Bio
                                                 Since 2005 I've been blogging on politics and parenting for The Huffington Post. I am also an award-w...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

How the Assault on Planned Parenthood is Hurting Women

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

I suppose that conservatives aren’t going to be happy until they kill off Planned Parenthood. Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin just signed a two-year, $66 billion budget stripping the organization’s health clinics of their state and federal funding. His budget, I might add, was passed without a single Democratic vote. So you know how truly popular and nonpartisan it was.

Walker is by no means alone in his obsession with gutting Planned Parenthood. Conservatives in Indiana, North Carolina, and Kansas have also targeted the group. In May Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels of Indiana signed a law cutting all Medicaid funds to clinics that do abortions. No matter that federal funds can’t be used for abortion. (Really, how many times must this be said? Federal. Funds. Can’t. Be. Used. For. Abortion.) No matter that abortion reflects only a tiny percentage of the services Planned Parenthood provides. Or that the law will overwhelmingly hurt women who are working-class and poor and don’t have the increasing luxury of seeing a private ob-gyn. Planned Parenthood must be stopped!

Fortunately, Daniels was stopped instead. Last week a federal judge ruled the law unconstitutional, and ordered Indiana to resume Planned Parenthood’s funding. And just in time. In a statement, Betty Cockrum, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Indiana, said, “We’ve been caring for our established Medicaid patients through donations, which were set to run out on June 20.”

As for Wisconsin, the effect of Walker’s budget will be devastating. Planned Parenthood has 27 health centers across the state, many of them in small, rural communities where there aren’t a lot of health-care options. Those centers see some 73,000 patients a year. According to Planned Parenthood, 12,000 women who don’t have health insurance won’t be able to get preventive care now. And the rest? They’re just going to have look elsewhere for their pap smears, cancer screenings, birth control and breast exams. Oh, well!

Which, as it happens, won’t be easy. Walker's budget also cripples Wisconsin’s delightfully named BadgerCare, a family planning program that serves 53,000 women and men at various health-care facilities. Including--surprise!--Planned Parenthood.

Walker, if you’ll recall, is the GOP governor that briefly made headlines with his bold ideas about cutting the deficit until Republicans realized how loony and untenable they were. At this point he might want to rethink his budget. According to his own Department of Health, the BadgerCare family program actually saves Wisconsin $140 million a year.

But this is not about money or the deficit. It’s not even about abortion. It never has been. It’s about who gets to control women’s bodies. If conservatives truly cared about reducing abortion, wouldn’t they fight to increase education and funding for birth control? Apart from that reliable old method abstinence, wouldn’t they try to encourage young men and women to prevent unplanned pregnancies? At the very least, we’d be spared those dreadful teen pregnancy reality shows. Instead, even contraception is becoming fair game with this crowd.

I have a soft spot for Planned Parenthood. Like millions of American women, it was at one of their modest clinics where I had my first gynecological exam. It was the place where I learned about the importance of women’s health, and of taking care of myself. At the time I was a shy, terrified 19- year-old who didn’t know much about my body, much less about the mysteries of birth control. I knew I didn’t want to get pregnant, and needed advice. I will be forever grateful to the skilled doctor who cared for me that afternoon, as I lay on a metal table shivering in my hospital gown, who gave me that knowledge. Who made me feel safe.

I no longer go to Planned Parenthood. I have a wonderful--and very expensive--ob-gyn I’ve been going to since my first lovely pregnancy 21 years ago. My teenage daughter goes to see my doctor now, too. "I love her, love her!" she trilled to me, as we strolled down the hallway after her first visit. But if we didn’t have the costly private health insurance that enables us to see Violet, or weren’t able to afford a doctor, I know exactly where we’d turn.

women's health

Credit Image: Kelly Schott on Flickr

  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Evan Myers 5 pts

Women DO have the legal right to choose to become or not become a parent. The question is at what financial cost, free or pretty darn near free. However, men have NO (read zero) rights to choose after conception as women do. The government MUST give men the right to opt out of parenthood during the first trimester, just as women have the right to. That does not in any way interfere with women's right to choose. It's only the right thing to do. And, there is no "child" at that point, and there never has to be unless she makes that choice.

Evan Myers 5 pts

At least women have post-conception reproductive rights. If you want to complain about government control of our reproduction, imagine being a man and having NO control over your post-conception reproductive rights.

What if you're a 16 year old kid who made a mistake in not using protection? What if you're in college? What if you are poor and can't afford a child? What if you're in an abusive relationship? Why should you be forced to become a father?

If you're answer is to keep your legs, be sure to tell that to women seeking an abortion.

