Bio
I live in Nova Scotia with my husband David, our little boy Luke, who is now six years old, and our little girl Sylvie, who is almost two. David and...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Keeping Gender a Secret Based on a Book? How Long Will It Last?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 20
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

X-a-fabulous-childs-story Inspired by a picture book, Kathy Witterick and David Stocker, a couple in Toronto, are keeping secret the gender of their third child, four-month-old Storm. They have two older children, Jazz and Kio, both boys, who've felt pressured to look masculine and behave that way:

“When I was pregnant, it was really this intense time around Jazz having experiences with gender and I was feeling like I needed some good parenting skills to support him through that,” says Witterick.

It began as a offhand remark. “Hey, what if we just didn’t tell?” And then Stocker found a book in his school library called X, A Fabulous Child's Story by Lois Gould. The book, published in 1978, is about raising not a boy or a girl, but X. There’s a happy ending here. Little X -- who loved to play football and weave baskets -- faces the taunting head on, proving that X is the most well-adjusted child ever examined by “an impartial team of Xperts.”

“It became so compelling it was almost like, How could we not?” says Witterick.

There are days when their decisions are tiring, shackling even. “We spend more time than we should providing explanations for why we do things this way,” says Witterick. “I regret that (Jazz) has to discuss his gender before people ask him meaningful questions about what he does and sees in this world, but I don't think I am responsible for that — the culture that narrowly defines what he should do, wear and look like is.”

I can imagine that'd be exhausting to try to hide the gender of your baby, yes, because it is almost the first question anyone asks. I sympathize with the couple to some extent -- it's true, as a culture we do expect very different things from boys and girls, some of us more than others. And even when you're aware of this and try not to impose silly and arbitrary expectations on your kids, you're still a product of your own social conditioning. You're also, however, a product of your biology. In the 70s, some sociologists believed that gender is completely elastic, totally a result of social conditioning, which led to the tragedy of David Reimer, whose penis was accidentally cut off during his circumcision as an infant. The doctors recommended he be raised as a girl. He was never told he wasn't a girl, he never felt like one, and he committed suicide as an adult. His story is told in As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl. Of course, there are many equally tragic stories of transgendered people who feel as if they're born in the wrong bodies -- and happily, more and more ones of transition.

I've been thinking a lot about gender lately as it's so interesting to see how it unfolds in the kids. I like to think that the Gender Fairy Godmother has bestowed the supposedly feminine gift of sensitivity on Luke and the supposedly masculine gift of an iron will on Sylvie. On a more superficial level, I'm amazed by Sylvie's preoccupation with her brother's dinky cars. He has oodles that he almost never plays with. She has never been given one and she plays with them almost every day. (As I'm typing this she's asking, "Play cars, Mama? Play cars?") In many other ways, they both remain true to stereotype. Luke loves play-fighting and has a bit of a preoccupation with conflict and death and Sylvie tends to be more nurturing. She'll leap up in horror crying, "You okay?" when a toy falls off a table, and she loves to wander around holding her dolls, rocking, and feeding them in a way Luke only rarely does.

I found the story of baby Storm via Rona Maynard, on facebook, who remarked the story reads "like the outline of a darkly satirical novel." Yes! Wouldn't it make a great one? And, although there's something that makes me feel deeply uneasy about using one's child to make a political statement, I'm betting little Storm's gender will remain a secret only until (s)he's able to announce it to the world him or herself, which means only another year or two.

What are your thoughts on this, as CNN calls it, International Controversy?

Stephany Aulenback

  • 20
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Partly Sunny 5 pts

I guess the reason this doesn't sit well with me is because it's pretty clear -- at least from the other articles I've read about this family -- that they've managed to raise their two boys in a very gender neutral household. And it shows. The boys have long hair and like many stereotypically "girl" things. So minus this social experiment, the parents are achieving their goal. At least I think that's what the goal is (or should be) -- to raise kids who have a good sense of themselves as people based on who they are, not what gender they are. But what I also find disconcerting is their reasoning that their boys have been teased for not being masculine enough, so their solution is to hide Storm's gender. They can rest assured that Storm will be the focus of major teasing -- I'm sure they know this and it makes me question whether they're doing it for him/her or themselves.

Tammy blogs about her super-exciting, highly controversial life on the cul-de-sac at Partly Sunny, Chance of Rain ( http://www.partlysunnyblog.com ). She also edits World's Worst Moms ( http://www.worldsworstmoms.com ), where good moms come to tell their best "bad mom" stories.

Scooping It Up 5 pts

I may not be the most progressive parents in the world. But what happens when Storm discovers his/her body, wants to talk about it? Do the parents then say "oh, but we don't talk about that, you don't have to be anything."

Now we are potentially teaching that having a gender and being proud of it is "bad" or taboo.

Are they going to ask Storm to consent at that point to the experiment and force the child to stay ambiguous. That seems a heavy load for a child.

