Bio
Unwilling to fully abandon my Chicago-area upbringing, I live in Manhattan with my husband, my teddy bear, and a 10 lb. rabbit, but insist on calling...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

If Nudity is Artistic Expression, Who Owns the Body Used as Art?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 16
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Although the news is frequently disturbing, I still read the newspaper while I eat breakfast. On Friday morning, a news item caught my eye: an art gallery in New York's West Village is displaying a live naked woman. The title told me everything that I needed to know: Hey, Look! She's Naked! But It's Art, So It's All Right.

The article discussed first amendment rights. In New York, nudity is an artist's right to expression, but more conservative lawyers argue that the public has a right not to have nudity imposed upon him/her. It's important to note that an individual, however, cannot just decide to walk around naked and expect to be covered by the first amendment if she/he is arrested. The nude model was not arrested as she stood in the gallery window. The article concludes, "Beyond the legality, Mr. Kuby offered up another theory for the lack of interference: 'The truth is, even the cops like looking at naked people.'”

Actually, and I think this is really the heart of the matter, cops don't like looking at naked people; they (like everyone else) like looking at naked women. And artists like using women's bodies as mediums for their messages not because women's bodies are somehow mere inherently beautiful than men's (that's a social distinction), but because they don't actually belong to the woman inside the body herself, so they are thus malleable. Everyone is comfortable looking at it and making it into whatever they want from it.

Men's bodies, however, belong to men. They inhabit their bodies autonomously. It freaks people out to see naked men because men deserve and are granted privacy because their bodies are theirs. We do not display men's bodies for messages, artistic or commercial, except in extreme circumstances. Hence, art using men's bodies is "edgy" and generally invokes a harsher backlash.

I know in my heart of hearts that if a naked dude stood in the gallery window in the West Village, there would be much more than shoulder shrugging and cops passing by. Indecency laws would be rolled out. No one would accuse the conservatives who oppose a naked person standing in a gallery window of being a prude if the naked person had a penis. As a society, we are suspicious of naked men. Why would a man be naked unless he had some nasty intentions? Naked men are predators.

This attitude carries over into other aspects of life. Since women do not have agency over our bodies, it is much easier to pass laws telling us what to do with them, particular when it comes to reproduction. Religious zealots have done everything they can to deny women control over their ability to reproduce, from refusing to fill or cover birth control prescriptions to restricting abortion. Has anyone suggested that condoms should be banished, that erection medicines should be carefully monitored, or that vasectomies should be banned?

I've not heard such arguments in the US. Because who has the right to tell men how to use their bodies? No one except the man who owns it. Again, unlike women's bodies, which belong to others, men are the people who know best what their bodies need. We would never mess with them.

Lest I come across as a prude, I have no objection to nudity in theory. A body is what a body is. I just have a problem with treating women's nudity differently than men's. This is how Western culture has worked for hundreds of years, of course, but that doesn't mean that it is acceptable. So until women get to own their bodies the way that men do, I will frown and grumble and be annoyed when I read stories about naked women standing in gallery windows being acceptable forms of an artist's first amendment rights.

Some other thoughts on nudity, self-autonomy, art, and feminism

What do you think about nudity, nakedness, autonomy, and gender equality?

 

 

Suzanne also blogs at Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants and is the author of Off the Beaten (Subway) Track.

  • 16
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
janicew 5 pts

"And I wouldn't want to walk down the street with my girls in hand and pass a naked woman or man in a gallery window. This kind of freedom of artistic expression takes away the freedom of others to walk down the street without seeing naked people."

This reminds me of the arguments about free speech. We generally seem to decide that people have a right to make ugly speech, and that others have a right to be offended, but they do not have the right to actually stop the other person making that speech. It doesn't take away someones freedom if they hear ugly speech, and I don't believe it takes away someones freedom to see someone naked in public.

storkclub 5 pts

As much as I want to believe being open minded about nudity, I am with you on that,it will take a long time to be in that place of no judgements, no bias and no sexism.Sad but its the reality.

Stork Club ( http://www.storkclub.com )

storkclub 5 pts

I'm with you on that...men usually exploit it in their minds and action..it's the old double standard issue again.

Stork Club ( http://www.storkclub.com )

ecolesbovego 5 pts

It would be great if we could get to a place where nudity was just a person with no clothes on - no connotations. I think that will take a very long time though!

