Bio
Hi - I'm Maria, nice to meet you! I've been a Contributing Editor here at BlogHer.com since 2006. I joined BlogHer as a full-time staff member after...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

President Obama Orders Hospital Visitation Rights for All Patients

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 12
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

In a memo issued Thursday, President Barack Obama directed the Secretary of the Health and Human Services agency "to ensure that hospitals that participate in Medicare or Medicaid respect the rights of patients to designate visitors." This order, which covers most hospitals in the United States, is being hailed as an important victory for the LGBT community. However, it also benefits many other individuals and communities, as well.

The widely reported case of Janice Langbehn served, in part, as a catalyst for the president's actions.

Langbehn, along with the couple's three children, was denied the ability to see her dying partner of 18 years, Lisa Marie Pond, when Pond was hospitalized in Florida in 2007.

After Pond's death, Langbehn sued the hospital, but the case was dismissed because there was no legislation requiring that visitation rights be granted to patients.

A Jackson Memorial Hospital official told Langbehn "[Miami] is an anti-gay city in an anti-gay state," clearly marking hers as a case of callous anti-gay discrimination. The hospital's argument and the court's dismissal of her case was additionally chilling in that it ruled that, absent specific legislation, patients have no human right to visitation when they are hospitalized.

Therefore, President Obama's memo made clear that in addition to protecting the rights of gays and lesbians, there are many other personal and family situations which this directive will now cover. The memo reports:

Yet every day, all across America, patients are denied the kindnesses and caring of a loved one at their sides -- whether in a sudden medical emergency or a prolonged hospital stay. Often, a widow or widower with no children is denied the support and comfort of a good friend. Members of religious orders are sometimes unable to choose someone other than an immediate family member to visit them and make medical decisions on their behalf. Also uniquely affected are gay and lesbian Americans who are often barred from the bedsides of the partners with whom they may have spent decades of their lives -- unable to be there for the person they love, and unable to act as a legal surrogate if their partner is incapacitated.

The ability to visit life partners in the hospital is often used as an argument for legalizing gay marriage. However, that does not help me as a single woman. President Obama's efforts here cover both me and my two partnered lesbian sisters equally, and for that I am deeply appreciative.

Related Reading

BlogHer CE no-I-am-zoe The Importance of "Gay Friendly" Health Care

It's hard for me to imagine how someone, or many someones in Janice's case, could be so cruel to deny visitation and information her and their children. And for what purpose? What did it accomplish? I can't even begin to think how out of my mind I would have been if I had been in her position. It is unfortunate that stories like this are a sad and sobering reminder to make sure we have all of our legal ducks in a row.

Waymon Hudson at The Bilerico Project: Florida Hospital Changes LGBT Policies After Denying Lesbian the Right to Visit Her Dying Partner

Jackson Memorial has added a non-discrimination policy that includes sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression, a patient's bill of rights that states the hospital's commitment to "providing quality care for LGBT patients", and a visitation policy that updates the definition of family to include same-sex partners and other people who may not be legally related to a patient.

That's a huge move forward from where the hospital was and sets a good example of the direction all healthcare providers should be moving.

egalia at Tennessee Guerilla Women: Obama Orders Hospitals to Honor Same-Sex Partner Rights (includes video)

Under the new rule, hospitals must allow lesbian and gay persons to have visitation rights. This is the kind of rule change that everyone thought Obama would implement in the first days of his term instead of only months before an election which some fear will be a Democratic bloodbath. Better late than never.

Ari Shapiro at NPR: Obama: Hospitals Must Grant Same-Sex Visitations (includes audio)

Some prominent gay and lesbian advocates said they had never thought of using Medicare and Medicaid funding as a tool to force hospitals to expand LGBT access. It's a move that Duffy of the Family Research Council calls "a big-government federal takeover of

  • 12
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Maria Niles 5 pts

It is not about politics - it's about love and humanity for everyone.

Thanks for sharing your comment, busybeeson.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

busybeeson 5 pts

Glad to see this pass for the LGBT community and others who will benefit from this. No matter where you stand on gay rights, this issue goes beyond politics and speaks to the very basic human need to have the comfort of those who love you and whom you love.

Maria Niles 5 pts

that leads to change. No apologies necessary and thanks for raising your voice.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

Maria Niles 5 pts

Since I doubt hospitals require people who claim to be non-same gender spouses, parents or siblings to show marriage licenses or birth certificates to prove their relationship - they are likely simply allowed to visit regardless of whether or not my the patient wants them in the room. Just because a visit my be permitted under the umbrella of a legally defined familial relationship does not mean that the patient has a positive emotional relationship and wants them in their room.

Thanks for commenting, IsleDance.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

healthyperhaps 5 pts

This discrimination is disgusting -- denying a woman visitation to her dying partner. I'm so glad that Obama recognizes this is wrong and is doing something about it. Ah, there can be such a narrow view about what constitutes family. There seems to be this idea that loving another person is a privilege -- one that is often afforded only to heterosexual couples. Anyone who doesn't fit that mold is often treated as some sort of deviant. It makes me so angry. Like Sarah Palin thinks homosexuality is a choice. A lifestyle -- that people "CHOOSE" to be gay... that gays don't have the capacity to truly love. It's ridiculous.

Sorry... Rant over.

I blog about my health and disability issues regularly at http://loveablehomebody.blogspot.com/

IsleDance 5 pts

And just because someone is related to the patient, doesn't mean they ((should)) be allowed mandatory access. They may not have the best interest of the patient in mind. They may not properly care for the patient when others are not looking. They may harm the patient. Only the patient should be allowed to choose their visitors. No matter what.

One Friday night, I loaded up my life and headed out... ( http://isledance.blogspot.com )

Maria Niles 5 pts

It makes sense to clearly spell out your wishes in advance as the Terri Schiavo case taught us. However, in much more common situations such as Janice Langbehn and Lisa Marie Pond's it is frustrating that simple human compassion cannot be a sufficient guide.

This isn't the first time nor will it be the last that we need the government to require some to do the right thing, however, so like you, Susie Knitter, I'm glad it has come to pass.

Thanks for sharing your views.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

Susie Knitter 5 pts

I'm so glad that this has finally come to pass but beyond annoyed that it had to be an issue. Why wasn't this just the natural course of things in these circumstances? Glad that strides are slowly, but surely, being made.

Maria Niles 5 pts

Yes, I remember being stunned when I read that patients don't inherently have a right to visitors. Crazy and sad. This will go a long way to changing that fact.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

Maria Niles 5 pts

Very good advice, Candelaria. As you wisely point out there might be friends or other family members whom you want to be your visitor and advocate rather than the persons legally in line.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

DeanaBirks 5 pts

This is enormously important (and so sad that it hasn't already been fact all these years).

Deana Birks
Eat. Drink. Read. Blog. ( http://www.deanabirks.com )

Candelaria Silva 5 pts

This is so important. I've seen long-term significant others of heterosexual and homosexual couples denied visitation. I've also had limited access to friends I was closer to when their blood relatives (from whom they were estranged) swooped in. I recommend that everyone designate a health care proxy, etc.
This order will help everyone. Thanks for writing about it.

http://blog.candelariasilva.com ( http://blog.candelarisilva.com/ )

Good and plenty!