Start saving for therapy.

Liz Rizzo 5 pts

After the story about the Swedish couple doing this, I read a piece somewhere a woman wrote who had grown up in a similar situation. Her point was that she felt unable to navigate society, and she felt lifelong damage from this.

I understand where they are coming from. All the gender messaging we give children from birth makes me stabby, but people do have to navigate in our world. And our world recognizes and reacts to gender.

Better to learn the norms - learn how to write the basic 5 paragraph paper - and *then* also be taught when to bend and push for who you truly are and what you truly want - like writing more freestyle once you've got the basic structure down.

Liz Rizzo ( http://blogher.org/blog/liz-rizzo )

I blog at Everyday Goddess ( http://everydaygoddess.typepad.com/ ).

erelyea 5 pts

The comments and this post are fascinating to me.

And I agree with what everyone has been saying in the comments. The kid is going to compare his/her body to his/her parents and figure out that Mommy's a girl, and I look like Mommy, therefore I am a girl and the secret will be out.

And it brings to mind an interaction I had with a friend recently. My daughter had lice (GAH) and after the third round of manic housecleaning, I lost it and had her hair cut into a short pixie cut. It looks adorable and is MUCH easier to search through for any stowaways. She came home after her first day of school post-haircut and reported that the kids on the bus told her she looked like a boy. Once I got past the utter rage that statement brought on, we talked a little about what she might do if they said that to her again. I shared that whole interaction with a friend and her response was one I wouldn't have even thought to think of: "That's ridiculous!" And it's true. My daughter is 5. She loves everything pink and even with short hair, it is patently obvious that she is a girl. Similarly, in a few years it will be obvious that Storm has a gender.

I like that the parents are trying to free their child from some of the gender stereotypes, but I wonder if this might be doing it the hard way.

nellewrites 6 pts

commments on the controversy over her parenting...

Kathy comments to CNN... ( http://abcnews.go.com/Health/genderless-baby-contr... )

nellewrites ( http://nellewrites.wordpress.com/ )

nellewrites 6 pts

I attended a seminar on gender. One of the first messages to the 250 or so of us there was 'never assume a person's gender'.

I do this, we all do this. In the moments when we first encounter someone in active conversation (as opposed to say... instant messaging where there is an element of sensory separation) our minds will make that judgement. And sometimes we'll get it wrong.

I can't agree - or disagree, for that matter - that what the parents are doing is risky, because I admit I don't know. What I find riskier, and far more likely to cause continued widespread damage, is the continued acceptance of an overwhelmingly patriarchal world. We accept it as okay because it is a known quantity, not because it is of good quality.

How do we explore outward such that we find our way in a different direction? Who are the risk takers, those who dare to push on to change? Again, I don't know. I just wish society would expend effort to engage in such discussion.

nellewrites ( http://nellewrites.wordpress.com/ )

justlinda 9 pts

In their effort to not let society impose gender expectations on their child, they themselves are imposing a political/social agenda on that child.

Maybe it will all turn out well. Maybe it will backfire.

As parents, I'm sure we're all trying to do our best by our children. Bucking the norm is our prerogative and sometimes it pays off.

I would worry about the converse gender message - that embracing one's gender is NOT okay - that these children may receive.

I have 5 daughters. Surely, some of what they do is influenced, perhaps heavily, by society. They are all so very different, I can't help but feel so much of who they are is their own self-expression. I'd like to think that they have been empowered to be females who can claim their place and express it how they wish. And if they do want to embrace stereotypical female traits, that is also their prerogative. I never want to send a message to them that their gender is something to be hidden.

I, too, believe we have the power to break free of stereotypes. I just think we can do so without subverting what a child's actual gender is.

( http://justlinda.net )JustLinda

fabulously imperfect

Twitter @JustLindaSTL

writeandchange 5 pts

While I totally agree with the sentiment of fighting/avoiding gender stereotypes, the practicalities of actually keeping the child's gender a secret seems overwhelming to me.
If we want true gender equality maybe we shouldn't have separate words for he/she, his/hers etc... but we do. Are the parents going to refer to the child in public as 'it'? Surely one of them will slip up sooner or later.

Karen Banes  (@writeandchange ( http://twitter.com/writeandchange )) blogs at ChangeTheWorldWithWords.com ( http://www.changetheworldwithwords.com/ )

klynn4jc 5 pts

I think this puts into words what I've been thinking and feeling since I read about this family.
And while sometimes the gender stereotypes are pushed on us in negative ways it doesn't always mean that gender is bad. Diversity is a good thing... or so they try to tell us! So why can't we have diversity of gender as well, instead of us having to all be the same?

crooked house 5 pts

I love the dandelion spores comparison. And I do agree the parents are both well-meaning and brave.