Aussie Elv blogs about her eco-conscious lesbian life in the suburban sub-tropics of Australia. Read all about it at Eco Lesbo Vego ( http://www.blogher.com/www.eco-lesbo-vego.com ), or on twitter at @ecolesbovego ( http://twitter.com/ecolesbovego ).

mashadutoit 7 pts

The artworks in our case were exactly about depicting an individual person.

A friend of mine did an installation in which she posed naked on a chaise lounge - in a copy of that famous - was it Degas?  The painting of the lady with the choker and the black woman holding flowers?

Also rather different, if its the artist putting themselves on display?

Suzanne Reisman 7 pts

I think that this reaction is totally about homophobia and race.  Good art challenges us to think about what we are doing and why.  A live woman standing naked in a shop window is just crass commercialism to me.  (I happened to see it last week, and it freaked me out a little to realize that the lifeless figure in the window was a living woman.)  Maybe that's what gets me the most in this is the utter depersonalizating, which does not seem to be the case in the example you pose.

Suzanne Reisman 7 pts

I hadn't really thought through to that end of the spectrum, but as a person who hates the gender binaries we find ourselves trapped in, I have to hope that a gender-equal society would allow us to see bodies when the people inhabiting them use them for their own purposes.  My hope is that male nudity would not then be so shocking/scary, and female nudity would have more self-autonomy.  But yeah, people really freak out now at the idea of trans and intersex people.

mashadutoit 7 pts

Suzanne - I'm very curious to hear your take on the following issue:

Our minister for art and culture has walked out on an exhibition that includes images of naked black women embracing.  She said that the images concern her because:

"Our mandate is to promote social cohesion and nation building. I left the exhibition because it expressed the very opposite of this.

"It was immoral, offensive and going against nation-building."

I find these images lovely, touching - anything but pornographic.  Its a real complex issue because it deals not just with sexuality and feminism, but with race, homophobia, and the responsibilities of an artist in our society.

Read about it here:

http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article332784.ece

http://www.mg.co.za/article/2010-03-03-lulu-xingwa...... ( http://www.mg.co.za/article/2010-03-03-lulu-xingwa... )

IsleDance 5 pts

Exactly.  We sexualize women to the point that girls are now growing up thinking it's normal to be sexual with their female friends...for fun or play or whatever anyone says.  Then they don't understand, later on, which way their attractions flow.  Environment is everything.  Next to biology.  We need to display all of this respectfully.

One Friday night, Isle Dance ( http://isledance.blogspot.com ) loaded up her life and headed out...

ecolesbovego 5 pts

Women's bodies are perceived as collectively owned, so to speak, so we see them much more often, and less fuss is made about female nudity. In contrast, men are believed to own their bodies, so they aren't displayed like female bodies are.

What about transmen/women and intersex and genderqueer folks though? We don't see their naked bodies much in public spaces - artistic or not, but I don't think that's about a sense of ownership as much as it is that non-binary gender and bodies are viewed as outside the norm.

So if everything was equal, would we see everyone's bodies, or no-one's?

Aussie Elv blogs about her eco-conscious lesbian life in the suburban sub-tropics of Australia. Read all about it at Eco Lesbo Vego ( http://www.blogher.com/www.eco-lesbo-vego.com ), or on twitter at @ecolesbovego ( http://twitter.com/ecolesbovego ).

Jaded16 5 pts

but art has a way about objectifying a woman's body and getting away with it. I agree with you 100% that artists get away with such "artistic expression" with female bodies because they lack agency. Even in the reverse situation - if men are nude they look sad and stricken (mainly showing they are doing this against their will) while women will always look happy to be at the male voyeur's service. Check this ( http://projectrungay.blogspot.com/2009/08/v-magazi... ) website. I'm sure you'll notice the defiant look in the male model's faces.  

~ Jaded16

http://jaded16.wordpress.com/

The Bake-Off Flunkie 5 pts

and I have no problems with nakedness. The human form is beautiful--I loved my figure drawing class in college. And I wouldn't want to see a naked woman or man in a gallery window. And I wouldn't want to walk down the street with my girls in hand and pass a naked woman or man in a gallery window. This kind of freedom of artistic expression takes away the freedom of others to walk down the street without seeing naked people.

As for your thoughts on who owns a woman's body, they are fascinating, and so obvious I never saw it.

Did I miss if the artist is a man or a woman?

LucindaA 36 pts

Because you are so spot on and I've never heard it articulated that way.  Yikes.

MommyLovesStilettos 5 pts

I have no problem with nudity and wouldn't look twice if I saw something like that. But the fact that women's nudity is treated so differently than men's really bothers me.