The Political Rhetoric of Race and Racism Invokes Historical Perspective and Potential Backlash
by Maria Niles

Race continues to be a factor in the presidential campaign this year and in recent weeks has been raised as an issue in ways that have led observers to analyze the issue through historical lenses.

Nicholas Kristof, in an Op-Ed in the New York Times noted that there was a "push to 'otherize' Obama." Kristof describes some of the forms this otherization is taking:

What is happening, I think, is this: religious prejudice is becoming a proxy for racial prejudice. In public at least, it’s not acceptable to express reservations about a candidate’s skin color, so discomfort about race is sublimated into concerns about whether Mr. Obama is sufficiently Christian.

This type of othering has moved from email rumor campaigns to much more explicit and public expressions. The Mayor of Fort Mill, South Carolina sought scriptural backup for the rumor that Obama is the antichrist. In North Carolina a real estate agency put up a sign reading "Obsama-Obama. Not American. Not Welcome." Karen Tumulty, in Time magazine, reports that The Virginia state GOP chairman urged volunteers to compare Barack Obama to Osama bin Laden as they go campaigning door to door. Recently at a John McCain town hall appearance a woman told McCain that she could not trust Obama because she read that "he's an Arab." McCain did take the microphone from the woman and say that it was not true but unfortunately did so in a way that implied that Arab people are not decent family people as BlogHer member, ManagementProf noted. And Rochelle Nelson at Sagacious Rambling reports that the woman who made the statement about Obama remains unconvinced despite McCain's rebuttal.

As the economy crumbles, McCain-Palin campaign rallies have become hotbeds of racism from subtle to overt from audience members, campaign surrogates and Sarah Palin herself. At recent campaign stops surrogates introducing the candidates have referred to "Barack Hussein Obama" and audience members at the mention of Obama's name have yelled out "terrorist" and "kill him." They've yelled at an African American sound man for a television network covering the event to, "Sit down, boy." A man displayed a stuffed monkey with an Obama sticker on it and then passed it off when he realized that he was on camera. They've accused Obama of "treason." (Stephania Pomponi Butler has a round up of racist smears and denouncements at MOMocrats)

And it is not just at campaign events where such sentiment is being heard.

Debbie Gorman at MOMocrats reports that at her workplace she has heard from two people that they would not vote for "a black" or a "goddamn ni**er" (Oh, and Palin's "a babe").

At an Oregon university "a life-size cardboard reproduction of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was hung from a tree on the campus, an act with racial undertones that outraged students and school leaders alike."

Republican Party spokesperson, Didi Lima was removed from her role in McCain's campaign after making "racial remarks"

Maud Newton shares the story of a Florida teacher who taught his seventh-grade social studies class that Obama's call for change stood for "Can You Help A (expletive) Get Elected."

TPM reader libgirl reports that two young men yelled "N***** lover" at her (and her six year old) while standing in her yard which displays and Obama sign.

Conservative observers have compared a video of young men performing step dancing while expressing how Obama has inspired them as like "Nazi Youth" or as an example of Obama's training of "militant radicals."

Some watchers of the most recent debate wondered if McCain's response to a question asked by a young black man was subtly racist when McCain assumed that the questioner probably hadn't heard of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac prior to the current economic crisis. The young man responded on his Facebook page and he too wonders:

In defense of the Senator from Arizona I would say he is an older guy, and may have made an underestimation of my age. Honest mistake. However, it could be because I am a young African-American male.

And, perhaps most frighteningly, there are reports of incitements to and threats of violence, property damage and, in one case, actual violence (a man was shot for wearing an Obama T-shirt).

The news is not all sad and scary, though. A Daily Kos reader reports a positive racial encounter from the campaign trail:

Early on, my canvassing partner and I ran into two young black men - bling, tattooes, etc. I try not to be racist - but it was all I could do not to be scared to death. They came up to us - and we introduced ourselves. The one gentleman's name is Kai. I asked Kai if he was registered to vote - he said No and we discussed how he could register. He looked up at me - and I swear he was tearing up in his eyes - he said - "You are the first white man who has ever spoken to me with respect in my life.

In another attempt to inject racism into the campaign, there has been a concerted effort to blame the economic crisis on lending to "minorities." Unsurprisingly, conservative pundits like Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin are fanning the flames of this talking point. But Republican Congresswoman Michele Bachman made similar charges on the floor of Congress.

Although the ugliness I've noted above has all happened in the past month, there is much historical precedent for the roots of this behavior. Journalists have begun to call on their colleagues to not ignore our nation's history of race.

