- Share This Post
- submit
- 11
-
Sparkle (0)
If we are, that would explain a number of issues that have been raised by Michael Richard’s racial tirade last week. According to Time Op/Ed writer James Poniewozik he says that “politicians and entertainers, after all, succeed by knowing our hearts and minds.†By ignoring ‘softer’ bigotry in the real world perhaps the outbursts from Richards and Mel Gibson seem shocking:
We are, in a real way, implicated in their achievement and their disgrace. So you'd think this explosion of public ugliness might spur some kind of national soul searching. Did we somehow encourage their bigotry, by ignoring softer forms of it in our pop culture? Did they think on some level, conscious or not, that they spoke for us? Were they right?
But the media have become so focused on the business side of show business--and the offense-contrition-comeback cycle has become so familiar--that the scandals immediately became dispassionate meta-stories about scandal management.
In a similar article on Latimes.com, Michael Shermer uses the Implict Association Test to argue that unconciously, all people harbour some racist thoughts.
But these days, the word racism is tossed around so much that its definition is manipulated to serve a variance of purposes. While most people would agree that both Richards and Gibson are racist, not only harbouring racist thoughts but made their views quite public, Shermer does make a very good point:
The insidiousness of racism is because of the fact that it arises out of the deep recesses of our unconscious. We may be unaware of it, yet it lurks there.
Perhaps so. But does racist behaviour just 'happen'? If so, then it's nobody's fault, right? No one is to blame, right?
But it's not about blame. It's about people taking responsibility for their actions.
Part of me still believes that while both writers both make good points - as some have said that it's better to know who hates you than those who hide their true feelings - I think that the articles provide a justification for Richard's actions, trying to eleviate whatever (if any) guilt their readers might feel. Hey, if he's racist, chances are that you are too but that's okay because we all are!(You know us coloured folk are just a bit too sensitive...)













