Neither heavy rain nor three thousand members of the media all crowded into one large tent nor the realization that Greta Van Susteren can't possibly weigh more than 90 pounds could keep me from last night's presidential debate.
Along with 2,990 other journalists (only ten were allowed into the debate auditorium), I was herded into the "Media Filing Center," where politicians and pundits stopped to give interviews and reporters from MSNBC, FOX and CNN pontificated live on the air. I walked around for a while and watched all that was going on, then found a seat and settled in to watch the debate.
I began the night expecting to be swayed toward one candidate. I was very surprised that it was the other candidate who appealed to me in the end.
Obviously, I haven't had time to fact check either candidates' claims, and I'll do more research before I make a final decision. But here were my impressions from last night:
Right off the bat, Obama struck me as giving some very vague answers. I often felt like he wasn't answering the questions at all (and was sometimes not even making any pretense of attempting to), but was instead reciting words and phrases ("middle class" comes to mind) that he had been practicing for months. I thought McCain, though also vague at times, did a better job overall of specifically answering the questions that were posed to him. He presented a much clearer picture of his ideas to me than Obama.
I liked that McCain named Warren Buffet as a potential Treasury Secratary, even after acknowledging that Buffet is an Obama supporter (and I think Warren Buffet is brilliant). We need a president who's wise enough to choose the best man or woman for the job, as opposed to his most ardent supporters.
On that note, McCain's consistent mentions of his bipartisan record really appealed to me. One of the things I like about McCain is that he's not the most popular member of the Republican Party. I saw this as a good thing, since I don't identify with the image of the typical Republican. He does have a reputation for being far more moderate than many of his Republican peers, and for working with Democrats. Bipartisanship is important to me in a president, it's rare in Washington, and I value it as a voter. I'm now wondering if it's true that Obama has never gone against his party leaders on any major issue, as McCain claimed several times.
I felt that both candidates were promising far more than they could possibly deliver. At times, they spoke of our faltering economy and pledged to get tough by freezing spending and cutting programs out of the budget that aren't working. Five minutes later, they were promising us tax cuts and health care refunds and new jobs and aid for Darfur and $15 billion a year to research ways in which we wouldn't have to depend on other countries for oil. I'm not so naive that I'm expecting our next president to save the economy and give me lots of new tax breaks at the same time. I don't want my taxes to go up, but that's about all I expect right now.
As far as actual plans, though, I couldn't help but be love McCain's proposal to double the child exemption on taxes, from $3500 per child to $7000 per child. That would be quite a big deal in this house. I had gone into the debate much more interested in Obama's tax plan than McCain's, but I came out of the debate really liking what McCain had to say about tax relief.
These are just a few thoughts I had. Of course, I was interested in their thoughts on foreign policy, energy, and the environment, but right now I think the economy is everyone's primary concern. My biggest concern about McCain is that he will put too much money and manpower into the war on Iraq. I don't really like either candidate's plan for the war; I'm still hovering somewhere between the two.
I realized even more last night that both candidates really are courting voters like me right now, middle class voters who aren't strictly tied to one party and haven't necessarily decided whom will get their votes, and I definitely got the impression that both of them were telling me what they thought I wanted to hear.
Well, McCain did tell me much of what I wanted to hear. Obama didn't. And the funny thing is that I went into it prepared to be absolutely bowled over by Obama. In fact, I was thinking yesterday afternoon that Obama would probably end up getting my vote. I was shocked at the end of the night to look through my notes and find that there wasn't one thing he said that really appealed to me, even though I had initially thought he would win my support. I certainly don't agree with McCain on everything. I don't think he'll make a perfect president. I may end up voting for him and later regretting it (*cough* George W. Bush, *cough*). But I think he may have a better handle on how to run the country.
I'm a little freaked out that I'm even writing these words. When I think of myself as a "Republican Voter," I think of people like Elizabeth Hasselbeck and Rush Limbaugh and Newt and I throw up in my mouth a little. I realize that a huge portion of my readership is pro-Obama (prObama?) and I expect some hand wringing to ensue over my thoughts. But I've opted to be honest here, and I will never be a diehard supporter of either candidate, so if you think you can change some of my opinions, by all means go ahead and try.
