- Share This Post
- submit
- 20
-
Sparkle (0)
In my city, Denver, it is a crime to own a specific breed of dog - a pit bull. (The 'pit bull' term may include the American Pit Bull terrier, American Staffordshire terrier and Staffordshire Bull terrier, among others.) Implemented in 2005, the ban decrees that owners have the choice of moving out of the city or having their dog(s) put to death. Though I have no personal experience with pit bulls, this seems outrageous to me - like some sort of weird animal racism. (Breedism?)
At first, I figured my city must have some unique grudge against these dogs but a little bit of research revealed that Denver is not unique. At least 12 nations (icluding Canada, UK, France and Italy) have similar bans. Here in the U.S., there are at least 18 cities/counties with some version of the ban in effect with seven proposed bans currently pending. Is this widespread fear justified?

In the Denver suburb city of Aurora, dog owner Florence Vianzon Sasek is currently challenging rules that force her to pay the city $200 a year for a license, muzzle or lock the dog up when traveling and keep a 6-foot fence around her property. Evidently, the rules apply to pit bulls and several breeds with "the same physical traits as pit bulls." Huh?
A lawsuit filed in federal district court by the American Canine Foundation on her behalf contends the ban is unconstitutional, vague, and unnecessary. (Trial is scheduled to start Monday.) The ban applies to Sasek's 5-year-old American Staffordshire terrier, but she was allowed to keep it under a grandfather clause. Sasek maintains her dog is not violent and has never bitten anyone.
Aurora city records show eight attacks on humans by dogs covered by the ban in 2006 and 11 in 2007. Interesting to note that "all other dogs" accounted for 123 attacks on humans in 2006 and 150 in 2007.
In trying to understand both sides here, I have to admit upfront that I was attacked by a dog as a child. (I don't recall the breed but it was damn scary.) I must also admit to being afraid of pit bulls or any other dog that looks like he/she could rip my arm off. Not sure if that is the media's fault or my own instinct but I'm all about full disclosure. (I should also admit that I love to fly, adore snakes and spiders and am genuinely turned on by the idea of public speaking. My only fear? Being eaten alive by an animal. There, I said it.)
Also, I was a resident of San Francisco when a young woman, Diane Whipple, was attacked and killed by two neighboring dogs at the door of her apartment. In that case (which went on forever and was widely discussed locally and nationally), the breed was Presa Canario, also known as Canary Island Fighting Dogs. To my knowledge, this breed has not been banned outright anywhere though it may fall under the 'pit bull' mantle. Disturbingly, the case sparked a surge of breed interest from sicko creeps everywhere. Said Dan Wilson, a Presa Canario breeder in Canada, who fielded tons of calls post-attack: "As soon as the dog killed that woman, they wanted them."
Perhaps it's not so much a dog ban that we should be enforcing but a ban on irresponsible asshole owners? For every loving, committed, responsible pit bull owner (and there are many, thank god), there is the angry, creepy guy on the corner with the dead lawn and the chain link fence who likes to encourage a pit bull's fighting instinct. (Why? My guess is Small Penis Syndrome.) In fact, many of these unsavory pit bull owners deliberately choose to not to spay or neuter their pet specifically to encourage an aggressive nature.
The hard statistics, unfortunately, do not help the pit bull case. Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People, conducted an unusually detailed study of dog bites from 1982 to 2006. The study reveals the number of serious canine-inflicted injuries by breed.
According to the Clifton study, pit bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes are responsible for 74% of attacks that were included in the study, 68% of the attacks upon children, 82% of the attacks upon adults, 65% of the deaths, and 68% of the maimings. In more than















