There was a problem loading this item
I'm not your honey, darling, sweetheart, dear, ducky, or any other diminutive creature
by Melinda Casino

Ever been called "honey" or "darling" by a salesperson while out running errands or shopping? You were having a pleasant interaction until they tacked on a condescending honey. It hardly seems worth the trouble saying, "I prefer not to be called that," because your two-minute interaction is probably the last time you'll ever see that stranger, and you risk offending them by responding in this way. Why is such a simple interaction so fraught with pitfalls and difficulties? This essay explores this topic.

It's not an accident, and it ain't so innocent

FemaleScienceProfessor got me thinking about gendered nicknames when she wrote about her dislike of the label "academic starlette":

"I suppose I am being ungrateful, oversensitive, and overanalytical, but what does that mean? Is that one of those 'you're a good female scientist' kinds of comments?"

She has a right to object. It's a perfectly legitimate response to:

a) feel repelled by certain forms of address, and
b) want to change how you are addressed and, by extension, how you are seen.

As FemaleScienceProfessor goes on to say: "I am constantly reminded that I am a 'female scientist' and not a regular scientist like all the men."

So, one of the functions of gender-specific appellations is:

To remind the subject that she is viewed as a gender first, not a person.

Unfortunately, for women this means a step down, for men, a step up.

Consider the equivalent form of address for men used in public contexts: Sir.

This term does not condescend to its subject, nor does it assume an unearned familiarity, nor does it sexualize. If anything, it confers authority. The equivalent term for women, Madam, is seldom used because of its implication of age. Furthermore, it carries a euphemistic taint for a woman who manages a brothel.

You're getting smaller…

The second function of these names is to make the subject smaller and less threatening.

As a commenter points out at FemaleScienceProfessor's blog, the "-ette" in "starlette" is diminutive. It's function is to decrease in size and by association, power, of its subject.

Similarly, terms like honey, dear, and sweetheart serve this function:

To make its subject appear smaller and/or familiar and therefore less threatening.

While sir augments its target, a term like honey stubbornly insists you are afforded less status and respect.

What's not in the dictionary

Words carry histories. These histories expand the meaning of words, making them larger than their rudimentary selves. "Honey", for example, carries with it meaning that extends beyond its rudimentary definition of "term of endearment".

"Honey", "dear", and similar terms are also employed in a passive-aggressive way; I'm sure we've all witnessed this or been on the receiving end. And, as passive-aggressive as it is, it does provide a satisfying outlet for many men (and women) who choose to use it this way. For women there is no similar option, no sarcastically spat "gent".

No expression for dissent

There exists no way to politely issue a rejection of these names. And that makes it worse.

Think of the short, useful phrase, excuse me. It's a flexible, brief and above all, neutral phrase that is appropriate in many contexts. It is understood as a neutral address which nobody takes personally when they're on the receiving end.

A short, utilitarian phrase such as "excuse me" needs to be invented for those circumstances where someone tries to "honey" you and you want to let them know you don't want to be addressed that way.

The absence of a socially approved script for declining "dear", "honey", "sweetheart", and other gender-specific names, points to a gross power imbalance.

Nothing personal—it's just not for me.

Now, why would someone take it personally when their "dear" is refused? If anything, the "term of endearment" is inappropriate—logically, wouldn't the person on the receiving end have more of a right to object?

The answer is very simple: because a rejection of the name is also a rejection of traditional way of seeing women. You're not only rejecting the word, you're shaking up the gender status quo. This can be very threatening to people. In effect, you're saying, "I don't like the way you're condescending to me, and I'm refusing your old-fashioned ideas about me based on my gender."

Conclusion

These are old-fashioned words, and wrapped up in these old-fashioned words are old-fashioned notions about women and gender. The power dynamics driving this custom are antithetical to promoting an egalitarian society.

Let's dump these asinine names into the trash.


Contributing Editor Melinda Casino also writes at Sour Duck.

