Here we go again! An Illinois jury has found parents Jeffrey and Sara Hutsell guilty of allowing teens to drink alcohol in their home, and now the Hutsells face possible jail time:
As the debate continues in courtrooms, at high schools and around kitchen tables across the country on who ultimately bears responsibility for underage drinking, a jury in Lake County weighed in with its own opinion Saturday, finding a Deerfield couple guilty of allowing their son's friends to drink in their basement one night last October.
Two teenage guests were killed in a car crash shortly after leaving the Deerfield home of Jeffrey and Sara Hutsell.
... Killed were Daniel Bell of Bannockburn, and a passenger, Ross Trace of Riverwoods, both 18.(The Chicago Tribune)
The Hutsells maintain that they did not see any drinking in their home. However, witnesses for the prosecution contradicted the parents' recollection of events. Read the full story here.
We've debated this subject before in Mommy & Family. At the time, most of the comments from BlogHer readers were sympathetic to Virginia parents who received jail time after receiving a guilty verdict for supplying alcohol to underage teens for one of their son's birthday party. The majority of comments indicated that readers thought the Virginia parents were wrong to serve alcohol to teens; however they felt the parents' sentence was harsh.
Nelle, who also blogs at Nelle2Nelle.org, offered the following commentary when considering the Virginia couple:
Alcohol is a fact of adult life, and we do a very poor job of educating our young on how to transition to that responsibility.
Throwing a party for a herd of teens is irresponsible and negligent. Does it merit 27 months in jail? IMO, no. I know we wish to show this is no joke, not to be taken lightly, but if we start tossing sentences at every problem we face as a society, well... we will have more jails than schools. (Comments from June post)
Lia from Lubeck, Germany, who regularly blogs at The Yum Yum Cafe, suggested that some American youth may abuse alcohol simply because underage drinking is taboo:
Where I live it is legal for sixteen-year-olds to buy and consume beer and wine. The idea, I guess, is that it is important for youth to learn in their homes the benefits of moderate use of alcohol: before they learn to drive (generally done at 18 years) or go out on their own to college.
My son, who is 17, and most of his friends don't drink alcohol, even though they have tried it on the occasion. There are others in his class, the cool gang, who do drink often and hard. The others don't feel any pressure though to follow. Since beer and wine are not "forbidden fruit" there is no mystical attraction to overindulge (or at least in theory). (Comments from June post)
One reader came armed with statistical facts, Jody DeVere of AskPatty.com. The following statistical fact struck me as potent:
Young drivers are over represented in both alcohol- and non-alcohol-related fatality rates. Alcohol-related fatality rates are nearly twice as high for 18-, 19- and 20-year-olds as for the population over 21. More than 40 percent of 18-, 19-, and 20- year-old crash fatalities are alcohol-related. (Comments from June post)
In my post about the Virginia couple, much of the reader debate revolved around underage drinking and why under certain circumstances it should be allowed. With the exception of Jody DeVere, few readers broached the topic to which underage drinking is sadly connected, drinking and driving.
Ending that post I said, "Well, we know that drinking oneself into a stupor is all fun and games until somebody goes to jail or while drunk, crashes a car and decapitates a child."
In this recent Illinois case, the two 18-year-olds died when their car slammed into a tree after they left a high-school, homecoming party at the Hutsell's home. So, people in that community are outraged, and Chicago media has devoted much ink, bits and bytes to the story. However, the majority of Chicago readers responding to an unscientific poll seem to think putting the Hutsells in jail goes too far to send a message to parents who serve alcohol to minors (Poll).
Chicago Sun Times columnist Tom McNamee says in the headline for his column on this subject that the "parents deserve our scorn but not prison." He says that a friend of his encouraged him to write about the Deerfield incident and possible jail time for the Hutsells. That same friend, according to McNamee, asserted that adults who take a hard line on the Hutsells are phonies:
We were all teenagers once, my friend said, and we all drank now and then, and our parents often looked the other way. That's how the real world works.
"But now we've got all these high-and-mighty hypocrites full of fake outrage," he said. "Give me a break." (McNamee's column)
McNamee said that while he usually agrees with his friend, this time he couldn't. He said he's heard more people sympathetic to the Hutsells, more who assert that teens can be hard to control. He himself swings between extreme feelings about he Deerfield couple, he said:
Even as I write this column, I find myself swinging back and forth between feeling compassion for the Hutsells -- I'm a father of teens myself -- and feeling disgust.
Yes, most teens will drink, but good parents don't approve, let alone help it happen.
