Bio
Stacy is an editor, writer, author, mother, blogger and former magazine editor. But her fancy title is editor in chief of BlogHer.com.
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

The Latest News About ADHD (With Same Old Controversy)

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 10
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

At a pediatricians' conference this weekend, the American Academy of Pediatrics revised 10-year-old guidelines regarding when children can be diagnosed and treated for ADHD, expanding the age range from between 6 to 12 years old to what is considered the full age range of childhood: from age 4 to age 18.

Boy running

Image Credit: loop-oh on Flickr


ADHD is now the most common neurobehavioral disorder in children, and with this reclassification, the number of diagnosed children is sure to climb. The last Center for Disease Control and Prevention survey reports that 9.5 percent of US children had been diagnosed with ADHD in 2007, a steady 5.5 percent increase annually for the previous four years.

The point of changing the stated age range, however, is not to include more children in the diagnosis: it's to ensure that treatment and intervention take place as early as possible. In an interview with Vitals on MSNBC.com, Dr. Mark Wolraich (a pediatrician at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center), said, ”Treating children at a young age is important, because when we can identify them earlier and provide appropriate treatment, we can increase their chances of succeeding in school.”

But as always with ADHD, some doctors (and many parents) voice concerns that these new guidelines will lead to even more children being medicated with psychostimulants like Adderall and Ritalin, which stimulate the brain to release the attention-stabilizing brain chemicals dopamine and norepinephrine. For the youngest end of the age range, it is recommended that children be treated with behavioral therapy, in an effort to retrain them to control some of their impulsive, disruptive behaviors. But -- if the child's impulsivity and lack of attention do not respond to these treatments and these habits are disrupting his or her ability to learn, make and keep friends and acquire developmentally appropriate skills -- then medicine should be considered, say pediatricians.

I wait for the predictable outcry about overmedicating our children. As the mother of an 8-year-old boy who was recently diagnosed with ADHD after almost three years of attempting to understand my son's personality and difficulties, I can report from my end that, in fact, the symptoms of ADHD -- behavioral problems or problems in school, as well as symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsiveness in various settings -- were definitely quite present in Zack at a very young age. He's also very gregarious and outgoing, which masked some of the other tendencies of ADHD. He was always in trouble at school for his lack of self-control-- with patient teachers who tried to teach him methods to self-manage -- but when he landed an inflexible teacher in second grade, everything went downhill and Zack's grades started to drop dramatically, along with his self-esteem.

Finally getting the diagnosis helped us explain to the teacher and the school what was happening behind Zack's impulses and lack of self-control. And in the end, I did decide to medicate him, because the two years of behavioral therapy and three years of psychotherapy hadn't changed much in his actions, though it did help with self-understanding. But nonetheless, he was severely distressed and confused by his inability to stop certain behaviors -- even when it was just the two of us at home, in a safe place, in a calm state of mind. It was seeing the confusion and fear in his eyes when I'd ask him to try to stop (running, talking, slapping, touching, anything-ing) that made me do something I never, ever thought I would: choose medicine. He is not a different boy on meds, and in fact, his ADHD behavior is still present when he is medicated; the medicine simply creates the necessary pause between impulse and action to give him a still-pretty-long-shot chance of being able to learn to control himself.

He once tried to use ADHD as an excuse for some unacceptable and typical 8-year-old talking-back behavior. I laughed and said, "Oh, no. That is never going to be an excuse for you. The medicine and the diagnosis don't take away your responsibility. You still have to do the hard work of learning self-control; the medicine just makes it possible for your brain to hear that message." He shrugged. Kid's gotta try to work his angles, was what he seemed to be saying. Totally normal, right? It's good to have some normal.

So he's on his way on the long, slow road of learning to master himself. But believe me, if I had been able to give myself and Zack the

  • 10
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Kathleen Christensen 5 pts

Soon after I was diagnosed, someone (whom I didn't know all that well) told me outright, "I hope you don't take meds." Later, someone accused me of advocating "medieval medicine" when I suggested in an online forum that sometimes people can manage their ADD successfully without meds. I get tired of the judgment around this issue.

My daughter and I don't take meds, but I've seen them be so helpful for some people. And other things can be helpful too: neurofeedback, behavioral strategies, diet, exercise, time in nature, meditation, a more hands-on style of education. Choices about what strategies to use, and when, should be respected as personal decisions.

Thanks to everyone for sharing their stories. I think that the more people hear a variety of stories, the less they're likely to judge.

biggreenmeanie 5 pts

It was actually my son's second grade teacher who suggested looking into behavior modification to help him focus in class. Not once did she suggest ADHD but we finally found our way to a very supportive doctor who guided us through behavior classes and medication. It angers and hurts me when people who don't live with ADHD say too many kids today are overmedicated. I cried struggling with my child not "being normal" but the first day and week was truly a miracle with the medicine. He is healthy and happy and yes, he tries to test me, but the medicine and ADHD is never an issue because our family doesn't make it one. Thank you for your post. I wish I could explain it as well as you do to my well meaning but ill informed friends.