You can subscribe to this feed

Posted In

Comments

 

Some of that language isn't gender-based

Recently I had lunch with a potential BlogHer speaker. I'm in my 40s, and she is my age or older. The waiter, a man in his 30s at the outside. Asked if we "girls" were interested in dessert. We both declined and then looked at one another pretty astonished. And spent some minutes discussing it and other similar incidents.

I definitely am not charmed when referred to with little "terms of endearments."

I have noted, though, that there is a certain cultural thing where folks call people those terms, and they use them on men and women alike. I am not Southern, but it does seem like a Southern thing. And I wouldn't even call it generational, because I've seen quite young people use those terms with men and women.

Doesn't make me like it any better, but it also is noticeably not *always* about condescending to women only!

Elisa Camahort
BlogHer and Worker Bees
elisa@blogher.org/elisa@workerbees.biz

 

Elisa you do have a good

Elisa you make a good point about "terms of endearment" being cultural.

Being Southern, I can confirm that it is indeed a part of our culture. In fact, it is also generational. Young people in the south (or any geographic region for that matter) may become deeply influenced by the mannerisms of a respected elder. If so, a young person will copy certain traits. The bond of Southern children and the traditions of Southern elders are very strong.

Respect, courtesy, and manners are drilled into us at a very early age. The words "yes sir" and "yes ma'am" are mastered well before pre-school. Anything less will draw a stern reprimand.

Fortunately, I was taught by my well-educated single Northern mom in this Southern Baptist culture. I was taught that "terms of endearment" were acceptable, when directed at your spouse or loved one. "Terms of endearment" are offensive, in a public setting.

I hope that we'll shift away from "terms of endearment" in our vocabulary and move towards "terms of respect". It is far more important, especially in a public setting, to use "terms of respect" and neutral statements.

When you are offended, you should say something. I think a lot of people will change, if they fully realize that they are offending you, or showing disrespect. Find a polite way to say ... "Please call me Elisa" ... or "Please don't call me a girl". After all, most of the offense takes place during a customer service (or as you are being served). Doesn't it make them a better server, once they finally realize they are doing something offensive?

Robert

Knights Valley USA
"The Ultimate Interior"

http://knightsvalleyusa.spaces.live.com/
Website: www.knightsvalleyusa.com
Website: www.oracdecorusa.com
Website: www.castlestoneusa.com

 

I try to suss out intent

Robert, your comments on this topic are interesting and full of great thoughts. I'll tell you: I feel like for my own mental health I try to pick my battles. Those waitresses that call me "hon"...I think it's habit and not anything more subversive. Even that waiter in the restaurant who called us girls...I don't think he intended to take us down a peg.

In the workplace? Whole different story!

But out in the world of restaurants and retail: I confess that this has not been an area where I've considered going all Norma Rae change-the-world about it. Of course, Melinda's original post makes the case that we should.

Elisa Camahort
BlogHer and Worker Bees
elisa@blogher.org/elisa@workerbees.biz

 

Picking our personal battles

I agree, in most cases it's a matter of habit ... and no offense is intended.

As Melinda suggests, I really think it should be addressed when it happens. Even if it's a "suggestion box' type of effort ... a telephone call to management ... or some other attempt of positive non-confrontational feedback.

Most people in the service industry want to please their customers, and in many cases ... this is "an awareness" issue. The objective is to create "repeat customers".

We learned long ago that for every "Norma Rae" that takes action ... there are 10 people that don't. My point, if two or three people complain about something ... then there are 20 or 30 others that were dissatisfied and "said nothing (to you)". Overall, that's worse ... because they simply quit being customers ... told there friends and family about the experience and expressed negative word of mouth advertising.

I agree that we have to pick our battles. Of coarse it's perfectly ok "not to say something". 10 out of 11 don't. It's the ones that do, that create awareness and motivate change. We "all" benefit when this happens.

Try to view your complaints as an opportunity ... a positive way to inspire better customer service or policy changes ... and in this case, change a persons bad habit.

Elisa ... the workplace! Yes, that's a whole new can of worms!

