Bio
Laina Dawes is a contributing editor for Blogher and is also a music journalist whose writings can be found at Exclaim! Canada and...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Oprah Opens School For Girls In South Africa

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 3
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

As everyone knows, part of being a celebrity is the inevitable fact that you will face scrutiny from the public, some of whom feel that it is your duty to appease their own needs and beliefs of how they think people in the spotlight should act.

When Oprah Winfrey opened her school for girls in South Africa this week, reportedly shelling out 40 million for the expansive building equipped with a yoga studio, indoor and outdoor theatres, oversized rooms with 200 thread-count sheets on plush beds, South Africans, most importantly Nelson Mandela, praised her for keeping the promise she had made five years ago. Celebrities flew in on their own expense to celebrate the opening of a school that some critics have said is too lavish for South Africa (or maybe it’s too lavish for the occupants?) But some Americans are angry. “One should always take care of home first,” said one commenter.

While some critics have acknowledged that what she does with her money is her business- after all, she earned it and has given millions of dollars to various charities both in the U.S and in other countries primarily towards educational resources - some have questioned her motives. Why not donate money to American educational institutions, especially inner-city schools in New Orleans that were chronically under funded pre-Hurricane Katrina? Or what about in Chicago, where her show is taped? According to a quote from Oprah in Newsweek she feels that her generosity to American children is not appreciated:

"Say what you will about the American educational system—it does work," she says. "If you are a child in the United States, you can get an education." And she doesn't think that American students—who, unlike Africans, go to school free of charge—appreciate what they have. "I became so frustrated with visiting inner-city schools that I just stopped going. The sense that you need to learn just isn't there," she says. "If you ask the kids what they want or need, they will say an iPod or some sneakers. In South Africa, they don't ask for money or toys. They ask for uniforms so they can go to school."

Several people have gravitated towards that statement. Diversityinc.com has been flooded with responses to their article on the school, but some say that while she feels that her generosity might have been snubbed by inner-city youth, there is the undeniable fact that she is helping in areas where others have not. On the other hand, are her riches getting to her head and she is blaming the poor for what North American society has bestowed on us: the overwhelming longing and consumption for material items? After all, do young women really need 200 thread-count sheets on their beds? I’m on the fence on this one. What do you think?

  • 3
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Mata H 5 pts

This issue gets me so steamed. What the heck is wrong with Oprah giving to Africa? I personally don't care if she gives her whole fortune to African causes. What makes an African child less worthy and an American child more worthy? She should not have to defend her actions. Why should anyone condemn someone who is doing something good in the world -- especially when most of the world is busy ignoring the savage and terrible need in Africa? I am glad Oprah stepped up. More wealthy people should. We are all brothers and sisters in this world. Good done in one place ripples through the whole world. So does neglect.

No one can give to every cause. I celebrate people who give to ANY worthy cause. Why does Oprah get the heat that other celebrities do not when they give to a non-American charity or cause? She certainly has been no slouch about giving to American causes.

Sorry for the ranting tone, but I am sitting her sputtering at the fact that anyone should complain about a decent act of charity -- or to imagine for an instant that any little girl doesn't deserve 200 count sheets. (Did anyone ever consider the fact that 200 ct sheets last longer than cheaper sheets, and are consequently a smarter investment????)

Quite honesly I think what is at the root of a lot of resentment about Oprah is that she is a powerful and wealthy African American woman. Her involvement in aid to Africa seems to make some people waaaaaaaaay too anxious.

Rantingly yours,
Mata H

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs relentlessly at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

Atena 5 pts

Just because Oprah is contributing elsewhere doesn't mean she isn't contributing here in the U.S. I'm tired of people's complaints about celebrities' less-than-perfect attempts to help in various situations in Africa. These people have means and visibility. What the hell else should they be doing - breeding horses? (Side note: Angelina Jolie isn't perfect by any means (and certainly not the queen of Africa, thank you very much Newsweek), but she's done more for people in Africa than I have). That's my mini rant. Back to the question at hand.

I think that it's perfectly reasonable for Oprah to build a school where it will be appreciated. We're not lacking for schools in the U.S., we're lacking for an effective system of public education, which is an extraordinarily complex issue. Between educators, legislators, students, families and communities, there isn't even a commonly understood goal for schools and their communities to work toward. Ms. Winfrey ought to be wary.

People forget that you need more than money to solve certain problems. Some American schools need money very badly, but you can bet that's not all they need. They need leadership, community partnerships and sustainable support. However Oprah feels about America's youth, just throwing money at schools isn't necessarily a good investment. If Ms. Winfrey is going to approach schooling in the U.S., I think her money would be put to good use endowing programs for teacher training and curriculum support. A shiny new school is pretty worthless if your teachers are burned out or incompetent.

And while no one really needs 200-thread-count sheets, there's something to be said for not just offering the bare minimum. Why not let these girls know that they're worth it? Oprah's vision extends beyond the chicken coop, into the land of high thread-count. I say Hell yeah.

Atena

Assumptions, Biases & Irrational Fantasies ( http://antibias.wordpress.com )

My Life As a Radical Whore/Madonna ( http://atenaoyadidani.blogs.friendster.com/my_blog... )

Gena Haskett 6 pts

I read Oprah's article about the school in her magazine. When she initially proposed the project she made an offer of $10 million. Folks came back with ideas to build a school the size of a chicken coup or a not so fancy farm house.

Now that tells me that even in the SA education department a girl child is worth about the same as a chicken that lays eggs. They were given the money to build and their vision could not be elevated past a chicken coup.

Envisioning - can we visualize a perfect school for young in-need girls? I have mine and Oprah has hers. Only difference is she have the money to make it a reality.

It speaks volumes on how people are saying that $40 million is too much to spend educate a group of children. Folks have no problem supporting the elite schools in the US and UK. How much does the top of the line schools cost and the people that pony up thousands of $$$$ tuition. You don't her a peep except when they write the check.

As far as the American schools? Both sides have legitimate points. What have we taught our youngsters? CONSUMPTION. Consume food, sex, music, clothing, games.

Americans haven't laid down a primary foundation of education before anything else. I'm not blaming the kids. So yes, I think she could have been frustrated with the existing school systems. Now could she have started a school from scratch in the US? Dunno. It might have been ten times harder to built it here.

But I think she would have run into the Envisioning thing again. Can urban youth and their families envision more than what is before them? Not an easy question.

Besides - there is the reality of running a school. She may find that there is more to it than just building one. Let her learn on her own dime and then when she is ready she will bring it back home. That $40 million will pay dividends she can't yet imagine if she is open to the lessons ahead of her.

(Sorry for the long windedness, I've been thinking about this a lot.)

Gena - Out On The Stoop ( http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com )