The story is jaw-dropping. One week before finals,the national office of the largest sorority in the country sends out eviction notices to 23 of 35 members. The reason:they are not attractive enough to recruit the type of new members the national office believes meets Delta Zeta standards.
As reported in The New York Times,
Worried that a negative stereotype of the sorority was contributing to a decline in membership that had left its Greek-columned house here half empty, Delta Zeta’s national officers interviewed 35 DePauw members in November, quizzing them about their dedication to recruitment. They judged 23 of the women insufficiently committed and later told them to vacate the sorority house.
The 23 members included every woman who was overweight. They also included the only black, Korean and Vietnamese members. The dozen students allowed to stay were slender and popular with fraternity men — conventionally pretty women the sorority hoped could attract new recruits.
There is the expected outrage. Few, who read the article, can feel anything but disgust for the cruelty of the national office.
And yet, sororities are big business. Like any business with a brand to protect they expect members to live the brand.
If the sorority doesn't meet it's bottom line, they have to close their doors just like any other business or nonprofit.
Do the same people who are appalled at the hideous treatment of these young women feel the same way about businesses who routinely discriminate against the fat?
In
The-F-Word Rachel Richardson writes about fat bias in the workplace.
About eight years ago, when I weighed 300 pounds, I was desperate to find a new job. I’d get called for interviews in which I thought I did relatively well, only to never get any calls back.
Fast forward just a couple years later. My professional qualifications are still relatively the same, but I weigh less than half my original body weight. I am hired at one of the premier global computer corporations in its corporate human resources department.
Coincidence? Maybe. But in my experiences, there is a vast difference in the way one is treated professionally when fat and when thin.
In her post, Richardson links to an MSNBC report on fat discrimination in the workplace.
America’s TV boss Donald Trump, who has been in a war of words with Rosie O’Donnell, told Entertainment Tonight recently that: “If I were running 'The View," I’d fire Rosie. I’d look her right in that fat ugly face of hers and say, ‘Rosie, you're fired.’ â€
Let’s say Trump was indeed Rosie’s boss and phrased his firing just like that, could he be charged with workplace discrimination? If he had said, “I’d look her right in that Asian ugly face†or “black ugly face†the answer would be a no-brainer.
But when it comes to obesity discrimination, the rotund among us have few if any rights when it comes to being hired, fired or promoted.
The reporter of that story,, Eve Tahmincioglu, has a blog,CareerDiva,
Recently I had a stomach virus that made me, what seemed, deathly ill for about a month. I lost about 10 pounds as a result and couldn’t believe the reaction I got from some of my female friends. One friend actually said she wished she could get a stomach virus so she could lose some weight. I couldn’t believe she would say such a thing given I conveyed to her how sick I was and how I was unable to really enjoy my life for those horrible weeks.
And this from Big Fat Blog about fat discrimination in Canada
A small online poll found that 25% of human resource execs admitted weight had a role in their hiring decisions. Another 35% suggested it might, on a subconscious level. Scary to think that 60% of those surveyed ultimately thought it was fine to judge a person on one's size, isn't it? [Thanks, Sandy.]
According to Charity Froggenhall at Eh..not so much only Michigan has an anti-fat discrimination law on the books.
Fat discrimination is an every day occurance in this country. The fact that a sorority discriminates against the fat is not news.
What is news is the sheer number of women they evicted.
Would this be a story if they had evicted three or five girls because they were fat? Probably not. And that's the real problem.
We are fascinated with this story because of the sheer number of members the sorority was willing to get rid of to reach their ultimate goal of 90 some members by 2009.
We are not truly appalled at the reason the women were evicted.Would anyone be writing or caring about three or five fat girls told to move out?
The number of girls evicted forces us to turn the spotlight on ourselves. We do not like what we see.
The actions of the Delta Zeta national office makes us take a good look at what we really believe. If we are outraged at what happened to these girls then let us be outraged at businesses that treat the fat as incompetent and less than.
Let us be outraged at ourselves for thinking it's perfectly fine for businesses to keep fat people in the back office.
Let us be outraged at ourselves for thinking that fat people are slobs, have no self discipline,and are less qualified to do management jobs.
Will this story finally be the catalyst to implement anti-fat discrimination laws? Fat chance of that happening any time soon.
Nothing that happens to Delta Zeta can compare to the anguish that these 23 women have suffered.
But if nothing happens about fat discrimination in the workplace then this will simply be another story that captured our attention for a few minutes in between Anna Nicole and Britney.
Elana blogs about business culture at FunnyBusiness
Comments
The Donald also hates pregnant women's
"looks"
He wanted to fire Nancy O'Dell from her Miss USA (or America) hosting duties because she is pg and he "doesn't like the way pregnant women look." But thankfully NBC stood behind her pointing out that you can't fire a woman for being pregnant.
Stefania Pomponi Butler
Contributing Editor, Arts & Entertainment, BlogHer
I blog:
CityMama
Kimchi Mamas
Family Food
On a higher level, I totally
On a higher level, I totally agree that to discrimate against someone based on looks, be it weight, height, race, or just the general arrangement of our features is absolutely reprehensible. Practically, though, I can see why a hiring manager might deliberately discriminate. After all, an overweight person is more likely to have health problems, raising the cost of healthcare for the whole company. And for certain positions, size can make it difficult to do your job. No matter how smart and educated you are, it's going to be more difficult for a 300 pound person to crawl under desks and such to provide tech support.
It's difficult to make rules that are both practical and not offensive, and I think sometimes when we try to offend no one, we shackle companies with rules that make no business sense and make everyone afraid of the consequences of every word.
That said, I wasn't aware that sororities were allowed to base admissions on looks and race any more than any other company. Sisterhoods exist all over, based on every facet of women, good and bad. On the one hand, there's no reason they shouldn't be allowed to base theirs on good looks, but on the other, they shouldn't be able to exclude on looks, either.
Quite the connundrum.
Becky
Clearly Delirious
I WAS a Delta Zeta in
I WAS a Delta Zeta in college and everything about this story rings true. We had "goober" cards that we used during rush events to record the names of girls who were awkward, ugly, geeky or just undesirable in some way. It was horrible to hear members get up and talk about some poor girl with braces and pimples like she was the Hunchback of Notre Dame. But it happened and the national reps who came down during rush events were notorious for pushing you to up your numbers and keep your image up. I served as a substitute at a fellow chapter once because the girls there were having problems with their numbers because they were seen as the socially awkward sorority on campus. I saw it all happen.
But, you know what they left out of the story? The national organization was trying to save the local chapter from ruin. And why were they in jeopardy? BECAUSE they were seen as the socially awkward sorority and they couldn't effectively recruit. What does that tell us? To me it says that the sorority is as sick as the society that shuns them because they aren't the "cool" sorority to join with lots of beautiful, fun, popular gals. Blame everyone if you blame a soul. Blame every girl that wants to join a sorority because there weren't enough of them choosing to go to that particular one because they weren't deemed desirable.
Same old, same old....
Good looks are definitely a ticket to a better life. For men there is "heightism" as well. If you are a short man, unless you are aggressive enough and intellectually gifted (ex: Robert Reich), forget advancing a lot in your career. My father was very short and it definitely had an impact on his career.
So unless you have model looks, career advancement is definitely harder (with the exception of goobers like Donald Trump)