President Barack Obama awarded Nobel Peace Prize
by Erin Kotecki Vest

From CNN:

In winning the Nobel Peace Prize, President Obama joins an elite group of U.S. presidents. He is the fourth to win the prize, the third to win it while in office and the first to receive it during his first year in office.

Unlike his predecessors, Obama was selected not for substantive accomplishments, but for his "vision" and inspiring "hope" at the beginning of his presidency.

BlogHer Contributing Editor Nordette writes, "Feels like an honor, possibly premature, and a lot of pressure to me. Look for more fundamentalist religious conservatives to say this is more evidence that Obama is the anti-Christ, a figure who is supposed to bring about a false peace."

The President also expressed surprise at his win:

Feministe writes,

"We absolutely should push Obama to do better — and he has a lot to improve — but the attacks on him for being awarded such a prestigious prize are disturbing. We have a sitting president who won a Nobel Peace Prize. That was unthinkable a year ago. I realize that a lot of people on the right are sore losers, but this is getting ridiculous. The Nobel conversations are already sounding like the flipside of the conservative reaction when Chicago didn’t get the Olympics — there, conservatives were giddy that America had lost something just because Obama wanted it; here, conservatives are devastated that an American leader won something, just because Obama is that leader."

While Jack & Jill Politics contends Obama should have turned it down-

"The Nobel selection committee appears to have so internalized that message that they’ve given the world’s most prestigious honor to a 9-month president whose promises are yet unfulfilled. I’m sure the Nobel committee is very, very smart, but it all made me wonder if they’re so eager to reward the first black president of the U.S. that they wanted to get it done now, just in case he turns out to be a warmonger robbing them of their chance to meet the coolest kid on the block.

The people who elected him hoping for change need to think critically and seriously about what this means for holding him accountable to the vision he put out during the campaign. Maybe Obama will make peace, maybe he won’t. There’s no way to know at this early stage, though the Administration’s flirtations with escalation in Afghanistan and Pakistan raise real questions. If, as the President said in his acceptance speech, this is a 'spurring' prize to encourage him to follow through on climate change and other agendas, we should make sure that it doesn’t provide more cover than motivation."

Althouse thinks this isn't about the Nobel at all-

"The question is why didn't he get the Olympics.

NOBEL PEACE PRIZE

The story of Barack Obama is the story of winning things when he hasn't yet done enough to deserve them. He is, quite simply, Barack Obama. We understand that. Why didn't the IOC understand? You could see it in that smile on his face, when he concluded his little speech in Copenhagen, that he bore the sublime knowledge he would acquire the Olympics for Chicago. Because he is Barack Obama, the man to whom grand prizes are given."

While Firedoglake muses, "I can almost hear the screaming from Dick Cheney and the neocons as they get the news."

The White House announced the President will be giving the $1.4 million dollars that comes with the prize to charity.

Comments

 

Still mulling over the win.

Thanks for getting a post up so soon, Erin. BTW, on my Examiner post somebody dropped by to say Obama is the anti-Christ. I knew that was coming as I said in the post you linked to. And yet I hope the guy was kidding about his feelings.

I also said on Twitter that his win is showing me that "What I'm learning from this Obama Nobel Peace Prize win is that most of us don't know why people win the prize. period."

I suspected it might be a message from the committee when I first heard the news. However, it's true that Obama did inspire hope around the world and wants to seek diplomacy before war. Will the world and this nation let him do that?

Whew! I've been reading some blood curdling venom out there today. Thanks for the link.

Nordette Adams is a BlogHer CE & you can find her other stuff through Her 411.

 

I'm still mulling too

and while I mull, I am scared at the anger. 

 

Politics & News Contributing Editor Queen of Spain

 

Giggle Peace Prize

If Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, I deserve the Giggle Peace Prize. Sounds fair to me. Vote for me! What could it hurt?

Christa @ www.giggleon.com

 

Giggle? SUre...

 

And maybe the snark peace prize too?

Politics & News Contributing Editor Queen of Spain

 

I could not be more serious.