My next step will be researching both candidates' records at sites like Fact Check (although I've since learned that Obama used to be head of the foundation that runs Fact Check, which is worth noting), Sunlight Foundation, Politics Anew, and Expert Voter (thanks for the links, guys!). I realize I was subject to heavy, heavy spin last night and I want to find out what's really what.
Who appealed to you in last night's debate and why? I'd love to hear your opinions.
Comments
debate
You may want to read up on this new mortgage proposal McCain put out last night. Basically, if Mr. & Mrs. Smith bought the house next door to you at the height of the real estate boom, using a no money done ARM that they now can't afford, the government would go in and say that house isn't worth $250,000 anymore, it's only worth $200,000 so Mr. & Mrs. Smith only owe the bank $200,000. The Ferrier's have been paying there mortgage so we aren't going to do anything for them. Oh, by the way, Mr. & Mrs. Ferrier, since houses are appraised by the value of the houses near them and we lowered the value of the Smith's house by $25%, the appraisal of your house just dropped 25% as well. Sorry
Not a big selling point for me
I didn't really like the sound of McCain's mortgage plan, to be honest. I need to read more about it.
For our children......
Don't do it. You have seen what has happened on the Republican watch. What's wrong with giving someone else a shot? It can't get much worse can it? If anyone thinks they're getting a tax break in the next 8 years, they're crazy. Do they really think the American public is stupid enough to believe they can pay for a neverending war in Iraq and Afghanistan and an $850 million bailout and not pay more taxes?
We need to take care of our children (health and education) and improve our image with the rest of the world (Mr.Bush doesn't care).
With the money we have spent on the war in Iraq alone we cold have funded world class public schools, rebuilt/repaired our highways, and have maybe, found a cure for cancer. (every week in Iraq we spend as much money as we allocate each year for cancer research in this country )
Don't even get me started on reproductive rights. (You don't have a uterus? You don't have a say!!!...my opinion)
I hope as a mother you would not even consider this evil war monger for president of our country. Your children's welfare depends on it.
My question for you
What do you think of McCain's here's $5,000 for health care plan? It makes me crinige every time I read it or think about it or have to hear it come from his lips. I will also say that being at a debate and watching people live and in person gives a whole different feel. I went to one of the debates in Las Vegas last year and it was mind blowing to be in the room right in front of these people and being able to really pay attention to movements instead of watching it on a television.
Oh and since you were sitting with the press how did the 'That One' comment come off?
(P.S. I still like you..)
Heather B. Personal Blog: No Pasa Nada BlogHer CE: Business, Career & Personal Finance
Remember
That the $5000 is only for families. otherwise, it is $2500 per individual, with a potential of being taxed for the health benefit.
I am 100% with you, Heather B.
My family spends $5000 per year out of pocket for healthcare on top of what insurance pays and on top of our annual payment to have health care insurance.
And we're relatively healthy!
To me? healthcare is enough of a reason to vote Obama.
Julie
Using My Words
Obama/McCain Healthcare
Maryan Pelland
online at www.demystifyingdigital.com/blogs/DigitalGrandparent
and www.womendaybyday.com
I agree with your conclusion that healthcare is the issue that just swings us toward Obama. The rest of the free world has healthcare under control - what is our problem with this? It's critical to the well-being of our entire nation. I wrote a piece for the Biloxi Sun Herald last spring about both candidate's healthcare solutions, and frankly, Obama's makes sense, McCain's just feels like a stopgap to answer voters' concerns.
Obama is leading this contest because he is actually addressing some of the issues. I have grown to respect his platform and his ability to step outside the show-biz stuff, at least some of the time. I think he'll have my vote - unless something really stunning happens in the next month - and is that really likely?I think McCain has given up.
May heaven give us the wisdom to make the right choice next month.
--mkp
More Research Needed
I couldn't figure out from listening to McCain how on earth that $5,000 "rebate" would work. I'm not sold on that. I need to look into it.
The reporters were so focused on listening and writing that there was no reaction to the "that one" comment. Personally, I didn't really think anything of it when it happened. I watched it again on YouTube and didn't see what the fuss was about. It's pretty clear that neither one likes the other right now (how could they?) and I really don't think McCain meant any major disrespect by it, any more than Obama would have if he'd done the same thing. Both men clearly struggled from time to time to keep their tempers in check.
