Bio
Learn more about me or just visit my personal blog or come bargain hunt with me. Writing? Check. Parenting? Check. Shopping for shoes? Check. Yep,...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Michele Cossey is a Lousy Mother... Right?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

On the heels of last week's school shooting, the media barely had time to stop and grab a fresh cup of coffee before the next kids-with-guns story was front and center, albeit this time with a twist: Michele Cossey was arrested for buying firearms for her 14-year-old son.


The story has all the earmarks of both the kind of both the outrage we love (oh, what a terrible mother she must be!) as well as the relief we crave (oh, thank goodness, crisis averted). And all the while, the media has chosen to zoom in on the mother's participation as the crucial plot point. Granted, it is a switch, a situation where there's no question of a parent's culpability -- particularly in a world where so many school shootings have left us asking, "Where were the parents?"


Over at Crime Rant tongues are firmly planted in cheek:

Mrs. Cossey bought her home-schooled son, Dillon, a .22-caliber handgun, a .22-caliber rifle and a 9 mm semiautomatic rifle, authorities said. According to press acounts, the teenager felt bullied and tried to recruit another boy for an attack at Plymouth Whitemarsh High School in suburban Philadelphia. Three weapons? Why didn’t she just get her son an Ipod or Halo-3 like all the other put-upon moms in America?



The sarcasm is duly noted, but there's a note of insidious truth in there. This notion that mothers are beleaguered and give in to children's whims just to get a little peace... it's a pervasive belief. Is it true? I want to believe that it's not, but that becomes a hard position to support in a society full of spoiled kids and, yes, kids whose moms are buying them guns because they want them.


Commenter TXMichelle goes one better:

The boy was picked on because he was exceedingly overweight. Mom has done this boy a disservice on several levels. I am guessing she gave him comfort foods too. I cannot begin to imagine what excuse he could have given her to prompt her to purchase a rifle with scope. Mom is in serious denial.

I'm not sure how the conversation about her involvement in purchasing weapons became an indictment of her parenting because her son is overweight, nor am I certain how I feel about this line of reasoning.

Dr. Jim West asks the question that was lurking in the back of my mind, which is where is the father in this story?:

Police said Frank Cossey was sentenced to house arrest for failing to acknowledge a 1981 manslaughter conviction when he tried to buy a .22-caliber rifle for his son in 2005, The Associated Press reported.

Ah, so that’s the example. Makes sense, doesn’t it. Children aren’t the problem, their parents are. You have to get a license to drive, to marry, to be buried, to fish or hunt; but the most important human responsibility of all, the raising of responsible children who become responsible citizens is left to people who don’t have enough sense to raise a goldfish.

Precious.

(At least he takes the time to consider the father as well.)

Lawmummy is quite clear and succinct in her opinion on this case:

She has been charged with a crime. She should go to jail. She should lose custody of her child.

There is zero excuse for this. Zero.

There's a part of me that agrees, and then there's a part of me that thinks this is a very slippery slope. Are we going to take custody away from every mother who ever made the wrong choice regarding her child? Are we going to remove custody just when guns are involved? Where would we draw the line? I don't know the answers to these questions. I know that something horrible happened here -- on several levels -- but mostly I feel a profound sadness for Dillon Cossey. Is Michele Cossey to blame for the dark and disturbed place where he ended up? Enough so that she deserves to have him removed from her care? Do we mothers really have that much power?

Susan Young questions how Michele Cossey could've "overlooked" all the signs of what was happening with her son. She notes all of the warning signs which she believes she would've seen, as a mother, had they occurred with her child. In the end, though, she ends her post with compassion:

I believe the Cossey family is in a terrible situation. My heart goes out to them on some levels. On others I am

  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
traumatic 5 pts

I do not think it is against the law to purchase firearms for minors to use. By the time I was 16 I had a .22 rifle, a 30-30 rifle and a 12ga shotgun. The difference here is in how they were used. My father took me to ranges and hunting and taught me the proper way to both handle and care for them. There was never a question in his mind that I would so something such as this or he would have never bought them.

Judging from what was found in the boy's room, I think his and my cases are totally different. :)

"Assault rifles" are not an issue here since none of the weapons the boy had were capable of full automatic fire. Adding a 30-round magazine to a rifle doesn't make it more capable of killing someone nor does it make the firearm more dangerous if it's in the hands of someone who isn't planning on breaking any laws.

