Minera IUD

Wondering if any woman out there have used the Minera IUD?

I have used the ParaGard without hormone and found that there was a lot of bleeding associated with it. Minera has progesterone in it which is supposed to completely stop the bleeding and be just as effective. I’m not crazy about hormones and contraception and wish there was an effective, non-hormonal form of birth control short of sterilization. I heard something interesting the other day at work. A nurse I was working with told me that the IUD can sometimes terminate a pregnancy. Supposedly you can actually conceive and the IUD can make the environment so unstable that a pregnancy cannot carry on. Of course nothing like this is written in the literature. Has anyone else heard this?

http://www.mydochub.com/blog

Comments

 

Hi there,

Hi there,

I have a Mirena, had it inserted in 2004. I used to take the pill prior to having my kids (and between them! LOL), and after my son was born my ob/gyn suggested it. The fact that it is basically as effective as tubal ligation without the permanence is what sold me.

My understanding was that between the minute amount of progesterone released and the IUD itself, you will not get pregnant. I had not heard what the nurse had told you, at least not in so many words. I understood that there would be no implantation--that the uterus with the Mirena inserted is simply not a hospitable environment for a zygote to implant. I suppose, then, in very technical terms, that would mean you'd conceive.

I LOVE my Mirena. I no longer have full-fledged periods, they began to dissipate after the first two months or so after insertion. In that vein, I also don't experience the hormonal mood swings I used to experience both on and off the pill.

Best,
Peg
Peggy, As She Is...

 

I use it too

I had mine inserted in 2005 because of heavy bleeding (which led to anemia) from fibroids. Perhaps I'm not the best person to comment on this, since it wasn't for birth control reasons, but I am not totally satisifed with it. I did alot of research, most that said that it shouldn't be inserted if you have fibroids but my doctor said it was either that or a hysterectomy. So I chose the IUD.

About pregnancy - while without the IUD my chances are around 50% - I was told that the IUD might cause miscarriage if you get pregnant within the months after you have it removed. My main complaint is constant discharge, which my doctor told me was because of the progesterone. Also, I still have periods - even though the bleeding has decreased, my mood swings and cramps are still present.

 

hysteroectomy is not your only choice for
fibroids

Here's an article from the WSJ that talks about uterine artery embolization (a procedure usually performed by interventional radiologists which is why OBGYNs don't talk about it) as an alternative to hysteroectomy for fibroids. There's also some cases of fibroids being treated with global endometrial ablations. Bread and butter OBGYNs don't always know how to perform organ preserving procedures so that's why they don't discuss them. They are trained to do two basic things with uteri--cut it open or cut it out. Good luck to you.

Hysterectomy Still Main Tumor Option
By LAUREN ETTER
November 7, 2006; Page D3

A new survey shows that fewer than half of women afflicted with uterine fibroid tumors are being informed by their gynecologists of a minimally invasive alternative to hysterectomy, the most common treatment for the condition.

The survey, to be released tomorrow, was conducted on behalf of BioSphere Medical Inc., a Rockland, Mass., company that makes products used in that alternative, which is called uterine artery embolization, or UAE. The procedure typically involves placing blood-stopping particles in the artery that feeds the fibroid tumors, which are painful and cause excess bleeding.

The survey, conducted by the National Women's Health Resource Center, could exacerbate tensions between interventional radiologists -- who perform UAE -- and gynecologists, who perform hysterectomies. Because nearly all cases of uterine fibroid tumors are referred to or diagnosed by gynecologists, some women never hear about the UAE option. The survey found 40% of women diagnosed with fibroid tumors were told by their gynecologists about the less invasive procedure. Nearly 58% of women were told about hysterectomy.

The Wall Street Journal published a page-one story in 2004 about hysterectomy patients failing to hear about UAE. Since then, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice chose to undergo the procedure, giving it enormous attention. "Women recognized that someone who is an independent, free-thinking person could look at all other choices, and make that choice and do well by it," says Dr. James Spies, an interventional radiologist at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. Since 2004, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists began offering information about UAE in its pamphlets that describe treatment options for fibroids.

Some interventional radiologists have said the new survey is evidence that gynecologists are still failing to tell their patients about the procedure. They say thousands of women a year are continuing to undergo unnecessary hysterectomies. The 40% figure reported in the survey is "still way too low given the fact that [UAE] is a mainstream therapy," says Dr. Robert Vogelzang, an interventional radiologist at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. "The only conclusion to make is my colleagues in gynecology simply don't want the word out, and that's because they don't do the procedure."

Gynecologists dispute the allegation that they withhold information regarding UAE to retain their patient's business. "Most people want patients to get what is best for them," says Dr. Howard Sharp, a gynecologist from the University of Utah and a member of ACOG.

Still, ACOG, the organization that sets standards for gynecologists nationwide, maintains a conservative view on UAE, saying the procedure provides only short-term relief for fibroid-related symptoms, and is considered "investigational" for women who want to retain their fertility. Dr. Spies says that opinion is "too simplistic and out of date." A five-year study, published in Obstetrics & Gynecology and co-authored by Dr. Spies, shows 75% of women who underwent UAE had long-term success with the procedure. While Dr. Spies says that he doesn't routinely recommend UAE for women wishing to retain their fertility, he says there are circumstances when UAE may be suitable for those women, specifically times when prior surgical attempts -- such as myomectomy -- have been unsuccessful in removing fibroids.

Fibroids are the number one indication for hysterectomy. Of the 600,000 hysterectomies performed every year, about a third of the uterine-removing surgeries are performed to treat fibroids. Hysterectomy requires general anesthesia and a cut into the abdomen. The recovery time is normally about two to six weeks. UAE requires local anesthesia and involves making a small incision in the groin to allow a catheter to be threaded into the artery. Typically no overnight stay at the hospital is required for UAE, and recovery time is less than one week on average.

As more nonsurgical options become available to women, hysterectomy could become less popular. In addition to UAE, there are other options including a focused ultrasound treatment, which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2004. There are progesterone-modulating drugs in clinical trials that could be effective treatment options that shrink the fibroid. One drug -- AsoPrisnil of TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. -- is pending FDA approval.

"I think hysterectomies are going to be on the decline -- and they should be," says Dr. Sharp. "If you can offer a less-invasive technology that is effective, that's a huge advantage."

 

IUDs

As a Naturopathic Doc I see patients for gynecology exams and problems. I have treated many women using IUDs, including the Merina. While many of them are initially happy with it, eventually I hear most women say their cramping and/or increasingly heavy bleeding causes them to want it removed. It sucks that there are not better options...

Yes, though rare, you can actually have conceived while using an IUD.....as well as on the pill and when using a cervical cap and/or diaphragm. Mother Nature has her way of making things happen whether or not WE want it to. Pregnancy will not last, however, in the presence of an IUD, as there will be too much irritation.

The idea of inserting a plastic object into your body cavity and leaving it there for an extended period of time.....is not natural. Eventually almost every "body" is going to complain about it. I still recommend condoms or other barrier methods because they are used only when needed and they protect you from STDs. If you are in a stable relationship and don't want to use barriers every time, you can learn fertility awareness easily. Then you use the barriers when fertile.....

Dr. Hannah

We must be willing to give up the life we've planned in order to live the life we are given.