Blog
Zandria.us
Bio
Hi! My name is Zandria, and I live in Washington, DC. I wrote for BlogHer.com for over three years (on topics related to single life and online datin...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

If You Could Only Own 100 Things...

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Is it possible to own a maximum of 100 things? It may seem like a large number initially, but sit back for a minute and think about all the stuff you own: random things you keep around but might use only occasionally, like staplers and hand mixers; tiny odds-and-ends stuck in kitchen drawers; boxes of holiday ornaments in the attic; out-of-season shoes and clothing; craft supplies that are kept on hand just in case the mood strikes. Heck, while you’re counting you may as well include silverware and every plate and glass in your cabinets. If you can’t fathom the idea of whittling your possessions down to 100 things, there’s no need to worry -- after all, with the 100 Thing Challenge you’re allowed to make up your own rules.

Dave Bruno is the person who came up with the 100 Thing Challenge (yes, that’s “100 Thing,” and not “100 Things”). He says he’s committed to living with only 100 possessions for an entire year, starting in November, but it turns out the number 100 is completely arbitrary.

Dave isn’t going to count his wife's or his kids' possessions, or things that belong to them as a family -- like couches and tables. Other stuff that won’t count: a collection of trains he doesn't want to part with. Woodworking tools. Two plastic storage containers filled with memorabilia (but he won't open them for a year once his challenge officially starts). And he may consider an entire collection of books to count as only one thing, too.

At least he's up-front about it:

Remember, this is my 100 Thing Challenge. I get to set the rules and decide when a rule can be stretched or outright broken. Basically I'm going by the spirit of the challenge not the letter of the challenge.

I’m all for adapting rules to fit your situation. If something doesn’t work for you, then change things and make them work. But if you’re the one establishing the challenge in the first place, don’t you think you should actually stick to the name of the challenge? If you have a lot of exceptions that make it easier for you to reach your goal, why put a number on the challenge at all? Why not just call it your “Downsizing Challenge” or the “Get Rid of Stuff I Don’t Need Challenge?” Is it because the number 100 makes it a catchier title?

(Here's a suggestion for Dave: if you're not going to count any shared household items in your 100 Things, or include anything that belongs to your wife and kids, why not just “give” them all your books? While you’re at it, “give” them anything else you don't really want to part with. All your problems will be solved!)

I've done a fair amount of downsizing over the past few years, and I’ve talked about the challenges of living in an apartment with a limited amount of storage space. There’s nothing wrong with getting rid of stuff you’re no longer using. In fact, I think it’s a great idea -- I applaud it.

Even after downsizing a fair amount over the past few years, I know I continue to hold onto certain things I don’t need (but I really wouldn’t mind if they no longer belonged to me). I’m still storing a few boxes at my mom's house, and in my little sister's attic in Richmond. The last time I was in my sister's attic a few months ago, I opened a box that’s filled with old mementos (mostly from high school and the five months I spent in Amsterdam in 2004).

One of the things I remember seeing inside the box was a large green and yellow button from high school, proclaiming my title as a Peer Helper. (Which means I was assigned to help an incoming freshman my senior year. I helped show her to her classes the first day of school, and had maybe one additional meeting with her about a week later to "check in." That was the extent of my Peer Helper duties.)

Some of these things bring back good memories, but there’s really no need for me to keep them at someone else’s house just because I don’t have room for them. I think what I should do is take the advice of other people I've seen online: bring my digital camera with me the

  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Zandria 5 pts

And, you know, I actually thought about that while I was writing this post -- people who go backpacking for months on end, or only own a few possessions because they're constantly on the move. I think a lot of those situations are temporary though, and a lot of people tend to have a "home base" where they keep all their junk. :)

Personal blog: Keep Up With Me ( http://www.zandria.us )
BlogHer blog: Singles/Fitness ( http://blogher.com/blog/zandria )

kazari 5 pts

I've just come back from travelling around Europe for six weeks.  It's somehow easier to limit your belongings when you have to carry them all from place to place - i can be quite brutal when packing. 

thinking about it though, if you count all the individual pieces of clothing, plus everything i carried in my handbag, there was probably just over 100 things.

and TRAVELLING is completely different from LIVING, i think - if you just added up all the necessary things in living (birth certificate, keys, id and creditcards, cooking implements, clothes) you'd get to 100 very quickly.