Robert

Knights Valley USA
"The Ultimate Interior"

http://knightsvalleyusa.spaces.live.com/
Website: www.knightsvalleyusa.com
Website: www.oracdecorusa.com
Website: www.castlestoneusa.com

 

Isn't "BlogHER" also a "gender-specific
appelation"?

Melinda's post:
"As FemaleScienceProfessor goes on to say: "I am constantly reminded that I am a 'female scientist' and not a regular scientist like all the men."
So, one of the functions of gender-specific appellations is:
To remind the subject that she is viewed as a gender first, not a person.
Unfortunately, for women this means a step down, for men, a step up."

I have to ask... how is "BlogHer" not a gender-specific appelation? The reason the label has always bothered me is for exactly the reason you gave: "to remind the subject that she is viewed as a gender first..." If you substitute "blogger" for "scientist", you get the problem that some of us have with the BlogHer label (not BlogHer the organization : ) my only issue is with the gender-specific qualifier)

I realize that most people don't have any problem with it, but I wanted to know -- Melinda -- how you view "BlogHer" in the context of the topic of this post.

As for the "hon", "sweetheart", etc. -- I spent most of my life in the Los Angeles area and not once was referred to this way, but when I moved to Colorado a few years ago, I was shocked by how often I hear it.

I also don't have a problem with "girl", as in "I'm a geek girl", but that's because I have always seen it as a synonym for "female", as opposed to something demeaning. A 10-year old is both a girl and a female. But I see a 70-year old as both a girl and a female. I don't see it as a transition where "girl" and "woman" are mutually exclusive, but I'm beginning to appreciate (from all the complaints about it) that not everyone feels this way. Perhaps this is also a southern California thing? We have "surfer girls" who don't become "surfer women," no matter how old they are.
And we also use "guys" in a non-gender-specific way.... in the classroom, for example, I'll say, "what I want you guys to do now is..." When I worked at Sun, we had some heated discussions on this, but it was about 80% in favor of "guys" as a generic term, and 20% who felt uncomfortable using it and thought it was a slight to the female students.)

 

I thought the same thing...

Kathy: I thought the same thing when I read the post. I know not everyone likes the distinction, and I know a lot of people, well, women, like the web because they can put their ideas out there without being pre-judged.

My personal feeling has always been that the only way we can stop the pre-judging and the identification of one's gender automatically being associated with the step up or step down that FemaleScienceProfessor complains about is to belie the assumptions with example after example. I feel the same way about other dividing lines.

When our new Tech editor Virginia DeBolt said at SXSW this year that she liked the web because no one could tell she was older, and therefore dismiss her technical know-how, my response was: that I wish she and others would be loud and proud about their age, so that people would see so many examples of great older techies that they could no longer judge a person's techie cred by their age. And let's face it, in most areas there are some that would benefit from such promotion and targeted exposure, and some that already have it and are the "norm" or "default."

As for "guys"...I use it fairly often in a non-gender-specific way without thinking much about it. So, we all have our blind spots, since I'm surprised that as much as 20% of folks were uncomfortable with it.

And in certain situations with certain people I even use chick and chica, but with those I am MUCH more conscious that not everyone will appreciate it, so don't use them across the board.

Elisa Camahort
BlogHer and Worker Bees
elisa@blogher.org/elisa@workerbees.biz

 

Elisa, you're right--a gender-specific label
*shouldn't* matter

... but unfortunately it often does.

Thanks so much Elisa,
I agree, it does seem like the ultimate goal is to have a gender-specific label *not imply a step in any direction,* and then it just stops being a problem to have that qualifier. By the way, that 20% at Sun who had a problem with the word "guys" were all male, and apparently there was only one incident anyone could recall where a female student actually said something about it. But I'll continue to use it for everything from people to pets--it's one of the most useful words in my vocabulary : )

 

Identity CRISIS ... what do you call ME???

Kathy ... this kinda raises a point ... a looming identity crisis that's been in the back of my mind for several weeks now.

