Bio
Rita Arens authors Surrender, Dorothy and Surrender, Dorothy: Reviews. She is BlogHer.com's senior editor.  Her parenting anthology and BlogHer'...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Military Family Values

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Last month I received an e-mail from an old friend of mine who recently discovered my liberal blog. It blew me away. (And I use it here with her permission.)

Here’s what it said:

I have to say since the reunion I read your blog everyday. I'm fascinated on how the other side lives. The civilian side that is~ there is no worry about war, when is daddy coming home from Iraq or is he going to make it home this time around, or how can I do this single parent thing again just so he can defend our freedom. Not to mention making it through another memorial service where during role call I break out into tears for my husband's mentor and fellow soldier. It's just a totally different life but one I take pride in.

At this point, I’m feeling pretty bad about complaining about my civilian job. But it goes on … and in my mind, gets worse.

I can appreciate your liberalism but I have to stay conservative in protection of my family. I tell my family Republicans give us raises and weapons and Democrats typically don't. I do enjoy reading about the debate though.

I remember in the Clinton era not getting a pay raise, not being able to train because there was no money. We were celebrating when Bush became president because I knew there was going to be money coming our way, housing would improve, new equipment, etc. We were going to get pay raises finally that made a difference.

At this point, I was beside myself with confusion. Is this the way it is? At work, I have a large poster that details where every cent of Bush’s last budget went. Over half of it went to “military spending.” That infuriated me, but never once did it occur to me in my furor that “military spending” translates into pay raises and housing for enlisted men and women, not just military contracts. When I think “military spending,” I think “Halliburton contracts.”

And all of the sudden, I was conflicted.

Because this is the way I thought it was.

That 2008 raise would be the start of a five-year plan likely to be approved by lawmakers for pay raises through 2012 that are one-half percentage point above average hikes in the private sector. This would bind the Bush administration and whatever administration follows it to a course of increasing the competitiveness of military raises and reducing the perceived gap between military and civilian pay from today’s 3.9 percent to about 1.4 percent by 2012.

The Bush White House has openly opposed the bigger raises, but congressional aides who will work on the compromise defense bill said lawmakers are unmoved.

So I wrote her back.

I think this makes an excellent humanizing point - regardless of our political leanings, only a cad wouldn't feel for what you guys have to go through on a daily basis. So many times we get caught up in just the politics, but every decision has ramifications. I tend to get angry (from my perspective) that so many are being put in harm's way for reasons with which I don't agree, but it is good to remember that those who serve perhaps wouldn't agree with me.

Then I decided to see how other military families feel. Do they think Republicans are the only people who care about them? Do they support the war? According to USA Today, they are conflicted, too.

Military families are more supportive of the war than Americans without immediate family members in the military, the polls show. Among Americans without military relatives, 59% say the invasion was a mistake, compared with 49% of immediate family members.

Here’s a perspective from Darla:

A year can change a lot of things. We're comfortably unpacked in this old house. I've rearranged the furniture more times than I can remember. I've tripled my yarn collection. We've added our rottie Sue back into our home. I got this fun laptop and tumbled headfirst into this blog world. We've embarked into the mysterious world of infertility testing and the complications of trying to schedule little things like HSG's and pelvic ultrasounds and blood testings with incredibly irregular menstrual cycles. Mr. D has changed occupations from Survival instructor to hip deep in snow as a Dirt Boy and snow plow equipment operator. I had a short sabbatical as a SAHW and than rejoined the working world. We even had a very fun full-military family Thanksgiving dinner. And, yes,

  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Judith in Umbria 5 pts

I was a military wife left running a military family for many years. We didn't make as much money as similarly educated civilians, but we got decent health care and commissary privileges and a sort of built-in social net wherever we went. I didn't love it, but I did it the best I could. Moving around so much meant I couldn't follow a professional career and besides, at that time working wives were frowned on unless they were childless and at the earliest part of the military career.

