Bio
I blog at Somewhere Else to Go and The Woman Citizen, which started out as heavily military and defense policy oriented.  (They grew out of my first...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

The Political Psychology of Fat

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 3
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Americans are wanted to be fat.

We are wanted to be fat by those who produce and market the foods that render us obese and diseased.

We are also wanted to be fat by those who sell us all the merchandise of weight loss-and whose profit more from our failures than our successes.

Most of all, we are wanted to be fat by a corporate-manufactured mass/trash culture and a governing imperium that prefers us passive, indolent, torpid and dumb.

And they get away with wanting us to be fat because of the many of us, fat or not, who refuse to understand that America's obesity epidemic is neither purely a matter of individual responsibility nor anything to be "solved" by "Fat Liberation" movements or PC pseudo-tolerance.  Our fatness is, rather, both a symptom and a cause of America's ongoing and accelerating decline as a civilization. But it is a symptom and a cause we can do something about-provided we face the issue as citizens.

There is no nice way to say much of what I'm going to say.  So let me begin with an affirmation of civility.  We engage in a monstrous, hugely self-destructive delusion when they (we) pout that "hating fat people is one of the last socially acceptable prejudices."  And facing this is not about hate.  It's about refusing to tolerate a national gluttony that neither we nor the planet can any longer afford.  It's about the future of us all.

So how bad is the problem?

Bemoaning our national obesity is a national obsession, a splendid exercise in non-binding self-criticism.  Hardly a day goes by without something on the subject appearing somewhere.  So only a few points need to be made in this regard.

According to the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), 66% of Americans over 20 are overweight; 30% of Americans over 20 are obese.  Between 1960 and 2004, overweight Americans went from 44.8% of the population to 66% and obese Americans went from 13.3% to 32.1% of the population.  Most of this increase occurred after 1980.  These figures are derived from a formula known as the Body Mass Index, or BMI. Because the BMI is based on weight and height, it does not always accurately measure the fitness of athletic people, who tend to be more heavily muscled and have denser bones.  Nevertheless, the BMI is also generous and most of us are simply not athletic, or even active.

Fat costs. In 1995, the direct and indirect costs, which have been adjusted to 2001 dollars to account for inflation, were $61 billion in direct costs and $56 billion in indirect costs; since fatness and obesity are more common in 2008 than they were in 1995, these costs are going to be far higher now.  The Department of Health and Human Services defines the costs in the following manner:  "Direct health care costs refer to preventive, diagnostic, and treatment services such as physician visits, medications, and hospital and nursing home care. Indirect costs are the value of wages lost by people unable to work because of illness or disability, as well as the value of future earnings lost by premature death." (All preceding figures may be found at http://win.niddk.nih.gov/statistics/#preval, accessed 28 July 2008.) 

So, given that two thirds of us are overweight-and almost all of us because we are fat, not because we are muscular-regarding fat people as some sort of oppressed minority is nonsense.   Hating fat people is not the last acceptable form of discrimination in America.  (It's still OK to hate people for their professions:  Ask any lawyer or journalist.)  Yet every time the New York Times runs an article on America's increasing problem of the girth, you can read a pandemic of reader comments claiming that it's all a matter in the eyes and minds of the beholders:  irate rantings that appear with such frequency and regularity that one might conclude that these people are reimbursed by the fat or the fat treatment industries. 

Yes, most of us bear at least some responsibility for our condition and its effects.  The first aspect of this responsibility is the fact that the natural antidote to obesity is well-known.  If we exercise and eat moderate portions of nutritious foods in order to balance energy intake with energy output, the overwhelming majority of us will not get genuinely fat.  It really is quite as simple as that, even though we are mammals who evolved to store fat.  Until the invention and common use of canning, packaging and refrigeration, around a century ago, fat