What in the world do you call ME???

Like other male participants (fans, and observers) of BlogHER ... I'm hovering ... admittedly lost at times ... somewhere "in-be-twixt" ... in a twilight zone type of world ... where I'm the role reversed minority, of sorts ... wanting to embrace your cause and concerns ... fascinated by your point of views ... intrigued with the vast diversity of subjects and opinions ... and delighted with the sheer brilliance and intelligence that often grace these pages ...

What in the world do you call me???

I'm starting to have an identity crisis ... a willing male victim in this wonderful experiment called BlogHER.

Sure, I can find a typical all-male or male dominated forum ... I've visited many of them. I don't fit in there ... my outlook is different. I'd rather be here with YOU ... learning, growing, enjoying, and relating to your perspective. Maybe even share a man's view, when and if it's appropriate.

What do you call ME ... a male ... a frequent visitor, that keeps coming back for the laughs, the smiles ... and the wonderful collective content you provide ...

BlogHIM just sounds WRONG! BlogHER FAN only begins to define me ...

Robert "Identity Crisis" Knight

Knights Valley USA
"The Ultimate Interior"

http://knightsvalleyusa.spaces.live.com/
Website: www.knightsvalleyusa.com
Website: www.oracdecorusa.com
Website: www.castlestoneusa.com

 

FoBs?

Robert: While you're a BlogHer member just like everyone else, I tend to think of all the wonderful guys that have been involved with Blogher as "Friends of BlogHer".

It probably started (in my head) because I do work with the Demo. party, and Clinton had that whole Friends of Bill thing going.

Anyone out there have a better tag?

Elisa Camahort
BlogHer and Worker Bees
elisa@blogher.org/elisa@workerbees.biz

 

Stopped by to try out the new tag

Elisa: That's sweet ... thank you. I stopped by to try out my new tag ... wanted to try it on ... see how good it fits.

Robert Knight
FoBs

hmmmm. I can think of several things "FoBs" could also stand for! We better not go there ... let's try the longer version ...

Robert Knight
Friend of BlogHer

ok ... it's looking better. :) Good suggestion Elisa. :)

Any other idea's out there?

Knights Valley USA
"The Ultimate Interior"

http://knightsvalleyusa.spaces.live.com/
Website: www.knightsvalleyusa.com
Website: www.oracdecorusa.com
Website: www.castlestoneusa.com

 

Gender?... And Age.

Last night we went to my Husband's fire department Christmas party at a nice restaurant. I am the youngest wife. The waitress, a female, did not refer to any of the other wives as "dear" or "honey," but I got it no less than ten times. TEN TIMES. In TWO HOURS.

I was embarassed beyond all comprehension. I'm sure it doesn't help that I look young but if a woman is in a group with a bunch of other women, don't single her out as the youngest and thus demean her existence in the group!

GAH. Aggravating.

Family Living; Hatfield Style - Our Family Blog.
Now a Blogger at AdoptionBlogs - Obviously, I'm Jenna. :)

 

I'm short and young-looking, so I get that
too

I know just what you mean Jenna.

Elisa Camahort
BlogHer and Worker Bees
elisa@blogher.org/elisa@workerbees.biz

 

A different perspective

Perhaps it's because I'm a bit older, but I have a slightly different take.

It is true, in the workplace it is objectionable and even actionable. It certainly wasn't when I started in the workforce and thankfully it is now. When confronted with baffoons, I find that simply stating they should never take that tone again works.

If someone uses the term Doll or Honey in the workplace that is one thing, but out in the real world I confess I tend to be called 'Hon' by 65+ waitresses as much as I do construction workers. I certainly don't think their intent is to offend or demean. I confess I now call people (both men and women) honey and darling, mostly as a defense because menopause seems to have erased names from my brain -- sometimes even my own. Perhaps a little honey isn't always a bad thing.

M My Menopausal Musings

 

Re: I'm not your honey, darling, sweetheart
...

