Bio
My name is Laurie. I have always loved words, pictures, stories, and people. I read and write obsessively. Over the years I've kept paper journals, w...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Liveblog: Earn Our Votes: What Questions Do Women Bloggers Want Candidates to Answer in Election 2008?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Note: This session moved really fast, but I found it important enough to cover this that I'm willing to post this liveblog in its fully imperfect glory. I'll be cleaning it up today, with links, so you'll all have access to some great perspectives from smart women on some of our most pressing issues related to the upcoming election.

Lisa Stone introduced Morra Aarons, the moderator for today and Blogher's political director. Lisa is the timekeeper.

Morra is so honored by the women who have come to this panel and the women in the room. She will start with pollsters and strategists.

Sarah Simmons, GOP political strategist

Anita Sharma, Lake Research Partner, specialist in education and women's issues.

Jen Hogg, will lead Iraq breakout group. She is a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War

Mary Catherine Hamm, videoblogger and blogger at townhall.com

Dr. Val Jones at Revolution Health will be leading the healthcare section.

Closing speakers will be Gina Cooper, executive director of yearlykos.com, Jennifer Posner, founder of Women in Media and News.

Morra handed it over to Sarah Simmons to talk about women voters. She says she always gets invited to these things because there aren't a lot of "Republican chicks out there". That's wrong. She would counsel you to remember that women are a diverse group of people. There are no "women's issues" - all issues impact women.

Who are women voters?

58 percent of women work outside the home. 52 percent are between 45-54,

62 percent are married, 35 are moms, 37 are single, and 27 are married moms.

In 2006, 55 percent voted Democrat, 43 percent GOP. In 2004, 51 percent voted Bush, 48 percent Kerry.

What do women care about?

She thinks Republicans did a great job in 2004, bad job in 2006 of figuring out what specific voters care about, and talking to them about it so they'll get up and vote.

Number one issue we think candidates should be talking about is Iraq. What's interesting is looking at the comparison of younger to older women. Women under 50 are much more concerned about healthcare. 30-60 have figured out how to do healthcare forms for children as well as parents.

Issues from most to least important according to polls.

Iraq
Health Care
Job creation/Economic growth
Illegal immigration
Terrorism
Environment

Older women are more likely to think that the situation has gotten worse than younger. Younger women are more likely to say that it's stayed the same. Older women are more likely to be home during the day, she says, more likely to watch the news?

Men believe that illegal immigrants help much more than it hurts, whereas women believe the opposite. Men: 50 percent believe it helps, 41 percent believe it hurts
Women: 43 percent helps, 47 percent hurts.

Women are much more likely to talk about how the kids get less attention at school because of focus on second language issues, or less service at the emergency room. Women personalize issues: environmental health means, "do my kids have access to clean drinking water?" or "can my family go on a hike." Politicians can personalize issues to talk to women in a more effective manner, rather than talking globally on a "plain paper" sort of issue.

Anita Sharma will echo Sara's statements about women voters. She'll recap women's vote in 2006.

Women decided in 2006 that the country needed a new agenda. Women's vote was key in the three Senate races in VA, MO and MT - the gender gap is how women and men vote for a candidate.

With each passing year America becomes more "unmarried". 2005 - 45 % of Americans were unmarried vs. 32 percent in 1960. Turnout in unmarried women shot up in 2002 and 2006. Unmarried women were more likely to vote for Democrats in the next election.

Women's agenda much broader - goes beyond Iraq to health care, education, environment, women's rights. Environment is a "second tier" issue for women. Why? It's a local issue where you can see the impact you can have yourself. Also some women tend to believe that we've made progress on the environment where we haven't on prescription drug costs or equal pay for women. If you use the word "environment" you won't link them in, but connect it to a broader platform, and you'll see more emphasis on women.

2006 as the year of the women leader. We asked voters on election day how they would rate women's issues. Over half said having a woman speaker was important. How do you think more women in Congress would impact growing scandal and corruption there?

Will 2008 be the year of the woman President?

A July New York

  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
toledolefty 5 pts

I think questions 1 and 2 under health care are similar and could be combined, and the question currently under the environment about protecting people from the effects of pollution could be moved to be a health question.

----
Jen
http://yawwblog.blogspot.com
http://angryfatgirlz.blogspot.com
http://toledolefty.blogspot.com

Morra Aarons Mele 5 pts

Hi all- before I formally post this, here's where we are now with the 12 questions we are going to ask candidates during Election 2008. Please comment or send suggestions- thanks!

BlogHer Earn Our Votes Manifesto:

The BlogHer community has developed 12 questions they want each and every candidate running for president to answer.

The questions fall under four topics, which were voted most pressing by the BlogHer community. These topics are:

Iraq
Health Care
Economic Future
Environment and Global Warming

Iraq:

1. Will you work to end the Iraq war before the 2008 election? If so, how?

2. The war is draining our country’s finances, and even with a significant troop pullout, the costs will not end soon. How do you propose to keep paying for the costs of war?

3. What are you physically going to do to help the Veteran's Administration and soldiers in need, instead of just paying lip service?

