The New Chocolate Finger of Pleasure
by Suzanne Reisman

Last May, my husband's boss asked him to move to London to open a new office. If he accepted this mission, we'd be there for four years. The potential move sparked mixed emotions in me. Although I've lived away from my family for the past 14 years, it is pretty easy to hop on a plane from New York to Chicago for a visit. From London, that's a much bigger journey. Leaving all my friends behind also pained me. On the other hand, I love London, and always wanted to live there for a spell. There are many reasons for this, but I fess up that one of them is how much I love British chocolate. I feared moving there and gained 100 pounds from all the candy bars I'd cram down my lonely gullet.

How silly I was! First, British authorities foiled my plan for nonstop chocolate consumption by removing the candy vending machines from the tube platforms. (Seriously! When I heard about that, I was so relieved that the move was canceled!) Then, the plan for the new office fell through, so I remained in New York. Finally, a few weeks ago Mars introduced its latest tempting product for the ladies: the Fling.

How does the Fling ruin my love affair with British candy bars? NPR explains:

Wrapped in a shiny pink and sliver package, this delicate "chocolate finger" is intended for women. The word "finger" is an industry term for a long, slim confection, Mars spokesman Ryan Bowling says, but with ads that invite you to "Pleasure yourself" in pink lettering, consumers might come to other conclusions.

What the fuck? I have yet to forgive Nestle, the makers of the super delicious Yorkie, for their evil slogan ("It's Not for Girls!"). Every time I see that damn wrapper with the circle and bar over a female cartoon silhouette, I want to find the responsible parties and poke their eyes out with a chocolate appendage. Several years ago, Gena Haskett at Out on the Stoop took Yorkie down a notch:

...The original concept was to market this as a man's chocolate bar, due to its size and volume. The tag line in the ad was "men don't have much to claim for themselves anymore" and the candy is "too big for a woman to handle."

Puleeze - I ate the original Chunky as a kid. That, my friend, was a hunk of chocolate. I can't speak for the modern version but back in the day there were actual raisins and peanuts surrounded by chocolate worthy of clamping down on full force. With real sugar too! I take off the U.S. nutrition label.

Setting aside Yorkie's concern that "men don't have much to claim for themselves anymore," the idea that only men can handle a big, long, thick hunk o' chocolate is hilariously homoerotic. I love it! It actually makes me want to eat Yorkie (which is pretty tasty) far more than that nasty 80 calorie "finger" treat. As Julia at Trysting points out:

...rather than giving us a subtle reminder of how sensually delicious chocolate is, they've decided to shove it down our throats with a marketing campaign written by someone who has read one too many Danielle Steel novels. I'm surprised it doesn't vibrate.

Also, it has no nuts. What kind of a candy bar is that?

Exactly! What hetero woman finds pleasure in a partner who has no nuts? (Heh heh. Oh, Mars - you make it too easy for me.) Sarah Gilbert at WalletPop also takes issue with the Fling:

And do you know what? That packaging looks to me like a feminine hygiene product... This product's marketing is wrong, all wrong, and whoever developed it should be sent back to the 10th grade. We may love chocolate but we don't make love with chocolate. Honestly.

What? Women don't make love with chocolate? Perhaps this is why the official website says it is only available for now in California. (You know how those weird Californians are...) Or, as Kjerstin Johnson at Bitch reminds us, "If it's anything like other pleasuring devices, I will not be seeing [the Fling] anytime soon in AL, GA, KS, LA, MS, TX or VA." (Johnson also dissects how the chocolate incorporates mica to get a shimmery appearance in three different colors. Women like variety in our pleasure sessions, you know.)

Mmmmm.... shimmery fingers. All of this research is making my "mouth" "water." Sorry, Fling. You may be the first new candy bar offered by Mars in 20 years, but I'll stick with the experienced when it comes to quelling my cravings. It may be true that it's not the size of the boat, but the motion of the ocean (to mix metaphors), but it takes Mr. Big* to really satisfy my "hunger." Oh yeah - cue the Barry White as I wrap my lips around this one.

*Explains Cadbury: "Mr. Big is the original big bar made to satisfy your hunger in an exciting way, without weighing you down. Mr. Big Original is a delicious vanilla wafer covered in fresh roasted peanuts and rice crisps, all smothered in a chocolatey coating. Mr. Big is a big bar packed with lots of different ingredients that has a bold, unapologetic personality."

Suzanne also blogs at Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants. Her first book, Off the Beaten (Subway) Track, is about unusual things to see and do in New York City.