I deserve the Giggle Peace prize. Why not?

Helping people bring giggles to their lives is an act of peace, no?

Raising money for charity, specifically for the mentally ill and suicidal (usually, these folks are in a in a giggle-less state), supporting those who lost loved ones to suicide (the act of suicide is a lack of inner peace, no?) and offering free Laughter Yoga to a stressed out community...all sounds like good stuff...all things I do for my community and certainly  sounds like Giggle Peace making to me.

Before you cry "snark" visit my site. I'm all about bringing peace into people's lives.

So, please vote for me for the Giggle Peace Prize and if you please, I'd like the Giggle Czar position too!

Christa @ www.giggleon.com

 

I did visit

 

And I'm curious what you think about the President receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, as per the post. 

 

 

Politics & News Contributing Editor Queen of Spain

 

I'm glad you visited

I'm glad you visited and hope you vote for me. I've had a hard week (as you may have noticed if you read my post, Grieve, Give, Giggle) and I could use some support.

I think the President's win of the prize is ludicrous. It is not a testament to any real or noteworthy accomplishment. It appears to be more prize for not being GWB.

I'm also not GWB but I could use 1.4 million right now.

I would like to ask President Obama to use some of his prize money to help me start a non-profit so I can reach more people in the community and promote peace through laughter. I've got a heart of gold but my bank account doesn't look like Oprah. :-)

Christa @ www.giggleon.com

 

I'm sure he was surprised

and humbled, and inspired to be in such company, and all the things he said. He has a big-time serious job to do, and the entire world needs him to succeed at it. The vote of confidence for his start, premature as it may seem to some people, demonstrates how much we, we humans, treasure the Hope that was all that was left in Pandora's box. 

People who have a problem with that, I don't understand.

http://www.blogher.com/blog/she-who

 

Surprised and disturbed

I too am surprised that he won but I am even more disturbed by the way some people are reacting to it.  Joe on Morning Joe said there was no upside to winning.  Then comes the class dunce idiot joke Micheal Steel and Rush then all of the other sarky crap.  I was thinking should we not be proud?  OUR President won THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE. The President of OUR country.  WTF?  I just could not get over how mean, small and dare I say unpatriotic this is. Last I checked we were all citizens of the same country, right? 

As to it being premature Rachel Maddow did a good peice on that last night.  She talked about Desmond Tutu getting it for his work to end appartied years before appartied actually ended and Aung San Suu Kyi getting the prize for her stance against the junta even though they are still in power.  It may well be that the committee sees his start and his vision worthy of the award.  I do think that is part of it but a big thing may be that we insulated Americans did not realize the depts of hatred GWB had tapped into for this country.  It may be a simple as he is not GWB.  Either way I took my halloween flag down and put up my American flag yesterday before going to work.  I am truly proud of my President.  By the way I hope he has some plans for that upcoming 3 day weekend and Bo's birthday. Priorities!

Michelle

I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/

 

Editors of Femisex.com

Editors of Femisex.com

Slate's John Dickerson has called for Obama to give the thing back.  The Nation wrote that it thought it was reading about this in The Onion vs. the NYTimes. 

It doesn't get anymore Obama-supportive than Dickerson and The Nation. 

Ruth Marcus of the Washington post said:

"This is ridiculous -- embarrassing, even. I admire President Obama. I like President Obama. I voted for President Obama. But the peace prize? This is supposed to be for doing, not being."

We posted that it is GWB who has brought some very amazing changes to women in the Middle East.  In last winter's Iraqi elections:

"Of the estimated 14,000 candidates, close to 4, 000 are women.
Wow….28% of the candidates were women! That is striking and a VERY big margin for hope."

Our stand is that if progress is made for women we need to accept that it can come from sources we may not like, but it is still progress.  And the idea of leaving women in Afghanistan to the Taliban is reprehensible. 

To the Nobel committee, a predominately female crew, I send them this quote from our March 15th story:

No one is going to place sanctions of South Africa because women are treated as 2nd class citizens. But the question remains why not?