My sister told me that when she was a teenager in the late 1970s, she had a friend in Berkeley and they sometimes would go to the Buttercup Bakery. They were waited on by none other than the yet-to-be-famous Suze Orman who would say to her, "What can I get you honey?"

(note: now my sister says she would say, "You can get me a million dollars! :-) "
- back then, she got a bran muffin...).

-Bob
bobafifi.com

usedflutes.com

fluteplayer.net

 

Responsible Training will help (so can you)

It seems that the majority of these offenses take place in retail, restaurant, and service settings.

I think employer's owe it to their customers to train employee's on professionalism, behavior, and communication issues.

Years ago, I worked in the Training and Development division for a very large retail corporation in Dallas. All new employee's (even newly hired corporate executives) we're required to attend a 3-day training program and a supervised 2-day OJT (on the job training) before they we're allowed to work alone with the public.

The Customer Service segment included training on "terms of endearment" and other objectionable behavior. The corporation was very aware of this and implemented a responsible solution.

We had an open dialog about this subject during the first day of the three day program. By the time the new employee's left, they had a grasp of the importance of showing respect.

Each employee was monitor during the training program as they interacted with customers. You would be surprised how often I had to correct them, even with the focused effort during the training process. They would sometimes stop in mid-sentence, so I knew I was getting through to them.

Remember, you ARE the customer and you have a right to express your dissatisfaction. You might not ever see that sales person (waitress, clerk, construction worker, etc.) again ... but, you might influence a positive change. It's about respect, and YOU deserve that.

Robert

Knights Valley USA
"The Ultimate Interior"

http://knightsvalleyusa.spaces.live.com/
Website: www.knightsvalleyusa.com
Website: www.oracdecorusa.com
Website: www.castlestoneusa.com

 

I'm not going to 'raise a

I'm not going to 'raise a stink' with management when an employee who likely makes minimum wage calls me 'honey.' I'd rather smile, assume they meant it well, wish them a pleasant day and move on.

 

... most of us do ...

That's a very common approach ... I think most of us do that.

I guess it's the degree of insult that each individual feels when faced with this ... and maybe the setting has some influence.

Yes, most of us smile, assume the best, and move on. Those that are the highly offended ... will react, when they feel it's appropriate. Sometimes it's simply not worth the effort ... depends on the individual, and the circumstances.

Thank you for sharing your point of view. I think a lot of people feel the same way, and agree with you. I take the same approach sometimes.

Robert

Knights Valley USA
"The Ultimate Interior"

http://knightsvalleyusa.spaces.live.com/
Website: www.knightsvalleyusa.com
Website: www.oracdecorusa.com
Website: www.castlestoneusa.com

 

Honey

Ever been called "honey" or "darling" by a salesperson while out running errands or shopping? You were having a pleasant interaction until they tacked on a condescending honey. It hardly seems worth the trouble saying, "I prefer not to be called that," because your two-minute interaction is probably the last time you'll ever see that stranger, and you risk offending them by responding in this way.

Usually I go ahead and risk offending said stranger by voicing (in the most pleasant tone I can muster) that I'm not "honey" or "sweetie." Honestly though, I don't get it all that much. (I guess I don't look like your stereotypical "honey," whatever that is.) Like Elisa said, it may be a cultural thing. I'm not Southern, but I have small-town roots, and it seems more acceptable there. (Rural Missouri in my case.)

Five Dollar Camera

 

Darlin' snookie wookie girlums

I once looked at a waiter who had called me a "girl" and said "I am over 50. To call me a girl says that you obviously cannot see well. Could you send over a service person who will be able to see the food that he serves me please?" I smiled innocently and batted my eyelashes and watched his brain turn "girl" into "bitch", but at least he kept that to himself:-)

I replied (quite audibly) to a female clerk who called me "darling" that I appreciated that she fantasized me as her darling, but that I was sorry, but I was not gay , was involved and unable to date her. I wished her well with her next darling, though. Another approach might have been to call her "bunnytoes" or "snugglemonkey".