I do like the "That One" t-shirts, though. They're hilarious.
It is partisan
but the Obama camp did fact check everything McCain said on Obama's record last night and it's really not surprising considering they've been smearing all week
http://therecord.barackobama.com/?page_id=1465
I would also recommend my last post entitled 'Enough is Enough' where I take McCain/Palin to task for dangerous, racist, tactics. http://queenofspainblog.com/2008/10/06/enough-is-enough/
Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain
You'll like this tidbit
The McCain campaign had volunteers passing out handouts to all of the media every five minutes during the debate, each one refuting something else that Obama was saying. I thought that was a clever tactic, although I'm not sure how much impact it had on the reporters. I didn't even read the handouts because they were partisan.
I am impressed...
I am impressed with your commitment to do the research and find the truth about what the candidates say before making a decision on who to vote for.
A couple of thoughts on your comments:
McCain's repeated statements that he has consistently gone against his party leaders while Obama has not actually rubbed me the wrong way. If he disagrees so much with the leaders of his party, why is he a Republican? I don't know if his claims are true are not, and to me it is irrelevant - I agree with most of what the Democratic party stands for, so I don't see the problem with a Democratic senator voting with his party most of the time. If McCain had brought up specific examples of legislation that Democratic party leaders supported and Obama voted for and that McCain disagreed with, it might have made more sense, but I don't get why agreeing with your party is a bad thing!
I also don't get how McCain's plan to have the government buy mortages using a reduced home value is going to help the situation. Renegotiating the tems of the mortgage at a lower interest rate so that people can make the payments, yes; bringing down property values in entire neighborhoods, as Blue Lady describes, no.
--Liz
I blog about creating a life worth living at: www.inventingmylife.blogspot.com
Oh I love that point
Why be a republican indeed---but on top of that, McCain votes 90% of the time with his party, so in truth, he's not much of a maverick.
But anyway what a good point---why is it supposed to be such a negative to agree with your party! Love that.
For the mortgage thing, another good point. Have you read the Dodd-Frank bill? It's the housing bailout.
Julie
Using My Words
I think...
...that McCain does vote with his party most of the time, but there have been some notable instances in which he hasn't. That's the kind of thing I'm looking for, from either candidate. I don't want someone who is strictly tied to his party, although I do expect the candidate to agree more with one party than the other. That's reasonable.
When a next door house is
When a next door house is foreclosed and stands vacant and vandalized, property values come down, and other problems arise. Where the property values were inflated, they have to come down one way or another. Better to let the house stay occupied by its family; as Hillary said, "Let's keep people in their homes."
On-paper valuations can be adjusted for; a next door house vandalized or occupied by squatters is REAL damage to the neighborhood.
FactCheck.org has their debate stuff out
Hoping this helps too
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_debate_no_2.html
Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain
Factcheck.org, funded by the Annenberg
Foundation
Factcheck.org, funded by the Annenberg Foundation, is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, whose director, Dr. Kathleen Hall Jamieson, has co-authored a book with Dr. Joseph Cappella, Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment.
The illustration for the book doesn't look very non-partisan.
Is the Annenberg Foundation that funds Factcheck.org any kin to the Annenberg organization that Ayers and Obama were involved in?
It is
Shellie it seems to be the same org but here is a little point you may have missed: John McCain's campaign released a list of 100 former ambassadors endorsing the GOP presidential nominee.
Second on the list, though her name is misspelled, is Leonore Annenberg, currently the president and chairman of the Annenberg Foundation and widow of ambassador and philanthropist Walter Annenberg. Ms. Annenberg was herself the "chief of protocol" at the State Department under President Reagan.
If the last name sounds familiar, it's because it also graces the name of the Chicago education board where Barack Obama and William Ayers sat in the room six times together.
Michelle
I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/
Tax Plans
One thing you mentioned that swayed you was taxes, and I'd really like to clear something up on this point.
The best way to examine the tax plan is how it affects you and other tax groups, on the whole, and the best place I've found for that was here. You have a couple of charts that weight things differently, along with a link to a very thourough breakdown of the tax plans that you may or may not actually have time to read (I've only skimmed it, myself).
