Bio
I am a journalist living in California, and this is my first foray into the virtual world. I worked as a reporter and copy editor for five years in v...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

India's missing girls -- nipping them in the bud?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 8
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Gender-based abortions in India is no longer the man-bites-dog breaking news story. It's such a pervasive  practice that it probably doesn't outrage us enough to tackle it on a war footing. It is recognized as a problem by law, it makes some men shift in their seats and many women unhappy. In other words, it runs the risk of becoming just another addition to the endless list of gender issues that we know the country needs to deal with, and hope that time and a robust economy will drive it to its natural death.

I seriously doubt that this menace will go away with time and money unless we constantly work to keep it at the top of our act-now lists. And here's why.
The argument goes, that as women (and men) get educated, employed and exposed to opportunities, prejudices fade away. Well that logic doesn't seem to apply in India and for good reason. The BBC recently reported that some British mothers of Indian origin were most likely aborting female fetuses. In an interview, a woman admitted having traveled to India to determine the sex of her fetus and terminate the pregnancy if they found out it was a girl. In a sting operation, the BBC outed a renowned gynecologist  --- recommended by the British High Commission and known for her public stance against female feticide  --- who offered to conduct an ultrasound to determine the sex of a fetus  -- which is illegal in India -- and also recommend someone if the [dummy] couple wanted to abort the fetus. [Following the expose, the doctor's license was suspended pending investigation.]

So what makes it possible for us to flout the law so easily in India? What about the doctor, a woman herself? It will take an entire conference to get to the bottom of this. But I'll take a shot at summarizing here some issues that help keep the problem alive and also point to a study that has done a pretty decent and detailed job of getting a handle on the issue.

India's skewed sex ratio is deeply troubling. The 2001 census reports 933 girls per 1,000 men, the ratio being worse in urban areas, the first sign that education and urbanization don't necessarily mean equity. Also, different regions (and religious/social groups) have thrown up different patterns of sex ratios at birth: meaning, one sweeping tactic will not solve the entire nation's problem.

Let me point you to the 2007 United Nations Population Fund report on India's gender bias and the practice of sex selective abortions. This is probably the most exhaustive and culturally-sensitive report that I have read so far about the problem, its causes, how it plays out socially across the country, and how this problem -- if allowed to grow unfettered -- can shake up the social fabric in the next two-four decades.
An interesting projection the study makes is that by 2025 or so, thanks to late marriages and fewer women , Indian men will find themselves in abundance and unmarried, with no women to pick from. It also fears that fewer women could lead to more violent crimes against women, and will also hit economically poorer men the hardest, as women will seek out financially sound or more affluent partners.
The report is a tad long -- 30-odd pages long -- but totally worth the read if you want to understand the problem.
(Note: The report measures sex ratio as number of males per 100 females, the Indian census records it as number of females per 1000 males.)

Most of the issues I raise here are mentioned in the report one way or the other. I am harping on them because it's easy not to see them playing a crucial role in keeping the practice alive. They are sticky issues that need people to stand up and act at the cost of possible confrontations and skirmishes that we, tradition and family-loving Indians, would love to skirt around.

As the report points out, in the 1980s, new abortion laws and access to pre-natal sex determination technologies led to a sharp deterioration in the child (0-4 years) sex-ratio. The figures also show that child sex ratio worsens in urban areas where couples and families are more likely to have access to sex determination technologies. Northern and Western India are the worst affected. Punjab, a state with one of India's worst sex ratio's, came the gruesome story of a doctor dumping aborted female fetuses

  • 8
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
snigdhasen 5 pts

Thanks Lisa! Has the book been made into a movie yet? I think they should...

Curiously, I have seen a lot of women talk about the doomsday scenario and even wish for it to happen, out of sheer disgust, I suppose --"Let there be no women in the world. Let's see how that goes."

While I hope the good men, and a good number of men, stand up to this, I believe it's for us, women, to fight for our own survival. As Gandhi would say, be the change you want to see in the world.

snigdhasen 5 pts

Yes, Suzanne, you echo my thoughts, really. As my mom would say, no matter what happens, it always affects women.

About lack of women spurring violence: Does sound counterintuitive, right? But that was also one of the first outcomes that my husband raised when I discussed this issue with him. The reason for that, as I see it, is this: with fewer women around, men will have to fight to get the ones available. While some may think it worth their while to win over women, many others may go with their basest of instincts -- get what you want by brute force. Going by traditional behavior patterns, rapes and forced abductions/sex, sexual abuse may go up.
Of course, all these are based on the assumption that men will continue to behave as they traditionally have, notwithstanding the change in circumstances.

