Bio
Hello, my name is Marianne Richmond. I write a business blog called The Resonance Partnership Blog at http://www.resonancepartnership.com though I hav...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Did MySpace and Facebook Users Really Age Overnight?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

According to the latest data from comScore Media Metrix, adults 35-54 now comprise 41% of those claiming MySpace is their space; that is an increase from 32% since August 2005. In fact, comScore says, half of MySpace users are 35 or older. The comScore data is not based upon MySpace registration but on comScore's internet measurement panels, presumably more accurate than the ages used to open a MySpace account. More accurate, maybe. Accurate? Not sure. Better question is, how are the terms being defined and how is the data gathered.

Data from Nielson/Net Ratings "confirm"s the comScore data, indicating that 46% of MySpace users are 35 or older.

The comScore data reported that Xanga skewed the youngest of the four major social networking sites with users under 18 accounting for 20%; MySpace is 12%. comScore reported that Facebook had the highest number of those 18-24 while MySpace and Friendster's younger users were 25 and older.

So one obvious question is, so what do the numbers mean; now that all the grownups have accounts, what are they doing? According to eMarketer, spying on their kids is one common pursuit. This hypothesis is based upon page views. AdAge reported, although no source was given, that "The average 12- to 17-year-old spent 260 minutes on MySpace and viewed about 808 pages. By contrast, the average 35- to 54-year-old spent 179 minutes on the site and took in 560 pages,"

Fred Stutzman, blogger and PhD student in Information Science at the University of North Carolina, seeks to understand the data by questioning how the term "user" is defined. In other words, is a unique visitor (measured by IP address) the same as a "user?" Or is number of visits and/or length of stay an important variable in answering the question, "Whose Space?"

By using statistical methods and old fashioned common sense, he looks at  presumed social network preference by age range and the visitor data and comes up with a null hypothesis: He concludes,  "More young people visit Xanga. More college students visit Facebook. More twenty- and thirty-somethings visit Facebook. However, no 35-54 year olds demonstrate any preference (no significant positive relationship) toward any social networking site. These adults simply visit these sites, for many good reasons, but they aren't joining them in a significant trend."

Danah Boyd also questions the data albeit from a slightly different perspective. She agrees that common sense does not support the 35-54 demo across social networking sites. She suggests that a teens using the family computer would skew the demographics since comScore counts computers. That's one way for parents to keep an eye on the kids. Another way is for parents to create an account. Parents, teachers, police, and of course predators are all there creating accounts and skewing the "usage" data. Dana concludes her post by expressing horror at the number of bloggers and members of the press that simply reported that the social networking sites had undergone a dramatic change in demographics.

Well, this is hardly the first instance that logic defying data is blindly reported. Just ask Toby at Diva Marketing. Or look at the way the Nielson data on podcasting was repeated across many channels. We really need to spend a little time understanding the numbers. Its not as exciting as the sweeping conclusions, but in honor of Friday the 13th, let me say; The devil is in the details.

Marianne Richmond also blogs at Resonance Partnership.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,  , ,  , , , ,

Powered by Qumana

  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Mistress Of The Dorkness 5 pts

I dig data, so I find this post compelling. Great topic... I have 3 blogs on blogger, one on Yahoo360 and recently started one on MySpace. But, the 360 and MySpace are really just a road-sign, if you will, directing people back to my blogspot address. Just a slight expansion on my sphere of influence *just in case* people are looking.

Of course, I have made some 'personal' posts on the 360 one as many of my professional peers use theirs as 'personal' spaces and TypePad and Blogger as their Professional fronts, so that's how we network socially.

As I use these sites for professional means, I do report my birth YEAR accurately as well as my name. A google search could turn up most of this information about me anyway. Some things I try to keep vague, but, there's only so much you can hide in today's connected world.

Melanie Perry
***not all who wander are lost***
Mistress of the Dorkness ( http://mistressofthedorkness.blogspot.com )
Love Dorkter ( http://lovedorkter.blogspot.com )
Through the Eyes of Dorkness ( http://eyesofdorkness.blogspot.com )

bobafifi 5 pts

Speaking of bad design, I just checked out a link on Mir's latest post - I can't read the first paragraph! Green font against yellow background?? Is this something that ANYBODY can read? Yikes. :-|
http://people.bu.edu/celiag/index1.htm

-Bob
bobafifi.com ( http://www.bobafifi.com )

usedviolins.com ( http://www.usedviolins.com )

fluteplayer.net ( http://www.fluteplayer.net )

xingping 5 pts

1. My husband has an account on myspace. Not an acurate age used.

2. My daughter (a high school student) is gradually switching from Xanga to Facebook. Why? "Not too many people using Xanga any more".

