Bio
I am 62, divorced, basically without living relatives, endlessly curious, spiritually imaginative and always embarking on one sort of journey or anot...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

PART 2: Juvenile Justice? Restorative Justice Programs

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 10
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

The restorative justice movement is a radical approach to overhauling the justice system by emphasizing responsibility and restoration in a new sentencing process. It is gaining advocates around the world, particularly in faith communities, and is one of the ways people are proposing change, especially to the juvenile justice system.

In our first article in this series, we spoke about the many moral problems with juveniles sentenced on the far end of the spectrum to life without parole. Now, we will explore the usefulness of this radical new approach to justice, especially with (but not limited to) first time juvenile offenders.

Let's say a crime has been committed. In the ideal world, what we want is for the offender to understand what they have done to the victim -- to "get" the impact that what they have done, and to do something meaningful and specific to make amends. Restorative justice does that.

A series of structured conferences is put together (either directly, through a third party, or via mail/video) of the victim and their family/friends and the offender and their family/friends.

The victim gets to describe:

  • What happened
  • How people were affected
  • What can be done to make things better

The offender gets the following:

  • Understand of the circumstances of the offense
  • Have a voice in describing the impact of the offense
  • Identify what can be done to makes things better.

(The above descriptions were adapted from the Australian Capital Territory Department of Justice and Community Safety, as is the following quote:)

RJ has been criticised as a soft option, relevant only to first-time offenders and useful only as a diversionary tool. Scientifically valid research has shown that RJ can reduce offending and can have its strongest impact on serious crimes, violent crime and prolific offenders ... They are also very challenging for offenders as there is nowhere to hide in a conference - offenders face the people they have harmed, the victims, the victim’s supporters and their own family.

The Smith Institute in London says that restorative justice, when implemented, reduced both recidivism among adults and youth, and also reduced cost to the area.

Implementing such an approach could only take place after a values shift, moving us from a desire for retribution and vengeance to a desire for healing. This is a global movement, yet we hear comparatively little about it here -- with the exception of the occasional in-prison meetings between violent crime offenders and a generic group of victims. These meetings, while deeply helpful, do not impact sentencing.

RESOURCES

Restorative Justice Online offers a variety of resources, studies, articles and videos about restorative justice. They are part of Prison Fellowship, which was started by Charles Colson after his release as a converted Christian from prison for Watergate offenses.

Restorative Justice is a private site about how restorative justice is being used in the school settings in New Zealand.

The Methodist Church's Report on Restorative Justice

The Presbyterian Report on Restorative Justice

The Progressive Jewish Alliance's Jewish Community Justice Project is the nation's first and only Jewish restorative justice project.

The United Church of Christ provides pro-active guidelines for those in its churches who wish to become involved with restorative justice projects, and discussion aids for congregations.

What do you think? If you were the victim of a crime, say a robbery from your home, would you want to sit down and confront the offender with how he had affected you and what he could do to make amends? Or would you just want him punished?

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool

  • 10
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
GaelMc 50 pts

http://www.blogher.com/justice-department-western-australia-ran-amuk

As one who actually taught JJO's and PPO's for their core curriculum, I have written this article about my book fictionalizing the situ in West Australia in Justice. I also desinged and implemented a program, Justice Thru Art to assist prisoners re-orient to life upon release and have an independence maker if not wealth creator for them. Thanks for your article.

Mata H 5 pts

I think some people have jobs, and others have callings. And callings can sure pull us through a variety of circumstances -- but what a joy they bring to life!

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

Jill Miller Zimon 11 pts

Well, I really always thought, since my late years in high school, that I would become a juvenile court judge some day - it was really what I wanted to do. But then I moved to and ended up living in Ohio, where judges are elected, and I have a real dislike for that (not that old boy networks for appointment are any better but...). On the other hand, as recently as last December a juvenile court judge asked me if I was interested in being a bailiff in his court which would actually allow me to hear some level of cases but I had JUST been elected to city council and there was just no way that I could take it on. I did pass it by my husband but we really agreed, the timing was absolutely terrible. But it would have been a fantastic entre back into juvenile justice, where I still know many people.