Journalists need to do more than call the play-by-play this election cycle. We also need to blow the whistle on such egregious fouls calculated to undermine the political process and magnify the ugliest prejudices that our nation has done so much to overcome.

Donna Brazile recalls living in the segregated South and speaks of the conversation on race we are now having because of Obama's campaign:

I’m gonna say it and get it off my chest, because for the next thirty days, I’m gonna be the best Catholic woman ever….As a child who grew up in the segregated Deep South, we’ve come so far in this country….But I remember when I used to get on the bus: my mother would tell me, “Donna, when you get on the bus, you and your brothers go all the way to the back, and don’t look at anybody.” We have changed. This is a more tolerant, open, progressive society. And yet, we’re having this conversation because [Obama] is biracial. He spent nine months in the womb of a white woman. He was raised…by his white grandparents…He got out of school and went to Harvard, and all of a sudden he’s “uppity” and there’s something wrong with him? What is wrong with us?…You can vote against him, but don’t ever put me in the back of the bus. I’m not going to the back of the bus! I’m not going to be afraid! My black skin does not make me inferior! And may I add: being a female does not make me dumb!

Kai Wright at The Root announces: Breaking News: It's Racism:

Americans have notoriously short memories, so it's often assumed that the critical clamor journalists hear from both left and right is new. It actually began with Southern segregationists brow beating Northern news organizations covering the Civil Rights Movement. Both sides of the Jim Crow battle knew the news media would shape how the country viewed them, so segregationists did all they could to make reporters part of the story. The liberal-media trope was their brainchild, and they used it to provoke the sort of false moral equivalencies that today's political reporters too often draw.

When a member of the crowd at a Republican rally yelled, "bomb Obama" Rachel Maddow put it in perspective when she wondered if the woman meant bomb like the four little girls who were bombed in a church in 1963.

Peter Beinart at Time magazine gives some historical perspective to the racial attacks on Obama and shares a picture that illustrates why attacks on Obama frighten many - his need for protection

Obama supporters and bodyguard
Obama with supporters, and a bodyguard, in Waterford, Mich.

Congressman John Lewis, a civil rights leader who was beaten by police during the Selma to Montgomery marches, hears echoes of that time in McCain and Palin's rhetoric:

As one who was a victim of violence and hate during the height of the Civil Rights Movement, I am deeply disturbed by the negative tone of the McCain-Palin campaign. What I am seeing reminds me too much of another destructive period in American history. Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division, and there is no need for this hostility in our political discourse.

Gary Kamiya at Salon.com writes The GOP goes back to its ugly roots:

McCain is resurrecting the GOP’s oldest tactic: Smearing Obama as a scary black terrorist sympathizer. But he may meet the same fate as Barry Goldwater.

Frank Rich, writing at the New York Times, notes:

From the start, there have always been two separate but equal questions about race in this election. Is there still enough racism in America to prevent a black man from being elected president no matter what? And, will Republicans play the race card? The jury is out on the first question until Nov. 4. But we now have the unambiguous answer to the second: Yes.

To the second question there are signs of backlash within his own party:

Christopher Buckley, son of conservative hero, William F. Buckley, endorses Obama (and not at conservative publication The National Review where he has a regular column because colleague Kathleen Parker "has to date received 12,000 (quite literally) foam-at-the-mouth hate-emails" for speaking out against the selection of Sarah Palin). Carla Marinucchi at the San Francisco Chronicle writes that McCain-Palin's hot rhetoric risks GOP backlash.

To the first question, although fears of the Bradley Effect have been widely noted, other observers believe that race plays out in voting through a number of different mechanisms and not only do not believe that there will not be a Bradley Effect but that Obama may reshape intersections of racial attitudes and voting in a way that will lead us to speak of the Obama Effect in the future. Despite the painful revival of our history of race and racism, the conversations that we are having might be shaping a new and brighter future.

But what if Obama loses some ask? Two writers come to similar conclusions - that even though there will be inevitable feelings that racism will have played a role if Obama is defeated, ultimately the national conversations around race that Obama is prompting are positive for our country.

But, if Obama does win, perhaps it will signal as Nicholas Kristof describes in his excellent article, "Racism Without Racists" (which points out how unconscious discrimination functions):

One lesson from this research is that racial biases are deeply embedded within us, more so than many whites believe. But another lesson, a historical one, is that we can overcome unconscious bias. That’s what happened with the decline in prejudice against Catholics after the candidacy of John F. Kennedy in 1960.