Suzanne 5 pts

I heard also about women being imported as brides. I hate that this whole situation is leading to a different type of oppression against women instead of making people realize that women are people too, and worthwhile ones at that. Why is it that no matter what goes on, it always somehow backfires against females? So depressing! I have to think (hope?), though, that at some point the non-commodity (social?) value of women will go up.

I'm curious how a lack of women will lead to more violence against women. That seems counter-intuitive, not that I disbelieve it. People have certainly proved thime and time again that we prefer acting like fools and brutes instead of as logical and compassionate beings.

Suzanne Reisman ( http://www.blogher.com/member/suzanne ), Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender ( http://www.blogher.com/topic/feminism-gender )
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS)& Other Rants ( http://cussandotherrants.com/ )

Lisa Stone 6 pts

Snigdha, brilliant brilliant post, thank you. I was immediately reminded of Science Fiction Author Frank Herbert's book, The White Plague ( http://www.amazon.com/White-Plague-Frank-Herbert/d... ), which poses the question, "What if women were an endangered species?" Here's the amazon.com write-up:

It begins in Ireland, but soon spreads throughout the entire world: a virulent new disease expressly designed to target only women. As fully half of the human race dies off at a frightening pace and life on Earth faces extinction, panicked people and governments struggle to cope with the global crisis. Infected areas are quarantined or burned to the ground. The few surviving women are locked away in hidden reserves, while frantic doctors and scientists race to find a cure. Anarchy and violence consume the planet.

The plague is the work of a solitary individual who calls himself the Madman. As government security forces feverishly hunt for the renegade scientist, he wanders incognito through a world that will never be the same. Society, religion, and morality are all irrevocably transformed by the White Plague.

I am grateful for your links to these blogs, all new to me. I think the only way that we can help change this frightening scenario is one woman and one family at a time. And in this case, you've started the process by driving traffic and exposure to this issue and their blogs. Now it's my job to write to them and see if they're interested in applying to join the BlogHer publishing network when it re-opens in February. We provide ads, yes, but as if not more importantly, we syndicate member headlines across our network of 1,200+ women writers.

Lisa Stone
BlogHer Co-founder ( http://www.blogher.com/member/lisa-stone )
Surfette ( http://surfette.typepad.com )

snigdhasen 5 pts

You are absolutely right, Suzanne. The abuse of a practice meant to help people plan families, makes me angry. But that's the tragedy of it all --- these people probably think they are indeed "planning" their families by choosing to have a boy.

It's interesting that you bring up the supply-demand issue, because I, too, (and so does the report), believe that it is a likely scenario where women will be valued because they are so few in number. The report suggests that the dowry system may actually reverse.

And it's already started happening. Reports ( http://www.indianexpress.com/story/253027.html ) are already coming in that families of some of the worst affected states, suffering from acute shortage of brides, have started "importing" women from other states and castes.
While we may benefit from this inter-caste/inter-state/inter-class marriages, it irks me that at the end of the day, women have become a commodity in the demand-supply chain. It's becoming a battle of the sexes for survival.

The report also suggests --and I agree-- that fewer women could also lead to more violence against women.

Thanks, Suzanne.

Snigdha

snigdhasen 5 pts

Yes, Kalyn, be ANGRY. That's what we need more of. Anger and a determination to do things differently, come what may.

Snigdha

Suzanne 5 pts

It makes me sick that people abuse abortion in this way. I think this is also a problem in China as well. Whenever I think about the shortages of women in these countries, it makes me wonder if the dearth of women might some day actually make girls more valuable. Most men want a wife and family. If none are available, it seems logical that the scarcity of women will increase their value so that it finally becomes an honor and worthwhile endeavor for families to have girls. Not that I ever want things to get this bad, but it does make me wonder if the supply-and-demand rules actually apply here or if the cultural biases you identified will continue to overrule logic and morality.

Excellent post.

Suzanne Reisman ( http://www.blogher.com/member/suzanne ), Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender ( http://www.blogher.com/topic/feminism-gender )
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS)& Other Rants ( http://cussandotherrants.com/ )

Kalyn Denny 5 pts

Great post! Things like this make me so sad and angry both.

Kalyn Denny
Kalyn's Kitchen ( http://kalynskitchen.blogspot.com )