Stephany Aulenback ( http://crookedhouse.typepad.com/crookedhouse/ )

crooked house 5 pts

Someone really should do a follow-up story on that family in Sweden. I wonder how they are doing.

Stephany Aulenback ( http://crookedhouse.typepad.com/crookedhouse/ )

crooked house 5 pts

Yes, I am really curious to see what happens to this family in a few years. By the way, I've reserved the book at the library -- I'm also really curious to see it.

Stephany Aulenback ( http://crookedhouse.typepad.com/crookedhouse/ )

jennyonthespot 5 pts

I understand the heart... I read some other excerpts on this, and what stood out to me was the burden it was placing on the 2 boys to explain themselves to adults when questioned. We do have to learn how to do speak for ourselves, but children deserve a season of protection from conflict. We live in a society where we can preserve our children's childhood... we can train and teach, but they really need us to stand in the gap until the are mature enough & ready to take on the world themselves.

Jenny Ingram writes at Jenny On The Spot ( http://www.jennyonthespot.com ) and wears glitter everyday. She also digresses over there on the Twitter @jennyonthespot ( http://twitter.com/jennyonthespot ).

Deb Rox 5 pts

The pushback to this says so much about how our culture is invested in perserving the gender status quo.

I think they are awesome parents. It sounds like they have been thinking HARD about gender in order to help their son Jazz who is expressing something other than what the segregated toy aisles tell him to express, and they notice how much gender crap people push on kids' identities, and they want a barrier from some of that for their new wee one as well as a public dialogue. How is that any more of an experiment than mindlessly securing a pink ribbon on an infant's bald head to be sure that strangers coo at her appropriately with softer voice tones?

It's not that they are trying to have a social experiment to raise a gender neutral child. They are trying to call attention to a social system that is out of whack. The pushback is similar to any parent who does something progressive. ("They are going to eat sugar/watch TV/see violence some day! If they don't do worksheets they won't go to college! etc.)

Deb Rox +++ Blog ( http://www.debontherocks.com/ ) like a freaking butterfly, sting like a Tweet. ( http://www.twitter.com/debontherocks )

JennaHatfield 9 pts

The only problem I have with their decision, is that they're acting as though this is a better way of parenting by not forcing gender onto a child. While it has it's benefits, it is no more or less a forced decision than deciding TO raise your child with a focus on gender. It is a parental decision made for the child. It is not a lack of decision, a lack of force. If they presented it differently, without the high horse of "I don't force my kids to do anything" air, I'd support it. Otherwise, drop the better than thou stuff. It's old.

Family Section Editor Jenna Hatfield (@FireMom ( http://twitter.com/FireMom )) blogs at Stop, Drop and Blog ( http://stopdropandblog.com ) and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land ( http://thechroniclesofmunchkinland.com ). She is a freelance writer and photographer.

nellewrites 6 pts

is telling. Instead of launching a needed discussion about gender in society, we get people asking what are the parents thinking?

I agree that you cannot shield a child from societal encroachment. One way or another, how society handles gender is in the air like spores from a dandelion, and we know what happens as those pretty yellow things bedevil lawnsmiths the world over.

The thing is, the parents recognise the problem exists, which is way ahead of all those foiks who think their action trite. Rather than just complain, the parents thought that in their own way, they would try to do something different.

Maybe instead of writing news stories about a family media at best portrays as curious, maybe we should be talking more about patriarchy and how it harms not just women, but everyone.

Ask yourselves... are we really huge fans of status quo patriarchal conformity? Does anyone on this board benefit from it? I'd love to hear from you if you do.

nellewrites ( http://nellewrites.wordpress.com/ )

Denise 9 pts moderator

I touched on this last year a bit in this post, Questioning Gender ( http://www.blogher.com/questioning-gender ), when a couple in Sweden decided to raise a child without gender.

I think it's an interesting idea and there are many parts of it that I love. But, I think it's pretty much impossible to do in our existing society.

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager
Life. Flow. Fluctuate.

lesasgoods 5 pts

I wrote a blog post about this same article the other day because it seemed to me that their parenting style may end up hurting the child(ren). The original article said that the one son chose not to go to a regular school because of fear of ridicule. What is going to happen when he is older?
I happen to be very progressive with raising my children, but I feel that parents like this end up making a lot of us progressive parents look like weirdos.

Parenthood, Party Tips, Homeschooling, OH MY!

www.bearhavenmama.com ( http://www.bearhavenmama.com )

natalied6579 5 pts

I had that book when I was a child and when I first heard about Storm my first thought was, "X". It's a great book that does well at dispelling gender norms but I don't know how easily it will translate into actually raising a child. Should be interesting to see what happens in a few years.

NonaNelson 5 pts

Breaking down gender stereotypes is commendable. Nothing irks me more than someone using the term "girly" as a pejorative.

But a child is not a social experiment and this seems like a stunt pulled by attention seeking parents.