We'll see - I can't imagine right now re-upping my law license and running for the juvenile court. But then again, I never ever thought of being a freelance writer and I definitely didn't think I'd run for a city council seat. So- never say never. :)

But juvenile justice has been a passion of mine for decades. Ok - last thing - when I was in social work school and we'd sit around talking about field placements, we'd all kind of talk about the ones we thought we could "never" do. I had friends in pediatric oncology - and I'd say, oy - I could NEVER do that! And then some were in geriatric social work, and I'd say, oy - I could never do THAT. But they would often say that they could NEVER see working with kids in juvenile court - and I could never understand how they could say that. :)

Jill Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

In The Arena: Jill Miller Zimon, Pepper Pike City Council Member ( http://jillmillerzimon.blogspot.com )

Mata H 5 pts

Jill you have made such an important and wise contribution with your comment. Thank you so very much.

Mata

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

Mata H 5 pts

Thanks for your comment -- these programs vary by state and agency that use them. There are even variant of the program that put victims of violent crimes -- like mothers of people who were shot -- in the room with either the offender or offenders of a similar nature in at attempt to have the perpetrator "get it" -- and see that what they did was not just an impulse, but an act with real and enduring consequences. It has also been used with some success on 1st time offending juveniles, and countries like Australia have a reduced number of repeat offenders because of it..I think this would have to start in a limited way and carefully tested.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool ( http://timesfool.blogspot.com )

Jill Miller Zimon 11 pts

Thanks for writing about this topic, Mata - you do take on the tough ones!!

I have a long history with this topic, literally starting in high school when I did an independent study project on juvenile recidivism - in 1979!

Fast forward to both my graduate school experience (getting a joint degree in law and social work) where I did a year of field work in the diagnostic clinic of the county juvenile court (in Cleveland so covering about 1.5-2 million people total) and eight years at a children and family mental health agency.

I cannot speak for any juvenile court system than the one I worked in but I do believe that nearly all have what is called an amenability process. This is a way in which the courts seek to determine which minors are amenable to rehabilitation or restorative justice approaches. These analyses are not haphazard and are not, in my experience, ignored. They are not, however, fail proof.

Professionals who work in the capacity of rendering clinical opinions as to whether a minor is amenable to restoration or rehabilitation seek to be the absolute best prognosticators they can be - they have no stake in whether a minor is bound over to adult court and faces adult-level sentencing if found guilty, or if they determine that a minor is in fact amenable to more treatment and yet may end up being a repeat offender.

Having faced minors who are in both categories - amenable and not amenable, I think it's incredibly important to realize just how few individuals we're talking about. No single life is worth making a mistake, but, I do think people need to realize that there are indeed, as I think Melissa suggests, minors who are not and never will be amenable to treatment.

I believe our court systems, including the diagnostic divisions, need to be sure that we are doing the utmost, prior to the bindover decisions and prior to rendering verdicts and prior to sentencing and prior to parole hearings, to ascertain the best paths down which minors can be shown where their life can lead - and where it won't depending on the choices made.

There are also many issues related to the kind of legal representation these minors get, and the kind of strains on treatment options and the availability of them that currently exist, not to mention the political football that politicians and candidates can play with suggesting getting tough or being sympathetic, depending upon how they read the mood of the electorate.

Minors are often treated as less than human in the court system, for many reasons, and it should still gall everyone that there were laws against animal maltreatment before there were such laws against child abuse.

Anyway - I just wanted to highlight that there is a significant role played by mental health professionals, usually, in these scenarios, and likewise a significant role played by expenses - and strained financial resources. Minors don't vote - and very, very sadly, this does, IMO, affect decisions related to what options are available for them before, during and after their involvement with the courts.

Jill Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

In The Arena: Jill Miller Zimon, Pepper Pike City Council Member ( http://jillmillerzimon.blogspot.com )

Melissa Ford 53 pts

I think I'd want something in between, perhaps a series of hoops with no-going-back points in between. I'm all for this, but I can think of the one person I know who is jailed for a violent crime and this would never work with him. It is beyond him to be remorseful for the crime -- only that he got caught. I could see the series of conferences as more damaging for the victims. It could be cathartic in certain situations and incredibly harmful emotionally in others. How much say would the victim have in whether they wanted to participate?

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.com/ ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).