Bio
AV Flox is a Peruvian transplant living in Los Angeles. She is the editrix-in-command of Sex and the 405, a site that shows you what your newspaper w...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Does Money Make a Man More Attractive? Income Disparity in Love

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

"I married beneath me," Lady Nancy Astor once said. "All women do."

It's been a century since the viscountess ditched her first husband, and by all indications, she was right. According to a Pew Research Center report, the number of married women making more money than their husbands has gone up to 22 percent from four percent in 1970.

Intrigued by the figures, I brought up the topic with my girlfriends last night over dinner at Boa.

"It matters," said my friend Katerina, 28. "It's not really about me – I don't want a man's money. I have my money. It's a power thing. Money makes men feel powerful. If he already feels powerful, I don't have to worry about making him feel like he's The Man. He's making a killing, pulling his weight and then some – he already knows he's The Man, so I don't have to cater to his ego and can go around doing whatever I want."

Kiki, in her mid-30s, had similar ideas about it: "If he's not determined, goal-oriented and working his ass off so his situation is temporary, it's emasculating."

Is the male ego so fragile? I threw the question to Twitter, a dozen men immediately responded, saying they didn't see a problem with being involved with a woman who made substantially more money than they did.

Then I decided to try something else: look back on my experience and analyze some of the relationships I'd had since college, and see if I seemed to have any preference, or if I could make any correlation between income and the level of fulfillment I'd experienced with each individual.

(I will take any excuse I can get to play with spreadsheets, it's true.)

My sample varied widely, but I discovered that of the seven most satisfying relationships, three were with men who had little money, three were with men who had just enough, and one, with a man whose family had money.

Those focused, self-made men raking in the serious cash and those focused on trying to get there had consistently led to underwhelming love affairs.

I had rated the relationships on a scale from one to five – and on gut alone. As I looked over the data again, I tried to think of the reasons why I'd given these top seven such high ratings.


Image by MaterialsAart via Flickr

The answer was simple and almost stereotypically feminine: it's the little things, silly.

What made these men stand out was not stuff or the idea of security – it was time and effort. None of them filled my house and office with all the roses in the city. None of them decked me in diamonds or furs. They took me on strolls in gardens and deserted beaches, strange cities, took me cruising on back roads in the dead of night, they read me to sleep, they wrote songs and poems, they made me art, sculptures, even furniture with their own hands.

This isn't to say that well-established, self-made men don't do any of these things, of course. But time and time again, I think about the top candidates in that category and recall something one of them used to always say: “It costs me more money to stop and pick up a hundred dollar bill than it does to just keep on walking.”

The man who has earned a substantial piece of the pie on his own knows the value of time. With those I'd dated, this notion carried into our relationship. There is nothing inherently wrong with taking the opportunity to turn an average conference trip into a sexy vacation – but if those are the only getaways a man can handle, I'm not that into it.

My ex-husband Richard and I used to fight about this all the time.

I recalled a trip to my native Peru in 2007. Exhausted from lunches, dinners and other social calls, I was more than thrilled by the notion of staying in bed late and doing very little all day. Richard wouldn't hear of it. Delighted with sudden “down time”, he packed up his laptop and went off to a cabina to see whether he could find something work-related with which to occupy himself.

"Most of us were taught that leisure equals sloth, laziness, idleness or shiftlessness," Paula Fontaine had written in an editorial for IN magazine, which I'd picked up on the plane on the way to Peru from Los Angeles, "'Idle hands are the devil’s playthings,' or so the saying goes."

I

  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Elana Paige 5 pts

In my extensive dating experience (unfortunately?) I find it's true, in general, that men who don't make much money suffer from a general sense of inadequacy.

I've also noticed, that these particular types of men have trouble seeing anything else but making money as valuable/useful work. That is to say, they don't take much pride in keeping house, or parenting, or being particularly attentive partners, or creating art... etc.

It's like, as women begin to achieve more power in the professional world, they're values are expanding; no longer is the domestic realm the only realm in which women are valued. But for men, the same expansion isn't happening so much... or so fast; they aren't valuing the domestic realm as one for experiencing pride and a sense of self-worth.

Wouldn't it be great if they did?