I say if it is an absurd remark, treat it that way.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs relentlessly at Time's Fool

 

My family is also Southern

My family is also Southern and they use these terms incessantly. Except when they fear that the other party would take it disrespectfully. They're more cognitive of it now.

What I cannot stand, one of my biggest pet peeves, is when a woman of my age, a bit younger or older, refers to me in this manner. It's like a subtle power tug, not so much an endearing term. I don't dig it at all.

Dana
Mamalogues.com
In the St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Pop Mama
Since Eve

 

don't want your lovin'

@ Knights Valley USA: I think the training idea is fabulous and wish more businesses invested in this. I hate being called any of these terms of endearment. If I'm there for service, not lovin'.

femilicious.com: feminist perspective
16 punches: geek blog

 

Showin' the love

Candace, thank you.

Yes, training is an investment at all levels.

There's a rule in the service sector ... called "The 80/20 Rule". The number varies slightly by industry, but the concept is the same. 80% of your sales come from 20% of your customers. These 20% are very satisfied loyal repeat customers. So, to insure success ... you maintain these relationships ... meanwhile ...

you find ways to learn from the remaining 80% ... ask questions, survey, follow up, listen, make changes, and train train train about what you have learned. These are the customers that will can bring substantial growth to your business.

Candice you are so right ... most of the time, you see these people ONCE ... or infrequently ... you don't need there "lovin'" ... or want it. You want to get out of there and move on to something else.

The surest sign of "love" in the service industry ... is a happy, content, repeat customer. Training is a big part of that ... a trained employee is an asset ... and the "public face" of the company. Any size company should "invest" in training ... those that do, generally succeed.

Robert

Knights Valley USA
"The Ultimate Interior"

http://knightsvalleyusa.spaces.live.com/
Website: www.knightsvalleyusa.com
Website: www.oracdecorusa.com
Website: www.castlestoneusa.com

 

Mata H! You're cracking me up,

If you come to San jose I will take you to the restaurant that I mentioned in my comment above. I'll see if we can get the waiter to call us "girls", just to see what bon mot you come up with!

Elisa Camahort
BlogHer and Worker Bees
elisa@blogher.org/elisa@workerbees.biz

 

"Ouch", "you can just call

"Ouch", "you can just call me, MC"

That's my way of politely letting someone who, with no offense intended, calls me "honey". Great for service associated situations.

I find that these days, 90% of the time, it is unintended. If, for reason I meet an intentional "honey", my response, while still polite and sweet, might be a bit more specific.

MC Milker

 

Melinda suggests ... A

Melinda suggests ...

A short, utilitarian phrase such as "excuse me" needs to be invented for those circumstances where someone tries to "honey" you and you want to let them know you don't want to be addressed that way.

While the debate continues ... it may be impossible to come up with the perfect universally endorsed, socially acceptable "neutral phrase". In the meantime, MC brings up an excellent response to the classic and often offensive "terms of endearment.

"Ouch", "you can just call me, MC"

Successful business' already make it a point to learn their repeat customers names ... that gesture helps to build the relationship, along with many other obvious benefits.

So, MC's approach makes it easier for the times when it is a "one time" or "infrequent" situation. Simply, and politely (when possible) say,

"Ouch", "you can just call me, MC" or

"Ohhhh, my name is MC" or

whatever works for YOU.

That's a quick, effective, and courteous way to remind them ... YOU are an individual ... YOU are unique ... and YOU are special person ... and deserve mutual respect.

Robert

Knights Valley USA
"The Ultimate Interior"

http://knightsvalleyusa.spaces.live.com/
Website: www.knightsvalleyusa.com
Website: www.oracdecorusa.com
Website: www.castlestoneusa.com

 

I've been honned and called a dizzy dame

way back in J School my TV news director called me a dizzy dame because I got lost on an assignment I was not amused at the moniker.

As an owner of an agency in the 1980s a young employee who grew up in St. Louis called me hon. He did it once.He never did that again ( we are still in touch and often laugh at my reaction -- he thought I was going to fire him.)