Xing Ping
http://newproductoftheday.blogspot.com/

bobafifi 5 pts

> maybe the page designs are a tactic
> to keep the old folks away....
> we are not hard wired to be able to follow the chaos. At least I am not.

Good point Marianne and certainly one worth considering, thanks.
Unfortunately, I've seen lots of MySpace pages by people in their 30s that are so hard on the eyes that it makes me wonder if that's just the way it is there (not that I care THAT much! :-)

-Bob
bobafifi.com ( http://www.bobafifi.com )

usedviolins.com ( http://www.usedviolins.com )

fluteplayer.net ( http://www.fluteplayer.net )

Marianne Richmond 5 pts

Laura,

My MySpace birth year is 1906 and I "count" among my MySpace "friends" many colleagues, airlines, radio stations, non-profits,politicians and celebrities both living (Jack Nicholson, Bill Murray, Goofy) and dead (F.Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald, Bertrand Russell, Albert Camus).

Not sure how this is captured in the stats but I am sure more than a grain of salt is necessary to interpret the "user" information....a little dose of common sense and personal exploration goes a long way.

Bob, I think maybe the page designs are a tactic to keep the old folks away....we are not hard wired to be able to follow the chaos. At least I am not.

Marianne

Marianne Richmond
resonancepartnership ( http://www.resonancepartnership.com )

kperfetto 5 pts

is only one reason I've never been a MySpacer. The bigger reason is I always get hit with adware.

Five Dollar Camera ( http://www.fivedollarcamera.com/blog/ )

bobafifi 5 pts

> I have a MySpace account, so technically I'm a member,
> but I haven't been there in months, and
> never found anything compelling there to make me return.

I'm baffled by the horrid page design that most people on MySpace seem to use. How can it be that a dark burgundy-red background with black text only looks awful to just my eyes??

> so I often will say I was born in 1903

Thanks for the tip Laura - I just changed mine to 1907! :-)
http://www.myspace.com/bobafifi

-Bob
bobafifi.com ( http://www.bobafifi.com )

usedviolins.com ( http://www.usedviolins.com )

fluteplayer.net ( http://www.fluteplayer.net )

Laura Scott 5 pts

I wonder at these statistics as well, and always feel I need to pull out the Morton Salt container to dash on any information that must largely come from the sites' own PR departments.

I have a MySpace account, so technically I'm a member, but I haven't been there in months, and never found anything compelling there to make me return. I don't even remember my username or what kind of info they asked for when I signed up. As a matter of policy, I never give my birthdate, especially since that can be used for things like identity theft, so I often will say I was born in 1903 or something like that. Does that show in the statistics?

In another personal anecdote offered as illustration, not as evidence, but anyway, I joined Second Life a few weeks ago. The Economist reports ( http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm... ):

Admittedly, some residents—there were 747,263 as of late September, and the number is growing by about 20% every month—are there just for fun.

Hmm. Ever since I left the help island where every new member is dumped, I've been exploring a mostly empty universe. There are buildings, signs, artwork, and I've stumbed into some very strange places, like a shopping center with swastikas and bouncing baskets that tried to trap you, but I hardly see any people.

So where are these 3/4 million people? Did they sign up, check it out, find nobody around and quite like I feel like doing?

When you look at political sites, I wonder at the stats as well. A site like RedState or DailyKos boasts a huge amount of traffic, but you see the same 50 or so people doing all the posting. Is all that traffic the same 50 people (and throw in, say, 500 lurkers) clicking through everywhere? How many "members" signed up because they heard of the site, tried some things out, and moved on?

In old media, a comparable statistic would be all the people who ever read the New York Times. Call all those one-time readers "members" and wow! Google should buy the NYT for a trillion dollars!

Laura Scott
design ( http://www.pingv.com ), snap ( http://scatteredsunshine.com ), blog ( http://www.rarepattern.com ) ... admin ( http://www.blogher.com/website-feedback )

xingping 5 pts

Young generation is adopting new technology much faster. G. Bush's iPod is bought by his daughter. Many new things will be spreading from young generation to old generation.