Bio
Hi, I'm Karen Ballum. but I'm better know around the web as Sassymonkey. I live in Ottawa, Ontario -- Canada's national capital. (No, I do not wo...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Pride and Prejudice...and Zombies

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

It is a truth universally acknowledged that Jane Austen's original Pride and Prejudice is sadly lacking in zombies. But have no fear! Seth Grahame-Smith has set things right with his recently published Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. It has everything you loved about the original but now with zombies, mayhem, and of course, brains.

Let's get the things that I found less than wonderful out of the way first. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies suffers from the same affliction that most adaptations do - unevenness. When you are working with Austen's original works and then try to stick in new content that mimicks her writing style it rarely works really well. Trying to match the tone and structure of the original is very hard and kudos to those that try. That being said, I do think that Grahame-Smith did a tolerable job of it, especially when you consider he was sticking in new content about zombies.

But I have to confess that this wasn't quite the novel I was hoping it was going to be. I loved the idea of sticking zombies into the middle of the Darcy/Elizabeth love story but I was hoping for more. I was hoping for wit that would either match Austen's original style or that the entire book was rewritten in a way that I didn't care about the deviations. I wanted a zombified version that could go toe to toe with Christopher Moore's Fool, a retelling of Shakespeare's King Lear. I spent much of the time wishing that Christopher Moore has written this (if ever there was an author that could work in a good balls joke it's him). I wanted a truly rewritten novel, not one that was just a wee bit rewritten with zombies stuck in where convenient. I think it was a great gimick that didn't live up to its potential and I can't help but wonder if it is because it sometimed seemed as if Grahame-Smith didn't love the original. I really wanted to love this zombie-filled version but I had to settle for "like" and "enjoy".

Now that I've gotten that out of the way, I loved (loved!) Grahame-Smith's Lady Catherine. Seriously, we've all always thought that she was a barracuda that could kick some major ass if given the chance and voila! Grahame-Smith made it so. Ditto the fact that we always knew that Lizzie could totally kick butt, and do it with style.
I liked that Mrs. Bennett was just as silly as ever and just wanted her daughters to be married, not warriors. I liked Wickham's punishment. (Heh!) I think I much prefer Charlotte's reason for marrying Mr. Collins in this version than the original.

What's everyone saying about Pride and Prejudice and Zombies? Plenty.

Laurel Ann at Austenprose doesn't get what the big deal is. Jane Austen ate her brain years ago and she and her fellow Janeites have been "an Austen zombie ever since, attentively working away for 200 years for her cause in pursuit of more brains to initiate into the holy sect of The Gentle Reprove and Witty Banter Society." (Heh!)

So who will like this book? Certainly not the Austen purist without a sense of humor. They will not even get past the gruesome cover. Not zombie fans, who will be annoyed having to trudge through a masterpiece of world literature to get to the scant zombie action. So that leaves the rest of us. Those loyal and devoted members of The Gentle Reprove and Witty Banter Society who, like Jane Austen, enjoy a good campy and gory Gothic novel, recognize tongue-in-cheek humor, and have been happily doing so for over 200 hundred years.

Raych at Books I Done Read didn't think that it quite lived up to its potential (I have to agree).

Let's be honest, this idea had waaaaaaaay more potential, but it ends up being a bit gimicky. I mean, Elizabeth Bennet offering to slay anyone and everyone who offends her honor never gets old, but the incessant references to being whipped with wet bamboo does. So probably don't bother unless you were going to re-read P&P anyways, in which case, toss in some Z's for flavor.

Sara at the Book Nook Club said it was deliciously over the top.

What a sneaky way to get my teenage brother to appreciate some classic literature. Literary types and Zombie lovers alike should appreciate the spirit of this reinvention, if they don’t relish every word. I have never read anything like it, so I’m officially begging for a

  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

And there's always vampires, werewolves, and mummies to add when zombies get tired.

It's not quite light on zombie content exactly. It was more than the zombie storyline wasn't quite as well integrated as I had hoped, if that makes any sense. I think it is perhaps more of an appeal to P&P fans who also like zombies than zombie fans that aren't so fond of Jane Austen.

Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca/ ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca/ ).

no_I_am_zoe 5 pts

I'm so glad you reviewed this.  I have a wee bit of a zombie obsession, so I was super excited when I first heard about this book.  But if it's light on zombie content, I might just pass on it then. I have to say, done correctly, rewriting the classics with zombies is a brilliant idea.  I wish I would have thought of it.

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

I had pretty much decided that I was done as well. There seems to be an awful lot of them, although I must say I enjoyed books one and three of Pamela Aiden's Fitwilliam Darcy, Gentleman series.

I really didn't think I'd read any more but then they went and threw zombies into the mix and well, I couldn't resist. At least it's different!

Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca/ ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca/ ).

ebyrdstarr 5 pts

Ok, I think I'm done with any and all Austen adaptations, prequels, sequels, etc.  I don't think I'm up for zombies alongside Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy.

But zombies in The Scarlett Pimpernel, now that I could totally go for.

( http://rantsofapublicdefender.blogspot.com/ )Preaching to the Choir

Denise 11 pts moderator

It's a good kind of spoiled, though.

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager

Flamingo House Happenings ( http://www.flamingohouse.net/ )

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

Ruined I say. Damn him.

This is probably not a must read right now book for you. If you were more of an Austen fan, maybe. It was still fun and I think you'd still enjoy parts of it but well, Moore has ruined us.

Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca/ ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca/ ).

Denise 11 pts moderator

I will probably read it eventually but you didn't convince me that it's a must read right now kind of book.

Anyone trying to do a quirky adaptation of any classic should read Fool and then sit down to work. Or read Fool and drop the project in favor of having Christopher Moore pick it up.

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager

Flamingo House Happenings ( http://www.flamingohouse.net/ )