myself: I still like Obama and Clinton. Very, very much.
Elisa Camahort
BlogHer
elisa@blogher.org
You misunderstand my statement
I did not say that choosing one candidate for nominee means that I don't think supporters on either side won't vote for the other in the general election. That's why I think this whole "Hillary has to be VP or her primary supporters will not vote for Obama" argument is bogus. The voters and dynamics of primary and general elections are different. But Lisa asked if Clinton's letter will build bridges. I don't think it will nor do I think it has to. It speaks to her supporters and it doesn't speak to Obama supporters but that's not what will affect general election votes.
I'm talking about the hardcore supporters who are amplified and magnified in blog comments (everywhere but here), twitter and the media. I don't think I'm that rare of a breed it's just that people like me who don't bully generally don't comment or get shown on cable news because we don't make for good TV or YouTube.
And my statement is not that sweeping. I'm just saying that that letter like speeches from either of them are not going to appeal to or inspire the other's ardent fans. I read that letter and am annoyed by the tone. Ardent Clinton supporters are reassured and impressed. I don't like her approach or style and wince when I hear her speeches that emphasize "I" and "me." I am energized and excited by Obama's words. See Liz's comment below. Clinton inspires her and Obama does not. Laurie White has commented here that she has listened to Obama's speeches and doesn't get it and can't understand what I hear in them. And if Clinton were the nominee I would vote for her without question but not because of a letter that Obama would have written to his supporters in a style that reassured and appealed to us. No matter. We will all vote for the Democratic candidate because it is the issues that matter and both Obama and Clinton are both highly competent and qualified candidates.
That doesn't mean that I believe that it is not possible to like and be thrilled by each candidate. I started off open to the entire field of strong Democratic candidates but I became an ardent Obama supporter and increasingly disappointed in Clinton over the course of the campaign. Ultimately many people were much more passionate about one candidate than the other. I know that is because of style not substance and the rhetorical approach is part of that.
ConsumerPop Marketing
PopConsumer (Politics, Current Events & Links)
Beyond Help (Music, TV & Pop Culture)
Hillary's letter
I liked her speech on Tuesday, and I liked the letter and the request for letters. I wrote to her and expressed my hope and desire to see her as the VP candidate.
Personally, it is my intention to set up a regular contribution if she is on the ticket because I continue to find her so inspiring, which I won't do for an Obama ticket that doesn't inspire me. But then, it's not like he needs my money anyway. ;)
Liz Rizzo
I blog at Everyday Goddess.
(i'm just sayin' is all..)
Lisa Stone for President, 2012!
Dopp Juice.
http://www.doppjuice.com
it could be great if Hillary
it could be great if Hillary and Obama be The One and Second Person in Usa.
Goonie
Baby 1st Year Care