Blog
PunditMom
Bio
Joanne Bamberger is a recovering attorney, writer, political analyst and political/media consultant living in the shadow of the nation’s capital....
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

If You Can't Trust a Nun, Who Can You Trust?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 2
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

What do you get when you cross an 80-year-old nun with a primary election that some in the GOP are trying to control?

I know that sounds like a bad joke. But it's no joke and the punch line can only increase the voting angst so many already have.

The presidential primaries are almost over, but that doesn't mean we can stop thinking about voters and the voting process. After all, what if a group of radical, senior-citizen nuns stormed a polling place and demanded to vote with expired ID's?

OK, so the nuns didn't actually storm their Indiana polling place -- shuffle was more like it -- but the voter identification saga continues with octogenarian nuns and teen-aged college students wrongly being turned away from the polls.

Just days after the Supreme Court's recent decision upholding the Indiana voter ID law that allows citizens to vote only if they have certain types of state-issued ID's, old and young alike were turned away from the polls, even though they were registered and otherwise entitled to case their ballots.

Supposedly, voter identification requirements are about preventing voter fraud. Maybe I'm going out on a limb here, but I'd be willing to bet my retirement account that those nuns weren't a bunch of over-the-hill Hell's Angels trying to crash the 2008 election party. If you're making an argument about procedural integrity, can you really argue with a straight face that the ladies wearing the habits are the ones we need to watch out for?

Sure, as a lawyer, I understand the argument of protecting the system, but it's not the electoral process this law is meant to protect -- it's preserving the GOP's hold on how the process works in the hopes that more Republican votes will count than Democratic ones.

Ally Klimkoski at Everyday Citizen blog writes about the details of other voters, in addition to those nuns, who also were sent packing in Indiana:

19-year old Angela Hiss, a sophomore and computer science major at the University of Notre Dame, was turned away from the [Indiana] polls ... as she attempted to vote in her first election. ... She presented several forms of identification - her school ID, a piece of mail that showed her campus address and an Illinois driver’s license – but was misinformed that she could not vote because she could not show in-state ID. ... Instead, they suggested visiting the local Department of Motor Vehicles to obtain the in-state identification required by Indiana’s newly-upheld law, an endeavor that could take hours, she explained. Furthermore, while the law allows her ten days to obtain the required ID from the DMV, Hiss’s travel plans [did] not give her time. As a result, she said, she [was] not be able to vote in the primary.

As for the poll workers, they also weren't telling people about the provisional ballot option. Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estes at the Moderate Voice blog has an edgier version of what happened in Indiana:

These nuns, and others like them, who are elderly and, in many ways, are naive about the world, yet very sharp about the ‘other world,’ and yet have dedicated a lifetime to serving day in and day out, who have sacrificed so much, deserve to be treated far more decently than this. Far more. I see the reasons behind [the law] .

But also, there has to be a reasoned application of such a law, so that when one casts huge nets meant to catch the common fish, they do not also catch dolphins ... dolphins are mammals, not fish. Dolphins are disabled when stuck in nets underwater, not allowed to surface.

It makes no sense to deny the innocent their hard-won freedoms whilst trying to entrap the others.

Indiana, for your penance, that’ll be ten Our Fathers, twenty Hail Marys, and a passel of rosaries. And an apology to the sisters from the Governor would be nice, since Mitch Daniels (R) is the one who signed the law to begin with.

Indiana is just the beginning, though. Missouri wants in on this voter-suppression-disguised-as- anti-fraud measure. So does Kansas (and you know it pains me to criticize anything remotely related to the Jayhawks). Plus, there's apparently some mischief afoot in

  • 2
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
JinianVictoria 5 pts

As an election judge I find that the above situation arose simply because of a lack of common sense.  There are always one off situations for every scenario that can be imagined, or for every rule or law passed.  What these  individuals opted for was the pious purity of the law.  This was simply a variant of the old Chicago idea of voting the graveyard..unless you are in total to the nth degree in conformance with the laws you are seen as a nullity and cannot vote.  Your putative status or job not with standing.  Can someone please say political dirty tricks?  Give it a rest people!   I do not have a state ID card  I do have a federal retired military ID card..if some lout told me i wasnt legal to vote because i lacked a state ID card my next stop would be a lawyer.  This was pettifogging pure and simple.  A nun?  These people have earned that right to vote and nobly so..To the individuals who said that they could not vote I have 2 words...BAH!!!  HUMBUG!!!!!

nellewrites 6 pts

Working to get less people to vote. What a wonderful strategy to embrace in trying to win elections.

I understand the difficulty in trying to make sure the person voting is who they say they are, but this can be vetted post vote if need be.

These laws are stupid. If they really want to curtail voter fraud, ban paperless voting systems.  

nelle ( http://www.nelle2nelle.org/ )