Bio
I'll just be over here drooling on the new J. Crew catalog ...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Mayim Bialik, Modesty, and Mainstream Media

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

To kick off the current season of What Not to Wear, Clinton Kelly and Stacy London made over former child star Mayim Bialik. Bialik is 33 now, married, and a mom of two. Earlier this summer, Bialik talked with Celebrity Baby Blog about her life: "We do the EC thing, elimination communication. We bedshare. We are a natural living family. We make our own shampoo, our own granola, our own cleaning products. We’re a non-obnoxious green family I like to think! We’re generally kind of holistic."

In other words, she's not your typical Hollywood mom.

Bialik's crunchy green lifestyle had influence her style too -- or so it appeared when she was ambushed on a NYC street by WNTW's Clinton and Stacy. Bialik was wearing long skirts and over-sized shirts and men's shoes. Like so many new moms, it appeared that she had given up and given in. The bloom was off the Blossom.

Stacy and Clinton made Bialik over, in what was a fairly typical WNTN episode (aside from the fact that the subject was a former TV star who once played a kid with an overly active fashion sense). At the end, Bialik looked like herself but more polished, more elegant, and more sexy.

And that's the bit that Bialik took issue with.

This week, in an essay in Tablet, an online Jewish magazine, Bialik writes about her WNTW makeover. She is gracious and funny and honest -- and critical of the way TLC overlooked the things that mattered to her in their editing of the episode. She writes, "The WNTW producers asked if I have any clothing restrictions. Deep breath. 'I don’t wear pants,' I told them. 'I prefer skirts.' You see, I am what I guess you’d call a Conservadox Jew. I started embracing certain aspects of Jewish modesty, or tzniut, before my second son was born, and although I know many Orthodox women who don’t observe tzniut, the boundaries and framework of privacy it provides appealed to me."

Bialik goes on to explain how she came to embrace tzniut in her everyday life, and what it represents for her.  She describes her early Judaism studies, undertaken in preparation for her marriage, as "almost anthropological—I was curious as to how Judaism viewed marriage and sexuality, but I did not really intend to increase my level of observance." But as time went on, Bialik says, she found herself embracing the dress code of traditional Judaism, and feeling empowered by her choices.

During the days of the sheva brachot, the seven traditional feasts celebrated in the days after the chuppah ceremony, I tentatively covered my head with scarves and crocheted hats, trying on my new status as a married woman. Beyond wearing a ring, my lifestyle didn’t have a means of representing the change from single to married, and I was cautious about challenging the feminist ideals I’d previously embraced. But I liked feeling a physical representation in my new life as a married woman. In synagogue, I began covering my head with tichels (decorative scarves) from trips to Israel—just as my Orthodox cousins who I used to consider submissive and trapped in an archaic lifestyle taught me to wrap them—and fashionable hats. No flowers allowed. Too Blossom-y.

As my life progressed, tzniut became a bigger part of it and I started appreciating what it means to keep your sexual appeal for yourself and for your partner. I came to see that not everything that makes me beautiful, sexy, or desirable needs to be on display.

On the set of What Not to Wear, however, Bialik and the producers did not see eye to eye. She was presented with mannequins wearing pants, despite explaining that she didn't wear them; one of her final reveal dresses was sleeveless. Bialik said, on camera, that she would not wear the sleeveless dresses without a sweater of some sort, and that above-the-knee skirts were not something she would wear. None of those statements appeared in the edited version that aired on TLC.

Bialik is not critical of WNTW or TLC, or of Stacy London and Clinton Kelly; in fact, she is incredibly gracious about the opportunity they gave her, telling Celebrity Baby Blog that "They really accommodated all the things about me that are so quirky fashion-wise, and gave me sleek. They kept saying sleek, sophisticated, modern and not frumpy. That’s what they were going for."

But Bialk also makes an important point, not so much about her

  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
LMAshton 5 pts

disclaimer: I've never seen the show. Until today, I hadn't even heard of it. 

Yeah, I'm a bit bothered, myself, with the "need" for everything to be sexy. Why? Is it really necessary? I can't imagine how.

I also dress modestly from within a religious framework, but honestly, I think, even without the religion, I would anyway. I've never enjoyed putting my body on display. I suppose experiences from my teen/young adult years have coloured that - large breasts have a habit of making animals out of otherwise well-behaved men. I opted for covering up.

And what's wrong with that? Why should I, or anyone else, have to put our bodies on display in order to be considered fashionable or looking nice?

Of course, now I live in a society - Sri Lanka - where covering up is even more important. Women here do not wear shorts or short skirts. Foreign women who show skin get more bad attitude and less friendliness than those women who cover up. If you want to be treated well here, don't show cleavage, shoulders, midriff, or knees. 