Comments

 

yes indeed - kudos to BritChocolate

Sigh..they even change the recipe when they export. I found that out when I lived there -- Cadbury's chocolate, especially the eggs, taste way better there. Then I found out that many companies changed their ingredients by country, so Grey Poupon Dijon mustard even tastes different in the UK (MUCH hotter), and some perfumes are even made differently...I know a man who wears a French men's cologne, and he had me smell the French version and American version of the same Guerlain scent. They were notably different. So, not to wander far from the topic -- the sad part is that we can't even satisfy a BritChoc Jones by buying it in the USA.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also yearns for chocolate at Time's Fool

 

I think I've figured out how to be
excessively popular

At BlogHer 09. Since we're driving we can just fill the truck to the gills with Cabdbury's chocolates. Think the border guards would buy the "I'm just bringing a few across for some friends"? line?

Sassymonkey and Sassymonkey Reads.

 

Same recipe?

Do they make them the same way in Canada as they do in England? As Mata said, the Cadbury in the US is not nearly as good as in the UK. (It's made by, and basically is, Hershey's, although a little better than Hershey's.) Regardless, I'll eat whatever you bring (I am soooo excited for a Mars bar, even if they did introduce the stupid Fling), and even if you come empty handed, you know we love you!

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants

 

Fling?

I'm from England (living in Canada) and oh do I ever miss British chocolate. Double Deckers, Lion bar, Curly Wurly, Turkish Delight, Topic. I can go on and on and on....

I haven't encountered the Fling. It sounds like an inadequate bar of chocolate bar to me. I'm definitely more of a whole Yorkie, Mars or Snickers person myself.

And I can't believe they've stopped selling chocolate in tube stations... why would they do that? Is travelling on the underground not bad enough already?

Sarah

http://lady-mama.blogspot.com/

 

The UK in NYC

One of the best parts of living in NYC is that a lot of shops here import Lion (which I love, love, love!), Turkish Delight, Yorkie, and Double Deckers. My local grocery store sells all of those bars and also Crunchies. But I can never find a plain Mars bar here, and Fling aside, Mars bars are my favorites.

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants

 

No Fling here

I love how all the comments thus far address all the good candy that's out there rather than focusing on the gender-marketed, mica-dusted crap!

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants

 

Well I'm in CA and haven't

Well I'm in CA and haven't seen these yet.

Maybe I better check the sex shops! 

 

In defense of the Fling

It is awesome. Delicious. Better than Chunkies (which I never liked because of those damn raisins which have no business being in a perfectly good piece of chocolate).  I just had a chance to try it and was seriously bummed when my sigOth ate the other one. 

 

But then, what do i know - I liked the fling ad too.

 

Mom-101

Cool Mom Picks.com

 

Glad that you like it

Diversity of opinion is welcome! Honestly, though, the ingredients scare me. Then again, I recently discovered that one of my favorite granola bars contains "shellac."

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants

 

This may come off as

This may come off as hostile, but I had to register just to let to say that as a blue-collar working guy dealing with LNI claims due to recent workplace injuries, a crappy job market where I can't get 40 hours in a week, no benefits, and my wife (who works fulltime) and I are facing losing our home, I read this ridiculously privileged whining nonsense and my stomach just started churning with bile.  Really, reading this made me want to scream obscenties.

Seriously lady, if the only thing in your life of leisure -- do you even work or do you just live off the industry of your husband? you don't mention having to quit a job. -- that is worth complaining about is that some candy company is floating a low-calorie candy bar aimed at women with a less-than-stellar advertising campaign then you should be thanking God, or counting your blessings, or whatever you do to express gratitude, because you are leading a charmed life.

Maybe this is why I never hear about what feminism has done for me or my wife.  Apparently feminism is about rich elites nattering about  crap that does even rise to the level of trivia.

 Three cheers for class warfare.

 

Actually, on second read, I

Actually, on second read, I realized the actual point of this post was for you to brag about your husband landing a job in London, and the candy bar thing is just a smokescreen to justify the bragging that proceeds.

 

Carry on.

 

Thanks!

You'll love my post on bikini waxing then! Probably you'd prefer it to my posts on the effects of foreclosure, why we need subsidized quality child care for all working families, or how to prevent rape. Those posts might upset your hypothesis about me, and I would hate to do that. I also won't bother explaining my career in community development, since clearly I am just a fluff head who worries about candy. Your assumptions really fascinate me, though, particularly because they are so hilariously off base.

Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants

 

Thanks for chiming in and elevating the level
of discourse, Ken!

Ironically, you've targeted a fantastically respected writer here who's known for posting thoughtfully and diplomatically about some of the most challenging issues of our time. And occassionally - marketing. (Oh, the horror.)

For you to presume to know her based on one anaysis of a buzzworthy ad campaign would be like me presuming to know you based on one misdirected rant.

I wish you luck with your situation. It can't be easy. And if you ever spent any actual time here, you'd know that we talk about that a whole lot too.

Mom-101