If a "broad-minded" mom and dad think otherwise, that's their business -- for their kid.
But what my kid drinks is my business.
Where I go soft with the Hutsells is on the question of fair punishment.
The Hutsells have already been dragged through the media, rightly so, for being foolish and irresponsible. They've been convicted by a jury. They face financially crushing civil suits.
And for years to come, every time a story pops up about drunken teens -- those stories pop up all the time --the Hutsells' names probably will get trotted out again.
Why pile on? Spare them the clink. (Namee)
He ends his column recalling an incident from his youth when a friend's father caught him drunk. As soon as the parent saw what was happening, says Namee, he declared "party's over," but he did not yell at him. He only asked, "What did you learn?" McNamee says he learned not to drink too much.
My children don't drink so far (ages 16 and 26), but we as parents never know what's in store for us when it comes to our children's life choices. I think that if my son ever wanted to have a party and offer alcohol to his underage friends I would stand firmly against it and withhold permission, but teens can be pretty creative when they wish to hide their deeds from parents. Nevertheless, I've repeatedly warned both my minor child and my adult child that they should never drink and drive, nor should they get into a car with a drinking driver.
Do you have more to share on this subject? Should the Hutsells receive jail time, after all those Virginia parents got 27 months in jail for providing alcohol to minors and no one was maimed or killed in that case?
Should America's laws be more lenient on underage drinking so that our youth learn how to drink responsibly around their parents? Do any of us have a practical solution for avoiding the tragedies of youth?
Photo Credit: Chicago Tribune photo collection
Nordette Adams has recently moved to New Orleans, La., her hometown, and hopes to catch up with her personal blog soon.
Comments
I think what makes me mad
I think what makes me mad about it is that the parents say that they were unaware of the drinking in their own home and believe it an excuse. I think it's a cop out. It's their house and I feel if they were doing their jobs as parents they would know - my mother knew if I so much as sneezed. I would never have snuck an underage drink in her home. Woman would go bonkers. I didn't end up a lush though, either.
Law in Missouri states that if alcohol is served at a party, the hosts of said party are liable for their guests' safe return home. You are within your right to refuse someone their car keys if they've been drinking in your home.
I think the punishment fits the crime, really. Their actions, or lack thereof, contributed to the deaths of those teenagers. Not cool.
Great post for discussion!
Dana
Mamalogues.com
In the St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Pop Mama
Since Eve
So many peripheral and associated issues...
We are a society wherein alcoholic beverages are a fact of life, and in fact part of our social interaction. I'm as guilty of this as anyone, loving a good beer, loving a margarita (please make mine blue.)
And it's a love hate relationship, one that encompasses our love of a good time and a good drink with our human frailties - namely not easily respecting known boundaries, applying common sense, etc. Add in the physical element that brings in addiction.
With such a world looming on their horizon, we expect teens to don and keep fastened halos, all while we mix up another one. We expect them to be perfect, where we can never be. Maybe we try to live that perfect life vicariously through our young. Dunno, but we sure as hell place unfair expectations upon them.
We need to be a bit more mature all the way around (says the queen of immaturity.) We need to teach responsibly, we need to understand that, just as with sex, kids are going to experiment with the world they will soon be a part of. They are going to want a piece of the good time they see us supposedly having.
Allowing anyone else's kidlet to drink is sheer folly. Stupid, dumb, ridiculous. Even if a parent signs their life to the devil by way of you, it's still all of those things. Why? Because there are countless variables, and none of them produce good outcomes.
Instead, teach your kids responsibility, not through abstinence, but by education. By knowing what that great mystery is. How it changes perception, alters our reality, impairs our judgment, makes us act stupid - and that yes, some people like to be some or all of those things at times. Teach them to think, to understand the consequences, to know there is no reclaiming a life lost, that dead is forever. Teach them to know that going there means they had better take steps to eliminate the variables, and tighten down the options.
They need to learn that the mystery is not so great, that excess brings a great intimacy with bathroom fixtures, or death, or vulnerability to sexual assault, etc. Teach through some controlled experience. And when you do... do so with your child only. Personally, probably a glass of wine with dinner is a perfect context.
When I see parents who have held or allowed a party to go on, I see parents who wish to be the kewl ones for their kids. There are other ways to be kewl, playing with lives is not one of them.
nelle
Thanks for the revisit...
I posted a rather lengthy reply last night, but received a 'held for possible spam' message, and it's yet to make an appearance. Guess the internet fairy was hungry!
nelle