- Share This Post
- submit
- 8
-
Sparkle (0)
In response to the Link I posted in relation to Toronto's Caribana, a letter-writer responded to George Elliott Clarke's article in Now Magazine with this:
George Elliott Clarke's article on Caribana is just one more round of self-victimization from the "African/Asian/black/brown" school of social activism. Please spare me the hyperbole!
Torontonians bend over backwards to be accepting and inclusive of people of all ethnic backgrounds. The straw men who are said to be "uneasy about these 'visible minorities'" must be a figment of the author's imagination.
Please don't play the race card to cover up the real concerns people have with the parade: poor fiscal management and the seemingly annual shooting. Caribana is a chance to have a good time, so stop crying about nonexistent persecution and enjoy the weekend!
The Race Card, according to Wikipedia (Don't you just love that site? I don't know how accurate it is, but....)
The phrase is used in two contexts. In the first, and more common, context, it alleges that someone has falsely accused another person of being a racist in order to gain some sort of advantage. An example of this use of the term occurred during the O.J. Simpson criminal trial, when the prosecution accused the defense of "playing the race card" [citation needed] in trying to present Mark Fuhrman as a racist and thus not a reliable witness against Simpson. Another example would be a criticism of Georgia Representative Cynthia McKinney's assertion that she was the victim of "racial profiling"[citation needed] after she physically attacked a Capitol policeman who had asked her to show her identification at a security checkpoint.
The race card is, in my experience, used to avoid the reality that racism actually exists, and commonly used by people who have never personaly experienced racial discrimination. It is also an indicator that the person who is accused of playing the race card is somehow holding onto a victim - like mentality. "Racism is over," they cry. "We live in a multicultural society. How can you say that racism exists?" In other words, 'shut the f#$k up. We don't want to hear you bitch about it because then we'll we have to take some ownership.'
So let me get this straight. In response to the letter writer(who jumped to conclusions about the article) Torontonians bend over backwards to be accepting. From the tone of the letter it sounds like Torontonians are gritting their teeth and pulling their hair to stifle their fustration. Is no one is allowed to have a dissenting opinion? That smacks of imperialism and a sense that minorities should remain silent and greatful as to not wear out their 'welcome.'
While society has grown in leaps and bounds, there is still resistance to open and frank conversations about race. Tax-paying, law-abiding citizens of colour still feel resistance in voicing their opinion and relaying their experiences in a forum where it will be heard and addressed. It is not to conjure up 'white guilt' - whatever that means - or suggesting that everyone should apologize for the behaviour for a few - but to be able to speak up on issues and incidences that affect them. By speaking up on issues of racism, not only is it a way to let other's know that it is a resisting factor in terms of equality and access to goods and services, but it also liberates the person who openly speaks about either a personal situation or a systemic one. After all, everyone deserves to be treated the same as everyone else, so if you aren't wouldn't you speak up?