It just might happen again, this time with race.

BlogHer is non-partisan but our bloggers (including me) aren't! Follow our coverage of Politics & News.

BlogHer CE Maria Niles also blogs about politics and news her personal blog PopConsumer.

Comments

 

Great blog

I hope to see what you will write about on the sexism.

 Here is a little sample.

Calling Palin a “c***”…and no one bats an eye.

http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/obama-supporters-wearing-sarah-palin-is-a-c-tee-shirts/#comment-7019

 

My beat

Thank you for your kind words. However, I hope you'll comment further if you have any specific thoughts on the issues raised in the post vs. attempting to redirect the discussion.

Just a note - my weekly column is on race and politics - I do not specifically cover gender at BlogHer. Several of the other Contributing Editors as well as BlogHer members have, however, written about Palin and sexism. I'd encourage you to check out the politics and news link at the end of my post, from the sidebar or from the drop down box on the home page or you can use the search box to find posts here at BlogHer or within the BlogHer network. I also invite you to consider writing your own post on the issue here on BlogHer. Just click on the create the a post button at the top of the page.

ConsumerPop Marketing
PopConsumer (Politics, Current Events & Links)
Beyond Help (Music, TV & Pop Culture)

 

Misinterpreted

I'm disappointed that you misinterpreted my comment as trying to redirect the conversation. However, I do believe you've made it clear to me that I need to redirect what blogs I read.

 

keep reading this one

I just think it is important that the comments here focus on the issue raised. I enjoy reading Maria's commentary about anything, but as a white woman, I learn the most from her comments on race.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool

 

Sorry to disappoint

And my apologies if I misinterpreted your intention with your original comment. It is just that in my experience as I've written about race and politics, I regularly receive comments from those who attempt to diminish the importance of race issues by deflecting the issue to gender. Some times the topics intersect and I will cover gender here in that sense. Both are important issues certainly in this campaign given the candidacies of Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin.

Generally those comments have come from supporters of the two female candidates and those who do not support Obama. Since you've noted that you are a staunch PUMA on other threads I made the assumption that your comment was offered in that vein. If I'm wrong and you are interested in discussing and engaging the issues of race and racism I hope you'll reconsider. If not, then indeed, there are other Contributing Editors who offer posts that will likely be of greater interest to you.

 

Thank you for posting this, Maria

Coincidentally I posted partly on the same concerns at my own blog today, at least the invocation of "otherness," but I did not have the bevy of sources to which you've linked. My post moves on to a different but related concern.

I may have to go back and add an update note at my blog with a link to your post here.

You may have heard that John McCain has asked Obama to apologize for John Lewis comparing McCain to George Wallace. Hmm.

Scarier than the people in the crowds shouting violent ideas is that McCain and Palin have been slow to speak against it. Actually, I don't think Palin's even whispered against it yet.

I don't know that I could do the research you've done and read these reports/posts because it turns my stomach, which is why I didn't get around to writing more about the nature of the McCain campaign rally rhetoric until now.

I especially thank you for ending with the ray of hope from Kristoff's article.

That's a great picture, btw, from Time.

Nordette is a Contributing Editor with BlogHer.com whose personal blog is hosted on another site at this link, Six Degrees of a Nasty Nation.

 

I have to disagree with you a bit, Nordette

Your post is extremely thorough and well linked. It is also, as always, thoughtful and insightful and you cover well another aspect of the implications of the recent campaign. Thank you for sharing it.

But yes, imagine my head swirling when I opened up the folder of links I'd bookmarked over the past two weeks and found 75 in there. On the radio, I heard the angry mob of voices from one recent rally and I teared up - it sounded like what I imagine did lynch mobs - so full of anger, hate and violence. It's hard but it is rays of hope like Kristof's that keep me going along with the deep, painful and very necessary discussions of race we are having as a country.

 

John Lewis

And I forgot to add that, personally, I found McCain's call for Obama to apologize ludicrous. It is rather hypocritical given that McCain has hired one of the political operatives who slimed he and his daughter with racist false rumors during the 2000 South Carolina primary.

However, I do understand why the Obama campaign asked Rep. Lewis to withdraw his Wallace comment, which he did. Obama does not need the distraction of the complaint to distract from his focus on issues and the economy in which voters are most interested. Although I understand Lewis' deeply personal reaction, Obama's campaign has never focused on the racial aspects of the campaign as it is not in Obama's interest to do so.

 

First, this is an excellent

First, this is an excellent and thorough coverage of the topic.

