Bio
Hi, I'm Karen Ballum. but I'm better know around the web as Sassymonkey. I live in Ottawa, Ontario -- Canada's national capital. (No, I do not wo...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Publishing Wars: Hardcovers vs. E-books

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

The past couple of weeks have been filled with the buzz of a great publishing battle starring the hardcover vs the e-book. Lines are being drawn in the sand and the two sides are butting heads with the intensity of a pair of cranky mountain goats.

Simon & Schuster, Harper Collins and Hachette Book Group have all decided to delay the publication of some e-books for several months after the hardcover release. Of course they aren't doing this for all releases because that would be too easy. They are doing it for selected releases, which means that in some cases the e-book will be available at the same time as the hardcover. Chances are, for that blockbuster release you'll just have to wait, assuming by the time it comes out in e-book format that you even remember you wanted to read it, let alone buy it. Amazon's response to this was to slash prices on e-books even lower, selling some popular new e-book releases for $7.99. No doubt the Walmart-Amazon price war will continue and I'm expecting a press release stating they've lowered the price of their hardcovers any minute now. Meanwhile, Random House is claiming digital rights to its backlist, including books that were published before the internet was even a gleam in someone's mind.

If you think it's all a big mess, well, I'm with you and we're not alone. Joanna from Comics Worth Reading finds Simon and Shuster's decision to delay e-book releases quite simply stupid.

When will publishers learn that trying to force customers to act contrary to their interests in order to benefit publishers is not a smart strategy? Note that “publishers currently receive the same wholesale price for an e-book that they receive for a print book”. They’re not losing any money by being more customer-friendly. They’re just afraid of the future, especially if it includes more format and price flexibility.

People who read e-books enthusiastically tend to be Readers, yes with a capital "r." Sure, we can get into how much we love the experience of reading a book, from the feel of the pages in our hands to the smell of a brand new book, but even a book lover like Jennifer Hudock admits that when it comes to frequent traveling and convenience nothing beats an e-book.

No matter how much I love the smell of a brand new book fresh off the shelf, I tend to travel a lot. Let me tell you, lugging a bag of books across country is a pain. If I can download it onto my device and toss it into my purse on-the-go, no one needs to ask me twice to download. The Digital Age is upon us. No one can deny that times are changing, and it is completely understandable that old-school publishers feel threatened, but instead of breaking with the wind, they might find alternatives and bend just a little.

The decision is hard for many of us readers to understand. I know many who are asking the same questions as Emily at the Erotic Romance E-Publisher Comparison website.

Sometimes I wonder whether large publishers want to fail at epublishing. Or do they think that if they screw up at epublishing, nobody else will do it? We have publishers charging hardback prices and paying paperbck royalty rates on e-books. And now there seem to be more and more major publisher providing e-books versions sporadically, and after a significant delay.

When something like this comes up, I know I can always count on Kassia Krozser for a post at Booksquare that digs down into the issues of all things publishing related. She certainly didn't disappoint me on this latest e-book issue. There's been a lot of talk about "distribution windows", something that I really only know a tiny bit about. She describes it simply as "the concept of moving a product through specific retail channels for specific periods of time." Readers are familiar with this - we are used to hardcover releases and then paperback ones. Movies have theatre releases and then come out on DVD months later. She questions if a movie distribution window is a good comparison for book publishing. Publishing needs to figure it out, she says, because they only had a year or two to get it right.

I’ll be absolutely frank about one thing: publishers have already lost the pricing battle. They’re being subsidized by Amazon and Barnes & Noble

  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
MLOKnitting 5 pts

The science fiction / fantasy community had this discussion back in the mid-90s.  The publishers - at that time - within SF/F listened and soon you had some books available online.  I've seen the same thing with the romance genre.  I think that this is a problem of disconnect that happens outside of genre publishers.

Someone will step into the vacuum.  It may be Amazon.  It may be Google.  Some authors were aware of these changes coming and had their agents negotiate agreements that kept their digital rights.  It is going to be an interesting fight.

MLO / Melissa

Books, Movies, Games, Ovarian Cancer, and Life in General at http://www.mloknitting.com/

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

It's not quite what you were suggestiong about authors getting their own presses, but Stephen Covey made an agreement with Amazon directly for his e-books ( http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9142323/Ama... ), leaving his publisher in the dust. They'll be the exclusive seller of his e-books for at least the next year.

There's always lots of comparisons made to the music industry. From a format point it works, but musicians can also make a lot of money on tours and merchandising. There's still lots of lessons they can learn from the music industry, like how they still release CDs and MP3s at the same time. Why can't that work for hardcovers and e-books? sigh.

Contributing Editor Sassymonkey also blogs at Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca ).

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

My wrists go through very cranky phases and handcovers do not help. Ditto any book that could be described as a Chunkster. I hope I never have to give up reading physical books (because I really enjoy them) but it's nice to know that e-books are around if that ever happens.

Contributing Editor Sassymonkey also blogs at Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca ).

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

I can honestly say I love my e-book reader and I also love reading on my iPhone but they'll never completely replace the physical book for me. The storage thing is a big thing for me. I'm running out of storage space and I really do not want to have to buy more bookcases. There are lots of books I'd be content to read, but not own permanently, that I can't get at the library and e-books are fantastic for that.

Contributing Editor Sassymonkey also blogs at Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca ).

Rita Arens 7 pts

As an author, I've been shocked by the business practices of the publishing industry. As a reader, I usually yawn and look the other way, because I'm still trying to read books that were written thirty years ago and am fine with waiting however long for the latest hot thing to be available in whatever format I want it in.

I'm watching the publishing industry with interest, however, because they are definitely on the verge of a sea change. I doubt they will handle it better than the music industry did, though it's been interesting to see what periodical publishers are doing about readers.

I wonder what would happen if successful writers got their own labels, like they do in the music business. What would J.K. Rowlings' publishing company look like?

Rita Arens writes at Surrender Dorothy ( http://surrenderdorothy.typepad.com/ ) and BlogHer and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak ( http://tinyurl.com/9pg62e ). She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

LMAshton 5 pts

I am also a Reader. I also happen to be married to a Reader.

And more than that, I'm a Reader who gave up hard and soft covered books. I am now exclusively an ebook Reader, as is the hubs.

I don't have a dedicated ebook reader, but rather, use my smartphone, as does the hubs. I started about a year and a half back, precipitated by joint problems that prohibit me from holding books, but my phone is doable and doesn't cause my joints pain or dislocations like books do. And because of the joint problems, I'll never go back to reading books in hard copy. The hubs won't go back to reading printed books for other reasons, including, but not limited to ease of use and portability.

Yup, publishers should just figure out already that they can either get with the digital age or be sunk by it.

Laurie in Sri Lanka

Chilli & Chocolate ( http://food.laurieashton.com ) | A Canadian in King Parakramabahu's Court ( http://srilanka.laurieashton.com ) | LMAshton on Twitter ( http://twitter.com/lmashton )

Hey Jen 5 pts

The kind with the capital "R". I tend to read alot of fiction though so I have somewhere around 500 soft cover books sitting in boxes that I can't "move". For those I think it is definitely worth having an e-reader for, but I also have an insane love of the feel and smell of books old and new alike that for all other books I would go to the store or order online a regular old hard/soft cover book for.

I don't have an e-reader yet, but one day I will. Like after Christmas. :)