Bio
I'm the executive editor of BlogHer.com, a food and travel writer, obsessive reader and player of games -- and as of March 2011 a Jeopardy! champion...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Judge Rules California's Anti-Gay Marriage Proposition 8 Unconstitutional: Bloggers React

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn R. Walker today ruled that Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage within the state of California, is unconstitutional.

SAN FRANCISCO - AUGUST 04: Prop 8 supporters Nadia Chayka (L) and her fiance Luke Otterstad (C) stand next to Prop 8 opponent Billy Radford as they stand outside of the Philip Burton Federal building August 4, 2010 in San Francisco, California. US District Judge Vaughn Walker will announce his ruling today on the constitutionality of Prop 8 in California, a voter approved measure that denies same-sex couples the right to marry in the State of California. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

From the ruling in Perry v. Schwarzenegger:

Because Proposition 8 is unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, the court orders entry of judgment permanently enjoining its enforcement; prohibiting the official defendants from applying or enforcing Proposition 8 and directing the official defendants that all persons under their control or supervision shall not apply or enforce Proposition 8.

WOMEN BLOGGERS REACT TO THE PROP. 8 RULING

  • Lisa Keen of Keen News Service calls it "a big decision, but stayed," noting that "a few minutes after issuing the decision, Walker also issued a temporary stay of its impact and directed attorneys challenging the initiative to respond to request by August 6."
  • Michelle Malkin says, "The decision from Judge Vaughn Walker is no surprise if you watched his show trial antics over the last several months."
  • This Week In Lady News takes a look "Princes," the ad that caused the initial 5% saw in voters, leading to the 2008 passing in the Prop 8 legislature.
  • Pam at Pam's House Blend has a rolling open thread stuffed with information and analysis.
  • NerdMom of Nerd Family Blog says, "I have a feeling that we are going to see another piece of legislation soon, either legalizing gay marriage or banning it."
  • Mom bloggers at Babble and their babies re wearing their support of same-sex marriage.
  • Candace Chellew-Hodge at Religion Dispatches quotes a new study showing Prop. 8 was "parent-approved."
  • Not Just a Working Mom posted some cool NOH8 pictures.
  • The California NOW blog has a list of celebrations in towns throughout California.

SOME BACKGROUND ON PROPOSITION 8

What do you think about the ruling? A victory for gay rights? A reversal of voter-approved legislation? Tell me in the comments.

  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
TW 6 pts

I disagree. I think the rights part should not come with marriage for ANYONE. If the government wants to give rights for couplehood for whatever reason, that shouldn't be related to marriage or not marriage but instead be equal for all committed couples.

Retro-Food.com

George Vreeland Hill 5 pts

When two people get married, it is because they love each other.
They want to be together in a bond that makes them one with each other forever.
It is a wonderful thing to have such a bond.
It is special.
It is love.
When a man and a woman get married, no one blinks an eye.
If two men or two women do the same, then many people do not approve.
They claim that it is not right or that it soils the real meaning of marriage.
What is the real meaning of marriage?
The answer to that question is in line one of this article.
It is because they love each other.
Does it matter if the couple is gay or straight?
Should it matter?
No!
After all, why should it.
Gays want their equal rights and among those equal rights is the right to be married.
I agree with wanting equal rights.
We are all people which means we are all the same.
It does not matter if someone is gay, white, black, a man, a woman, tall, short, young, old or whatever.
We all want our equal rights.
That is our right.
However, we need to go beyond equal rights when it comes to gay marriage.
Society needs to understand that any marriage is not about the right to be married.
It is about wanting to be married as a loving couple.
Love is not something that should be decided on by voters.
It is not a court issue either.
It should not be an issue at all.
Marriage is between two people in love.
It is not between two people, the voters, the courts and anyone else who has an opinion.
Gay marriage does not bring down the meaning of marriage.
It makes the true meaning of marriage even better.
That is what love does.
It makes things better.
Society has come a long way in the last fifty years in terms of equality, but we still have a long way to go.
It is a shame that love is something that needs to be fought for.
I am not gay, but I am the same as you as you are to me.
May love conquer all.

George Vreeland Hill

ms_lorelei 5 pts

...homosexuality is as normal in animals as it is in people.

http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718....

Lori, speech pathologist, writer, and business owner, blogs home-family-working-mom drama at In Pursuit of Martha Points. ( http://inpursuitofmarthapoints.com )

gh123 5 pts

even animals know that being gay is not natural have you ever seen a gay rabbit or a gay dog no! even animals are smart enough to figure that out but we havent yet but i really hope that america will wake up and see the truth i miss the days when you are not gay or strait your just people living their lives and trying to be a help to others the good old american way!! and if their are gay people let them be gay but dont condone them by letting them marry and and giving them benefits which by the way is a huge waste of taxpayer dollars!!!!

ms_lorelei 5 pts

...that the big argument AGAINST the ruling is how "the will of the voter's was undone."

I live in California and our damned proposition system is ridiculous and costs us obscene amounts of money.

And often, OFTEN, the voters vote and the courts go back and say, "Umm, well, actually you can't do that because it breaks other laws that have precedence over yours."

And the level of hysteria that accompanied all those other overturns (anyone remember the auto insurance price roll-back?) did not reach this fever pitch.

Any law that denies a population a legal right to action - when that population is in the minority - takes very, very careful consideration. The will of the majority cannot be used to oppress a minority.

Lori, speech pathologist, writer, and business owner, blogs home-family-working-mom drama at In Pursuit of Martha Points. ( http://inpursuitofmarthapoints.com )

Lady News 5 pts

I'm so proud to be a Californian today! Thank you for the link love.
Stassa Edwards
www.thisweekinladynews.com ( http://www.thisweekinladynews.com )

lauracarroll 5 pts

But the game is not over yet. The defense will appeal and wants to take it all the way to the Supreme Court. I don't get why opponents to same sex marriage just don't get it--it is discrimination, plain and simple. Many countries do get it, like Argentina, Canada. Sweden, Norway, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Iceland and South Africa. May we finally be on the way to be added to this list. ~Laura Families of TwoLaura
Families of Two
http://lauracarroll.com