Second, frankly I saw McCain's call for Obama to apologize as lumping all black men together -- saying that since Congressman Lewis is black, Obama, as a black man running for President, is then responsible for Lewis' comment.  How else can you interpret McCain's complaint, when Lewis is not a direct member of Obama's election staff, or campaign advisers?

Should Obama then demand that McCain personally apologize when any old, white guy makes a comment anywhere in the country?

I'm just disappointed that Congressman Lewis later backed off his original criticism. Pretending that racism isn't becoming a part of the McCain/Palin strategy is not going to focus the country that much quicker on the "issues". After all, isn't equality also an "issue" in this country?

 

Frustrated

Thank you, Shelly for your kind words about my post.

I agree, I was frustrated when Lewis toned down his statement. However, he has endorsed Obama now so regardless of how tenuous his involvement in Obama's campaign, the two will be equated. The line Obama has to walk is similar to the debates - he can't come across as too fiery or angry - and Lewis' mention of Wallace was already being called out as "over the top." Totally unfair to Obama and I personally disagree that it was over the top but I understand why the campaign asked for Lewis to back down.

 

I thought it was valid too

but I totally understand the political reasons.

I'd like to hear the reasons behind why it's 'over the top.'

Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain

 

over the top

I think it was a matter of the media starting to weigh in support of the McCain's condemnation of Lewis' statement and the continuing effort to create false moral equivalences to promote an appearance of being "fair and balanced."

In my opinion, Lewis was not saying that McCain was the same as Wallace who actively opposed desegregation and advocated racist policies. He said that the climate of anger and violence related to race that is bubbling up from the rhetoric the McCain-Palin campaign has engaged lately reminded him of the climate that surrounded Wallace's rhetoric and which led to violence which Lewis was a victim of. Given that people are repeatedly calling for Obama's death at McCain-Palin rallies I don't think the comparison was unfair. But if you agree with the McCain campaign's argument that Lewis was implying that he is behaving the same as someone who called for racist policy then that is how you get to the reasoning that it was over the top.

 

I think your assessment is

I think your assessment is correct, and I can understand, but I still find it unfortunate.

I agree with you: Congressman Lewis was equating the McCain/Palin campaign with Wallace's because he remembers the same level of hatred of "other", the outsider and those who are not "one of us" that exemplified a Wallace campaign. I would not be surprised if Wallace's campaign strategies weren't incorporated into the McCain campaign--not the pushback at civil rights, but the divisive strategy of playing on the fears of the undereducated, especially in times of turmoil and economic uncertainty. 

We shouldn't have let the media control this one -- Lewis' statement was important, and deserved wider discussion. Now, we're back to the smears after all of McCain's phony talk of "respectful" campaigning this weekend. 

 

Horrible direction

 

 Thanks for this post. It is with great disappointment I've seen what is happening to this country over the last few weeks, but in some ways it is exposing an ugly truth. 

The hate inciting rallies are a far cry from derogatory sexist or racist tee-shirts worn by supporters of both candidates.  Both are telling of our society, but one is far more dangerous to our country as a whole.

I've been happy to finally see some journalist comeing out against this thing. It took a few days too long on my opinion.

 

I have to note that the first real television journalists to call McCain on this were female.  While the males were commenting on this in a way which would give anyone the impresson it was just another day in election park Rachael Maddow , and a female news journalist from CNN ( I am sorry I've momentarily lost her name in my grey cells), were the first telly pundits to actually call it what it was.

 

cooper

 

Campbell Brown

is the CNN journalist and BlogHer CE Lainad wrote about her comments here.

I agree that the vocalization of calls for violence are far worse than nasty T-shirts, especially given that a man was shot simply for wearing an ordinary one in support of Obama. I pray that no more actual violence will be committed and that the rhetoric will be toned down. I believe that Senator McCain has received the message and will hopefully direct his campaign to back off.

 

I'm so sorry there are so many examples

You did an amazing job here, Maria.  I started a post about the "otherness" oped too and your post here reminds me I need to get that out there.

I know I've talked about this before in different ways, but I have to repeat that I feel the use of labels really is a double-edged sword. Labels let people get lazy - they dissuade people from looking at the elements that contribute to a label and think critically about how labels should or shouldn't be applied.  They make it easy for people to sweep up whole groups of people into one bunch while excluding others who maybe should be included.

I'm very conflicted about the use of labels - but I still feel as though they are used, overwhelmingly, in a bad way.

What do you think?