Your reactions to it will depend on your priorities. Look, for instance, at the $33,000 - $66,000 tax bracket. McCain's tax plan would only give them back $319. Obama's would give them back $1,042. A lot of my friends with kids to feed fall into that tax bracket, and they're the ones struggling. They're also the ones who will take that additional $700 and buy stuff with it.
One final thing. Look at the average cut in taxes, across the board, on the two plans. McCain's is $1,200. Obama's is $160. McCain's spending plan is, by most accounts, no cheaper than Obama's. How he intends to pay for his programs when giving that large an across the board tax cut when we're already in deficit spending is a question worth considering.
Thanks for listening.
Eric Sipple
Honestly...
...this was one of my primary concerns. How can either candidate deliver on his promises of tax relief and health care reform and get the economy out of this hole? I felt like both of them were just saying what they thought I wanted to hear.
One of the things that
One of the things that bothered me, again, about McCain is his willingness to talk out of both sides of his mouth.
How can he in a half-hour's time-span say that he has a reputation for being able to work with both sides of the aisle and then turn around and call himself a maverick that is not too popular with either his party or the democratic party? Please, re-watch the debate and listen to him say it.
How can he (in the first debate) first say that Obama was initially wrong about the surge in Iraq and that even Obama conceded that it had succeeded beyone their wildest expectations, and then turn around and state that Obama would not even admit that he was "wrong about the surge working". Even the CNN fact checking site backs up this one.
How can he label Obama as a cronyist, when McCain is the one who has been in Washington for almost 30 years, when it was McCain who was censured for the Keating debacle? That bothered me immensely. The fact that he would continually stress the word "crony" in relation to Obama did bother me.
As far as the tax issues and the health care, CNN.com has a terrific fact checking site. Basically, the McCain health care plan would initially reduce taxes but they would evenutally go up, as per Obama's statement. And honestly, Obama is correct. I pay $83.00 a paycheck (every two weeks) for standard health care, which is half the total cost- my employer picks up the other half. Let's say that McCain says, "Hey! Here's 5 grand- go buy yourself some insurance if you need it"... WHY would an employer continue to fork out thousands if not millions of dollars towards health care? They wouldn't. So now a vast majority of Americans would be looking for health care coverage. With my employer paying half the cost for medical only, I currently pay $2,158.00 out of my paycheck. If McCain's plan happens, I would most likely end up having to pay the entire amount, which would be over $4,000.00. Now, add in a spouse and children and see how far that $5,000.00 gets you. You can also visit http://www.electiontaxes.com/ to see how each candidate's tax system will work for an individual voter. You put in some basic earnings info and presto magicko! You get an approximate answer.
Another thing that has me going is the theatrics involved. I absolutely cannot stand it when McCain gets that "ooohhhh.... there's a ghost story in here somewhere" voice going in the debates and interviews. I know it's a personality trait, but it makes me insane. And the overused term "My Friends" also put me over the edge. It came across as patronizing and creepy.
No, before the first debate I was beginning to lean towards Obama. After seeing some of the attack ads that McCain has run, hearing the "terrorist" talk (another fear ploy) coming from Palin, etc.. I am more solidly behind Obama. After last night's showing, I am now upset with McCain after I used to be a big fan of his. How quickly times can change.
To each their own. You liked
To each their own. You liked McCain after that debate? Go for it, and good luck if he wins.
I honestly think McCain is showing signs of
senility.
Today he accidentally referred to a crowd as fellow prisoners instead of fellow citizens. Last night he just wasn't clear in his arguments. One minute he was talking about a spending freeze, the next he was talking about buying out mortgages of those in need. At one point Obama was talking and I noticed McCain wandering around in the background, just out of it seeming. He was trying to joke with the audience despite knowing the audience wasn't allowed to make any noise. He is a 30 year politician. Shouldn't he know better? His breathing was irregular like just walking around the stage was too much for him. I really thought the age and cancer history were just talking points before, but now my own eyes are telling me McCain just may not have the physical and mental health for the job. And he still has almost a month left of campaigning.
