Bio
I'm a pedagogy specialist, which means I help university instructors improve their teaching. As the contributing editor for Research, Academia, and E...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Mega-Museums in Abu Dhabi -- cultural imperialism in reverse?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

In museums, who gets to represent whose culture? It's an old question that in the U.S. tends to play out most publicly when Native American patrimony and culture are displayed in museums. When such cultural controversies become global, often ownership comes into question--who really owns the Elgin Marbles, for example? The perniciousness and persistence of colonialism has dragged many of these conflicts into the 21st century. But what happens when the tables are turned, when a Middle Eastern country--specifically Abu Dhabi--wants to represent Western culture, and even make use of Western museums' brand names in the process? And how should museums in the West advise colleagues in the East who are new to the museum field?

These and other questions are facing major museums--including the Smithsonian, which is advising the Abu Dhabi Authority for Culture and Heritage on a Bedouin museum; the Guggenheim, which in 2012 will open a 300,000-square-foot museum there that has alternately been described as a medieval cathedral and pharaonic"; and the Louvre, which has licensed its name--to the tune of $520 million--and its expertise and art (for an additional $747 million) to an art museum slated to open in the city in 2012.

(To see the designs of the new museums, as well as read artistic statements from their "starchitects," check out this round-up from ArchNewsNow.)

About Abu Dhabi
Abu Dhabi is the capital of the United Arab Emirates and its second largest city, with nearly 900,000 people residing in it. The Guardian provides some history and context for the United Arab Emirates cultural interests:

They were once little more than oil outposts in the desert, wealthy but remote, seven emirates bound together in a federation on the south-eastern tip of the Arabian peninsula. But the United Arab Emirates are fast reinventing themselves as a cultural and recreational hub, with tens of billions of dollars of investment transforming Abu Dhabi and Dubai in particular. Abu Dhabi, whose petrodollars give it one of the highest per capita incomes in the world, is styling itself as the cultural alternative to Dubai's more ritzy holiday and retail destination.

The emirates capital plans an "upscale cultural district" on Saadiyat, with the $400m Guggenheim museum part of a $27bn government-funded development that will include museums, a concert hall and art galleries alongside two golf courses, hotels and an "iconic 7-star property". The Dubai plans include indoor ski slopes, an underwater hotel, a $4bn theme park, and the elite island development known as The World.

The billion-plus dollars that Abu Dhabi is paying France is part of a long-standing economic relationship with the Western European nation. As The New York Times reports, there may be a bit of quid pro quo underlying the French government's willingness to cut a deal with Abu Dhabi.

For France the agreement signals a new willingness to exploit its culture for political and economic ends. In this case, it also represents something of a payback: the United Arab Emirates has ordered 40 Airbus 380 aircraft and has bought about $10.4 billion worth of armaments from France during the last decade.

Louvre Abu Dhabi
Much of the controversy has swirled around the Louvre Abu Dhabi, which will feature art from throughout history and all the world's regions, including Islamic art. At the time the French government was negotiating with Abu Dhabi, 4,650 museum experts signed a petition protesting the deal, claiming that the Louvre was behaving more like a profit-maximizing corporation than as a protector of and educator about the world's, and particularly France's, art.

Others have criticized the petitioners. Maymanah Farhat, a specialist in modern and contemporary Arab art and the editor of ArteNews, says colonial turnabout is fair play. In a long and thoughtful article, she writes,

Much of the opposition to the proposed Abu Dhabi Lourve lament that the French public will be deprived of its heritage. Three out of eight of the departments that structure the Louvre collection contain art from the Middle East and North Africa and are categorized as such: "Near Eastern Antiquities," "Egyptian Antiquities" and "Islamic Art." If this latest transaction with Abu Dhabi does in fact indicate a move to exploit France's patrimony, then it must be acknowledged that the "French culture" being disputed over is not purely French nor is it devoid of a ruthless colonial history. In theory then, according to French opinion, it is perfectly acceptable to exploit non-French peoples and cultures for economic gain,

  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
marjorieS 5 pts

Hi Leslie -- thanks for a provocative post.  Since I head out to Abu Dhabi next week for a tour of Happiness Island as well as meetings with the museum planners, and then to Israel for more museum research, I'll take lots of notes and report my observations and on-the-ground thoughts to you.  My reading and discussions so far reveal a very complex set of circumstances, colored by misinformation and stereotypes (including my own), but seeing will be believing, and listening instructive, so onward ... Marjorie 

Jeff.Mather 5 pts

Thanks for a very interesting article, Leslie!

As a regular museum-goer, I can only think that opening new museums in the UAE (especially new art museums) is a very good thing. I'm always seeing something new, seeing something old in a new way, and having new ideas whenever I go to an art museum, especially the ones that I visit often. It's a real drag to have to travel long distances to see exhibits; and I'm glad that people living in and visiting the Emirates will have a chance to experience even more of the world's cultural history.

(I hope more Arabian and Islamic art makes its way to Europe and America, too. The Afghan art exhibit you mentioned was a great case in point. It was brilliantly put together and showed that Afghanistan was a crossroad for ideas, goods, art, and religion for centuries, turning the idea of it as a perpetually war-ravaged place on its head.)

Call me a cynic, but I believe that at some very basic level, all museums are about vanity and civic aggrandizement, so I don't have a problem with why the UAE wants these museums. But I think they've fundamentally misunderstood the subversive role of art in society, if they think that they can in some way bring artwork in and not have it transform the way their patrons see the world. Who knows, maybe that's partly what they're after.

Jeff ( http://www.jeffmatherphotography.com/dispatches/ )

Pam 5 pts

I'm reading Loot right now - I've just cracked it, so I don't have much to say about it yet.I've also been spending a lot of time thinkng about how Native American culture is displayed/portrayed in museums - in the past, mostly - look, there were natives and after the west was carved up into states, some other stuff happened having nothing to do with the natives and now they don't really matter. [Sigh.] I saw another of these exhibits just a few days ago. 

I do support making Western art available for all audiences, this is just one of the ways to promote cultural curiousity, if not understanding. I don't expect that the display of Western art will all of a sudden give women previously unheard of rights or alleviate the awful awful antisemitism. But I'm a thin edge of the wedge kind of person. You have to peel up the corners somewhere, and art seems like a really great way to do that. 

PS: I think the Elgin marbles belong in Greece. There, I said it. Give Them Back. 

Nerd's Eye View ( http://www.nerdseyeview.com )@nerdseyeview

sgreenla 5 pts

Very thoughtful post, which I've tagged for the del.icio.us feed for my first year seminar on globalization.  You say:

"Women's artwork, Bedouin arts, and the cultural productions of other
groups that have been marginalized in the Muslim, Arabic, and Persian
worlds should be showcased, but the truth is that these people's
contributions are not valued."

I'm not sure I agree that those contributions are not valued unless you mean valued in the narrow sense of the prices such arts brings at auction.  I suspect that showcasing that art for Western audiences would increase its value however defined.  Ignorance leads to undervaluation, imho.