Jory Des Jardins 5 pts

This reminds me of a story in my 20s, when I was dating a struggling (read: very cute, passionate and sometimes homeless) artist. My grandmother asked me about him, and what he did, and I told her, and she said, "Oh, Jory, you'll never be happy with one of those." She was right, but not because he was broke all the time. More, it was because he was in this state of search, and I, also in a state of search (albeit an employed state of search), made us completely incompatible. We were just searching for more all the time.

I used to feel attracted to men with more career experience--chances are they made more than me. But then I realized that I was more interested, not in their money making ability, but it their success and confidence--I hoped it would rub off on me. Once I built my own success to a point where I felt satisfied (a point I never would have come to had I not invested in mucho personal development) the question of what my man earned--or his career success--became increasingly irrelevant.

I've dated my share of self-absorbed, "successful" men. Not worth it, my friends. You're better off worrying about yourself and snagging the man who will move heaven and earth to support you emotionally. Just my $.02.

Jory Des Jardins
writes on business and career topics at BlogHer, and on her personal blog From Here to Autonomy ( http://www.jorydesjardins.com )

Wicked Shawn 5 pts

..a wealth of aspirations. Aspirations of love, dreams, travel destinations, sexual positions, romantic inclinations, hopeful ideals. Wealth is not always about money. I have been with men who make more than me, men who make less than me. In the end, relationships success or failure rates seemed to be based more on poor communication of expectations and lack of truthfullness. Perhaps that is not true for everyone, but it has been my experience.

lauracarroll 5 pts

Money can contribute to what makes a man attractive. For a lot of women today that don't need or want a man for his income it tells her that she will not have to "carry" him. I also see many women who are very clear that whoever they marry he will move them up the socioeconomic ladder. I don't see the same phenom with men. Whether she or he makes more, a lot has to do with being on the same page about money. For ex. for couples where say he is more comfortable than she is living above their means and the debt that goes along with that, it spells trouble. Also no matter how much money he makes, when a gift shows he took time to make it special (not just cash) e.g., makes a card instead of buying one, bringing home your favorite sweet, trumps just a man with cash every time. ~Laura

Laura
Families of Two
http://lauracarroll.com

Bill Cammack 5 pts

Excellent Advice your grandma had for you about Leisure! :D

Though I personally don't care how much money a gal makes, the reason a lot of guys need to make more than their women is that they NEED to feel superior to her in all areas.

They don't consider themselves equals ( http://billcammack.com/2010/05/16/honesty-respect-... ) to women they date or marry. The woman is an addition to his lifestyle.

He's stronger than her, smarter than her, maybe not prettier than her, has more common sense and makes more money so he feels good about himself. If he starts losing categories, like intelligence and earning potential, a guy like that might feel the need to bail out so he can be superior to some OTHER chick.

That's a pretty sorry existence, IMO. First of all, I think people should get together who actually like each other, not because the other person has toys, gadgets, cars & houses they want. Secondly, having money doesn't automatically give you relevant life experience. Women don't get to bring money to bed.. only experience.. so when it counts, the experienced burger-flipper's going to win out over the lackadaisical female CEO every time.

From the women's side of things, it's practically a non-issue. Guys are throwing sex at women every day anyway, so there's no reason for women NOT to select the richest guy that's interested in them, all other things being equal.

~ Bill ( http://billcammack.com/ )
I blog at billcammack.com ( http://billcammack.com/ )

( http://billcammack.com )

Deb Rox 5 pts

Do you know that country-western classic?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-tsVMHuHrs&fea...

Some of my most satisfing (and hot) relationships were characterized by wealth or wage disparities. There is a lot of truth to the sexual power held by someone living out a mythic Working Class lifestyle--work hard all day but then leave all thoughts of work and neurosis about advancement behind when clocking out, and then live hard outside of work through sex, relationships, friendships, sports, leisure. Working class lovers don't leave your bed to check the Toyoko stock numbers--though they might crawl out early to go duck hunting during bird season, so there's that, but when when they crawl back in a few hours later, they are wide awake and undistracted.

Deb Rox

3 Smart Girlz ( http://www.3smartgirlz.com/ ) consulting

Blog ( http://www.debontherocks.com/ ) like a freaking butterfly, sting like a Tweet. ( http://www.twitter.com/debontherocks )