I didn't see it
And trust me, I was looking for it. But it made me laugh to imagine McCain "wandering around, out of it," during the debate (I think all his roaming was carefully planned and inteded to make him seem comfortable and dominant). And is there video of him saying "My fellow prisoners?" Because that's hard to believe, but it would be pretty funny if it's true.
My Fellow Prisoners
You may have already seen it, but if not, enjoy.
"my muslim faith"
Yeah, I think McCain must be suffering from the same kind of senility that Obama has.
My Take On Last Night
Sen. Obama: I think he spoke well. Was upfront about his policies. He was very well composed. Stayed away from the trash talk and really spoke on the issues. He clarified when needed and remained in control. He did not talk down to the audience or to the moderator.
Sen. McCain: He was very condescending to the moderator. He avoided the questions and went on the attack rather than answering the questions. He was engaging with the members of the hall and that was his strong suit.
I do not feel that either candidate ran away with the debate. I do think the McCain controlled his temper much better than I anticipated. He really needed to pull away with the debate and he fell short.
Jess Mom to Thing 1 and Thing 2 CEO of Knight INC.
That's Interesting
because I felt like Obama spent way too much time refuting McCain's digs, when he could have been answering some very important questions that I would have liked answers to.
I was actually disappointed to feel this way. I really loved Obama when I saw him on Oprah during his first appearance. I wanted to feel that way again last night. I didn't. I wasn't exactly enamoured by McCain either, but I thought he more clearly explained his ideas and seemed to have a (SLIGHTLY) better concept of how things would work if he were president.
I am far from 100% sold on McCain though. I have got to read more about both of them. That much is clear.
About McCain's digs ...
I think Obama was in a lose/lose situation with that. If he didn't respond, it would come across as true, and when he answered the questions he was asked and then responded to the attacks, he was called out by the moderator for overrunning time so he had to think of a way to refute the attacks as well as answer the questions in 2 mins or close. He obviously couldn't do both justice.
It seems to me like McCain went in with a strategy to answer questions and then attack Obama or say something untrue such as Barack intends on raising taxes on small businesses or that he still can't admit the surge worked, forcing Barack on the defensive while he was at the same time trying to absorb the question asked and then answer. It kind of worked it seems and it was the first time I sensed Obama getting a little angry or a little upset.
Temi
I was expecting the attacks
It had been announced that both sides would "get personal" in this debate and attack the other. It was interesting to see how they responded. McCain seemed to accept that it was going to happen and Obama, as you said, seemed a little upset about it. I would have been, too. I have no idea how either one maintained his calm.
ToQueenofSpain
Queen of Spain,
I just saw the discusson on your blog! OMG! How scary. It's sad really what people have been fed, and depend on one perspective alone. Really. We take one debate and perhaps use that as the basis for our very important vote. Maybe right after the elections, there could be a possibility of moving to the other side, by then it's too late. We've got to do just that....RESEARCH. I tell my students that all the time. Where is your frame of reference? One magazine article? One debate? One night of an experience? It's unfair to Sen. Obama that as the many lies roll in, the more believers there are about them. That one post on your site, condemning Sen. Obama as a "cold bastard." Yikes. But I believe in your spirit QueenofSpain. I do. I I love your retort. It was exactly what people are afraid of hearing and seeing...and reading. We're so stuck in our own closets that we refuse to look at things from multiple perspectives.
I too was sorta kinda semi-excited that a woman was picked at the VP candidate, but that woman isn't me, nothing like me, and would never represent me, my struggles nor where I come from. She doesn't even sound like anyone I know - very textbook. Very. If that's the kind of leadership this country needs at a time like this, then I guess we'll just have to wait and see, but like you and many others have said, enough is enough, and I've damn well had it.
GirlProfNYC - www.pinkerink.com
Two Things
You Said: McCains proposal to double the child exemption on taxes, from $3,500 to $7,000 per child.
I Say: How does that benefit me? I am a single, TAX-PAYING, citizen who cannot have kids due to medical reasons. I live well within my means, but still live paycheck-to-paycheck, struggling to pay off loans. How is an extra $3,500/child in your pocket good for me/people like me?
You Said: I may end up voting for him and later regretting it (*cough* George W. Bush, *cough*).
I Say: Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. Do you really want to make that mistake again? Can we as a country make that mistake again?