 

 

Why not say "congratulations" and let it go?

As written at my blog, Obama is not the first person whose peace prize award has been controversial.  Furthermore, the chairman for the committee said in a CNN video interview this is not the first time someone who has received the award early for the promise of what he or she may do rather than for what the person's actually done.

I think it's natural to question why Obama received the award and even to disagree with who gets the award, but ultimately, we have no say in who gets the Nobel Peace Prize. It would be nice if Americans could just be happy their president received it.

Personally, from all the fall out and criticism from both sides of the aisle, left and right, I think the award is only pressure, perhaps even a curse for this particular president since there seem to be so many people who'd like to tie his limbs to horses and have them run in opposite directions.

It's one thing to wonder why they chose him. It's quite another to start listing all the reasons why he should not have been chosen especially since the Nobel committee has given the award before to people simply for inspiration.  While Martin Luther King, Jr., for instance, received the award in 1964, he was primarily a motivator and organizer. He inspired a movement. And there are many people who malign both him and his legacy.

As for state leaders, consider the multiple winners for attempting to achieve peace in the Middle East. Are we there yet? No.

George W. Bush? Really. He lied to get us into a war not to mention his distaste for diplomacy and handling of Hurricane Katrina flooding New Orleans.  He promoted closing doors not opening them and had a might makes right mentality.

If you think the Nobel Peace Prize should be an award for fighting for the rights for women, then you should send that suggestion to the Nobel committee. But I still don't think that would put GWB in the running for one. Any good that came for women due to a Bush action was icing on the cake, not a meal.  What did Bush stand for?

Nordette Adams is a BlogHer CE & you can find her other stuff through Her 411.

 

Really

Give the thing Back?  Really! This is the Nobel F-ing Peace Prize!

GET. OVER. YOURSELF.

GWB is right where he should be, actually where he should have been for the last 10 years. For everything he did right he did 10 wrong.

Michelle

I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/

 

gains r gains

Editors of Femisex.com

We did not support GWB but are not so partisan we are unwilling/unable to see the good coming out of his war.  It was a war for oil and yes GWB lied to us to get in there.  But BHO has lied to the public about health care reform as well.  We are able to say liar no matter who does the lying.

shrug.

We are not suggesting GW for a Nobel, but in 20 years, I dunno.  In Medicine and Physiology the award is often given out years later to see if the science has borne fruit.   In 20 years women may have come so far in the Middle East ---and when women gain power peace is often a outcome!--that such an award would be feasible.  Iran and Iraq are inextricably linked in matters of competition that date back centuries.  If Iraq moves away from religious and sectarian government to a democratic system where women have a fighting chance at a life fully lived, Iran will follow!  period.  Look at what is happening in Iran right now.  Yes we must wait and see, but I leave you with this from last week's NYTimes:

Oct. 1, 2009, we get this pretty astounding news:

DHULUIYA, Iraq — Iraqi politics has a new catchphrase, the “yes, we can” of the country’s coming parliamentary elections. It is “national unity,” and while skepticism abounds, it could well signal the decline of the religious and sectarian parties that have fractured Iraq since 2003.
Across the political spectrum — Sunni and Shiite, secular and Islamic — party leaders have jettisoned explicit appeals to their traditional followers and are now scrambling to reach across ethnic or sectarian lines. In some cases, the shift is nothing less than extraordinary.
party leaders agree that something fundamental is changing in the mood of Iraqi voters.
Provincial elections last January showed diminishing popular support for religious or purely sectarian parties

We wanted Bush gone and he is.  Obama is tabla rasa.  We agree with Ms. Marcus, this award is plain silly and makes Obama look silly for his acceptance. 

What I can say per Mr. Obama is that since taking office public support for abortion is at its lowest point in the history of asking the question.  One more "abortion is a moral tragedy" speech out of Obama's lips and we may see a real backwards backlash towards women take shape.   We expect such talk out of GWB. but for Obama I truly fear the impact on women and their lives.

