The Other Boleyn Girl - Chopped Off At The Neck
by Jenny Lauck

Way back in June of 2007, I was delighted to learn that Philippa Gregory's fantastic novel - The Other Boleyn Girl - would be coming to the big screen. Having devoured all of Gregory's Tudor novels, I had high hopes for this film.

The strength of Gregory's novel was in the richly developed plot and fully imagined environment. You knew what everyone looked like, where they were sitting, what they were wearing, who was looking at them, what they all were eating...and on top of that, you knew what motivated most of the characters, and what was at stake.

Author Tracy Grant talks about her fascination with the Boleyn siblings' relationship at her site, Secrets of a Lady:

One of the things I found most intriguing about The Other Boleyn Girl as a both a book and a movie is the complex relationships of the three Boleyn siblings, Anne, Mary, and George. Relationships between siblings offer such a rich wealth for an author to explore–love, jealousy, understanding, misunderstanding, competition, support, histories that intertwine from the cradle.

Additionally, all the characters were quite vivid, and the romances and heartbreaks were skillfully built. Gregory builds some mighty fine tension in her characters, and the longing and anguish and triumph were tangible. These were characters that I either loved or hated, and by the end of the book, I wanted more.

Not so with movie version.

Despite the gorgeous cast, the brilliant costumes and the lovely scenery, the vast epic from the novel is distilled down to the essence of the plot - and it becomes hollow in the process. I wanted the sweeping, languorous epic, the whole sweating, bosom-heaving, I can't take any more oh my GOD do not stop deal and instead I got a quickie.

How rude. Frankly, it really could have used some foreplay.

Spyscribbler notes that the cleaning up of the various plots was a bit too tidy:

The movie was faithful to the spirit of the book and mostly to the plot, but much of the motivations of each character was left out. Sadly, most of the spying, betrayals and intrigue was left out. (It breaks my heart.) George was never given an opportunity to show himself as the life of the court, as he was, nor was Anne given the opportunity to show how delightful she could be for the king.

Mary, however, was the truest. They tidied things up; she bore only a son in the movie, while in the book and in real life, she had a son and a daughter for King Henry.

Sarah Johnson at Reading The Past pinpoints the problem accurately:

...the film does play it safe, more so than Gregory's novel did, and not just in that instance. Johansson's Mary Boleyn = meek, quiet, and biddable; Portman's Anne = outspoken, witty, daring, and ambitious. Making them polar opposites simplifies things, and rendered the movie superficial. Gregory's version of Mary was more well-rounded, and therefore more interesting; I found it hard to root for either sister, despite it being blatantly obvious that their father and uncle were using them to fulfill their own ambitions ("pimping them out" is the phrase the NYT review used, and rather aptly).

Perhaps if I hadn't read the novel, I would have been able to embrace the film more fully. MaryAnn Johanson from The Flick Filosopher found the whole thing ridiculously delicious:

And that’s all in The Other Boleyn Girl, the fun sexiness, the mean nastiness, the oh-my-god-movie-starness of Scarlett Johansson (no relation -- don’t I wish I could glom onto her gorgeousness) and Natalie Portman and Eric Bana. They are not movie stars who let you forget you’re watching movie stars -- at least not in this movie, and maybe costume dramas bring that out in certain actors; they’re not, at least not in this movie, actors who can disappear into their roles. But that’s okay. It’s redolent of the kind of glamour and charismatic faux-trickery of Golden Age Hollywood, like watching Cary Grant or Katharain Hepburn in anything: you never really want to see a character, you want to just bask in their radiance for an hour or two.

That’s sort of not fair, when it comes to this flick, because it’s not like these three stars aren’t real actors, don’t want to be taken seriously: it’s just their own damn dumb luck that they’re so impossibly captivating in that movie-star way. And so the kind of sexual Mexican standoff in which they find themselves circling around one another becomes a ridiculously delicious soap opera.

Other excellent reviews:

Brandy McDonnell

...the film cuts big corners trying to cram in so much history and speculation. Even for a casual history buff, having Henry's historic break with Rome reduced to foreplay conversation induces cringes.

Maitland McDonagh

Peter Morgan's (THE QUEEN, THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND) adaptation of Gregory's popular novel is more focused on sins of ambition than sins of the flesh -- for all his legendary appetites, Henry didn't make his legendary six trips to the altar out of lust. Unfortunately, keeping the film's running time under two hours meant trimming political complications to make room for some soft-focus rumpy pumpy. And let's face it: If you swap out power for sex, the sex needs to be hotter than a PG-13 rating generally facilitates.

Criticize This

Both Gregory’s novel and Chadwick’s film are playing-with-facts accounts of the Boleyns’ struggle to win King Henry VIII’s favour – the difference is, the book entertains, while the film only disappoints.

and don't miss this: Jennifer Merin speaks with Philippa Gregory.

You know what I find so interesting is that despite the gains made by feminism–and I am a feminist and a great supporter of equal rights–you look at Anne Boleyn who gets from nowhere to be Queen of England, and has the King of England dancing for six years–six years of courtship–during which time he turns the history of England upside down in order that he might get into bed with her, and she won’t allow it–you know, that’s a woman who…well, I mean, these aren’t wiles, this is campaign level strategy. She was a phenomenal woman. Absolutely phenomenal.

Did you see The Other Boleyn Girl this weekend? What did you think?

___________________________________________________________________-

Jenny Lauck also blogs at Three Kid Circus.

Comments

 

oooooh, now I'm not sure...

...if I should see this. I was hooked on The Tudors on Showtime and am having trouble with the casting of the film.

Sigh.Maybe I'll wait for the DVD. The book was too good and I can't bear to ruin it just yet.

Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain

 

The TV Tudors

I don't get Showtime on my cheapo cable package - but I'm on the scout for the DVD set when it comes out. I think the only way to really do The Other Boleyn Girl justice would have been to make it a mini-series length film.

Honestly, as much as I love Diana Gabaldon's Outlander series, I'm pretty relieved that no one has tried to compress that sweeping epic into an hour and fifty minutes. Hey, maybe one of the cable networks should produce that.

(I'm revealing my high-brow reading tastes, aren't I?)

The Circus is in town!

 

It's A Renter

I haven't read the book, so I saw the movie cold. The performances by Natalie Portman and Scarlett Johansson were the only things worth the price of a ticket. They were very, very good. Eric Bana was just so, so. The costumes and sets were magnificent, but my litmus test is always, is it worth $10? Not really. A renter at $5 is much better.

My girlfriend who went with me and is a huge "Tudors" fan nearly fell asleep she was so bored.

Megan
BlogHer Contributing Editor, TV/YouTube

Megan's Minute
Video Runway

 

Maybe on DVD

I loved this book. I'm not going to go and see the movie. I may rent it when the DVD (or OnDemand) is available. I've had my (literary) heart broken too many times to put myself in that position again.

 

More Tudors

I also loved the book, and found myself disappointed by the movie. It wasn't all bad. They did a great job with Mary's character, but Anne and her brother were never fully developed, not to mention King Henry. None of the politics at the time were discussed, and it seemed like King Henry's divorce with Catherine was a moment's decision that took only a few weeks to accomplish. Granted, I just finished watching season one of The Tudors, which did a much better job of developing the story.

The only time I felt moved was in the last scene, during which Natalie Portman gave a superb performance. Too bad we never got to know her character through the rest of the movie.

Plastic Daffodils

http://plasticdaffodils.wordpress.com/