Jill
Writes Like She Talks

 

Just to clarify

By the use of labels, I mean, for example, allowing people to define a group in a certain way that then gets stuck with a certain connotation until challenged and challenged successfully.

So - for example - Saying someone is an "Arab" or a "Muslim" - the way it's been used as a smear tactic against Barack Obama makes it now seem as though anyone who is in fact an Arab or a Muslim must be construed to be, in some way, negative or bad for America or automatically unpatriotic.

Of course that is completely inaccurate.  This is profiling at its worst - but it's also labeling.

Another example is the way in which the term "liberal" is bandied about as though it's so horrific.  Now, for people with certain ideological beliefs, they may actually feel that way, but to broaden the use and the label to such an extreme that anyone who, for example, like to do anything remotely related to community organizing gets labeled a "liberal" with a perjorative meaning - that is ridiculous.

I have difficulty with these terms because they literally slap a label on a group of traits or characteristics in such a way that then, as shorthand, it can be used to instill smiles or frowns, engender good or bad.

I really dislike that.  

 

Jill
Writes Like She Talks

 

I share your distaste

I don't understand enough about the science and psychology of rhetoric to understand why these shorthand labels come into usage and how they are defined. For example, if you survey attitudes towards "liberal" beliefs, the majority of Americans would be considered liberal, yet as you note somehow Republicans have succeeded in defining liberal as a wide-ranging pejorative.

Certainly, Arab and Muslim being associated with negative meanings comes from how we've allowed the conversation to take place around terrorism. It is sad and unfortunate and I don't know what more can be done than we continue to speak out and make it clear that we will not accept facile labels. And that we collectively do a better job (in many aspects) of holding our media accountable for their role in popularizing the dumbing down of language and discourse. Ultimately stuff happens because we allow it - how's that for a thoughtful response ;)

Thanks for your thoughtful questions, Jill!

 

As comprehensive a report as I've seen

Thanks, Maria! I've seen snippets and read bits and pieces about many of these examples, all enough to get increasingly disturbed. But I had not seen a good comprehensive overview of the issue until this post. Of course, now I'm terrified. But better-informed.

 

Surprisingly optimistic

I can see how the avalanche of news lately can be terrifying and I've felt deeply sad and moved to tears at points. However, I find myself ultimately optimistic because we are talking about this, many are standing against racism and violence and that's how we move towards ending it. I'm pleased by the lack of complacency.

Thanks for your kind words and for your comment, Toddie.

 

Another stellar post, Maria

Unfortunately, the slime just keeps coming. The Washington Post reported today that the GOP chairman in Virginia compared Obama to bin Laden.

I am sometimes struck dumb by all of the vitriol. I hear Audre Lorde thundering from the grave: Your silence will not protect you.

Thank you for your witness.

 

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

Thank you, as always

Your kind support means much to me. The Virginia GOP chairman is particularly disheartening because he not only continues to press the point, he is teaching others to spread the attack.

Thank you as well for the Audre Lorde quote which is very appropriate at this moment.

 

Printing for study but ashamed!

Thank you so much for this comprehensive review and analysis of this issue.

I
will be sharing with the family as it's clear that our children will
not receive this information accuratley at school or on TV.

I was
unaware of the volume of incidents in recent weeks.  Just mind-boggling
that people tuck themselves in at night with thoughts of hate.  I can't
even imagine how sleep comes.

I felt ashamed though when I read your comment about McCain's comment  - No he's not an  Arab, he's a family man...WHA???

That
went right past me as I viewed that clip a hundred times.  Right over
my head.  That's scary because if I, a person with open heart and
mind,  can fail to hear a racial slur - which on reflection is pretty
damn obvious, well God help us because it's in recognizing and
witnessing that we will cast the bright light of love on all the
darkness...

Thank you and I will become more vigilant. 

http://blog.myforgivenesskit.com 

 

Glad you found this helpful

I appreciate you letting me know that my post is something that you found useful in providing information.

And, I wouldn't feel badly about not picking up on that perspective about McCain's Arab response. He was certainly making an effort to respond respectfully and I would guess that his injection of a negative sterotype was not consciously intentional so I think it would be easy to miss while appreciating his effort.

I know I have a crazy number of links in the post and I certainly don't anticipate that anybody is going to read them all :) so let me highlight this piece which gives insight into how we can all be unaware of the biases we hold. We all can be better at recognizing hurt cast towards our brothers and sisters and by engaging in dialog like this we will do better.

Thank you so much for your thoughtful comment.