 

Just for the record, I'm a little
uncomfortable

about you posting as an anonymous multitude. It's really creeper. And the picture is pretty frightening, too.

I come here to hear from women (sorry, men, but basically, to hear from women) from all life experiences and points of view. Keeps my mind lively. But this weird unsigned "we-us" business reminds me of the McCarthy Era, where "I have here in my hand a list..." prefaced a lot of negative stuff.

My experience as a feminist, starting with consciousness raising and other cooperative activities, is that the individual experience of women may become the basis for shared political action. But a letter which probably originates in one person's story (No one shrugged in unison, did you?) and claims to represent a broader consensus... that's really hard for me to evaluate as a source and makes me personally uncomfortable.

http://www.blogher.com/blog/she-who

 

Knowing when a politician lies

Easy answer, one knows when a politician is lying when their lips move.

Obama is NO different than Bush. He lies. He's just following the Politician rule book. I don't  fault him for following his truth, even though I disagree with him on his policy and leadership.

We went into Iraq, yes. Agree or disagree with why we went but that fact remains, Saddam Insane is dead (and I for one am thankful) and democracy is taking root in that country. Women are in a better position now than they were under Saddam's rule. Hell, they got to VOTE in January! Who do the ladies of Iraq have to thank for that? George W. Bush.

Abortion is a moral tragedy. How can one condemn water boarding of terrorists (grown adults hell bent on killing Americans or anyone else in their path to further their insane political and religious agendas) and not also condemn killing the unborn...innocents?

If one is immoral, they are both immoral. 

This country is absolutely less safe today than under George W Bush. If Obama really wants to protect Americans and broker peace, he must ACT, not talk. Givng him an award before he's produced results is asinine. Obama promised in March he would concentrate on protecting the Afghan population, training Afghan security forces and building economic opportunity and better governance.

The General has asked for troops to forward that mission. Give him the troops.

In a world of candy canes and lollipops, we would make peace without war. And yes, that would be nice. The Taliban and Al-Qaeda would lay down their arms, stop killing innocent people, torturing their people and subjugating women. We would all sing songs of love, harmony, apple trees and honey bees - the world would be like the Coca-Cola commercials from the 1970's

Obama was given an award for peace, make peace. Talking about it doesn't make it so.

Wishing my thighs were smaller doesn't make it so either. It is up to me to take action.

 

 

ur liver please

Editors of Femisex.com

Abortion is a human right, my right as a human to keep others out of my body!  But if you want jurisdiction over my uterus, then fair is fair:  I get  your liver! :-)

 

Editors of Femisex.com Dear

Editors of Femisex.com

Dear She-Who

   If you are "creeper" about our format it would mean you are "creeper" about how the NYTimes speaks in their editorials, as a united voice.  to wit: we endorse HRC for potus.   Nothing sinister my friend.  visit our site and read our "about."   We are noted for our centrality, something very sorely missing in journalism these days.  

And for the record, I will never demand to know who you are Ms. She-Who:-)  We don't keep any lists, only links!

 

I'm objecting to a post here.

Here you've moved between first person singular and first person plural, which editorial posts in the Times don't tend to. The public editor of the Times is Clark Hoyt. The editorial page editor is Andrew Rosenthal. Current members of the editorial board include: Carla Anne Robbins, David Shipley, Robert Semple, Serge Schmemann, Philip M. Boffey, Francis X. Clines, Adam Cohen, Lawrence Downes, Carol Giacomo, Verlyn Klinkenborg, Eduardo Porter, Eleanor Randolph, Dorothy Samuels, Brent Staples, David C. Unger, and Teresa Tritch. 

http://www.times.com/ref/opinion/editorial-board.html

Many of these people also write pieces under their own names, and I suspect Andrew doesn't need much help with the authorship of daily editorials, but one assumes there must be a group process of some sort for pronouncements like presidential endorsements. If y'all are working journalists, all this is familiar to you.

