Pam
Bio
I'm a freelance technical writer with a terminal case of wanderlust. I make most of my living explaining how technical things work to people that nee...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

New Fees: One More Reason to Travel Light

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 10
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

By the end of the year, he told shareholders, American would be slashing its seat capacity by more than 10 percent, grounding as many as 75 of its aging and fuel-guzzling aircraft, and next month begin charging most fliers $15 to check a bag.--Seat 2B

In case you're not clear on what that means, that's 15 dollars to check ANY bag, not your second bag full of stuff you picked up while traveling. That's your basics, the things you can't carry on because the TSA still sees more than three ounces of toothpaste as a threat. Your second bag? That's an additional 25$. 

Chris Elliot asks some very good questions about the new luggage fees.

If American and other airlines unbundle the cost of luggage from your ticket, and you’re paying extra for all of your luggage, shouldn’t you get something for the money? At the very least, an immediate refund of the fee if your luggage is lost or “misplaced”? And maybe we should insist on drawing up a separate legal contract for the carriage of our luggage, including more compensation when luggage goes missing.--Elliot

And Susan at Wicked Good Travel Tips has a message for American Airlines.

If you need to raise prices to make up for high fuel costs - do it, have some b…s. We understand your industry is feeling the pinch in a big way - tell it like it is. I would rather pay $100 more for a ticket and be treated with some courtesy and respect, and offered something to eat on a 6 hour flight. If you want to be a budget airline with pay-as-you go services, ask Ryan Air to buy you out. Instead of trying to lure us to fly with inexpensive flights, you are encouraging me to opt out of the whole flying experience - it’s not worth the hassle.--Wicked Good Travel Tips

Gadling anticipates how this is going to affect our travel experience and surprise, it's not good.

Now, since nobody wants to pay an extra 15$, everyone is going to want to bring their luggage aboard, overhead compartments are going to jam up, people with giant luggage are going to clog up space and passengers are going to get testy. Of course the new rule doesn't apply to elites, but as several people on the underground pointed out, it really affects everyone on the aircraft. If the overhead compartments are full and the flight spends an extra 15 minutes on the ground sorting out luggage issues and appeasing passengers, the entire plane is late, right?--Gadling

There's plenty more snark to be found directed at American's new fees. Our overseas budget airlines travelers are less sympathetic - they've been shelling out baggage fees since Ryan Air decided it was okay to nickel and dime their passengers for every little things. But given that the the fees are here and that they only likely to increase, what's a traveler to do?

In many cases, it may not be practical to travel carry on only. Then, you'll just have to shell out. There's no getting around it. But there are plenty of circumstances in which a single carry on bag is plenty - and I'm here to tell you, it's totally doable.

Since it's getting to be that time again and I know lots of you are planning your long weekends in San Francisco for BlogHer, I'm going to take the liberty (and vanity) of reminding you that last year, I went to BlogHer with One Carry On Bag. That included my laptop and more clothes than I needed for the three days I was in Chicago. BlogHer Fashion editor Susan Wagner has repeatedly posted terrific travel packing tips, check out her posts for advice from someone way more fashion conscious than I.

For the record, we tend to leave the house extremely light and come home a bit heavier, and that's not just from eating exotic treats. We have learned that there's nothing we need that we can't get at our destination (excepting meds, those should always be carried on), that we can do without whatever we've forgotten for longer than we think, and that we can pick always up an extra bag for cheap to check the additional stuff we've picked up on our adventures.

Also I think the fees are ridiculous. Charging customers to check one

  • 10
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Deb Rox 5 pts

I fly often for business--three times this week, for example--and I think the airlines are becoming more than uncomfortable, they are dangerous.  Planes teeming with carry-on, bodies sardined into each other (notice they are also reducing seat capacity by 10%) and then long, trapped waits on the runways are ridiculous.  I wish they would just charge what it costs to fly decently, and then people would force the country to develop a decent rail system.

Until then, if I'm on a trip where I will collect or buy things, I pack dead clothes that I throw out before coming home.  Anyone want to open an airport shipping franchise with me?

Deb www.debontherocks.com ( http://www.debontherocks.com ) when life throws you on the rocks, it's time to get your rocks off

Pam 5 pts

Oh, it's crazy, Leandra, you're right. You'll be all careful about packing your ONE bag with the perfect dimensions, and then, someone gets on with a giant stuffed animal (seen it), a huge clunky toy (seen it), a musical instrument (i pity traveling musicians), a backpack AND a giant purse (seen it)... and it's so random. Stuffing your purse into another bag doesn't mean it's going to take up less physical space. But like you said, whatever.

No one trusts the airlines to deliver their bags anymore.  So you opt for carry on only, only to fight the war on liquids. It's absurd. 

Nerd's Eye View ( http://www.nerdseyeview.com )

tlkativ 5 pts

My husband and I travel at least once a month and we haven't checked a bag since October. We use American quite a bit and depending on the size of the plane, carry-on space can be a real hassle.

