- Share This Post
- submit
- 0
-
Sparkle (0)
Source: Philanthropy 2.0 Study
Last week, Geoff Livingston, Qui Diaz and I posted a summary of our findings from our Philanthropy 2.0 research, a survey of the giving habits of the social media savvy, over at Mashable. I'm using this post to roundup the reactions to the study and add some more context.
A common critic of online giving through social media is that the dollar amounts are too low per donor and donations tend to be transactional, not relationship-based or one-time donors. This has been found in a number of surveys over the past few years (see Allison Fine's astute commentary on the recent Blackbaud survey here)
If we look back a year ago at donation trends on Facebook Causes, we also see the same complaint.
- Causes Reports On Its First Year - $2.5 Million For 20,000 Charities And NonProfits by Michael Arrington, TechCrunch.Com, Washington Post, May 29, 2008
- $2.5 Million and Counting, The Agitator, May 29, 2008
- Social Networks: It’s About the Relationship by Stephen MacLaughlin, BlackBaud Blog, May 29, 2008
- The Long Tail of Facebook Causes. Frogloop Blog. James O’Malley and Justin Perkins. July 24, 2007
But, we know that the demographics of social networks are aging (see my round up the recent research about babyboomers on social networks) and we are beginning to observe that the social web is becoming more of a place for fundraising for causes as well as philanthropic discussions.
As we wrote in the Mashable post:
While the social web has been a fantastic place for nonprofits to harness the long tail of giving with movements like Twestival and the Case Foundation’s Giving Challenge, high dollar donor cultivation has not been prevalent. The goal of our Community Philanthropy 2.0 survey one month ago was to determine whether there is potential for nonprofits to cultivate significant donors online (defined as someone who gives $1,000 or more), and how that can be accomplished.
You can read about the rest of the findings on Mashable, but there were a number of good points made about the challenge of transitioning to social media infused fundraising. While there may be tremendous opportunity, your organization won't be able to reap the benefits if it is stuck in doing the same strategy year after year.
Allison Fine offers some great advice for getting "unstuck"
- Keep doing what works but know and plan like it isn’t going to work
forever. In fact, you should plan that this is the last year you’ll be
able to do what you’ve done before successfully. You don’t want to get
caught totally off guard like newspapers that thought they had much
longer to transition from old to new than they really did. - Get your conversations going online NOW! Pick one or two places,
say Twitter and Facebook, and start talking about your issues and
listening to the conversations that folks are having about your cause.
Don’t worry if the conversation is small, don’t worry that it isn’t
leading to donations right now. You need to practice talking to people
online about your cause; these aren’t skills that more traditional orgs
have in their DNA. - Find one fundraising event or idea to take online this year. Use
Facebook to ask your folks for ideas for fundraisers, should we pick a
day and everyone does their own thing like Red Nose Day,
or should we have one event in person, maybe a lower key breakfast this
year instead of a fancy dinner, or maybe a virtual event or contest?
Don’t prescribe, listen and learn.
I'd add to Allison's point about finding a low risk experiment that you can learn from. I've outlined a methodology for this based on David Armano's Listen, Learn and Adapt. Carie Lewis from the Humane Society of the United States has used this approach with impressive results over the last three years.
You have to think of your "experiments" as one part learning, and the other part building up your online
network of donors. It takes time, but does show results as the comments on the original Mashable post seem to indicate:
Two years ago The Children's Wish Foundation of Canada established a
presence on Facebook and incorporated guidelines for our Chapters to
establish their local groups. This integration has lead to lead to 7
Chapter groups communicating local news to their community and a
national group with over 3,400 people sharing their stories and
experiences.
Since then the Foundation has ventured out to
many of the social sites, spreading awareness about our cause and
connecting with supporters. We have experienced great success