However, in THIS format, comments on BlogHer, a corporate reply is very unusual, and, as I said, I, personally, find it kind of unpleasant. It's clear that I'm talking to an individual, and not knowing who that individual is (a handle is fine) makes it harder for me to weigh the merits of your opinion against potential areas of bias. That's feedback for you, do with it what you will. :)

And "creeper" is an adjective, describing the behavior of posting as you have chosen to.  I wouldn't "be creeper about" it. I might be "put off" by it, as I am. 

http://www.blogher.com/blog/she-who

 

Abortion is a human right

Abortion is a human right?

Murdering the unborn a right? WOW! Glad your mom didn't take that route.

Ok then, then you should have no problem with putting a bullet in the head of every criminal, including terrorists and low life at Gitmo and in our prisons. All the child molestors, rapists and murderers should be put to death too. Actually, forget a bullet, that's too humane - chop off their hands, heads and arms...maybe get some forceps out and do some damage there.

If abortion is a human right then torturing and killing criminals and terrorists is a right too.

Glad we got that straight.

 

Editors of Femisex.com Dear

Editors of Femisex.com

Dear She-who--

 I am an editor at FemiSex. for this post I culled items from posts written on our site by various voices.  that leads to the we stand.  I suggest :  let's don't get too far off topic on this thread but please feel free to comment post on our site if you are displeased.   And  fyi::: Andrew gets a whole lotta help on his editoral page.  trust us there!

I am off for the day, but I hope the focus returns to BHO and his Nobel. 

 

Giggle on:  I would NEVER force my mother to sustain a pregnancy she did not wish.  I am sorry you don't have the same respect for you mother and her body.  But I am so glad the choice is not yours,either way, when it comes to my or anyone else' s body.

I respect you right to bodily freedome, please learn to respect others.  best wishes,

FemiSex 

 

BHO should not accept this award

 BHO should not accept this award. I believe his dog, BO, deserves it more.

Yes, give the award to B.O.!

And Femisex, whatever that means, I am sorry you show no respect for the innocent and unborn. 

Best wishes to you.

 

 

 

 

President Obama's Nobel Peace Prize - The
Real Reason

In my opinion, there is a strong reason why President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. It was something almost imperceptible, but I'm sure I heard it, and felt it myself. You might remember it yourself. 

It was the almost audible collective sigh that very nation in the world gave when they heard he won the United States presidential election. 

You know how satisfying a sigh can be, especially one of that magnitude.  A sigh of relief is one of the best feelings the world can experience. The tension is the world seemed to drop dramatically. So if one man can do that for the entirety of the world, if he can make it sigh, then by golly give him the prize!

 

Well said.

Well said.

 

President wins Nobel

I am not bashing President Obama if I am stunned at the decision.  To put it in perspective: Teddy Roosevelt was awarded the prize for brokering an end to a war between China and Russia.  President Obama was awarded the prize, really, for making campaign promises.

I've just completed _Three Cups of Tea_ about Greg Mortensen, who has spent about twenty years buidling schools in Pakistan and Afghanistan, giving a generation of boys and girls access to an education other than the rabid, violent, hateful and exclusively male schools of terrorist indoctrination.  The locals who staff and administer these schools teach a conservative but more accurate version of Islam that properly admonishes violence and not only allows but requires that communities educate their young girls.

The children attending these schools will learn math, literature and science from qualified instructors rather than hate from illiterates.

One of the first he built has produced a young woman who has finished medical school and returned to her rural Himalayan village to further improve the lives of her neighbors.

I tell you this as a US Marine Captain.  I have proudly deployed four times in the war on terror and I tell you that Greg Mortensen's work is where the tide against extremism will turn.

His work began long before 9/11 and the results will reverberate for generations. 

His work has established clearly evident progress and he is a countryman worthy of Nobel consideration.

President Obama is, perhaps, a beacon of hope.  I am rooting for him, certainly.  I like him, in the end, but cannot help but feel that the Nobel commitee has diminished their credibility by awarding it to someone's potential work rather than actual accomplishment.

 

Well this thread sure took a turn.

Thank you all for weighing in on your feelings on Obama's peace prize win. 

 

Politics & News Contributing Editor Queen of Spain