Bio
SJ is based out of Seattle, WA. Her fate to be a "Pop Culture Librarian" was sealed when she studied information behavior on a Britney Spear...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

I Wouldn't Walk A Mile for These Stilettos

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 8
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Perhaps you've heard about or have seen RJ Reynolds/Camel cigarette's newish No. 9 brand, which features a black box with pink detailing, and is ostensibly targeted at women? California congresswoman Lois Capps has led the outcry against Camel's marketing strategy, which in addition to using "girly" packaging, runs their No. 9 advertisements in popular glossy women's magazines that are often read by young women.

And the No. 9s must be doing well, because this fall, Camel is rolling out a spin-off of the No. 9 brand called "Stiletto," which is a longer, thinner version of the regular No. 9s.

So what's the problem? I first thought. Women (and men) can choose to smoke if they want, and I love pink, as do many of my friends. Everyone knows that smoking kills, but so do a lot of things. Then I did a little digging. Please don your tinfoil hats as we jump into the sinister world of women-targeted cigarette marketing strategies. The author is not responsible for resulting cynicism-induced grumpiness.

If you have not seen these cigarettes, have a look at the packaging below. The menthol variety looks similar, but uses a bright green in place of the pink.

Holy Clever Marketing, Batman! Even the camel is pink!

Aww, isn't that adorable? Wouldn't that go well with your flip phone and planner and pen and shoes? Why, these cigarettes would even match my hair! Bonus!

Then I looked closer at the ad campaign. In addition to the hot pink packaging, the print ads have a floral background and sometimes use the phrase "light and luscious," which to me evokes, I don't know, fruit salad or something healthy. Anecdotally, I have heard women I know say that they hesitate to "kick their butts" because they're afraid they will gain weight, and it seems that some teens cite weight loss as a reason to start smoking. "Light and luscious" started to seem a little more nefarious than I first thought.

Congresswoman Capps and others claim that the cigarettes are being targeted towards women, and specifically young girls. Why bother with this, I thought, when you could just recruit adult smokers with freebies, deals, and sexy ads? There are two probable reasons they are going after our girls. And I say "our" because I have a six-year-old who often looks over my shoulder as I flip through waiting-room fluff, and a young sister who makes me look about as hip as Maude Flanders. Many of us have young women in our lives, right?

The first reason and simplest reason is that, as many people know, cigarette companies need replacement smokers, since they are killing their most loyal customers. The industry needs 5,000 new smokers a day to maintain their current ranks and profits (this article also explains how cigarette companies target women, minorities, and teens).

The second reason seems to be more specific to Camel brand. It is estimated that only 30% of Camel customers are women, whereas 40-50% of Marlboro and Newport buyers are. But wait…let's be fair and let a RJ Reynolds spokesperson have a say:

"About half the audience is actually male," says David Howard. "The colors and the packaging simply accentuate the style and the premium nature of the brand."

Oh, I see. "Pink" means premium, now. Notice how he says, "audience" and not "customers." Very clever, Mr. Howard. There is also some anecdotal evidence that men are buying this brand, but COME ON. This looks to me exactly like every other cutesy pink item that has been marketed specifically towards women in the past few years, like ladies' toolsets, and the aforementioned phone, as well as pink items that benefit breast cancer research.

Finally, I wondered if there was truth to the notion that No. 9s were targeting young women, meaning teens. Gawker, known for its flip attitude and a penchant for facetiousness, argues that if Camel No. 9s were truly targeted at young girls, they would depict Hilary Duff dolls and so forth in the ads. But I think Camel's got it just right. Put the ads in magazines that young women look to for cues, showing them images of what they aspire to be: hip, grown-up, fashionable. The message that being a smoker is part of what being a hip, fashionable grown woman is comes though.

In a perverse way, things get more interesting when you look at the magazines that carry the advertisements and their reasons for

  • 8
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Super Jive 5 pts

Thanks for your comments. I am not across the board pro-government "interference," but I think it's for the greater good when it comes to the health of the population, overall.

Your Pop Culture Librarian also writes almost daily at I, Asshole ( http://iasshole.org ).

Lisalikesluck 5 pts

If they can get a 14 or 15 (and even younger) girl to start smoking, chances are almost 100% that she will smoke for life. Their staff psychologists who help to design the ads are some of the best in the business.

Czarina 5 pts

The taxes and restrictions being levied on cigarettes are extremely effective in reducing the smoking rate. I believe that it's down to..I want to say the high teens...in NYC after the smoking ban.

If one increases the financial cost and decreases access, this works better than blanket ad prohibitions.

Hard alcohol used to not be advertised on TV and marketing to kids directly was banned in the 70s. But until there are sweeping policy changes, targeting specific companies will not work, they'll just morph into something else and come up with another way to meet demand.

Stylefool ( http://www.stylefool.com )

Super Jive 5 pts

Oh, thanks, Maria! I appreciate corrections like that. I shall edit. I know that wikipedia isn't always up-to-the-minute.

Your Pop Culture Librarian also writes almost daily at I, Asshole ( http://iasshole.org ).

Mata H 5 pts

The only thing that shocks me about this campaign is that anyone is surprised by it. We are a greedy capitalistic country and allow cigarettes to be legally produced and sold despite evidence of the dangers. We allow cigarette companies to advertise. Let' see, if I were a cigarette company, what would I do to increase sales? That is the goal after all, increasing sales. I'd create a chic little cigarette that masqueraded as a fashion accessory. And I'd advertise it where fashionistas and wannabe's would see it. As long as we give the cigarette companies that inch, they will take it. This is no different than the "Marlboro man" appealing to a certain kind of guy.

The problem is not that they took the inch, it is that we gave it to them.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H., ex-Virgina-Slims smoker has come a long way, baby at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

Maria Niles 5 pts

Altria, which still owns Phillip Morris, no longer owns Kraft. They completed the spinoff in March. And General Foods was merged with Kraft in 1989 so is no longer a separate company. Just a heads up for those who are concerned about supporting a cigarette manufacturer if they buy those brands.

I used to work at Kraft and the Phillip Morris ownership caused me to think long and hard about accepting the position initially. But I'm glad I did work there and at least it now stands on its own as a company.

That said, the girly pink marketing? Awful.

Kleenex® Let It Out™ Blog ( http://www.kleenex.com/blog.aspx )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

Super Jive 5 pts

That is a great point, about the making ends meet thing.

It's like, where do you draw the line? Because it seems like the corporate tentacles are so ubiquitous that if you wanted to go purist, you could only accept articles for, I don't know, organic carrots. Grown locally. And there's only so many carrots people can buy.

Your Pop Culture Librarian also writes almost daily at I, Asshole ( http://iasshole.org ).

Suzanne 5 pts

You know what I hate most about cigarette companies? The fact that they could, of course, start looking for other products to sell to replace the revune they lose when people die or quit. But that's not the easy way out. Nah, it's much more fun making hot new cancer sticks.

I think this is also a sad reflection on the state of publishing. My two favorite feminist magazines seem to take cigarette ads, as they are not on the list you link to. (And I vaguely remember seeing those ads.) They have to in order to make ends meet. It's just depressing.

Suzanne ( http://www.blogher.com/member/suzanne ), BlogHer Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender ( http://www.blogher.com/topic/feminism-gender )
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS)& Other Rants ( http://cussandotherrants.com/ )