Environment and Global Warming (we have four right now- our community needs to vote and rule one out!)

1. We are reaching the point of no return on climate change. What will your legacy to the environment be?

2. How will your policies help to protect people’s bodies from pollution in the environment?

3. What is your position on expanding public transit as a means to reduce carbon emissions, create additional jobs, and provide a resource to communities? How will you incentivize states and municipalities to take these steps?

4. Sometimes, an attitude of "Not invented here" keeps politicians from adopting very good policies from other countries. For example, will you support participating in Kyoto and other international efforts to address climate change? Will you consider ideas and standards from other countries as a guideline to federal policies, rather than trying to create new standards from scratch?

Our Economic Future:

1. Will you give a tax credit to people who are self-employed and need to buy health insurance?
2. How will you address predatory lending practices to ensure Americans buy homes they can really afford?
3. How will you create federal public policy that helps families break the cycle of poverty?

Health Care:

1. Most of us believe every American deserves health insurance, but what are you going to do about the fact that we just can't afford to give everyone everything they want? How will you allocate scarce resources?

2. How do you intend to make sure that everyone gets health insurance?

3. What is your position on requiring all major private, Medicaid, or federal health insurance plans cover birth control?

Zoe Chafe 5 pts

Thanks for these great notes. If anyone has follow-up questions about the environment breakout group discussion, feel free to send me an email at zchafe@worldwatch.org. (Quick introduction for those that weren't present: I'm a researcher with the Worldwatch Institute.) I think Cooper was taking notes during the session, so she might share the play-by-play of our discussion sometime soon. It was a pleasure to meet you all, and thanks again to Morra for organizing such a great session.

Worldwatch Institute ( http://www.worldwatch.org )

toledolefty 5 pts

We hadn't reached a consensus on the third question, but many of us were interested in knowing candidates' position on expanding public transit as a means to reduce carbon emissions, create additional jobs, and provide a resource to communities. I think that it's unfortunate that so far, no candidate has taken a strong stand in favor of mass transit, when such a huge part of the carbon problem in the U.S. is our marriage to the car.

There was also a question about whether candidates would be willing to consider ideas and standards from other countries as a guideline to federal policies, rather than trying to create new standards from scratch. Our group had a sense that an attitude of "Not invented here" kept politicians from adopting very good policies from other countries. On a related note, people wanted to know if candidates would support participating in Kyoto and other international efforts to address climate change.

----
Jen
http://yawwblog.blogspot.com
http://angryfatgirlz.blogspot.com
http://toledolefty.blogspot.com

sgranger 5 pts

Quick correction/clarification about my name and info above in the main summary - it's spelled Granger, without the i, and I don't run campaigns in the sense of campaign managers - I help manage various online aspects of the campaigns, like blogs, and most of my political clients are Democrats. (I apologize if I wasn't clearly speaking through the microphone - I wouldn't want anyone to think I was misrepresenting myself.)

lauriewrites 5 pts

This is great - I appreciate the help with covering this session.

sgranger 5 pts

This will be a little rough because I took a lot of notes, but I'll do my best with the time available before our next session...

Essentially our breakout came up with three issues/concerns to phrase into questions (in no particular order):
1) Leaving - Are you in favor of troop withdrawl? If so, when would you remove the troops and how would you do it? Also more specifically, are you working to do it before you take office, and if so, how?

2) Money - What is your position on the economics in the situation in Iraq and how would you empower Iraqis to be financially supported when they

3) VA/Healthcare - What is your view of the state of the VA system and healthcare for veterens? What would you do to change the existing system?

We had a lot of good discussion. It wasn't necessarily polarized - everyone seemed to recognize the need to get out of Iraq, for example, but many people in our group had definite issues that were passionate to them.

One of the issues brought up was that of getting accurate information from what's really happening in Iraq. We wanted to know how viable it really is to get out of Iraq soon.

Beth Corbin criticized the use of "no-bid contracts" as a serious problem in terms of not fully utilizing the abilities of the Iraqis to rebuild their country both in terms of physical and governmental infrastructure.

So the general question was asked - how do we transition back to Iraqis rebuilding Iraq? How can we protect the interest of the civilians there? Our panel leader, Jen, who works with Iraq Veterens Against the War, brought up the important point that our military doesn't have capabilities to build infrastructure. Military people are not trained in that.

Then the discussion turned to the concern of hurting our soldiers if we cut off funding for the war. Nancy Hill said "there is enough money to withdraw our troops safely."

Then on the topic of accurate information, Gloria Pan inquired "how do we bring a level of competence into anything that we do?"

Morra followed-up with another point that the VA system seems to have disappeared off the radar particularly in terms of long term care, mental disabilities, and as someone else said, traumatic brain injuries.

Then we wrapped up and came up with our major issues, noted above. Thanks everyone for participating!

Morra Aarons Mele 5 pts

Thank you Laurie!
And I want to let everyone know that I will be posting the questions in their (semi) final form, as well as a way to vote, as soon as I can.

I think we're on to the start of something big here-- but it's so important for us to get fair questions that represent as many BlogHers as possible. Today's session was rushed, so don't consider any of these questions final!