The poor choices made here were what the boy was doing while the mother evidently either didn't know or didn't care. It is her business to know these things. Also, no one here has pointed out the fact reported in the news that, at the time of his arrest, he had no access to any of the weapons except for the air guns and the fact there was no ammunition for the firearms in the house. I've not seen that mentioned in any news item after the first day.

To me, "illegally buying firearms" means she wasn't able, by law, to purchase them for some reason or another. Just as his father wasn't. Of course, I could be wrong about that. Perhaps it's "illegal" because of what he was evidently planning?

davemartin7777 5 pts

There is a little girl involved with this "family".
I'm hoping that this thing get her out of that creepy home.
No way anyone can convince me that, that little girl is safe there.
The father is a felon, the kid's older brother is a felon too.

davemartin7777 5 pts

There is a little girl involved with this "family".
I'm hoping that this thing get her out of that creepy home.
No way anyone can convince me that, that little girl is safe there.
The father is a felon, the kid's older brother is a felon too.

davemartin7777 5 pts

He goes by "Shadow19462" if the link at the bottom doesn't work.

I've left some comments, I'm wondering do you think they were appropriate?

You all seem to have your bases grounded so I'm just wondering.

Frankly looking at the kid reminded me of a young "Sam Richard "Son of Sam" Berkowitz.

Read his "thoughts" on the North Hollywood bank shootout video.

I'm thinking that some people are just born evil.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Shadow19462

alyssaroyse 5 pts

You are so right. Spot on.

But we still all need to look at the larger societal issues.... Thankfully, this kid may get a second chance.
___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com ( http://www.JustCauseIt.com )

lawmummy 5 pts

Well, I guess you already know from the little snippet from my blog - but to be fair, there's lots more there than those sensational bits.

So let me clarify. As a mom, I do not normally advocate removing a child from a home based on a few poor choices. I believe that most children belong with their parents. I believe in rehabilitation. I believe in second chances.

But if you read the details of this case, however, you realize that this mother (and yes, the father, too) has made a series of poor choices that have put her son at risk, and possibly other children, too.

It wasn't one gun - it was more than one gun. The guns were assault weapons, not hunting rifles, and not air guns (though there were more than 30 of those as well). There were bombs and grenades, all in plain view, according to the DA. The reason the mother bought them? The father had attempted to purchase a gun for the boy before (2 years prior) but wasn't able to do so because he was a felon - manslaughter for DUI.

This child clearly had issues. The child needed help. The parents chose not to seek help for the child (that is documented extensively in the press here in Philly). Instead, they removed their son from school and bought guns for him. And yes, it's against the law to purchase assault weapons for minors.

I don't think the child should be removed from the home to punish the mother - the courts will deal with her punishment. I think the child should be removed from the home because his parents are failing to parent him and the potential consequences are harmful not only to the child but possibly the greater community.

It's terribly unkind to be judgmental. But it's more unkind - and a greater disservice - to nod our heads collectively and utter niceties about giving the parents another chance. What about the child? This child is still a child. He still has the chance to figure out what his place in life is - it would be wrong not to give him that opportunity. And it's clear that his parents aren't capable of doing this.

I still echo what I said on my blog: Is it child abuse or just plain neglect? I don’t know. What it isn’t is parenting.

--

Kelly Phillips Erb

http://www.lawmummy.com - my personal blog
http://www.taxgirl.com - a tax blog (and it's not as boring as you think)
http://www.onebooktwobook.com - a children's book blog
http://www.gossipgirlreport.com - a blog for Gossip Girl

Mir Kamin 6 pts

Alyssa: I think the "what can we do about it" reaction is spot-on. Suggestions?