Added to that, eating disorders are at a much lower rate here, although rising with Western fashion influence, and people in movies/television tend to have much more varied sizes and shapes than Hollywood portrays (imagine a size 14 woman jiggling her belly fat in the Bollywood dance numbers!). Related? I think so. The body issues that women have in the West is not as prevalent here, not by a long shot. It's actually quite refreshing. :)

Chilli & Chocolate ( http://food.laurieashton.com )

A Canadian in King Parakramabahu's Court ( http://srilanka.laurieashton.com )
LMAshton on Twitter ( http://twitter.com/lmashton )

Susan Wagner 5 pts

In fact, this is a totally topical -- and really interesting -- take on what Bialik was talking about.

I think you're right, that "sexy" has become fashion industry shorthand for a lot of things that don't necessarily have anything to do with sex. The dilemma, of course, is that then we're seeing sexy everywhere and there's no alternative. 

For women like Bialik, who want -- for personal or religious or whatever reasons -- to keep sexy for their partners, it's hard to find good style advice, because that shorthand is so prevalent.

I would rather we went back to "pretty" or "cute" or "stylish," instead of defaulting to "sexy."

Friday Playdate ( http://www.blogher.com/fridayplaydate.com )

ynnej 5 pts

As a former WNTW addict, after watching so many episodes I feel like sometimes the show uses the word or the inference of the word "sexy" to mean a lot of things, many of which don't even mean sexually appealing. They use it to mean things like "pretty", or "cute", or "a little more form-fitting than a bag".I feel like, because it is a cable show, they use the word "sexy" in place of other more accurate words because it is perceived to be more exciting. However, a lot of the time they are not actually revealing more, but less, than the person was revealing before - only more tactfully.

Thats a bit of a tangent from your original topic, however - I would have loved to have heard more on that episode about Mayim's religious convictions and seen Stacy and Clinton work within them, because I really think they could have done that. I had no idea until you told me that there were such parameters that could have been brought in. Thanks for the post!

http://www.ConscientiousConfusion.com

http://www.afamilyis.us

Flightkeeper 5 pts

I think it's good to be sexy, but it's hard to be comfortable with it if you're not used to it because sexiness is a frame of mind.  I think you can be sexy and not wear skimpy clothing.  In fact as I get older, i tend to equate sexiness with being sophisticated.  I look at Tina Turner being sexy and over 50 and I am happy that she gives us a great example.  In fact I look at all the sexy ladies over 40 including Cher, Elle Macpherson, Vanessa Williams, Goldie Hawn and I'm really inspired.  Growing old doesn't mean looking frumpy, just as being sexy doesn't mean that you wear very little. In fact you can be both modest and sexy.  However, if you are part of a religious community that frown on sexiness, well an individual really can't control that.

http://flightkeeper.blogspot.com ( http://flightkeeper.blogspot.com/ )

http://cutefuncool.blogspot.com ( http://cutefuncool.blogspot.com/ )

MDiskin 5 pts

I'm all for looking stylish and working what fits and getting out of a schlumpy rut, but as I get older I'm much less comfortable putting myself on display. To me there is nothing more sad than seeing women my age (39) and older struggling to hold on to an I AM SEXY look that depends on short skirts, overboosted cleavage, and scary Madonna arms.

Because there is style that fits you, and is appropriate at certain ages, and that works for seasons in your life, and then there is what everyone on TV seems to be desperately trying to achieve, a militant sexiness that devalues true style, which should accentuate your best features on the outside and signal your worth and substance on the inside.

(Not sure that this is the problem with WNTW -- more of a cultural observation. But it seems to infect just about everything on TV)

ameliasprout 5 pts

I really liked the episode, and while I was relatively sure that there was something relating to her faith going on, I'm not sure everyone would gotten that.  That is unfortunate they cut it, since I think we could all use to learn something. 

 I don't see a problem with "sexy" for an adult audience, especially since I think WNTW has always dealt with it.  If anything, they've covered up women who wore too little nearly as often as they've gotten someone out of clothing that was to large.  In media as a whole, I think it could be handled better.  I see women at work (the broader sense, not my employer) who show more than I would think is a good idea.  I know that a lot of that comes from the media being skewed towards our non-work lives as well as geared towards a younger audience. We could all use a fashion editor some days.

As I'm adjusting to my weight loss, and plotting for more, I know that to look my best I need to be working the v-neck and stop wearing things four sizes to large. You could say that I'm trying to look more sexy, but for me it is more about appreciating myself enough to care about how I look.  If anything, that was what I got out of her episode.  It was about appreciating herself enough to care how she looked.