The problem I have is the inconsistancies in enforcement. On a recent trip to SFO, I had a compter bag, my (normal-sized) carry-on and a small purse and I was stopped by the gate agent, who told me I had to stuff my purse into my husband's backpack so I would only have two items. Annoying, sure, but okay.

I then watch as multiple people board carrying all manners of bags, filling the overhead bins, while I have my computer bag and purse on the floor at my feet. I guess she went on break.

leandra.
where's your sense of adventure? ( http://www.ericandleandra.com/wp/ )

Suzanne Reisman 7 pts

and let me tell you, the overhead bins were stuffed to capacity, and this is before this stupid, horrific, inane, anti-consumer, ridiculous insult to travelers was instituted. As a person who almost never checks bags anyway for fear of them being lost, fighting for overhead bin space is going to suck. The people I really feel for are the flight attendants who are going to have to deal with this insanity, as Gadling pointed out. Just a stupid idea.

Suzanne Reisman ( http://blogher.org/member/suzanne ), Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender ( http://blogher.org/topic/feminism-gender )
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants ( http://cussandotherrants.com/ )

Sue Walsh 5 pts

... of the airlines nickle and diming us. I take the bus or train whenver I can. It's cheaper and they never cancel or leave you sitting around for hours.

Wedding Tips Blog ( http://wedding-tip.com )

Gena Haskett 6 pts

I was talking with a friend at break time. I mentioned that I shipped my extras from Blogher last year home via FedEx. I said I might do the same to send my carry-on to the hotel.

My friend said not to do that. The TSA would be all over me because I didn't have luggage, a "sure" sign of a suspicious character. So golly, what are my option?

If I just show up with a large handbag it isn't enough (for me) I fit the profile and get razzed by the TSA.

If I bring a carry-on I have to compete with much taller people for a spot on the overhead rack. (Not bashing tall people by the way, some of them are very nice especially when helping me to get my carry-on down.)

I can't take the train because of on-going construction. I would have to get on and off the Amtrak bus.

I flat out don't trust the luggage folks, I've seen too many investigative news videos that convince me that I would be a stone chump to hand over my luggage. If America Airlines can run past the heat and keep any version of the baggage bounty then they will all do it.

Greyhound, anyone?

Gena - Out On The Stoop ( http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com )

Blondie In Brazil 5 pts

I agree. It would be so great if we had a rail system as accessible and affordable as Europe. I'd travel so much more in the US.

I really don't have a problem with the $15 as I think most airlines are headed in that direction. I do share the concern about the carry ons becoming overwhelming. I really hope they enforce sizes and weights on that so everyone has room and those left to board last aren't out of luck.

At the same time I don't understand the whole system. RyanAir does nickle and dime, but things still come out less expensive. You pay the same to check a bag, but your flight is practically nothing. I mean, to fly to major cities in England and France you only pay the taxes.

 US airlines are beginning to charge for baggage and the rates are still higher. I wish we had a true discount airline in the states. However, I will say the US is much better than Brazil. I can't afford to go anywhere by air here.

Blondie in Brazil Blog about my adventures living in Brazil: www.blondieinbrazil.blogspot.com ( http://www.blondieinbrazil.blogspot.com )

Pam 5 pts

I really wish rail made more sense for us. It's too expensive out here on the west coast - the distances that make sense are those that it's actually easier to drive, if you're more than one person, and the long haul ones are just too expensive. I would absolutely take the train, I'd even pay a little more, if the pricing for the long trips added up to be worth the extended time.

I looked at train fares from Seattle to SF for BlogHer, at a 28 hour trip w/sleeper, it's cheaper to stay the extra night in SF and take the 1.5 hour flight.

Nerd's Eye View ( http://www.nerdseyeview.com )

Candelaria Silva 5 pts

I had been drafting a letter to American Airlines after they forbid their Skycaps to collect tips and now when I hear this, it makes me not want to fly American Airlines again.  Like another of your respondents, I would rather have a higher ticket and get the courtesies built in.

The slipperty slope they've begun means that they'll start charging for all carry-ons that are not purses (within a certain size) or wallets.

I pack light, send packages ahead of time during the holidays, and have left certain essentials (like robes and sneakers) at my daughter's home - because I visit her so frequently.  Train travel is looking better and better to me.  I can travel slowly, walk around, and catch up to myself  As for now, I will not book with American Airlines.

All the airlines are doing stuff that is sticking it to the customer, despite the fact that we are totally at their mercy as to whether we will leave on time and arrived safely and sanely!

MMarquit 5 pts

We were looking for rail options for my husband's father, who has a phobia of flying. It costs twice as much to get him on a train from NY to UT than flying -- and it takes longer than driving the distance in a car!

Any sort of traveling is becoming prohibitively expensive -- even as we become a more mobile society. I miss Europe and the convenient and reasonably priced mass transit...