Bio
I'm just a geek at heart. I've been through the tech boom and bust and managed to survive somewhat unscathed. I've done web design, online news,...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Please Tell Your Kids:

That Magazine is Not a Broken iPad

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

You've probably seen the video by now, of a 1 year old baby trying to figure out how to use magazines. Apparently she thinks they should be as responsive as tablet computers. The video title is "A Magazine is an iPad that Doesn't Work".

I saw a number of people share and comment on this video last week. Many of them were saying that this new generation will never know traditional media or will learn to see beyond paper. It makes me picture a world where books are rare, sacred objects to which only an elite few have access. The idea of it saddens me.

I get frustrated when I hear parents of this new generation talk about the end of paper and books, implying the end of written history. Hubby and I are raising a member of that generation and he has far more books than he does computer programs, favourite websites and video games... combined.

I shared the video on Google Plus and my colleague Todd Lyons commented:

"Interesting, but more indicative of what the child has been exposed to than a compelling argument that written content is useless....The only 'digital natives' there are are those we choose to keep stranded on the digital island."

I had the exact same reaction. And I would even argue further that this generation will be just as effective in balancing the written word and the digital word as the last 2 generations who have grown up alongside new technologies (from TVs to PCs). Books are just the first step; if we focus our kids on digitally experiencing the world around them — instead of actually interacting with it — then they may quickly lose that sense of wonder when they experience something for the first time.

As parents, we are the first access point our children have to the world around them. If we choose to limit their exposure and concentrate on the shiny technical stuff, we might devalue our own history and culture in their eyes. We need to teach them balance between online and offline, the value of live interpersonal interactions, to appreciate what's around them, to go and be in the world, not a spectator behind a screen.

Think back to a moment of awe at seeing something with your own eyes or experiencing something for the first time. Your first roller coaster ride. Your first kiss. Receiving your own mail when you were a kid. Cracking the spine of a new book. Gingerly turning the pages of a very old used book. There's something magical about physically interacting with an object in that way. I may be a fan of tech, but I sincerely hope those physical experiences are never fully replaced by the online world.

Video

For more geeky goodness, visit spydergrrl.com or follow @spydergrrl.

  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
WhitneyD 8 pts

I think that you definitely need to find a balance between old and new technology.

I decided long ago I wouldn't let my kids play too much with my phone- not because I didn't think they could handle it, but because I wanted them to be comfortable with paper and using standard computers first.

I love books, the feel of the paper. I write my first drafts on paper. There's something about the feeling of a pen on paper. While I am amazed at how intuitive this technology is- since it's so intuitive... why introduce them when they're that little and make it all they've ever known?

Virginia DeBolt 13 pts

The article said, "I would even argue further that this generation will be just as effective in balancing the written word and the digital word as the last 2 generations who have grown up alongside new technologies (from TVs to PCs)."

I think that's quite true. My own response to the video was to think about how intuitive and easy to understand touch screen devices are. Even babies understand the concept. Our technology, thanks in large part to Steve Jobs, has reached the point where there are almost no barriers to using it.

apoll82 6 pts

the real question is why anyone would give their one year old child free reign of a $200 piece of machinery??

LucindaA 12 pts

Finding the balance is always the challenge. I agree that children need to experience the real world, not just the digital. They only get to be kids once. Why not let that childhood be as interactive as possible?

TheFeministBreeder 5 pts

I LOVE technology, but my biggest problem with this idea that books will become obsolete is that you cannot just hand someone a digital "book" the way you can hand them a paperback. If you can only read a book if you own one of these few-hundred-dollar digital devices, think of the knowledge and learning we're keeping away from poorer people. Think of the resources that a person would have to have in order to get their hands on information. I, personally, LOVE my lending library, and that's why I keep buying paper books. I'm a childbirth educator and doula, and I like being able to hand my students a book and say "Here, there's something valuable in here." If I only had a digital copy, I couldn't do that.

Conversation from Twitter

SylviaDionCPA
SylviaDionCPA

taxtweet I just RT'd an article on Steve Jobs with baby video in it. Interesting to read this one with different perspective.

mizjawnson
mizjawnson

blogher No, it's someone getting internet fame for showing that a baby lacks manual dexterity to turn flimsy magazine pages.

Sparkle_Agency
Sparkle_Agency

blogher soon that will be all they will know!

Conversation from Facebook

Anne-Marie Ross
Anne-Marie Ross

That video just pretty much looks like the kid does the same hand movements all the time. I don't think it's quite a treatise on the death of the book.

Christina Lane
Christina Lane

Wow what a judgey narrow article

Emily Banks
Emily Banks

I have to agree: my baby is read to serval times a day, but he also loves playing with my iPhone and iPad. I swipes his finger across everything, because that's how he gets to "push buttons." I don't want my child not to know what a magazine, or book, is - of course not. I am a HUGE reader and studied English/Writing through graduate school. But that doesn't mean I won't let him play with buttons and gizmos that make him happy (with my supervision, naturally...I mean, he is a BABY).

Renea Henry
Renea Henry

So silly. Babies have limited motor skills. They point and touch things. It doesn't mean they are trying to operate a magazine like an iPad.

Camille Elizabeth Kea
Camille Elizabeth Kea

This proves nothing. Babies naturally push buttons, touch everything, tear paper and get attracted to shiny objects and things that make noise or produce light or other stimulation.