--
Mir from WCS
(BlogHer Mommy & Family contributing editor)

Personal: Woulda Coulda Shoulda ( http://wouldashoulda.com/ )

Having it all with less: Want Not ( http://wantnot.net/ )

Mir Kamin 6 pts

All excellent points, Professor Kim, made more eloquently than I was able to manage in my original post. Thanks for chiming in. :)

--
Mir from WCS
(BlogHer Mommy & Family contributing editor)

Personal: Woulda Coulda Shoulda ( http://wouldashoulda.com/ )

Having it all with less: Want Not ( http://wantnot.net/ )

alyssaroyse 5 pts

Were the parents to blame? Yes. of course they were. Were they alone, should they alone carry the burden of blame? No. Of course not. It's hard to say exactly where the buck stops in situations like this, certainly it should have been stopped before a mother purchased firearms for her child. But she wasn't the only person who missed the cries for help.

The child was exceedingly obese. Did no one notice that? That is, in some states, a sign of neglect and abuse and has resulted in children being taken from their custodial parents. (Ah, the child was home-schooled, thus eliminating one such layer of safety nets.)

Someone threw out Halo 3 as a sarcastic comparison of the way that parents cave to their children's requests. But the more salient point is that Halo 3 is a violent video game - one of many - in which we are taught to deal with our fears, insecurities and adversaries using massive violence - which includes firearms. Who's to blame to the popularity and wide acceptance of these games? (Not the manufacturers who are serving a hungry market.)

Where were the parents who taught their children to ridicule and bully people who were different from them, be they obese, poor, colored or something else? And where are the people to stand up to those children and teach them that is not an acceptable way to behave? (Except that we do accept it, even applaud it in much television programming that is aimed at children?)

Yes, the parents are to blame. Certainly. But they are not alone. As a society that creates violent entertainment, gobble sup lurid tales of death and destruction on the news as if it were psychological candy for sanctimonious souls (so glad it happens to "those" people and not us,) we are all responsible for this.

We need to praise the kid - and his parents - who said "no" to this plot. And then we need to HELP the family in which it originated. Then we need to look at what we accept as news and entertainment in our culture, and all take some responsibility for it. Those of us who know better have some responsibility to put it out there, and lead by example.

It's so sad. And a symptom of a much larger illness that we all share. This didn't happen to "those" people, it is happening to all of us, and it is eroding the fabric of our society.

What can we - you and I - do about it?
___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com ( http://www.JustCauseIt.com )

moddivorce 5 pts

It isn't entirely the mother's fault, however, she is cupable. I'm not sure how any person can justify buying a minor the weapons she purchased for her son. And putting her son at risk for killing himself and others, in my mind, makes her an unfit mother. I also agree that there are others at blame - including the child himself, his father, the gun suppliers and the legislatures who refuse to stricter gun laws.

No matter how you look at it, it's tragic.

Kim Pearson 5 pts

The few details that have come out about this family paint a complex and troubled picture, and we don't even know how many of them are true. The mother is reportedly a diabetic who moves around on a walker ( http://www.philly.com/inquirer/multimedia/10505332... ). The father's manslaughter conviction came from a fatal motor vehicle collision while he was DUI.

All of this raises questions about the atmosphere in which Dillon was raised. Was the mother well enough to pay attention? Did the father have a substance abuse problem? Where did the son's fascination with Nazism come from? As a community, we want answers that cater to our need for the world to make sense. We want to believe that the parents could have done something to prevent this, and that there is some sign we, as outsiders, could look for to help us recognize and thwart danger.

Are they bad parents? Clearly they made some poor choices. We don't know what, if anything, they tried to do to help their son. We don't know how stable they are themselves. How easy it would be to chalk this up to an isolated case of bad parenting.

The best news in all of this is that the boy will get a psychiatric evaluation, and perhaps the help he needs.

And the other piece of good news in this is that the boy that Dillon recruited had the good sense to go to his parents and sound the alarm.

One hopes that this will be a learning experience for all concerned.

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/kim-pearson )|Professor Kim ( http://professorkim.blogspot.com )|

Erin Kotecki Vest 5 pts

As soon as I started reading the initial news reports the FIRST thing I saw was about the mother purchasing the guns. Its so hard to know where to begin, but to think it just must have been so terribly screwed up that the gun purchase may not have seemed like much at the time. So sad.

Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain ( http://queenofspainblog.com/ )

dynamitt 5 pts

I feel sorry for the boy and his mum. I have no idea how it got this bad and how he was able to get her to buy weapon for him. I really do hope they both get help and can be happier from now on.

Dina

dynamitt ( http://dynam1tt.blogspot.com )