Having said that, I have also been called to task for saying "You guys" during a facilitation that was 90% female-- I offended. I started saying "you guys" when I moved to Minnesota from Virginia because saying "y'all" in Minnesota is about as politically correct as saying "Hon."

I changed the "you guys" to ladies and gentlemen. It felt silly but the audience was happy.

elana
Blogher Contributing Editor,Business&CareersFunnyBusiness

 

Intentionality...

It's interesting that so many people think that if someone doesn't intend to offend you, that their behavior is automatically excusable.

I always like to give people credit for their good intentions, however, it doesn't really matter a whole lot if someone didn't mean any offense. If they say something offensive, then they ought to know about it. If they meant no offense, that's all the more reason to tell them about it: to help them avoid offending others.

Informing someone that you don't want to be referred to in a particular way doesn't have to be a harsh confrontation. It can be something as simple as "Thank you very much for being so friendly, but I actually prefer not to be called ________. You can call me Atena, though."

There is a power dynamic at work when you call someone a name not of their choosing, whether the participants are aware of it or not, whether they intend it or not. It may relate to age, territory or any number of insecurities. Don't doubt it - naming is powerful, and in the most casual of circumstances, anyone can be made to feel small.

In order to be respectful, we have to be intentional, whomever we may be speaking to. Carelessness (i.e., she says that to everybody) doesn't lead to respect.

I say pick your battles, yes. But also let people know if you find their behavior toward you unacceptable. Your silence is your consent. Just make sure that your comments toward others are as respectful as you would like them to be toward you.

Atena

Assumptions, Biases & Irrational Fantasies

My Life As a Radical Whore/Madonna

 

Your silence is your consent

Atena, that's an excellent post. I couldn't agree more.

I'd like to think that in most instances it's an awareness issue with the offenders.

If you express your discontent, then you can walk away knowing you did your part. As you suggest, it doesn't have to be harsh ... to be effective. It doesn't always have to be face-to-face, or immediate ... but, something should be said. Otherwise, you've excused and endorsed their disrespect.

Merry Christmas Atena.

Robert

Knights Valley USA
"The Ultimate Interior"

http://knightsvalleyusa.spaces.live.com/
Website: www.knightsvalleyusa.com
Website: www.oracdecorusa.com
Website: www.castlestoneusa.com

 

Well, now we have a few

Well, now we have a few posts about responding politely when we are insulted by a careless or deliberate phrase of diminishment. Sometimes, that is just dandy. Sometimes it makes it all seem way tooooooo serious. I say to use common sense. There is no sense in swatting a fly with a howitzer, but sometimes making everyone (including the person offending) laugh a little, eases things.

Wait until those of you who are not 50, turn 50 -- then the waiters start saying things like "And what would you young ladies want?" Or you are introduced as being "56 years young". If you think you are offended now, just wait -- there is so much more in store. Sometimes, to get through it all, one just has to laugh, or occasionally get a bit snippy.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs relentlessly at Time's Fool

 

Really interesting perspectives...

and not that I can add much at this point (and I am proscratinating on Xmas duties) but I think a polite "I would prefer or please call me Marianne" for the unintentional works just fine...having said that, I agree wholeheartedly with Atena about silence being consent to the unacceptable, so speaking up is important.

Additionally, some of the not so endearing references ARE cultural, regional, gender specific etc....but as we get older (and we all do regardless of culture, race, gender etc.) we will all be subjected to the kinds of things that Mata mentions and of course worse; sometimes the complete disrespect and disregard for the elderly.

My elderly mother and I frequently laugh when doctors and bankers and other professionals that we might be talking to about her affairs address their questions and explanations to me. Laughing at them, dilutes the effects of what could be hurtful.

There is noting wrong with my mother's cognitive abilities...and I always politely tell them that the decisions are hers. Then they speak in a louder voice to address her...there is also nothing wrong with her hearing; my hearing is much worse than hers.

Marianne Richmond
resonancepartnership