In response to recent salmonella outbreaks, the FDA has approved the irradiation of produce.
Question...Is this supposed to make me feel better about eating produce? If so, it's not really working that well.
What do you think? Does the benefit outweigh the risk? If you could choose between irradiated or non-irradiated produce, what one would you choose? What one would you want to feed your children?
From The New York Times...
The government will allow food producers to zap fresh spinach and iceberg lettuce with enough radiation to kill micro-organisms like E. coli and salmonella that for decades have caused widespread illness among consumers.
It is the first time the Food and Drug Administration has allowed any produce to be irradiated at levels needed to protect against illness.
"This is probably one of the single most significant food safety actions done for fresh produce in many years," said Robert Brackett, chief scientist for the Grocery Manufacturers Association, which petitioned the agency in 2000 to allow manufacturers to irradiate a wide variety of processed meats, fruits and vegetables and prepared foods.
Advocates for food safety condemned the agency's decision and asserted that irradiation could lower nutritional value, create unsafe chemicals and ruin taste.
Well, it didn't take me long to find other women bloggers questioning the safety of this practice.
From CityMom...
Per today's New York Times, the Food and Drug Administration has decided to let produce suppliers irradiate some of our fruits and vegetables, ostensibly to destroy dangerous food-borne bacteria. Depending on where you stand, this is either a huge knee-jerk reaction or smart preventive measure.
From Choosing Voluntary Simplicty...
According to the Associated Press report, the FDA has decided that small doses of radiation will not only kill E. coli, listeria and salmonella on these two greens, the radiation will also give them a longer shelf life. And...they insist that the nutrient value and texture will remain the same.
Even if these claims are true… and many experts dispute them...I personally am still completely opposed to irradiating any of our food products. And yes, I am also aware that the groups pushing to have our food supply irradiated insist that it is completely safe and that no trace of radiation remains on the food. I still don’t want the food my family eats to have been exposed to ANY radiation treatments, and I don’t care how small the dose is. Apparently I am not alone… according to recent surveys, almost two thirds of the people in this country are against food irradiation and say they will not knowingly eat any food that has been irradiated.
Instead of setting up an expensive and controversial irradiation program, why doesn't the FDA enforce stricter cleanliness standards for the growers and processors? Wouldn’t it make more sense to prevent the produce from being contaminated, instead of just accepting the contamination and trying to kill it with radiation?
From Susan at Agricultural Law...
Sometimes, we should trust our instincts.
I should begin by saying that I am a huge fan of science, and I am astounded by the cool things that we have learned to do thanks to creative scientists who "think out of the box" and question our assumptions and challenge our instincts.
Sometimes, however, science offers us the opportunity to do things that our instincts tell us we should not do. I would put the cloning of animals for meat production in this category. Similarly, we have now learned what many people instinctively knew or should have known - that you should not have animals eating their own species (e.g., mad cow disease being spread by cattle eating the remains of cattle).
From Green Mamma...
So the FDA is now allowing food producers to zap our food. Specifically, food producers will expose spinach and lettuce to irradiation, using enough radiation to kill E. coli and dangerous germs, which meat and poultry producers already do.
I have to be honest. I do not know the ins and outs of irradiation. Fortunately, what I do know is how to google "irradiation," to help me begin my education and understanding of the various arguments made for and against the radiation of food. As is the case with other food debates (organic versus conventional foods versus GM foods), there are 2 prevalent points of view. On the one side seems to be food producers and their supporters who consider irradiation a way to help prevent food borne illnesses, spoiling and infestation of foods. Supporters of irradiation see it as a practical way to increase the shelf life of foods that have a tendency to spoil. Of course, opponents to irradiation consider it a method for concealing poor agricultural and sanitation practices. Other concerns had by opponents to irradiation include worker safety, the effect of radiation on food and seeds, and the safety of consuming foods treated with radiation.
From Laura at The Garden Pages...
One more reason to grow your own!
See? You don't have to worry about filthy conditions in the fields or un-enforced health and labor codes in the processing plant - just nuke it!
I know, us organic gardeners are all 'nutty'. What does a tree-hugger (planter, tender and caretaker) know about radiation in food processing? Not much and I'd like to keep it that way if you know what I mean.
From Carla Golden's Get Healthier Blog...
Starting August 22nd, your fresh vegetables may now be irradiated without your knowledge. The FDA has unleashed a new rule allowing food companies to secretly irradiate lettuce and spinach, and there is NO requirement that these foods be labeled with a warning label! The FDA is also looking to expand this to other vegetables such as tomatoes, peppers and onions. Soon, ALL vegetables may be irradiated.
Why does this matter? Because irradiation destroys phytonutrients, including anti-cancer nutrients that are protecting your health right now. With this rule, the FDA is literally killing the food supply!
This NaturalNews.com feature story reveals full details about this crime against nature and the FDA's desperate measures to destroy the national food supply and sicken Americans.
From The Courageous Cook...
Well the FDA has agreed to allow food producers to ZAP fresh spinach and lettuce with enough radiation to kill microorganisms like E. Coli and salmonella. This sounds like a good idea to me after the whole scare in 2006. But are there hidden consequences? I mean think about it---Radiation? I always get a little freaked out with that lead apron they put on me in the dentist office and truly why does the hygenist have to leave the room? I've done just enough research on this to almost make me swear off lettuce. Critics say that the radiation will make food less nutritious and that most of the illnesses caused by lettuce are from viruses. Really I could have done without knowing that.
How do you feel about the FDA approving the irradiation of produce? Let me know in comments.
Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
at catherine-morgan.com, The Political Voices of Women, Care2 Election
Comments
Absolutely NOT in support of this
Good grief. We've grown a lot of our food for many years. This is one more reason to expand our efforts. Lately I've had a couple medical procedures that used radiation. I wasn't at all happy about that; now I find my food is nuked as well? Yuck.
We don't buy iceberg lettuce, and now spinach is off the list unless it's homegrown. Bummer. Does this rule impact organically grown produce as well?
Granny Sue Stories from the Mountains and Beyond www.grannysu.blogspot.com susannaholstein@yahoo.com
I only buy organic produce, meat and dairy
So that's my answer.
---
Vered DeLeeuw
http://momgrind.com/
http://www.uptous.com/
the chemicals in our food
I can certainly agree with you. This past few years I have planted my own tomatoes and green peppers for a few reasons. It infurates me how 1 green pepper that's been on the vine for a little bit longer costs 3.00 when it only costs a dollar for a pack of seeds or a dollar for a start of the plant. THe chemicals that they use in our foods affect my 14 yr old ADHD child very much so. I can tell when she's been into reds, and blue food die. Its like dealing with a cat on a hot tin roof. Its a wonder all the kids are diagnosied with ADHD.
I'm trying to be polite and
I'm trying to be polite and refrain myself here - but any fears about food being irradiated are just silly. Its a very good thing. People are just afraid of what they don't understand. It will kill bacteria and fungi on the food and make it safer to eat. They should have done it a long time ago.
Being exposed to radiation doesn't make something radioactive itself. Think about it - if you get xrayed - you don't give off xrays yourself. If someone has cancer and gets radiation, they don't become radioactive themselves.
my last post:
2 Reasons Why Women Should Vote for Obama
These are not silly questions or concerns
It is like telling me "we are going to assemble a shabby car but before it is sold we are gonna hose it down with super shiny paint that will prevent rust".
Here is the thing. The FDA should have created a public education program to explain what food irradiation is and what it does to protect food. That did not happen or if they did they kept it on the real down low.
The FDA is a governmental organization that seems to me just an extension of the food producers industry. The FDA made a decision about a process to kill food contaminates. Who else was at the table when this discussion came up?
Ok, fine nuking food may or may not be a good thing. I do not trust the FDA. It has been underfunded for years.
You cannot rely on food producers inspecting their own crops and then have them fill out a report that says "Yes, we are fine, no problems here".
You can't import food from other countries that have lax hygienic production standards or are using certain types of pesticides and expect irradiation to correct all of that. There are systemic problems with food production and those items are not being address.
Based on the past eight months I think it is very necessary that we are skeptical. Skeptical ain't silly.
When I buy mustard greens that will be irradiated will there be any residue from that radiation that will enter my body? If I consume those greens that have been treated will that have an effect on bacterial in my body?
Gena - Out On The Stoop
Hi Trisha
Hi Trisha. I understand what you are saying. But, I do know that the food is not radioactive. I'm concerned with what happens to the food on a molecular level, after it is exposed to this radiation.
When cancer begins, it is at that same molecular level.
As far as cancer patients who receive radiation treatments go...That radiation can destroy the cancer cells, but it also destroys many healthy cells. In the case of cancer, the benefit of using radiation outweighs the risk to the patient. [Just a side note: There are some types of radiation treatments that DO cause the patient to be radioactive for a certain amount of time.]
Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan at catherine-morgan.com, The Political Voices of Women, Care2 Election
Depends
When I was in college we had a professor that was an advocate for the radiation of our meat supplies. She actually received death threats from anonymous persons because of her work and efforts. Now that is just crazy!
Personally, I am all for radiation of meats. No harmful substances stay in the food and it could greatly increase safety.
When it comes to vegetables I am in favor of it for safety, but if the speculation that it harms important nutrients is true, then I'm not so sure.
For me - meat, absolutely; produce, not so sure.
When I hear people that are so hardcore against things like this I wonder what their feeling would be if they had a loved one get sick or diet due to some of the outbreaks in the past. Would you have wished these types of safety procautions had existed? It is hard to say. I think if it came down to it that a death could have been prevented I would want it to be.
With all tha being said, I am still in favor of growing your own when it comes to produce. However, as far as the actual radiation harming us, I believe it does not.
My thoughts as a Nutritionist at Fake Food Free
Blog about my adventures as an US expat living in Brazil at Blondie In Brazil
The FDA
Great discussion and post! I agree with Catherine 100%. Personally, I think that just the because the FDA approves it, doesn't mean that its truly safe. We have seen countless examples of this over the years. And frankly, I think that this approach is like slapping a band-aid on a broken leg. Like it was mentioned above in the original post, wouldn't it make more sense to focus on proactive things like creating and enforcing stricter standards?
Sheila
http://www.livewell360.com
This processing of our
This processing of our food scares me very much. Our best bet is to always go back to the natural way of tending our food as much as possible.
Karen
"Life is too short to pout all the time."
A Deaf Mom Shares Her World
Hands & Voices
Organic Produce is Good for us!
I am an advocate for organic produce and foods mainly because i firmly believe we shoudl reduce the amount of pesticides, chemicals and antibiotics we consume from our food supply. I just wrte a post aboutit on my other blog today if you are interested:
http://rickrockhill.blogspot.com/2008/09/another-excuse-for-me-to-crow-about.html
Palm Springs Savant
Microwave irradiation?
So how does this all compare to microwave irradiation, or for that matter high-temperature cooking (which I know can create free radicals)?
Thanks for a great post and discussion. I just finished my own post on the subject; something I've been meaning to do for the last week, and was motivated by this one!
Sara Faivre-Davis
downtoearthblog.com and wildtyperanch.com