Pale@BTPM 5 pts

My son was recently diagnosed with primarily inattentive-type ADD (as well as dyslexia). His verbal IQ scores are in the very superior to mildly gifted range, which masks a lot of his challenges ... to the point where he is getting by or better than getting by ... or else he very much ~appears~ to be getting by ... in spite of his issues. The ~inattentive type~ ADD means that he does not have "behavior" issues in the classroom, so he is far from the proverbial squeaky wheel. Nonetheless, he needs significant, proactive support to help him compensate for and overcome his challenges. But I can't tell you how many obstacles and false perceptions are in the way of getting him what he needs. The backlash that you speak of against medicating kids because the pervasive, uneducated perception is that kids today are 'overmedicated' because it's 'convenient' ... Honey, there is nothing ~convenient~ about my son's circumstances. Fact: He faces far greater risk from NOT medicating (depression, anxiety, addiction, academic failure ...) than he does from the little white pill. Continued ...

Pale@BTPM 5 pts

My son began a trial of Ritalin last month and it has made a world of difference in his focus and performance. His dyslexia tutors, who were not informed about the meds beforehand, could tell instantly that something had changed dramatically for the better (as in, Who is this child and what have you done with your son?!). They were positively giddy at his increased ability to step up and work to his potential.

The enormous extra demands that his dyslexia (an information processing issue) puts on his working memory and his processing speed were compounded by the ADD (ADD & Dyslexia often present together ... up to 60% of the time). Taking ADD out of the picture, or at least easing it a bit is a blessing beyond words. Especially since the school will probably insist that he "does not qualify" for specific therapy/support for the dyslexia (a whole blog's worth of posts in itself). Continued ...

Pale@BTPM 5 pts

We, too, were aware that something was going on with my son from an early age. His young five's teacher spent all of half a week with him and decided he had Asperger's (wrong, but I spent four years worrying about the possibility, even though that didn't really add up to me. Thanks for that).

There is a strong family history of ADHD. I have two brothers-in-law and a niece and two nephews who are medicated for it and my husband and I now feel like we should be evaluated ourselves. High-functioning, inattentive types can be very hard to diagnose, but what a toll it can take on your self-esteem when you believe there is something inherently ~wrong~ with who you are.

Whenever you make parenting choices in situations that are not obviously black-and-white (ie many things in life and in parenting), people -- those on the ~outside~ of the situation -- will second guess you. The media/cultural backlash against the ADD label (and all neurological/psychiatric conditions, for that matter) feeds that armchair quarterbacking and the negative perception ... when, in my shoes and my son's shoes, the problem itself is quite injury enough. Continued ...

Pale@BTPM 5 pts

I wish I had medicated my son sooner; I have to wonder if he would have made better, more solid progress LAST year if we'd acted then. But the Greek Chorus of "TSK TSK overmedication for convenience-sake ... lazy parents and teachers tsk tsk" makes everyone, including physicians, more reluctant than they should be to support meds in appropriate cases. It makes it harder to ~discern~ appropriate cases in the first place because unfortunately there is no medical test that can confirm diagnosis. So more often than not, it takes precious (lost) time for the problem to separate itself from "age-appropriate", range-of-normal behavior. These guideline changes aren't the dramatic improvement we need, but acknowledging that treating sooner rather than later is a step in the right direction.

LucindaA 15 pts

When I was teaching, I has students with ADHD. They truly benefited from medication and therapy. They clearly needed extra help. The problem was the students who were told they had ADHD when I don't believe they did. Now I know I'm not a doctor and I wasn't there parent. But there was a clear difference in behavior. A line that you could almost draw in the sand between the child who struggled because he couldn't control himself and the child who simply didn't want to control himself. (My nephew is a great example. My sister doesn't have the will to discipline him so she says he's ADHD when I have watched him willingly control his behavior in circumstance where he knew the limits.)

That's what makes this thing so tricky. Seeing kids labeled who shouldn't be. All it does it make it harder for the kids who really need help to get it. While I have mixed feelings about the expanded age range, I certainly hope it opens doors for those who need the help.

Hallie Sawyer 6 pts

I recently wrote a magazine article about this after my sister's boys had been diagnosed. Rather than go the medication route (her ped's first choice for therapy-another blog post!), she did her own research. Many of her son's behaviors were calmed by changes in his diet. It made a dramatic enough difference that his teacher noticed a difference within a week.

Both kids have dramatically improved and her experience spurred me to do more research. I spoke with a local pediatrician that focused on Integrative Medicine and it was refreshing to talk to a doctor that wasn't pushing meds from minute one. I encourage you to look into diet and nutrition as another way to tackle this disorder, unless you already have.

It was a huge eye-opener for me and my sister. Best of luck to you with this as I know it is very trying.

texasebeth 24 pts

Our son, who will be 7 in January, was diagnosed with ADHD when he was just barely 4 years old. I had never really thought about him having ADHD but I knew the boy just couldn't stop touching things! Seriously the child was straightening up the aisles at Wal-Mart when we went shopping.

We did the research for a few months and went with the medication our pediatrician recommended as well as started therapy for behavior modification. Charlie is no where near zombie like when on his meds by any means! He is still a fidgety busy little boy with minimal impulse control but his brain can now slow down enough for him to pay attention and learn.

Like you, we don't use his ADHD as an excuse for bad behavior. Charlie is still expected to follow household rules, use good manners, be responsible for his decisions, etc. He is learning how to function in the world and how to be a successful, independant productive member of society despite his ADHD. Just like others who are disabled for any reason do.