  • 3
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
aathanas 5 pts

Thanks for your reply.  I wasn't really expecting one, I just wanted people to know about bad estrogens and their relationship to obesity.  You said that progesterone is not a bad estrogen, as if you were disagreeing with something I said in my comment.  I never said that progesterone is a bad estrogen.  Progesterone and estrogen are separate entities, different and practically opposites in their function(s).  In any event, I've lost 2 more pounds since yesterday's comment (and I had a large Starbucks again).  You (or anyone else) needent be suspicious about my mentioning DIM.  There are several brands of it out there available at any health food store and online and I am not associated in any manner with any of the manufacturers of these products.  I am just a person who has struggled with obesity many years and I finally found out why.  And I believe that many Americans don't know it, but they share in this main reason for their weight struggles too.  I believe I have read that DIM is simply a natural product made from effective elements contained in broccoli and cauliflower that have the wonderful effect of ridding the body bad estrogens.  You could sit and eat 12 heads of broccoli and 12 heads of cauliflower a day to get the same effect, but who wants to do that?  The term "estrogen" actually refers to 3 types of estrogens:  estrone, estradiol and estriol.  Bad estrogens are xenoestrogns from environmental sources and from certain food sources mentioned in my original comment, and if I'm not mistaken it's "estriol" that my naturopathic physician refers to as the bad one.  All the literature surrounding all of the brands of DIM available mention bad estrogens and how their products metabolise them, reducing Estrogen Dominance.  "Bad estrogens" can easily be "Googled" and indeed it is a known term.  Estrogen Dominance is a medical condition whereby a woman has too much estrogen to her progesteone ratio (again, estrogen and progesterone are two different things).  If anyone "Googles" Estrogen Dominance, they will see that one of the known symptoms of it is obesity or difficulty losing weight (regardless of methods attempted).  Good Lord, this is not spam... I am simply trying to share something that will help others. 

 P.S.  I am losing weight and I do not feel deprived for the first time in my life.  I eat what I want (but I don't gorge myelf and never have...)(and I, of course, I avoid foods that have hormones (estrogen) in them listed in my original comment), I TAKE DIM and I exercise a little bit but not like a fiend and the weight is falling off.   I PLAN TO CREATE A YOUTUBE PAGE SOON CHRONICALLING MY WEIGHT LOSS WITH DIM AND EXPLAINING ABOUT ESTROGEN DOMINANCE AND THE CATTLE, DAIRY AND POULTRY INDUSTRIES' AWFUL GREED IN PUTTING HORMONES INTO THE FEED WHICH GETS IN OUR FAT STORES AND MAKES US FAT.  DIM GETS RID OF THAT.

Erin Solaro 5 pts

aathanas---

Interesting comment.  I'm not exactly certain what a bad estrogen is, any more than I know what a bad testosterone is.  Both are anabolic steroids, both build muscle mass and increase aggression, and estrogen is more powerful in its effects at lower levels than testosterone, far more so.  (That is probably why men have higher blood levels of T and its deriviatives than women do of E and its.)  There are natural ranges and balances that are problematic if upset or exceeded, but that's a different story:  progesterone, for example, is not a "bad" form of estrogen. 

And synthetic hormones, especially the estrogens, like antibiotics, are widely used to increase meat production in livestock and stave off infection (actually, all the widespread use of antibiotics does is create multi-drug resistant bacteria).  The problems are serious, but to say that they produce the type of obesity we see in Americans, and that it is impossible to lose weight if you eat a diet containing estrogen or testosterone---is simply untrue. 

We are in a cultural situation in which maintaining a healthy body weight, activity level and diet does in fact, code as deprivation.  We are mammals, we do have the mammalian tendency to wear our excess food as fat, as insurance against a bad harvest, women, especially.  The female body would like to store enough excess calories to see a woman through pregnancy and almost exclusive nursing for about 6 months without any increase in food consumption.  Add to this saturation advertising, by companies whose profits depend upon us eating and eating and eating, long past the point of nutrition or even pure, sensuous pleasure, and restraining oneself and working out seriously feels like deprivation.  And in a relative sense, is, in fact.  But that does not take into account what we want for our bodies:  whether we want them merely satiated with ever increasing amounts of cheap calories, or well-fed, strong with muscle, sleek with a healthy amount of fat.  Solving the problem of American obesity means asking ourselves some hard questions about how we should live.

Finally, while I have not reported you as spam, I am extremely suspicious of anyone pushing a product for purchase, which you are.  (This is very different than spreading the word about artisan work.)

Cheers,

Erin Solaro

aathanas 5 pts

I agreed with or at least really understood about 88% of this blog.  It's a subject I've been interested in for a long time.  It's a shame what the food industry and diet industries have done to us. 

I think I have found the answer to fatness for most of us.  I really believe what I am going to say will be on everyone's lips within a year from now and all of us will finally start losing this weight.  I just started applying what I'm going to say about a month ago with great results--for the first time in my long life.  Before that I had tried EVERYTHING.