RebeccaMiller 5 pts

Even though I don't support Planned Parenthood, I agree with this post. If women feel that it is such an important organization why not raise the funds needed? Why must the federal government do the providing for such a controversial group?

RebeccaMiller 5 pts

My concern about Planned Parenthood is that it always seems to come across to me as very ideological and pushy of an agenda that the whole country certainly doesn't support. And I don't trust that the gov't funds are not going to support abortion. No, the funds will not cover the actual abortion but won't it cover education about abortion?

I would absolutely support a gov't organization that provides free medical care for women (and men and kids for that matter)...and I'm willing to pay tax dollars for it (I supported the attempt to get health reform passed), but I don't trust Planned Parenthood to do it.

AndiAnderson 5 pts

Abstinence only works for those who choose it for themselves. It's not something you can impose on others or institute in a free society. In the real world it has never worked and never will. PP provides education and options for women.

onblank 5 pts

Women can do anything that men can do. Policewomen, firewomen, chairwomen. Everything. Except that silly little thing about having sovereignty over their bodies. Every time there is an argument over tax dollars for abortion (which is already illegal, by the way), terrorist rhetoric is used to sway votes. And that rhetoric makes it even harder for women to make their own moral decision about abortion. It's about all the convincing I need to become an ex-pat when I hear that we're still having to fight this fight.

If you can not hit the drive through one night this week and send that money to your local Planned Parenthood, you'll be supporting an organization staffed with the most caring people I've ever met. People not motivated by money, or insurance. Their walls are plastered with posters about avoiding date rape. They offer low-cost health care to people that need it most. They educate when so many parents do not. My local office offers re-introduction classes for people who have escaped abusive polygamous communities.

A measly $15 from every woman outraged by the government trying to tell them they must use their bodies as if they were cornfields would make a world of difference to one of the few organizations that actually does some good and will help make a stand against the constant assault on women's reproductive rights.

Solidarity.

--Kristina

www.OnBlank.com ( http://www.OnBlank.com )

JOon Hancocky 5 pts

Not everyone wants to get married, but everyone wants to have sex. Educate people and subsidize contraceptives. Encourage abstinence if you want, sure--just don't bank on it.

Gianna Rae 5 pts

If people just didn't have sex with whomever they wanted whenever they felt the "urge," maybe there would be less unwanted pregnancies therefore less abortions and planned parenthood could go on with helping these people with their gynocological health without being known as Abortion Clinics.

Abstinence until marraige would solve many problems for planned parenthoood and for the rest of the people in this world.

Gianna Rae is a busy mom of 4 with many random thoughts traveling through her head which is why you can find her at A Traveling Thought. http://atravelingthought.blogspot.com

ThomasDeLorenzo 5 pts

to deny women access to free and basic health care is doing nothing less than destroying the future of our children. and the Repubs think gay marriage is to blame???? they really just have to look at their state budgets and see how little (or not) they are funding entities like Planned Parenthood. Even I, as a gay man, have used Planned Parenthood. It is a safe, trustworthy place to get health care, and have a sympathetic ear when you need it most. Even if you arent pregnant.

I ask Scott Walker -- would you deny your own wife a pap smear? Now go figure out your budget with that in your mind.

Destroy women and you destroy half of America.

Mona Gable 5 pts

So glad you mentioned Title X, Laura. That's another vital program that's being hammered and will only hurt families who need the help the most. Sigh. But I guess government isn't supposed to help people, right?

Mona Gable 5 pts

Some people don't like facts, I think. It gets in the way of their agenda.

lauracarroll 5 pts

Those going after PP say funding for health centers like it and others would help cut spending--The Guttmacher Institute says not so. It estimates that for every dollar invested in contraceptive care in particular, taxpayers save medicaid costs. With regards to Title X (which anti-abortion legislators also want to derail),the law "prevents about a million unintended pregnancies, about half of which would end in abortion."

But even if Title X and Planned Parenthood funding were tanked, people could still go to community health clinics--they would still have somewhere to go, right? Not likely, as the GOP wants to but a billion dollars from those as well.

So kill Title X and Planned Parenthood funding, and the places that are left, you will get more unintendend pregancies, more abortions, and more children being born to poor parents. Proposed cost cutting will surely be more likely to cost more money in the end.

At the heart of it, the bill's agenda is not about cost cutting — it is just another back door way to try and go after reproductive rights.

Laura Carroll

Childfree author of Families of Two

blogging at La Vie Childfree http://lauracarroll.com ( http://lauracarroll.com/ )

alexash 5 pts

My heart sinks with this. However many times the facts are presented, people do not see the wide range of support PP affords people.

Let's hope the donation matching that PP has going on through tomorrow brings in much needed support. Bravo to Amy Poehler for getting involved, too.