Military spending, on the other hand, is very little about decent pay and benefits for military personnel. Military personnel can retire after 20 years with a generous pension and they often can get well-paid jobs in associated industries because they are still young and therefore work on another pension scheme. I don't necessarily recommend that someone stay in the military for those reasons, anything but, but it does ameliorate the lower salaries a bit, I think. If they stay on for 25 or 30 years, the deal gets better yet, and the jobs and seats on boards get better as well.

The real reason to sit up and pay attention to military spending is completely other. http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/01/02/... ( http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/01/02/... )
has some information everyone should know. Military spending is doing some shocking, immoral and stupid things around the world and the situation is getting worse. What percentage of those figures do you think represent pay and benefits for those military families? The sum would blow your mind. The reason to stay on top of this massive waste and scandal has nothing to do with paying military and everything to do with saving the US economy from the robber barons that are destroying it.

http://www.judithgreenwood.com/thinkonit/

fnm1gll 5 pts

I'm often puzzled by the comments of this administrations supporters in the military, like those shown here.

She says that Republicans provide raises to military personnel while Democrats typically don't, although the current raise seems to be coming from a Democrat-led Congress, just as the Republicans were in charge of the budget through much of Clinton's tenure. And since there's been so much reported during the Iraq war about the Bush administration's use of private contractors which are paid so much more than our own military (for often doing the same work), I would think pay would be a sore point with this administration.

Even if it were true that Republicans paid more to the military, I would think that sending soldiers to war unnecessarily would trump salary concerns. And though I dislike making the point, it's not true that soldiers in Iraq are protecting our freedom. You could say they were fighting for Iraqis' freedom perhaps. I don't think our freedom was ever in jeopardy in Iraq -- even if there had been weapons of mass destruction. Even the attack on 9/11 didn't jeopardize our freedom -- it jeopardized our safety and stole many lives. But our freedom can only be jeopardized if our country and it's principles is destroyed. However, many would say that the actions of this administration in violating the Constitution is a greater attack to our freedom than any external threats.

I do think that her point about the difference in the two worlds -- the military and the civilian -- is an excellent point. I can't imagine what it would be like to have a loved one in Iraq. I have a good friend who's son has been in Iraq and she hardly slept the year he was there. I have no doubt that his service took years off her life. It's a big price to pay and it's only being paid by a relatively small segment of our population. Our country is at war in Iraq but many of us are barely touched by this event which is catastrophic to so many lives here and in Iraq as well.

Rita Arens 7 pts

If nothing else, this whole experience has taught me a lot about the military. I had no idea the pay differentials were so great.

Surrender, Dorothy ( http://surrenderdorothy.typepad.com )- When I was your age, we just let them ride in the back window.

TLSchaefer 5 pts

Confusion does seem to abound on this issue, and it's on both sides. I'm a life-long Democrat, as *was* my husband. He "changed sides" during the Clinton era for exactly the reasons your friend stated. As a mid-level medical technician, he could have earned quite a bit more on the outside as a LVN, but instead decided to serve out his 20 years.

This year, as a retiree, he's heading more toward Ms. Larimore's viewpoint...he's looking at all the candidates (as am I) for someone who not only makes sense about overseas/military policy, but has a plan for the homefront as well.

It's a very fine tightrope to walk. Until the Bush administration, I'd viewed the two parties very simply...the Democrats tend to work on infrastructure, while the Republicans focus on foreign policy. Now, though...I'm not so sure. President Bush and Mr. Rumsfeld have been vehemently opposed to bringing both military and civilian pay standards into the "real world"...I make HALF of what my counterparts do in the civilian world. But there's a caveat...I know my paycheck is coming every two weeks, the retirement is great, and there's a feeling of family and cameraderie you just don't find on the outside...trust me, I've been there.

TL Schaefer/Keira Ramsay
www.tlschaefer.com ( http://www.tlschaefer.com )