Like you said, the cattle and poultry industry puts hormones in the feed which affect us when we eat most beef, chicken, milk, cheese, butter, sour cream, or products made with them, etc.  The problem with most diets/plans is they fail to address this, or if they do - it's only inadvertent, which doesn't lend itself to consistent diet success.

For those of us ALREADY carrying aroud some fat, avoidng these foods isn't enough to get rid of the hormones contained in our fat stores.  Avoiding these foods is a good first step but not enough by itself to lose weight.  I found a product (there are a few brands available) called "DIM."  (I think I use Nature's Way brand.) This product is vey inexpensive (RIGHT NOW...) and widely available.  DIM metabolizes and rids the body of the bad estrogens stored in our fat from a lifetime of consuming the hormone-laden beef, poultry and dairy that has been doing us in.  I have been losing weight like crazy and I haven't been doing anything different, except taking DIM and avoiding hormone-laden foods.  I even go to Starbucks.  In 2006 or 2007 Starbucks stopped using products containing these hormones.  When choosing butter, milk and cheeses, I choose lean and/or organic or hormone-free versions. That's it.

The problem with the bad estrogens in our fat stores is that once they exist, they go to work manufacturing more of themselves all on their own!  Can you believe this!?  They go on autopilot!!!  That is what makes it almost impossible to lose weight without DIM if you already have fat on your body.

Both men and women can take it, even teens.  Bad estrogens from these foods (and other environmental sources) can even lead to breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men, so I am also avoiding breast cancer in my future by taking DIM.  They can march all they want and wear their pink ribbons but all they really need to do is take DIM.

Any woman who has honestly tried to lose weight and cannot is probably another victim of these industries, not lazy or an overeater.  I think this issue actually accounts for 90% of Americans' obesity.  I think DIM will end obesity in America (and other countries consuming these hormones in their food supplies).  Just Google "DIM" and "estrogen" and "obesity" and you'll see knowledge about this product makes perfect sense and is gaining awareness.

Thin women may be able to diet successfully, but if you have any significant weight packed on, avoiding hormone-laden foods without taking DIM won't do it.  It can take about one year of taking DIM to rid the fat stores of these bad estrogens from the hormne-laden foods we've been consuming.  Now, vegetarians probably are thin or lose weight not because they are vegans, but because they AREN'T taking in any more of these hormones.  Adkins may work temporarily, but unless you choose hormone-free foods, over time the body will accumulate the hormones and progress will stop cold.  The South Beach diet is good but only if you use hormone-free foods.  Jenny Craig is low fat but not hormone free- PLUS they load their food wth SOY which in many cases SLOWS THE THYROID or RENDERS THYROID MEDICATION USELESS!!!  NutriSystem tastes HORRIBLE, is unnecessarily restrictive and does not provide the GOOD fats and also not hormone free.  Weight Watchers doesn't address hormones in the food choices--slowing progress and causing diet failure. 

Exercise helps metabolize bad estrogens within fat stores, but more slowly than taking DIM.  Obese persons would have to exercise so hard to get the desired effect they may end up pulling a muscle, hurting themselves or getting discouraged by pain.  It is better to take DIM and exercise a reasonable amount and avoid these hormone-laden foods simultaneously.  There is no need for deprivation. 

Choosing organic dairy, hormone-free beef and chicken is not really that expensive when you think long term.  I don't even think calorie restriction is that important (unless we go overboard).

I'm telling you I'm eating whatever I want (as long as it is hormone-free) and taking DIM and exercising a little and THE WEIGHT IS FALLING OFF.  I have tried everything in the entire world before this.

I had hypothyroidism and now need less of my medication because of taking DIM.  You see, the bad estrogens lead to ESTROGEN DOMINANCE which can cause hypothyroidism!!!

It's O V E R people, no more obesity.  I bought as much DIM as I could get my hands on - IT WILL GO UP IN PRICE WHEN WORD SPREADS.

No longer will we need to accept our fat, obsess about our weight, be jealous of thin women, lose job opportunites, experience other types of rejection or have to analyze or psychoanalyze our society for the way it treats us.

Now that this DIM is working, I (anecdtally) know what the REAL problem has always been for certain!

Next problem.  I plan to create a YouTube video explaining this and video-chronicalling my progress, but I better start soon or there won't be any weight loss to chronical!!!!! 

LISTEN PEOPLE, DIM DIM DIM DIM DIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   (Picture me screaming and shaking yhour neck!)