Zandria 5 pts

I think that's a VERY good question to ask.  And even though it's harder to do with things I already own, I MUST put it into effect!  :) 

Personal blog: Keep Up With Me ( http://www.zandria.us )
BlogHer blog: Singles/Fitness ( http://blogher.com/blog/zandria )

Zandria 5 pts

You're right, Vered.  Limiting yourself to a certain number of things just seems like way more stress than it's supposed to be.  If you don't have clutter and you like the way things are, that's the way it should remain!  :) 

Personal blog: Keep Up With Me ( http://www.zandria.us )
BlogHer blog: Singles/Fitness ( http://blogher.com/blog/zandria )

Zandria 5 pts

I hate excess stuff, too, but it sure is easier to keep it from coming in than it is to get rid of it!  :) 

Personal blog: Keep Up With Me ( http://www.zandria.us )
BlogHer blog: Singles/Fitness ( http://blogher.com/blog/zandria )

smartchica47 5 pts

The number seems arbitrary (even more so if you can define 'things' any way you want) but I appreciate the concept. My general rule is to ask, "Do I love it?" and "Do I need it?" If the answer to both questions is no, I try to get rid of it/not buy it. However, it's definitely easier to apply that to new stuff I'm thinking about buying than to get rid of stuff I already have.

Jenn

http://quirkyeconomist.blogspot.com

Vered 5 pts

Seriously. I have 2 kids and yet my house is completely clutter-free.

I just don’t find pleasure in STUFF. I find pleasure in people, and in experiences. I don't get attached to things. There is nothing that I own that I am emotionally attached to - perhaps with the exception of photo albums or the journals I wrote when my kids were babies.

But I would never attempt to limit myself to a specific number of possessions. It seems like unnecessary pressure. Instead of simplifying my life, it would complicate things. No thanks. :)

Vered DeLeeuw
www.momgrind.com ( http://www.momgrind.com )

TCMom 5 pts

Recently, excess STUFF has been really flipping me out. Whether its extra packaging, wrappers and containers, or randomly buying unnecessary plasticky things in the dollar rack at Target, or feeling the pressure to own certain gadgets or extra luxury items... I'm just over it. Enough already. I am feeling overwhelmed and closed in. I am worried about what its costing us (environmentally and financially) for all of it. But 100 things? If I stuck to 100 things with two boys, I think I'd personally only be left with my computer and MAYBE the clothes on my back (see where my priorities are)!

But I am absolutely on board with challenging yourself to cut back and think carefully about what you have or really need.

I also like the challenge that I recently read about asking readers to try and go through a whole month -or even a week - without buying one thing. Thats a good one to try too!

Caroline

http://morningsidemom.wordpress.com/

Zandria 5 pts

There are certain things you keep around that you might not use every day, but they still serve a purpose (aside from stuff like momentos that are around for nostalgia's sake).   

Personal blog: Keep Up With Me ( http://www.zandria.us )
BlogHer blog: Singles/Fitness ( http://blogher.com/blog/zandria )

Kalyn Denny 5 pts

I do understand the idea of downsizing. I recently gave away more than 50% of my clothes, only keeping the things I wear often. (I know, they say you should do this often, but how many people actually do it.)

But trying to limit your posessions to an arbitrary number of items seems silly to me. What if I use my breadmaker to avoid trips to the store? Maybe having a tiller helps me grow my own food? (And I have well over 100 cookbooks, so don't even get me started on that one.)

Kalyn Denny
Kalyn's Kitchen ( http://kalynskitchen.blogspot.com )

biggirlblue 5 pts

I totally agree with this: "That's what I think downsizing is all about -- not holding onto things you don’t use (and don’t have a huge attachment to), and not over-cluttering your living environment."

My husband and I have been doing this purposefully for about 10 years. It was a lot easier for me than for him as I've always been more of a sort and clean type of person (but I still cling to things). He literally had kept everything.

When we go home to visit we see where he got the habit from. We find ourselves getting agitated at the clutter in my in-laws home. The counters are always full of stuff, the basement is stuffed, the spare rooms are stuffed. They've cleaned out some stuff at our urging but there really is a lot of material to be recycled.

We still have a lot of work ahead of us. As I sit here, I can see a bookshelf of books someone could be reading but I just can't bring myself to give them up. Not yet anyway. Soon...

I belong to an online group called Free Cycle which has been instrumental in helping us clear out some of the stuff we are not using to get it into a home where it will be used.

Good luck with the downsizing!

Moe
Big Girl Blue ( http://biggirlblue.blogspot.com ), M.E. Wood lens ( http://www.squidoo.com/mewood ), Large and Lovely ( http://largeandlovely.bellaonline.com )

"Women are going to form a chain, a greater sisterhood than the world has ever known." ~Nellie McClung, 1916